This should be a good "at a glance" indicator of the relative ratio of carbonates vs clastics within the underlying Rogersville in relation to unconventional completions as well as the potential for high quality sands in the Rome below and the Maryville directly above to have received direct and or substantial hydrocarbon charge from migration out of the self-sourcing Rogersville shale.
REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA E CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA ISSN 1519-5228 - Artigo_Bioterra_V24_...
Rogersville Shale Compostion Reading Between the Plates Maryville over Rome, plates 21 over 23 b logs
1. ?
?
?
?
18
15
67
4
17
31
14
620
11
10
28
5
25
5
1
16
35
13
20
10
4
3
1
11
15
2
0
4
0
4
14
0
31
17
3
19
17
16
13
25
3
16
9
20
10
10
20
10
20
30
10
20
10
10
10
0
Sandstone percentages are derived from lithologic fractions calculated by
computer from digital well log data. The quality of these data are dependent
on the original log quality and the accuracy of the lithology calculation. For
these maps, rocks were classified as sandstone if the sandstone component
calculated was greater than or equal to 40%. Well locations indicated with
a + symbol are partial penetrations, and these values are not necessarily
honored by the contours.
Rome Formation Net Sandstone Percentage Map
Contour interval 10%
Scale 1:1,000,000
0–10% sandstone with porosity >4%
10–20% sandstone with porosity >4%
20–30% sandstone with porosity >4%
30–40% sandstone with porosity >4%
>40% sandstone with porosity >4%
Well penetrating entire Rome Fm
Well penetrating partial Rome Fm
(data not necessarily honored by contours)
Surface Fault (Ky.)
Rome Trough Outline
Rome Trough Consortium
Rome Formation Net Sandstone Percentage map
Contour Interval 10%
Scale 1:1,000,000
3216 0 16 48 64 80 Kilometers
16 0 16 32 48 64 80 Miles
Rome Trough Consortium: Plate 23B
Maryville
Limestone
Carbonate
Ramp
Eau Claire Fm.
Clastic Shelf
Conasauga Shale
Intrashelf Basin
Maryville
Limestone
Carbonate
Ramp
Maryville
Mixed
Carbonates
and
Clastics
3216 0 16 48 64 80 Kilometers
16 0 16 32 48 64 80 Miles
EQT
IEP
XEC
CHK
TOC 4.8
CHK
XEC
IEP
COG
HRD
Fannin 537 1st Production
LO White 529533 Fee
Margincrest
Prospect
Migration Perpendicular to Dip
Rogersville Subsea Top -10,034' by 758' thick
RGV & Rutledge below high carbonate
Rogersville Subsea Top -8,318' by 744' thick
Rogersville Subsea Top -8,337'
by 434' Thick On-lapping Local
Minor Topography would make
a good example for textbook
Rogersville Subsea top -8,961'
by 973' Thick Lower Gamma
Gamma Low< Ash Williams &
accumulated at much slower rate
carbonate in EQT vs Clastics in
Ash Williams???
Rogersville Thickness Undefined this map
suggests higher sand content
Ashland Williams #1
Maryville through Rogersville higher
accumulation rate +20% of EQT Location RGV
Subsea Top -8,520 by 1,100' partial penetration
At A Glance Insights Into The Composition of the Rogersville shale.
*
New Rogersville Shale well locations and opportunities within the Rome Trough of Eastern Kentucky including the Exxon Smith #1
well, the location of the highest documented Rogersville TOC and the preferred migration pathway suggested by Ryder in Open-File
Report 05-1443.
*.
Highlighting the differences in make up of the Maryville Limestone (Plate 21 transparency) which directly overlies the Rogersville
Shale overlain on base map showing the high porosity Rome Net Sands (plate 23-B) that are below the Rogersville shale
hydrocarbon kitchen. .Modified from Plates 23-B and 21 of the Rome Trough Consortium Study by Harris and Others.
*
Far right shows comparison between the gamma logs from the EQT-Horizontal Technologies 1-H and the Ashland Williams #1 well
the EQT log is marked MD and without a TVD or directional survey it is hard to tell but the survey tells us it is vertical. Terminology
issues between the different O&G companies is obvious in the comparison of log signatures compared to the drillers Logs.
*
This should be a good "at a glance" indicator of the relative ratio of carbonates vs clastics within the underlying Rogersville in
relation to unconventional completions as well as the potential for high quality sands in the Rome below and the Maryville directly
above to have received direct and or substantial hydrocarbon charge from migration out of the self-sourcing Rogersville shale.
Stacked
Opportunities
145525
Horizontal Technology 572360 EQT
JOHNSON
KY
51570
ASHLAND EXPLORATION 1 WILLIAMS, E
JOHNSON
KY
0 200
Total Gamma Ray (API)
0 200
Total Gamma Ray (API)
Maynardville Limestone
Nolichucky Shale
Maryville Limestone
Maryville Limestone
Rogersville Sh Rogersville Sh
Rutledge Ls
Pumpkin Valley Sh
Rome Fm
8000900010000110001200013000
70008000900010000
HS=500
PETRA 1/17/2017 11:40:57 AM
Conasauga on EQT DL 7,359'
Top Rome on EQT DL 10,873'
Total Depth Drilled
13,383' (MD)
Total Depth
Logged 12,850'
Total 5.5" Tubing
13,172'
Deviated Bore Length
3,139'
Landing Point to end of
Lateral 1,988'
First to Last Perf. 1,909'
11,207' to 13,116' @KB
Total Deviated
Wellbore 3,139'
First to Last Perf 1,909'
Most Probable Scenario
First to Last Perf 1,909'
if from end of wellbore
11,207' to 13,116' @KB
?
Top Rutledge Limestone
Log Signature
@ CHK/Northup #1
CHK Northup #1
Log Signature
Pumpkin Valley Shale
Subsea Top -8.961' kb
?
Smith #1
Core
Signature
EQT Rogersville
Top Below TD in
Williams Well