About an exciting publication in Nature Letters (Open Access) by Browne et al, in which they culture many "unculturable" bacteria from the human gut. This works highlights how spore formation is a process utilized by many gut bacteria. Presentation given to the Swaine Chen research lab at the Genome Institute of Singapore and the National University of Singapore on 20 Oct 2017.
Grafana in space: Monitoring Japan's SLIM moon lander in real time
Journal Club Presentation on "Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation"
1.
2. Detection of microbial species in an
environmental sample
1. Microscopy
2. Culturing
• Allows for in-depth analysis, genetics, etc.
• Requires that you know how to culture it
3. Sequencing-based approaches:
• 16S sequencing (Sanger or NGS)
• Metagenomic shotgun sequencing
• Transcriptomics
• Single-cell WGS
Successfully culturing a microbe is
critical for understanding the
function of its genes
3. Detection of microbial species in a
sample
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Culturing
In-depth analysis of
species (e.g.
characterization of
hypothetical genes)
Have to know how to
culture the species.
Low-throughput
16S Sequencing High-throughput
Limited to taxonomic
information
Metagenomic Shotgun
Sequencing
High-throughput.
Information about all
genes (e.g. metabolism)
Follow-up work is
difficult without culturing
Single-cell WGS
No culturing required for
WGS
Follow-up work is
difficult without culturing
4. Novel culturing methods
• “Microbial Culturomics”
• e.g. culturing fecal samples in 212 conditions. (Lagier et
al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 18(12):1185-93)
• Rational design of culturing conditions
• e.g. culture of oligotrophs in low nutrient media (Cho &
Giovannoni. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004. 70(1): 432-440
• Community culturing
• e.g. iChip to culture soil bacteria (Ling et al. Nature. 2015.
517(7535):455-9)
5. Culturing of gut microbiota members
using the rich medium YCFA
• Casitone
• Yeast extract
• NaHCO3
• Cysteine
• K2HPO4
• KH2PO4
• NaCl
• MgSO4
• CaCl2
• Resazurin
• Haemin
• Biotin
• Cobalamin
• P-aminobenzoic acid
• Folic acid
• Pyridoxamine
• SCFAs: acetate, propionate,
isobutyrate, isovalerate,
valerate
• Thiamine
• Riobflavin
Duncan et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 52(6):2141-6
6. Overview of Workflow
Fecal
Samples
(n=6)
EtOH treatment
+ culturing with
germination
culturing
Total Microbiota
Spore-Formers
Metagenomic and 16S sequencing Full-length
16S sequencing
(Sanger)
8. “We hypothesized that sporulation is an
unappreciated basic phenotype of the
human intestinal microbiota that may
have a profound impact on microbiota
persistence and spread between
humans.”
9. The relative abundances of bacterial
species correlate between fecal
samples and total microbiota culture
“…73.5% of the 741
computationally
derived metagenomic
species…were also
detectable in the
cultured samples”
10. 16S sequencing profiles show similarity
between fecal and cultured samples,
dissimilarity with spore-forming cultures
11. Phylogenetic tree of isolates based on full-
length 16S sequencing
Pure culture of
~2000 colonies
results in 137
unique species
Represent 90%+
of total
abundance
67/137 isolates
are novel
12. Phylogeny of spore-
forming isolates shows
that sporulation is
spread across many
families of the
Firmicutes phylum
14. Spore-formers are more aero-
tolerant (just like C. difficile)
Dashed lines: non-spore-formers
Solid lines: spore-formers
15. Identification of an ethanol-
resistance gene signature
“Support vector, machine-
based, contrast set
association mining was
applied to identify the
optimal, weighted gene
signature consisting of 66
genes.”
Training Dataset
16. Application of the gene signature
demonstrates that ~1/3 of the microbiota is
capable of spore formation
18. Conclusions
(1) A large number of species can be cultivated using one protocol
(2) Sporulation is a common phenotype of the gut microbiota
Strengths:
• Applies “culturomics” to a specific hypothesis
• Helpful machine learning model for predicting sporulation ability
• Establishes a general model for gut-to-gut transmission
• Opens the door for more detailed studies of the cultured
species
Weaknesses:
• Are only able to culture a few phyla (Bacteroidetes,
Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes)
Fig 1A: Metagenomic sequencing of fecal samples and colonies scraped from YCFA plates grown anaerobically
What did they do with zeros? I.E. those species detected in the fecal sample but which didn’t grow when cultured, or vice versa.
Extended Data Figure 2 | Comparison of sequence read content of
faecal samples and cultured samples for six donors. The majority of
sequence reads from the original donor faecal samples (n = 6) are present
in culture samples both as raw reads (93% shared on average across the
six donors) and after de novo assembly (72% shared on average across the
six donors).
b, Principal component analysis plot of 16S rRNA gene sequences detected
from six donor faecal samples (n = 6), representing bacteria in complete
faecal samples (green), faecal bacterial colonies recovered from YCFA agar
plates without ethanol pre-treatment (black) or with ethanol pre-treatment
to select for ethanol-resistant spore-forming bacteria (red). Culturing
without ethanol selection is representative of the complete faecal sample,
ethanol treatment shifts the profile, enriching for ethanol-resistant
spore-forming bacteria and allowing their subsequent isolation.
Novel genus member: they were able to characterize the isolate taxonomically to the family level, and then the genus was “unclassified”
Novel family member: they were able to characterize the isolate taxonomically to the order level, and then the family was “unclassified”
Novel:
Species=45
Genera=19
Families=3
Total=67
Streak colonies to singles (from ethanol treated and untreated samples), full-length 16S sequencing to identify species. Here showing what was isolated and what genera or species they belong to, overlaying the relative abundances of these groups as determined by metagenomic sequencing of fecal samples.
“species” here, means novel species, genera, and families (as worded in Fig 1C)
Full-length 16S used to make tree
Branch colors are families
Shaded text are isolated from the ethanol treatment, unshaded from an untreated sample
Grow in broth, treat with EtOH, plate onto YCFA +/- bile acid germinant. Non-spore-formers did not survive the EtOH treatment.
Grow O/N anaerobically in YCFA broth. Dilute and spot onto YCFA agar + taurocholate anaerobically. Move plates to aerobic conditions. At time points, transfer back to anaerobic conditions and incubate for 72 h, then count colonies.
A genomic signature for identifying spore-forming bacterial species contains sporulation- and germination-associated genes and genes not previously associated with sporulation. Characterized sporulation genes are on the outer circle, genes not associated with a specific sporulation cycle or uncharacterized genes are in the inside rectangle. C. difficile strain 630 gene names are used when possible, otherwise locus tag identifiers are shown. Bacillus subtilis gene names are used when no C. difficile homologue is available. The signature is enriched with known sporulation-associated genes from stages I–V of the spore formation and germination cycles (significant at q < 3.0 × 10−37, Fisher’s exact test). Genes associated with regulation are present with at least 10 genes coding for regulatory or DNA-binding roles (q < 1.4 × 10−5, Fisher’s exact test). Genes not previously associated with sporulation are also present and these have putative roles as heat shock, membrane-associated proteins and DNA-polymerase-associated proteins.