Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Shelf-Ready Doesn’t Always Mean Ready to Go to the Shelf
1. Shelf Ready Doesn’t Always
Mean Ready for the Shelf
IMPLEMENTING A CHECKLIST FOR
SHELF-READY APPROVALS
2. American University and Shelf-Ready Approvals
Background on American University
Blackwell’s – Started Shelf-Ready Approvals, continued with
Coutts/Ingram
WorldCat Cataloging Partners for MARC Records
Acquisitions Staff receives titles, routes to Cataloging
There must be a quicker way to get titles to the shelf
3. The Idea
Do all books need Cataloging?
Acquisitions staff already handling books and checking for pre-processing
Extend the position duties to verify MARC record against a cataloging
checklist
Books can be routed directly to Cataloging
4. The Specifics
Physical check of books
Damage
Physical processing has been completed (stamps, strips, barcodes,
bookplates, spine labels)
Bibliographic data check
Encoding level
Dates
Title/Variant titles
Call numbers
Local cataloging practices and other information
Name adjustments
5. Categories After Check
Books that did not pass the “Copy Cataloging” checklist and need to be
routed to Cataloging for additional work.
Books that bypass Cataloging but need additional processing, such as
new spine labels or book plates.
Books that bypass Cataloging and need no additional processing, which
can go straight to Circulation to be shelved.
6. Route to Cataloging
Books with no 6xx fields
Mismatched information
Books with numbers, symbols, etc. in title
Folios, Reference books, music, children’s materials, multiple volumes,
etc.
National literatures
Any edition beyond 1st
Books lacking 505 field
7. Issues with Books
Duplicate records / books provided by vendor
“Short records”
Diacritical issues
Multiple 505’s: “Bad” TOC information in 500 as well as “good TOC”
information in the 505 in the same record.
Duplicate 520’s
Poor quality spine labeling
Spine label not generated from holdings
8. Challenges / Issues to Consider
Separate workflow for approvals and firms
Not all books will fit this workflow
Shelf ready process as a whole has increased challenges such as call
number/spine label issues.
Need to actively collaborate with other units such as Circulation and
Acquisitions to solve problems
Requires significant time investment upfront for training and proofing.
Ongoing spot checking is a must
Communication with your vendor is important
9. The Results
2009: 24% of Approvals bypassed Cataloging
For the past five years, this percentage has risen 10% each year.
2014: 60% of Approvals expected to bypass Cataloging
2013: Total number of approval books was 7816 (4700 routed to
Circulation)
10. Vendor Relations
Lots and lots of work!
TOC issues
Diacritics
Short Records
Spine Labels
Why oh why won’t Coutts and OCLC work together?
12. Thank You
Further questions?
Ask Us!
Stacey Marien, Acquisitions Librarian
smarien@american.edu
Alayne Mundt, Resource Description Librarian
mundt@american.edu
Editor's Notes
Introduce ourselves.
There are challenges and issues to consider:
The checklist isn’t a catch all. We have found that not everything will fit into this model. For example we
Maintain a separate workflow for approvals and firms, and most of our firms don’t fit the checklist model well for a variety of reasons.
Shelf ready process as a whole has increased certain challenges such as call number/spine label issues.
As a result, we have needed to be proactive about collaborating with other units such as Circulation and Acquisitions to solve problems.
Implementing a checklist such as this requires a significant time investment upfront for establishing the checklist, training and proofing. Ongoing spot checking is a must.
Communication with your vendor is important. We have resolved a lot of problems and improved results by staying proactive with our vendor.