Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Issue71 cash-flows


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Issue71 cash-flows

  1. 1. ISSUE NO. 71 — October 2005 C A L E N D A R Economic Evaluation of Mining Projects ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Introduction determine if the project merits the additional ○ China Mining 2005 funding necessary to progress to the next level. ○ November 14–17, 2005 ○ In order for mining companies or investors to DCFROR is the after-tax rate of return that ○ Beijing International Congress Centre make statements regarding the mineral reserves of discounts future cash flows by properly taking into ○ Beijing, China ○ a project, security exchanges throughout the account the time value of money. The method is e-mail: jan.klawitter@china- ○ world require owners to validate the economic also referred to as the internal rate of return. ○ viability of the project. Engineers typically make ○ ○ this determination through economic evaluation DCFROR is defined as that rate of return that Mines and Money London ○ using a tool called cash flow analysis. Simply makes the after-tax present worth of future cash ○ November 21–23, 2005 stated, a cash flow analysis is cash in (revenue flows from the project equal to the present worth ○ Hilton London Metropole Hotel ○ from sales) less cash out (direct operating costs, of after-tax investments. If the project’s DCFROR is ○ London, United Kingdom taxes, royalties, capital expenditures – or any out- greater than the company’s minimum rate of ○ e-mail: tracey.fielder@mining- of-pocket expenditure) which yields net cash return, the project is considered economically ○ ○ flow. These cash flows are typically estimated on viable. Discounting future cash flows is done ○ an annual basis and discounted back to the through formulas of compound interest, discus- ○ Gold & Precious Metals present moment in time to determine the sions of which can be found in economic ○ Investment Conference ○ discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) or engineering or accounting books. ○ November 27–28, 2005 net present value (NPV) of the project. ○ San Francisco Marriott DCFROR is used in conjunction with other ○ San Francisco, California ○ Economic evaluation and financial analysis are economic parameters such as NPV and payback. ○ e-mail: commonly, though incorrectly, used NPV is defined as the difference between the ○ interchangeably. Economic evaluation is the present worth of future cash flow and the present ○ ○ NWMA Annual Convention: method used to determine the economic viability worth of initial investment using a predetermined ○ Exploring the Modern Minerals of a project. It is the primary measure of discount rate (preferably the company’s minimum ○ Renaissance alternative investment opportunities. Financial rate of return). If the difference is positive, the ○ ○ December 5–9, 2005 analysis is the method used to analyze how a project is considered economically viable. DCFROR ○ Red Lion Hotel at the Park project will be funded; whether it will be 100 and NPV are related in that the DCFROR is the ○ Spokane, Washington percent owner equity, a combination of equity and discount rate where the NPV of the project is zero. ○ ○ e-mail: debt, a joint venture arrangement or some ○ combination of these financial terms. However, Payback is a simple method that does not ○ cash flow analysis can be used to evaluate the incorporate time value of money concepts. ○ Mineral Exploration Roundup ○ 2006 economic impact of the various financing options Payback is the period of time required to ○ January 23–26, 2006 on the project. payback the initial investment from future cash ○ flow. Although the method does not account ○ Westin Bayshore Resort & Marina ○ Vancouver, B.C., Canada Economic evaluation can be used virtually any for time value of money, it is a useful evaluation ○ e-mail: time in a project’s life: from the pre-exploration parameter because it provides some indication ○ ○ stage to assist in determining the size and tenor of how long the company has to wait to get its ○ Runge Professional Development of a mineral target (conceptual level), during the money back. A company may be able to survive ○ Courses exploration stage (pre-feasibility level), through 2 to 4 years before positive cash flows arrive. ○ ○ Mining for Non Miners - Nov. 30 project development and financing (feasibility Periods of much longer time than this may strain ○ Dragline Mining System - Dec. 1-2 level). As projects progress through the various companies beyond their financial means. ○ stages of evaluation, the cash flow model ○ Mining Economics - Dec. 5-6 ○ Truck and Loader Systems - Dec. 7-9 parameters will be replaced with better The concept of minimum rate of return is a ○ Calgary, Alberta, Canada estimates and engineering data in order to significant discussion by itself where authors have ○Copyright 2005 by Pincock, Allen and Holt, a division of Runge Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  2. 2. devoted entire books to the subject. Mine Planning and Cash Flow Analysis rather an allowance used to reduce taxable ○ ○ ○ ○Several factors make up the minimum income. Use of non-cash items to reduce ○ ○rate of return, which in general terms Economic evaluation of alternative mine taxable income is dependant on laws of the ○ ○consist of the company’s cost of capital plans requires estimation of the project’s governing entity as levied by the taxing ○ ○ ○ ○with some allowance for risk. Most mine and process production parameters, authority. Restrictions or additional taxes ○ ○evaluators look to the company’s chief royalties, operating costs, taxes, capital may be levied on income leaving the ○ ○financial officer to provide the minimum costs and ongoing capital replacement governing country. It is the responsibility of ○ ○ ○ ○rate of return for economic evaluations. costs. Table 1 illustrates what goes into a the company and the evaluator to gain an ○ ○Although determining the minimum rate typical cash flow for any given year. understanding of the governing nation’s tax ○ ○of return for projects is beyond the scope law, which often means employing local tax ○ ○ ○ ○of this paper, suffice it to say that Table 1 Annual Cash Flow Diagram knowledge to assist in properly interpreting ○ ○determining the minimum rate of return and applying the necessary tax laws. ○ ○is not a simple calculation. ○ Gross Revenue ○ ○ ○ Less transportation, smelter/refining, As mentioned earlier depreciation and ○Companies often request evaluators to ○ marketing and downstream depletion are non-cash allowances. ○ ○ Depreciation is an allowance for capital ○perform economic evaluations on a pre- ○ beneficiation charges ○ ○tax basis for a variety of reasons. Less royalties investment over the useful life of an asset. ○ ○However, most people do not realize that Less operating costs Most countries allow some form of ○ ○ depreciation for the majority of mining ○pre-tax evaluations require one to use ○ Net Operating Revenue ○ ○pre-tax discount rates, which are not the Less non-cash items: industry assets. Countries may have several ○ ○same as after-tax discount rates. As just Depreciation categories of depreciation depending on the ○ ○ asset’s use. Generally the faster the write- ○ ○discussed, determining a minimum Depletion ○ ○discount rate is a complicated matter, Amortization off, the more likely this will trigger some ○ ○without having to calculate a new pre-tax Net Taxable Income form of alternative minimum tax calculation. ○ ○ ○ Depletion is an allowance for a nonrenew- ○discount rate. It should also be noted Less taxes ○ ○that pre-tax evaluations are not accept- Plus credits able resource. Depletion is only allowed in ○ ○able to establish mineral reserve state- Net Income After Tax some countries. ○ ○ ○ ○ments because taxes represent operating Plus non-cash items ○ ○costs and are therefore, required to be Net Operating Cash Flow Every country has some class of taxation ○ ○included in the cash flow analysis. Less capital costs (initial and sustaining) generally taking many different forms. ○ ○ ○ ○ Less working capital While companies may have negotiated an ○ ○There are two basic situations in evaluating Less acquisition costs ○ income tax holiday, there may be other ○projects: 1) one is referred to as ‘stand- forms of taxation such as the value added ○ Less land payments ○ ○ ○alone’ where all tax deductions and credits Net Cash Flow tax (VAT) on not only final product sales, but ○ ○are carried forward and used against future major equipment components coming into ○ ○ ○ the country. Although it’s likely the company ○project income and taxes, and 2) the other Gross revenue from the mine takes into ○ ○is when the project is evaluated within the account annual tons produced, ore grade, will receive a tax credit for VAT later in the ○ ○corporate envelope where income exists mine recovery, and process recovery all project’s life, the money is required at the ○ ○ ○ ○elsewhere in the organization such that all multiplied by commodity price to generate project’s startup, adding to capital invest- ○ ○tax deductions, credits and savings are total gross revenue. Deductions from gross ment. ○ ○taken when incurred to gain the most revenue consist of product transportation ○ ○ ○ ○favorable economic advantage. Although costs from the mine site, additional Once taxes are removed from the income ○ ○some companies may have no choice, beneficiation costs and marketing costs. stream, the mine operator is left with net ○ ○companies tend to evaluate projects using operating cash flow. Net operating cash ○ Royalties based on net smelter return value ○ ○ ○‘stand-alone’ as the base case. While this are calculated at this point, further reducing flow is further reduced by capital costs, ○ ○evaluation does not present the best gross revenue. Direct operating costs changes in working capital, acquisition costs ○ ○ ○ and required land payments. The resulting ○economic scenario, it does tend to allow including mining, processing, general, ○ ○the projects to be evaluated on their own administrative, property taxes, severance calculation yields the project’s annual net ○ ○merit. Later in the evaluation process, taxes, corporate overhead charges and cash flow. This calculation is performed for ○ ○ ○ ○companies can incorporate the project into ongoing reclamation costs are subtracted every production year and each additional ○ ○the corporate evaluation scenario to from gross revenue, generating net operating year beyond the last production year where ○ ○analyze the combined economic advan- revenue. reclamation is required. These net cash ○ ○ ○ ○tages. flows are discounted to a present time to ○ ○ Unless the operation has the enviable determine the NPV and DCFROR of the ○ ○DCFROR and NPV are the most widely used project. ○ position of a negotiated tax holiday during ○ ○ ○investment decision methods in the mining it’s first few production years, net operating ○ ○industry because they properly account for revenue is subject to taxation. Taxation One important component of cash flow ○ ○ ○ analysis that requires special attention is ○time value of money and they allow typically includes national (federal), state ○ ○different mineral projects to be analyzed on (provincial) and local taxes. Non-cash items, working capital. Working capital is the ○ ○a common basis. These methods allow which may consist of depreciation, money required for day-to-day operations. It ○ ○ ○ ○companies to properly rank investment depletion and/or amortization, are applied is particularly critical during the project’s ○ ○alternatives in order to make the best to reduce taxable income. Non-cash items startup phase and is often a significant ○ ○decision where to employ their money. are neither capital nor operating costs, but expense requirement. However, working ○ ○ ○ ○ 2
  3. 3. capital is not the usual capital expense and is to the change in the parameter. The Leverage and the Effect on DCFROR ○ ○ ○as such, is not an allowable tax deduction. range of changes generally runs plus or and NPV ○ ○ ○Cost items typically included in working minus 10 to 20 percent, or possibly higher ○ ○capital are: 1) inventories such as raw for conceptual level studies. Not that long ago most projects were ○ ○ ○materials, spare parts, supplies, product-in- financed from the owner’s equity capital. ○ ○ ○process and finished products, 2) accounts These results provide the company with a More recent projects are of such magnitude ○ ○receivable, 3) accounts payable, and 4) cash sense of critical parameters indicating and risk that other sources of capital are ○ ○ ○on hand. Depending on the level of project required to bring the project into produc- ○ which ones should be closely monitored. ○ ○study, working capital may be estimated Generally one of the primary parameters tion. Debt financing is one such source, ○ ○using detailed accounts of the aforemen- most sensitive to project economics is which is why it is worth discussing the ○ ○ ○ impact leveraging has on DCFROR and NPV. ○tioned items or through order-of- revenue followed by either operating or ○ ○magnitude estimates based on 10-20 capital costs. Revenue factors consist of ○ ○percent of the fixed capital investment or One common mistake when evaluating ○ grade, recovery and price and a given ○ ○ projects using borrowed money is to ○1- 3 months of operating costs taking into percentage change in any one of these ○ ○consideration the type of process and how carries exactly the same impact on revenue. perform the cash flow analysis on the total ○ ○long before the first saleable product is ○ investment rather than just the equity ○ ○ portion of the investment. This is another ○available to market. Remote project Although sensitivity analysis is an important ○ ○locations may require a higher working aspect in economic evaluations, it is a reason why evaluators should perform a ○ ○ base case analysis using 100 percent equity. ○capital cost. single point parameter test. Sensitivity ○ ○ ○ analysis does not account for the likelihood It provides a baseline to compare leveraged ○ ○While working capital is invested at the or probability of any particular parameter evaluations. ○ ○ ○startup of an operation, it is usually shown being within a certain range or distribution ○ ○ ○as being recovered at the end of the nor how that distribution impacts the If the after-tax cost of borrowed money is ○ ○project’s life because the components project’s economics. While probability less than the project’s cash investment ○ ○ DCFROR, then it is economically desirable ○initially required are considered recouped at ○ theory with respect to economic evaluation ○ ○the end of mine life. However, some is very interesting, its subject matter is to borrow the money and defer the ○ ○companies are providing more working beyond the scope of this paper. With the remaining equity investment. This will ○ ○ ○ significantly increase the DCFROR and NPV ○capital throughout the project life to allow proliferation of computer software, several ○ ○for various unknowns and fluctuating commercial packages are available to test a of the project by leveraging up these ○ ○monetary exchanges or increases. In some project’s economics to various probabilistic indicators. However, it is important to note ○ ○ ○ ○cases working capital may be recovered models. that leveraging works both ways. If the ○ ○early in the project life or it may never be project’s DCFROR falls below the cost of ○ ○recovered, depending on the project’s Limitations of DCFROR and NPV borrowed money the project will not be ○ ○ ○ ○circumstances. able to service the loan and will generate a ○ ○ Although DCFROR and NPV are probably significantly negative NPV. ○ ○Sensitivity Analysis ○ ○ the most widely used and generally ○ ○ accepted economic evaluation tools Summary ○ ○It is highly recommended that the evaluator available in the industry, they are not ○ ○ ○ The process of economic project evaluation ○perform the primary project economic without limitations. Neither DCFROR nor ○ ○evaluation based on a project stand-alone NPV account for the magnitude of the using cash flow analysis can be a long, ○ ○situation and 100 percent owner equity (no investment in a project. A project with a complicated and arduous task. As the ○ ○ ○ ○debt financing). This case will provide a capital investment of $100 million may project progresses and more detailed ○ ○sound baseline from which all other cases show the same DCFROR as a project information becomes available, the ○ ○can be evaluated and compared. mineral evaluation process becomes more ○ requiring a $1 billion investment. DCFROR ○ ○ ○ does not account for differing project lives. complex and requires further evaluation. ○ ○Although engineers make every effort to A project with a 10 year life may show This situation is somewhat unique to the ○ ○ mining industry and it is very much a ○reasonably estimate mine and process ○ nearly the same DCFROR as a project with ○ ○production parameters, as well as capital a 20 year life. NPV is the only tool which circular evaluation process.. ○ ○and operating costs, uncertainties exist, can adequately account for projects with ○ ○ ○ Economic evaluation through the use of ○which need to be evaluated. These “what varying lives. ○ ○if” concerns can be addressed through cash flow analysis will generate a project’s ○ ○sensitivity analysis. The main point of this is that companies DCFROR and NPV, which allows us to ○ ○ ○ ○ and investors should not rely solely on one systematically and quantitatively evaluate ○ ○The cash flow program can be setup to economic parameter for decision making. It the economic potential of various mineral ○ ○evaluate changes in tons, grade, recovery, investments. DCFROR and NPV are the most ○ is important and perhaps critical that all ○ ○ ○product price, capital and operating costs available economic parameters be used widely used investment decision methods in ○ ○relative to different discount rates. together to provide a reasonable picture as the mining industry because they properly ○ ○ account for time value of money and they ○Evaluators typically graph the results in ○ to the economic health of a project. Armed ○ ○“spider diagrams,” which illustrate the with the project’s economic evaluations allow different mineral projects to be ○ ○impact on project economics when any one and the political analysis of various analyzed on a common basis. These ○ ○ ○ methods allow companies to properly rank ○parameter is changed while other param- countries, companies should be in a good ○ ○eters are held constant. The steeper the position to make an informed decision investment alternatives in order to make the ○ ○curve the more sensitive project economics regarding the mineral property. best decision where to employ their money. ○ ○ ○ ○ 33
  4. 4. Example Cash Flow AnalysisTable 2 provides an example cash flow diagram with the various parameters illustrated as discussed in this paper. Any resemblance to an actualproject is merely coincidental. Table 2 C ASH FLO W STATEM ENT ($1,000 U S) G O LD M INE PRO JE CT O W NER EQU ITY (100% ) YEAR PreProd Y1 PY1 PY2 PY3 PY4 PY5 P Y6 PY7 PY8 PY9 PY10 PY11 TO TAL M INE RE VENUE 0 13,441 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 17,921 22,402 197,134 LESS: NSR ROY ALTY (5.0% ) 0 672 896 896 896 896 896 896 896 896 896 1,120 9,857 LESS: M INING CO ST 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 0 0 32,000 LESS: PRO CESSING CO ST 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 33,000 LESS: G &A CO ST 0 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 4,400 LESS: LEACH PAD D ETO X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS: RECLAM ATIO N 0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 200 200 200 4,600 TO TA L O PERATING CO STS 0 8,572 8,796 8,796 8,796 8,796 8,796 8,796 8,796 4,496 4,496 4,720 83,857 NET CASH FLO W FRO M OP ERATIO N 0 4,869 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 13,425 13,425 17,681 113,277 LESS: IN TERE ST EXPENSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS: DEV ELOP MENT CO STS 2,730 910 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,640 LESS: DEP RECIATIO N 0 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 40,200 LESS: DEP LETION 0 152 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 2,554 3,192 26,328 TAXABLE INCO M E (LOS S) -2,730 152 2,917 2,917 2,917 2,917 2,917 2,917 2,917 7,217 7,217 10,835 43,109 IN COM E TAX @ 44% + P ROP TA X -1,201 122 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 3,328 3,328 4,969 20,259 TAX ADJUS TM ENT -1,201 122 1,079 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN COM E TAX P AID 0 0 309 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 3,328 3,328 4,969 20,259 NET CASH FLO W FRO M OP ERATIO N 0 4,869 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 9,125 13,425 13,425 17,681 113,277 LESS : TAXES 0 0 309 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 3,328 3,328 4,969 20,259 LESS : CA PITAL CO STS 36,800 3,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,200 LESS : FINANC ED CAP ITA L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS : W O RKING CA PITAL 0 2,143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2,143 0 LESS : DE VELOP MEN T C OSTS 3,900 1,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,200 LESS : AC QUISITIO N CO STS 300 200 0 350 0 325 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,175 LESS : LAND PAYM ENTS 0 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 0 0 0 207 LESS : INTERE ST EXP. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LESS : PR INC. PAYM T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANNUAL CASH FLO W -41,000 -2,200 8,791 7,362 7,712 7,387 7,712 7,712 7,712 10,097 10,097 14,856 46,236 CASH FLOW SUM M ARY G old Price ($/Oz): 400 DCFRO R: 12.0% PR OJECT NPV @ 5% : $20,208 PR OJECT NPV @ 10% : $4,491 PR OJECT NPV @ 15% : ($5,244) This month’s article was prepared by Don Tschabrun, Principal Mining Engineer, Pincock, Allen & Holt is a consulting and engineering firm serving the international mineral resource industry. Your comments and suggestions are always welcome. Contact Pincock, Allen & Holt • 165 S. Union Blvd., Suite 950, Lakewood, Colorado 80228 • TEL 303.986.6950 • FAX 303.987.8907 • Pincock4Perspectives is published as a free information service for friends and clients. Information for News Pix is paraphrased from various sources; references available upon request. Consultants for Mining and Financial Solutions 4