This document discusses the revised assessment and accreditation process of teacher education institutions in India by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). It outlines the differences between NAAC, UGC, and NCTE and their respective roles in accreditation. The objectives of the study are to explain NAAC's assessment and accreditation process, assist teacher education institutions in achieving higher grades, and encourage continuous quality improvement. The document also details NAAC's revised framework, including the seven criteria and their weightages used to evaluate institutions. Scores are calculated using a combination of qualitative and quantitative metrics to determine an final grade point average and overall accreditation status.

1. The Study on Revised Assessment and
Accreditation Process(NAAC) of Teacher
Education Institutions in India
Mr. Bheem pad Mahato
ID- 19IUT0350003
Research scholar

2. INTRODUCTION
• The quality education is the major issue in India. The
word quality derived from Latin word ‘Qalis’ which
means ‘ of what kind’. According to Wikipedia
“A property or an attribute that differentiates a thing
or person”. The secondary and higher secondary
education is the backbone of education system of any
nation. This is making a bridge between the primary
and higher education system. By maintaining the
quality of secondary and higher secondary education,
we can promote the learner in higher education and
minimize the dropout rate. It will help us to achieve
the goal of Gross Enrollment Rate 50% in higher
education in India by 2030.

3. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAAC,UGC AND
NCTE
• NAAC- NAAC is an acronym for the National
Assessment and Accreditation Council. The
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION
COUNCIL (NAAC) conducts assessment
and accreditation of Higher Educational
Institutions (HEI)

4. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAAC,UGC AND
NCTE
• UGC is the University Grants Commission.UGC
is responsible for approving Universities or
Colleges whereas NAAC accredits the
programs offered in the University or
institute.
• NAAC is an autonomous body that is funded
by the University Grants Commission (UGC)

5. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAAC,UGC AND
NCTE
• The National Council for Teacher Education as
a statutory body came into existence in
pursuance of the National Council for Teacher
Education Act, 1993., on the 17th
August,1995.

6. A &A
•ASSESSMENT
• ACCREDITATION

7. NEED of ASSESSMENT and
ACCREDITATION
• For funding by external agencies
• Institutions self introspection and evaluation.
• To know the quality and credibility of the institution
• For internship
• For admission
• To enhance the quality of educational program
• For recruitment and placement
• To know and update the teachers knowledge and skill.

8. INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION
AGENCIES
• Times Higher Education
• QS World University Rankings
• Shanghai Ranking Consultancy

9. NATIONAL ACCREDITATION AGENCIES
• National Assessment and Accreditation Council
(NAAC)
• National Board of Accreditation (NBA)

10. Objectives of Study
• To Explain the concept of assessment and
Accreditation process of NAAC.
• To assist the TEIs in securing appropriate Grade
in the process of Assessment and Accreditation.
• To realize the academic objectives of Teacher
Educations Institutions in India.
• To encourage TEIs in continuous improvement
and focus on institutional functioning towards
quality enhancement.

11. NAAC Revised Assessment and
Accreditation (A&A) Framework
• Preschool/ Montessori teacher education which
is usually in the form of certificate/diploma
programmes,
• Early Childhood Care & Education - ECCE,
• Elementary teacher preparation usually in the
form of D.El.Ed. Or 2-year diploma programme,
4 year B.El.Ed.
• Secondary teacher preparation which is B.Ed.
after graduation or ITEP after +2.

12. Quality Indicator Program for
Framework for TEIs
• Curricular Aspects
• Teaching – Learning and Evaluation
• Research and Outreach Activities
• Infrastructure and Learning Resources
• Students supports and progression
• Governance, Leadership and Management
• Institutional Values and Best Practices

13. NAAC CRITERIA WISE WEIGHTAGES
FOR DIFFERENT HEIs
Sl
no
Criteria
Universi
ties
Autonomous
Colleges
Affiliated/
Constituent
Colleges TEIs
UG PG
1
Curricular Aspects
150 150 100 100 105
2
Teaching –Learning and
Evaluation 200 300 350 350 360
3
Research and Outreach
Activities 250 150 110 120 100
4
Infrastructure and
Learning Resources 100 100 100 100 100
5
Students supports and
progression 100 100 140 130 115
6
Governance, Leadership
and Management 100 100 100 100 120
7
Institutional Values and
Best Practices 100 100 100 100 100
Total
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

14. Distribution of Metrics and KIs across
Criteria
Type of HEIs Universities
Autonomous
Colleges
Affiliated/ Constituent Colleges
TEIs
UG PG
Criteria
7 7 7 7 7
Key
Indicators
(KIs)
34 34 31 32 32
Qualitative
Metrics
(QlM)
36 35 35 36 44
Quantitative
Metrics
(QnM)
79 72 58 60 79
Total
115 107 93 96 123

15. Process of A& A
50%, 10%, 500/100, 60 %, 30 %
Pre Qualifier Stage 25 %
70
%
30
%

16. CALCULATION OF CGPA
Key indicator Weightage
Key aspect grade
points (5 pt Scale)
Key Aspect wise
weightaged
Environmental
Consciousness
30 4 30*4 =120
Innovations 30 2 30*2 = 60
Best practices 40 2 40*2= 80
Total 100 260
Criteria Grade Point Average (Cr GPA) = 260/100 = 2.60

17. CONCLUSION
Range of
institutional
CGPA
Letter Grade Status
NAAC accredited
University College
3.51-4.00 A++ Accredited 9 17
3.26-3.50 A+ Accredited 26 142
3.01 – 3.25 A Accredited 136 1065
2.76 – 3.00 B++ Accredited 23 537
2.51 – 2.75 B+ Accredited 23 729
2.01 – 2.50 B Accredited 75 2106
1.51 – 2.00 C Accredited 12 522
Total Accredited 304 5118
TOTAL Recognized 993 39931
Difference 689 34813

18. THANKS