2.vina serevina lukman hidayatullah

I would like to say thank you to my
lecturer :
Dr. Ir. Vina Serevina
as Assesment and Evaluation Lecturer
State University of Jakarta
Student :
Lukman Hidayatullah
3/12/2014 1

KONTEN FROM THIS SLID REPRESENT THE BREAKDOWN OF
FROM SOLUTION AT HANDING OUT WHICH ENTITLE :
“ PROBLEM AND IT’S RESOLVING
ABOUT APPLYING OF REGULATION
EDUCATION MINISTERY OF
NATIONAL NUMBER 20 YEAR 2007
ABOUT STANDARD ASSESSMENT."
REGULATION EDUCATION MINISTERY OF NATIONAL NUMBER 20 YEAR 2007
ABOUT STANDARD ASSESSMENT3/12/2014 2

As have been limited by demarcation
of It’s problem of, that is F poin and G
point from ‘ ENCLOSURE REGULATION
OF NATION EDUCATION MINISTERY ‘ ,
and some problems of field, that
happened with reference to the poin.
ABOUT STANDARD ASSESSMENT
3/12/2014 3

Citation Regulation of Minister of National Education
Republic Of Indonesia Number. 20 Year 2007 about
Standard Assessment of Education, Point F and G.
But to be elaborated by this opportunity, that is
F point and G point perceived have happened
inappropriate in field, among others
1). F. 1 and F.9
2). G.1 , G.2 And G.6
3/12/2014 4

F. Assessment by Set of Education
1. To determine Complete Criterion Minimize
each;every subject by paying attention educative
participant characteristic, subject
characteristic, and condition set of education
passthrough educator council meeting.
9.To give report attainment result of learning
storey;level set of education to on duty education
of sub-province / town.
3/12/2014 5

G. Assessment by Government
1. Assessment result of learning by government conducted in the
form of Test State with aim to assess attainment of grad interest
nationally at certain subject in science subject group and
technology
2. Test State supported by a system guarantying problem secret
and quality and also peaceful execution, downright, and fair
6. Result of Test State used as one of the determinant pass of
educative participant from set of education which its pass
criterion, is specified every year by Minister pursuant to Comittee
Standard National Education recommendation ( BNSP ).
3/12/2014 6

Solution of Related Problem
in Field.
3/12/2014 7

F.1. Specifying Complete Criterion
Minimize each;every subject by paying
attention educative participant
characteristic, subject characteristic,
and condition set of education
passthrough educator council meeting.
3/12/2014 8

Problem :
With settler Assess Complete Criterion Minimize ( KKM )
specified by subject teacher , each;every school, as
commended by F.1 point Regulation of minister
education of Number national, 20 Year 2007, aim to
determine attainment yardstick result of learning every
semester.
but in its execution, there is by mistake in field that
happened, among others :
1. Complete Criterion Minimize like be forced
2. There are some teacher exploiting student which is
remedial , dubiously and inappropriate duty.
3/12/2014 9

F.9. reporting attainment result of
learning storey;level set of
education to on duty education of
sub-province / town.
3/12/2014 10

Problem :
Data assess reported student to on duty
education of sub-province / town stem from
accumulation assess student rapot from
semester 3, 4 and 5 . Field found by
uncorelation in target and its execution, among
others : With rule of pass Test National, 40 %
from value accumulate semester 3,4 and 5 given
by teacher, and 60 % from Test National value .
Hence happened Mark Up assess by teacher.
3/12/2014 11

G. 1. Assessment result of learning by
government conducted in the form of
Test National with aim to to assess
attainment of grad interest nationally
at certain subject in science subject
group and technology.
3/12/2014 12

Problem and solution offer :
Assessment result of learning by government of vital
importance once in Test National word meaning may
not be vanished, very important to evaluate and
searched to find better system, and require to be
executed with as good as determination of pass with
only certain subject, this require to study to repeat.
3/12/2014 13

G. 2.The State test supported by
a system guarantying problem
secret and quality and also
peaceful execution, downright,
and fair.
3/12/2014 14

In the field that happened leave for back is by what expected
by standard assessment of education National arranging
about quality of education in Indonesia, quality of education to
show of quality of human resource as a whole in this country .
But in reality many and insincerity leakage of problem
conducted by educator it is of course, because educator which
is have interaction to directly with student.
Figured in here, some factual finding from media focus a period
of , to this the following :
3/12/2014 15

G. 6. Result of Test National used as
one of the determinant pass of
educative participant from set of
education which is its pass criterion,
it’is specified every year by Minister
pursuant to Committee Standard
National Education recommendation
( BNSP ).
3/12/2014 16

A lot of news by media and also electronic, informing
occurence, that happened at UN participant which do
not pass after accepting announcement result of UN
There is, which is stress, there is also terminating its
life by which is no good, because a reason of weight
account shame because do not pass UN .
With matter that way, need presumably to test to
repeat this Invitation, without lessening quality of
education in Indonesia.
3/12/2014 17

CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION
Permendiknas RI No. 20 Year 2007 about Standard Assessment
of Education, of National represent invitation becoming law
arm rest, and quality control regulation result of education,
according to education national standard developed by Comittee
Standard National Education, require to specify Standard
Assessment of Education, with Regulation of Nation Minister
Education .
Standard Assessment of Education is set in Regulation Nation
Ministery Education , representing network procedure process
assessment result of learning educative participant from daily
restating phase until Test National.
3/12/2014 18

Permendiknas RI No 20, Year 2007 about Standard
assessment, of vital importance once, although there
are some poin which need argument and require to
study to repeat, so that happened compatibility among
target and its execution, and can fasten all component,
as invitation function which is matter, a matter that
happened unexpeted of field, representing deviation
from Permendiknas RI No 20, year 2007 executor and
perpetrator, is above mentioned, deviation of that
represent effect consequence from regulation of the
invitation.
3/12/2014 19

One of the problems that happened, that is
determination of prosentasi assess 40 % from value go
to school , and 60 % from result of UN, which disagree
with fact.
so that do not address the truth of assessment prinsif
which is do like that also with rule result of UN
becoming pass directive.
this matter which become motivation deviation of
assessment prinsif, that way need presumably study
more circumstantial, with evaluating fact in field.
3/12/2014 20

CHAPTER V SUGGESTION
have been elaborated by above its assessment result of
learning Nationally very require to be conducted by
government, this matter to know and quality efficacy of
education in Indonesia, thereby there is no reason to vanish or
eliminate UN.
but in its execution require to study by a system which is
proporsional, which can fasten and dribble quality of education
of Indonesia toward more of invitation will not escape study
repeat and evaluation.
if when do not be done by study repeat and evaluation, good
of change or completion, hence will happened ruination or
retreating from a target.
3/12/2014 21

Thereby, limited to suggestion from writer, suggestion writer related to
breakdown of assessment standard at F point and G point from conten of
Permendiknas RI No . 20, Year 2007 about Standard Assessment of
Education.
Among others : KKM still need remain to Reporting System assess 40 %
from assessment of school require to be negated, because always
happened Mark Up value, and this matter disagree with assessment prinsif
which is commendation Permendiknas RI No. 20 Year 2007.
UN as pass determinant, require to be looked for by its solution, taking
example with changing class step system and majors, which is the
following sharpness : Student SD ( elementary school ) as usual,
educational years 6 year with directive assess Pure Test National ( UNM ).
Student SMP ( intemmediate school ) as usual, educational 3 year with
common Iesson items, and directive assess Pure Test National ( UNM ).
3/12/2014 22

Student SMA ( High school ) specialize in X class, and
educational years only 2 year, a period of this is gone into effect
determination of pass like really controlled UN to tighten , and
otherwise pass in year second this, student given by
opportunity by following class return during one year with
curriculum program which have been determined.
Become being equal a period of to 3 year ( if for the student of
which do not pass in year second). And need is presumably
given by reward for the student of able to pass UN in second
year.
That is year presumably only a suggestion, and request
presumably to be enunciated to the and limitation by mistake of
suggestion from writer.
3/12/2014 23

Source :
3/12/2014 24

2.vina serevina lukman hidayatullah

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (15)

Similar to 2.vina serevina lukman hidayatullah

Similar to 2.vina serevina lukman hidayatullah (20)

More from vinaserevina

More from vinaserevina (20)

2.vina serevina lukman hidayatullah