David Nicholas Digital Consumers Implications For Libraries
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

David Nicholas Digital Consumers Implications For Libraries

on

  • 1,929 views

congres e-inclusion, digital consumers: implications for libraries

congres e-inclusion, digital consumers: implications for libraries

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,929
Views on SlideShare
1,914
Embed Views
15

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
10
Comments
0

1 Embed 15

http://www.slideshare.net 15

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

David Nicholas Digital Consumers Implications For Libraries Presentation Transcript

  • 1. consumers: Digital consumers: implications for libraries (and society) Professor David Nicholas CIBER research group University College London david.nicholas@ucl.ac.uk http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/research/ciber
  • 2. Background: choice and change • Choice, digital transition, unbelievable access, Google & disintermediation transformed information landscape • Because so much information seeking goes on remotely and anonymously we have not woken up to this yet. Yet digital transition has further to go • Still working on the basis of old paradigm – risk of decoupling • Keep looking at the future, and blaming the kids…dumbing down dumbing
  • 3. What have we learnt? • Seven years of building an evidence base from the digital footprints people leave behind • What people do and not what they say they do • And what they do follows….
  • 4. Tremendous activity and going up and up • Access main driver. More people drawn into information net (all librarians now!) & existing users can search more freely & flexibly. • Lots of ‘noise’, which unfortunately regarded as demand & satisfaction. – majority of users robots (HofC) – of human users many are ‘foreign’ foreign’ – all have very short attention spans • They do it all the time - use well into the night and over the weekend
  • 5. Consumers like it simple • Users avoid carefully-crafted discovery systems. Everyone likes Google – Physicists and Historians, included. • Advanced search used rarely, and hardly at all by users in highly-rated research institutions. • Add-ons and innovations distinctly a minority sport – email alerts, VLEs, blogs. And as for federated searching forget it!
  • 6. They are promiscuous • Around 40% do not come back • Choice, shop around, lured away be search engines • Poor retrieval skills (2.3words) and leave memories in cyberspace add to ‘churn’ rate • Direct result of end-user checking • Younger they are the more promiscuous they are; men more promiscuous than women!
  • 7. They bounce • Over half visitors view 1-3 pages from thousands available. Bounce in and then out again – related to promiscuity. • Bounce because of search engines, massive choice, an ‘acceptance of failure’ - shortage of time & overload • Bouncing not always a sign of failure but can be • Younger people bounce more
  • 8. The horizontal has replaced the vertical Promiscuity and bouncing creates flicking. Victoria! Hoover through titles, contents pages & abstracts at a huge rate and its pleasurable: • I can update my knowledge very quickly…the sheer number of books is overwhelming, if I can look at them very quickly – you know within 15 mins, I can look at 3 or 4 books – and get some very superficial knowledge of what is in them, nevertheless it improves my scholarship, because in the back of my mind, these books already exist
  • 9. Viewing has replaced reading • Power browsing • Have been conditioned by emailing, text messaging and PowerPoint • Don’t view an article online for more than 2-3 minutes • If its long, either read the abstract or squirrel it away for a day when it will not be read (digital osmosis) • Go online to avoid reading!
  • 10. Consumers want ‘immersive’ social information environments • Social networking starts at home! • Returned book trolley!
  • 11. Brand is more complicated than you think • Difficult in cyberspace: responsibility/authority almost impossible in a digital environment – so many players, so many brands • Do librarians have brand or authority? • Also what you think is brand is not what other people think. Tesco!
  • 12. So what does it all mean? • The study confirms what many are beginning to suspect: that the web is having a profound impact on how we conceptualise, seek, evaluate and use information. What Marshall McLuhan called 'the Gutenberg galaxy' - that universe of linear exposition, quiet contemplation, disciplined reading and study - is imploding, and we don't know if what will replace it will be better or worse. But at least you can find the Wikipedia entry for 'Gutenberg galaxy' in 0.34 seconds
  • 13. Conclusion • Was it always so and worked with the wrong (ideal) models? • We are all the Google Generation • Fast information for a fast food generation • ‘I’ information rather then ‘peer’ information • Understanding information seeking a prerequisite to determining outcomes…access is not an outcome • Are we really benefiting from the information society and always on. Fast forwarding the e-citizen to what? • And whose responsibility – libraries decoupling and publishers the new librarians?
  • 14. Plug for the book of the PowerPoint •http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/index.shtml
  • 15. Plug for the television programme! • BBC 2 Digital Revolution. Filming at UCL on 14th November. On the box in January and on the web at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/digitalrevolution/