1. Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
The Health Professions
Council
2. Contents
• Welcome and Introduction
• The HPC and the role of a UK regulator
• Policy at HPC
• Fitness to practise
• Stakeholder engagement
• Registration at HPC
Mutual recognition and EEA processes
IMI / Security verification
Continuing professional development (CPD)
3. Health Professions Council
• Independent UK statutory regulator of 15 professions
• One of nine health regulators
• Derives powers from Health Professions Order 2001
• Purpose is “to safeguard the health and well-being of persons using
or needing the services of registrants” – Article 3(4)
• Separate role from professional bodies and trade unions
4. Ph
O ys
cc io
up th
at er
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
5,000
0
io ap
n al i st
th s
e ra
R pi
B ad s
io i
og ts
m ra
ed ph
ic er
al s
Pr sc
ac ie
Sp nt
ee tit Pa is
io ts
ra
HPC Register 2011
ch ne
an rp m
ed
d sy ic
la
ng ch s
O C ua
ol
og
pe hi
ra ro ge is
tin po th ts
g di er
de st ap
pa s is
rt /p ts
m od
en ia
tp tr
ra is
ts
ct
iti
on
219,000 registrants from 15 professions
er
D s
C ie
lin tit
ic ia
al ns
sc
ie
H A nt
ea rts is
r in th ts
g er
ai ap
d is
di ts
sp
en
Pr se
os O rs
th rt
ho
et
is pt
ts is
/o ts
rt
ho
tis
ts
6. Professional and lay input
• 507 ‘Partners’ working across 677 partner roles
– Our professions and lay persons
– Provide expertise for good decision-making
– Approval of education and training programmes
– Registration decisions (applications and CPD audits)
– Fitness to practise decisions
• Council and Committees
• Professional Liaison Groups (PLGs)
8. About the Policy and Standards Department
Develop policy and strategy
Policy
and
Standards
Consultations
9. Our standards
• Standards of conduct, performance and
ethics: behaviour and attitudes expected
• Standards of proficiency: professional
knowledge, understanding
• CPD standards: requirements for ongoing
learning
• Standards of Education and Training: we use
these to approve education programmes
10. Guidance
• Explains our policies in more detail
• Advises registrants and/or students on
how they can meet our standards
• Formal guidance is published
• Informal guidance (advice):
• Website
• Email
• Phone
• Meetings
11. The way policy works
• Responsible for reviewing standards, updating/writing new guidance,
or undertaking work on policy change
• Write papers for Committees and Council to advise them on options
• Require Committee and Council approval of proposals before
consulting – plus legal approval
• Meet with stakeholders on projects relevant to HPC policy
• Provide advice on HPC policy to registrants and members of the
public
• Organise and coordinate professional liaison groups to work on policy
change as needed
12. Consultations
• Normally consult for 3 months
• Information posted online in dedicated ‘consultations’ section of
website
• Also sent to consultation list of over 400 interested organisations.
• Certain consultations go out to all registrants
• Respond to external consultations
13. Responses to external consultations
• Respond to public consultations relevant to our work and our
registrants
• Respond positively where possible, constructively where we disagree
with proposals
• Recent consultations we have responded to:
• European Commission Green Paper on Modernising the
Professional Qualifications Directive
• House of Lords European Union Committee call for evidence on
the Professional Qualifications Directive
14. Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
Fitness to Practise
15. Fitness to practise: An overview of the process
• Allegation made
Allegation
• Investigate allegation
• Interim order imposed Investigation
• Hearing convened
Interim Order Mediation
• Case considered by final
hearing panel Hearing
• Sanction imposed
Judgement
16. Fitness to practise: when we will take action
• Serious or persistent failure to meet standards
• Improper relationships with service users
• Failure to respect the autonomy of service users
• Sexual misconduct
• Misuse or abuse of drugs and alcohol
• Failure to provide adequate care
• Poor record keeping
• Theft from a service user
17. Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
Stakeholder engagement
18. Stakeholder engagement
• AURE (Alliance of UK regulators in Europe): Meetings 6x annually,
communicating HPC position, debates , contributing to joint
statements and consultation responses
• BMA EU forum: Bi-annual meetings, wide range of organisations
represented, debates, communicating HPC position
• BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills): Developing
working relationships, supporting events eg EU Commission London,
coordinating HPC responses, data gathering
• CLEAR (The Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation):
Supporting CEO, attending as delegate (London 2011), speaking slot
(CPD)
19. Stakeholder engagement
• EU Commission: Annual meetings with CEO & Policy, developing
close working relationships, attending & supporting Commission
events eg Modernisation of the Professional Qualifications Directive
• Supporting International regulators: Cypriot Ministry of Labour,
Norwegian government, Hong Kong
• European Parliament: MEP meetings with CEO, attending IMCO
Committee (Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee),
supporting MEP’s assistants
20. Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
Registration at the HPC
21. Role of the registration department
• Maintain and publish a Register of health professionals
• 36 full time staff
• 100,000+ telephone enquiries per year
• 20,000+ email enquiries per year
• UK approved courses – over 10,000 applications per year
• Readmission and return to practice process
• Bi-annual renewal process
• Audit of continuing professional development (CPD)
• Verification checks for identity, education and career history of all
overseas qualified applicants
22. Routes to registration – all international applicants
• 180 - 200 International applications received per month (25% are
EEA applicants).
• Forms downloaded from HPC website
• Applicants advised to read standards of proficiency before applying
• Incomplete forms returned to applicants with advice
• Character declarations sent to fitness to practice before assessment
• Background checks carried out to verify applicant’s identity, education
and good standing
• Use of outside agencies such as UK NARIC and Kroll International
for background checks
• Service level agreement of 10 working days for assessment decisions
23. Routes to registration – international (non-EEA)
Applications are sent to two registration assessors from the relevant
profession (HPC partners)
Assessment based on professional qualification and additional
education, training and experience
Possible outcomes:
• Accept – applicants meets all standards of proficiency
• Further verification – additional information requested to address
shortfalls in application
• Test of competence – interview to determine borderline cases
• Reject – applicants have automatic right of appeal
24. Routes to registration - EEA applicants with mutual recognition
Applications are sent to two registration assessors from the relevant
profession (HPC partners)
Assessment based on professional comparison and additional
education, training and experience
Possible outcomes:
• Accept – applicants meets all standards of proficiency
• Further verification – additional information requested to address
significant shortfalls in application
• Adaptation period – normally additional supervised practice or
academic module. Applicants have automatic right of appeal
• Aptitude test – can be requested by applicant if they feel adaptation
period is not required
25. Role of IMI
• Currently three HPC professions covered:
Physiotherapists, Practitioner psychologists, Radiographers
• All advisors involved in processing international applications have
access to the IMI system
• Safe and mostly effective way of receiving information
• Used in both permanent establishment cases (verification process) and
in decisions on temporary provision of services cases
• Increasing use – 10 requests within last 6 months:
7 sent by the HPC (Estonia, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Spain)
3 received by the HPC (1 from Sweden, 2 from Spain)
26. IMI - our experience
• Most replies within 1 month, however some take several months to
conclude – this means delays in the recognition process and
unnecessary obstacles for the applying professional
• Not all relevant authorities are willing to engage – there is no method
of enforcing mandatory use
• Unclear which authorities can be contacted in some cases (long list to
choose from) – lack of explanation who is responsible for what
• Overview of regulatory systems for each profession would be helpful
• Still a limited number of regulated professions covered by the ‘general
system’
• Good potential for growth and extended use
27. Assessment process – training issues
• Assessors receive refresher training every two years regarding
developments in legislation
• All new assessors receive equality and diversity training
• On-going quality monitoring to ensure recommendations are fair,
appropriate and legally sound
• All refusal and adaptation period recommendations must be approved
by registration managers
• EU Commission has reaffirmed that systematic language testing is
ruled out as a condition of recognition
• Speech and language therapy is the only profession that is exempted
from this part of the directive because knowledge of the language is a
core competence of the profession
28. Temporary provision of services
• Temporary and occasional nature of the provision of services
(Directive 2005/36/EC, Article 52)
• Proof of nationality or citizenship
• Attestation(s) of legal establishment (or proof of 2 years professional
experience)
• Evidence of professional qualification
• Decision in 1 month
• Registration for 1 year (possible to renew)
• Typically approx. 40 declarations per month
Once the declaration has been processed and accepted they
professional may begin to practice using the professional title from
the Member State in which they are established e.g. 'Fizjoterapeuta'
in place of 'Physiotherapist' for a Polish registrant.
29. Post-registration and renewal
• Name and registration number displayed on the online Register
available to the public
• Registration renewed every two years with declarations of current
practice, character, health and CPD
• £76 fee payable per year
• Registrants lapse from the Register if they do not renew successfully
– must pay and sign
• Requirement for registrants to keep personal information up to date
• Registrants must advise of any changes in health or character
• Over 60% of registrants now renew using online portal
• Over 95% of registrants successfully renew each cycle
30. Continuing professional development
• A statutory requirement for all HPC registrants since July 2006
• Audits began in May 2008
• Flexible outcome based approach (not points / hours)
31. Questions from HPC
• Point of contact for regarding for professions regulated by the HPC in
Romania
• Certified/official translators – process for verification
• For professions currently regulated in Romania which HPC regulates
- is there one agreed curriculum? Who is the owner?
• Status / role of Radiography Nurses - Nurses or Radiology
Technicians?
32. Finding out more and getting in touch
www.hpc-uk.org
ftp@hpc-uk.org
0800 328 4218
Find us on www.facebook.com/hcpcuk
Follow us on www.twitter.com/HPC_news
Follow us on www.linkedin.com
Sign up for our RSS feeds www.hpc-uk.org
