Enc1101 unit3 data analysis

891 views
824 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
891
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Enc1101 unit3 data analysis

  1. 1. Organizing and Analyzing Data Discourse community ethnography
  2. 2. Which characteristics have scholars focused on? <ul><li>Swales </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Expertise, lexis </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Mirabelli </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Genre, expertise </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wardle </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Genre, participation, intercommunication </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Student paper </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Expertise, genres, lexis, intercommunication </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Which characteristics will you focus on? <ul><ul><li>Goals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Intercommunication </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Participation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lexis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Genres </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Expertise </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(step 2 on assignment sheet) </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Which characteristics will you focus on? <ul><li>Trade data with a partner. </li></ul><ul><li>Discuss: which of the six characteristics stand out to you as most interesting in your partner’s data? Why? </li></ul><ul><li>Write: which of the six characteristics stand out to you as most interesting in your own data? Why? </li></ul>
  5. 5. What are the scholars’ arguments? <ul><li>Swales </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Defining discourse communities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Mirabelli </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Multiliteracies, defying stereotypes </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wardle </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Enculturation, identity, authority, modes of belonging </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Let’s make an argument…again! <ul><li>Trade data with a partner. </li></ul><ul><li>Look for: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Conflicts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Participants with difficulties </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Authority </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stereotypes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Multiliteracies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Identity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Modes of belonging </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Etc. </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Let’s make an argument…again! <ul><li>Write: what aspect of your partner’s data seems most interesting to you? </li></ul><ul><li>Discuss with your partner. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Let’s make an argument…again! <ul><li>Write a tentative thesis statement. </li></ul><ul><li>Share with the class. </li></ul>
  9. 9. Drafting <ul><li>Start drafting your methodology section. </li></ul><ul><li>What do you need to include? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Observations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collecting texts </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Structure <ul><li>IMRD </li></ul><ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jot down the names of the scholars you will refer to. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Methodology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jot down what methods you will need to describe. </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Structure <ul><li>IMRD </li></ul><ul><li>Results/Discussion </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Decide what organization will best suit your argument. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>By Swales’s characteristics </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>By questions (see Wardle) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>By community-specific topics (see Mirabelli) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Share. </li></ul></ul>

×