This document defines defamation as the publication or broadcast of a false statement of fact that seriously harms someone's reputation. It applies to both printed and spoken statements made online or offline. The document notes that truth is an absolute defense against defamation, but proving a statement is true can be difficult. It also explains that statements of opinion alone cannot be defamatory, and discusses some of the challenges around legislating cyberbullying and internet trolling. The document provides examples of statements that could be considered defamatory and discusses the standards of fault required in defamation cases involving public figures.
4. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
5.
6.
7. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
15. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
16. Truth is an
absolute defense
to defamation.
But there’s a
catch: Knowing
something is true
and proving it’s
true can be two
different things.
17. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
20. Myth
As long as you preface your statement with a qualifier
such as “In my opinion,” or “allegedly,” or “I think,”
you cannot be successfully sued for defamation.
False: While such qualifiers have their place, there are
no “magic words” that will always shield you from
liability.
25. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
26. Red Flag Statements
• Accusations of illegal conduct or involvement
with the criminal justice system or criminals
• Charges of sexual misconduct or promiscuity
• Statements that attack a person’s honesty or
integrity
27. This may be a lie, but does it
really harm a reputation?
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. Defamation defined…
Publication or broadcast of a false
statement of fact that seriously harms
someone’s reputation. Applies to printed
statements and spoken statements, both
online and offline.
33. Fault Required
The First Amendment requires
that in order for defendants to
be held responsible for
defamation, the person suing
must show — at a minimum —
that the reporter/editor acted
unreasonably.
39. Good news: You’re not legally responsible for libelous
comments made by others on your blog.
40. Even if you post online anonymously, courts
may be able to determine your identity.
41. You do not
need to reveal
information
about who uses
your website,
unless you’re
served with a
subpoena or
court order.
42. About the Presenter
Mark Grabowski is an associate professor at Adelphi
University in New York, where he teaches Internet
Law. Previously, he worked as a lawyer and a
journalist. He holds a J.D. from Georgetown Law. For
more information, visit markgrabowski.com or email
mgrabowski [at] adelphi . edu
43. Sources
• Student Press Law Center: “Libel Law Primer”
• Electronic Frontier Foundation: “Online Defamation
Law”
• Cyberlaw by Brian Craig (Pearson, 2013)