Comenius Dive in the Sky

1. Comenius Multilateral Project “Dive in the sky”
Final feedback questionnaire for students
very poor poor not too bad good excellent
Utility of sharing a European project
Project awareness/involvement
Knowledge of the partners’ countries
Curiosity and interest about the partners
Time devoted to the project
Experience exchange with foreign
students
Task sharing inside one’s class
Students’ meetings
(experienced/reported)
Parent’s involvement
Problem solving
Astronomy practice
Foreign language practice
Technologic device practice
Enrichment from the project
Attitude about a new Comenius project

2. Final feedback questionnaire for teachers
very poor poor not too
bad
good excellent
Relationship among partners
Communication efficiency
Teaching experience exchange
Task sharing among partners
Organisation of the visits
Students’ meetings and workshops
Headmaster’s/headmistress’s support
Colleagues’ support
Task sharing among colleagues
Students’ participation
Parents’ involvement
Local authorities’ involvement
Press involvement
Astronomy practice
Foreign language practise
Technologic device practise
European Union awareness
Project results
Attitude about further participation in
the continuous project(s).

3. EVALUATION OF RESULTS
In the project evaluation survey participated 10 teachers and 30 students from all partnership
countries. The target group was chosen according the participation in mobility programs. They
completed the questionnaires provided above. The answers results are shown in diagrams.
STUDENTS RESULTS
1. Utility of sharing a European project.
2. Project awareness/involvement
3. Knowledge of the partners countries
1
9
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
Not to bad Good Excellent
7
23
Good
Excellent
2
3
10
15
Poor Not to bad Good Excellent

4. 4. Curiosity and interest about the partners.
5. Time devoted to the project
6. Experience exchange with foreign students.
2
8
20
Not too bad
Good
Excellent
2
8
20
Not too bad
Good
Excellent
1
12
17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
NOT too bad Good Excellent

5. 7. Task sharing inside the class.
8. Students meetings (experienced/reported).
9. Parents involvement.
5
15
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Not too bad Good Excellent
2
14 14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Not too bad Good Excellent
1 1
5
13
7
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Very poor Poor Not too bad Good Excellent

6. 10. Problem solving
11. Astronomy practice
12. Foreign language practice.
1
20
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
Not too bad Good Excellent
1
10
19
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Not too bad Good Excellent
3
27
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Good Excellent

7. 13.Technologic device practice.
14. Enrichment from the project
15. Attitude about a new Comenius project
3
1017 Not too bad
Good
Excellent
7
23
Good
Excellent
4
26
Good
Excellent

8. TEACHERS RESULTS
1. Relationship among partners: according to the answers of the teachers,
participated in mobility programs and other project activities, all teachers
named relationship among partners as an excellent.
2. Communication efficiency
3. Teaching experience exchange
4. Task sharing among partners
3
7 GOOD
EXCELLENT
1
9
GOOD
EXCELLENT
4
6 GOOD
EXCELLENT

9. 5. Organization of the visits: according to the answers of the teachers,
participated in mobility programs and other project activities, all teachers
chose evaluation- excellent, for the organization of the visits.
6. Students meetings and workshops.
7. Headmasters/headmistress support
8. Colleagues support.
1
9
GOOD
EXCELLENT
8
2
GOOD
EXCELLENT
9
1
GOOD
EXCELLENT

10. 9. Task sharing among colleagues
10. Students participation
11. Parents involvement.
12. Local authorities involvement
9
1
GOOD
EXCELLENT
1
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
GOOD EXCELLENT
2
8
0
2
4
6
8
10
NOT TOO BAD GOOD
4
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
GOOD EXCELLENT

11. 13. Press involvement.
14. Astronomy practice.
15. Foreign language practice.
1
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Not to bad Good Excellent
1
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
Good Excellent
1
9
Good
Excellent

12. 16. Technologic device practice.
17. European Union awareness
18. Project results and attitude towards new Erasmus+ project.
All respondents identified results and possibility for the further
collaboration as excellent.
4
6 Good
Excellent
2
8
0
2
4
6
8
10
Good Excellent