Rhetoric and Stereotype Essay Stereotype is a sweeping statement standardized image about a person or group with little or no evidence. The primary purpose is to hurt one s feelings or to attack one s character. Have you ever stereotyped someone or felt like you were being stereotyped against? How did being stereotyped affect you, or how did it make you feel once you got to know the person or persons? All kind of people make up our society. Within society, there are a massive amount of groups, most of which have been stereotyped in one way or another. We develop stereotypes when we are reluctant or incapable to obtain all information needed to make fair judgments about people or situations. In the absence of the unknown statistics, stereotyping allow us to...show more content...Michael Moncur once said, Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river. Moreover politicians often stereotype against each other by using derogatory implications, innuendos along with a series of fallacies to personally attack their opponent. For instance: Democrat is seldom spoken without the term tax and spend it is usually attached before or after that term is spoken. Naturally, it is used to stir already biased emotions against an issue with an appropriate number of convenient facts to provide legitimacy to the argument. In the political world, one group may call another group s beliefs unpatriotic or disloyal. All they really mean is that they disapprove of those ideas. Depending on the seriousness of the debate and level of frustration, the greater the rhetorical definitions, analogies, and explanations along with associated arguments from outrage real or staged. From either position, many arguments are arguments of tradition using the same catch phrases and hyperboles with maximum of well placed dysphemia. (Moore Parker, 2007, pp.133, 507) Turning to Ad Hominem fallacies; these are not errors they are used deliberately to attach slanted claims to a group or persons to inculcate into the listener a distorted and negative view of their target, namely, whoever opposes them. (Moore Parker, 2007, pp.173 179) What caused citizens perception of politicians to Get more content on HelpWriting.net

1. Rhetoric and Stereotype Essay
Stereotype is a sweeping statement standardized image about a person or group with little or no evidence. The primary purpose is to hurt
one's feelings or to attack one's character. Have you ever stereotyped someone or felt like you were being stereotyped against? How did being
stereotyped affect you, or how did it make you feel once you got to know the person or persons? All kind of people make up our society. Within
society, there are a massive amount of groups, most of which have been stereotyped in one way or another. We develop stereotypes when we are
reluctant or incapable to obtain all information needed to make fair judgments about people or situations. In the absence of the unknown statistics,
stereotyping allow us to...show more content...
Michael Moncur once said, "Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river." Moreover politicians
often stereotype against each other by using derogatory implications, innuendos along with a series of fallacies to "personally attack" their
opponent. For instance: Democrat" is seldom spoken without the term "tax and spend" it is usually attached before or after that term is spoken.
Naturally, it is used to stir already biased emotions against an issue with an appropriate number of convenient facts to provide legitimacy to the
argument. In the political world, one group may call another group's beliefs "unpatriotic" or disloyal. All they really mean is that they disapprove
of those ideas. Depending on the seriousness of the debate and level of frustration, the greater the rhetorical definitions, analogies, and
explanations along with associated arguments from outrage real or staged. From either position, many arguments are arguments of tradition using
the same catch phrases and hyperboles with maximum of well–placed dysphemia. (Moore & Parker, 2007, pp.133, 507) Turning to Ad Hominem
fallacies; these are not errors they are used deliberately to attach slanted claims to a group or persons to inculcate into the listener a distorted and
negative view of their target, namely, whoever opposes them. (Moore & Parker, 2007, pp.173–179) What caused citizens' perception of politicians
to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net