2. Foodborne Illness in the U.S.
76 million cases of foodborne illness per
year in U.S.
13% of all foodborne illness is from fresh
fruits and vegetables
The number of people affected by a
produce related outbreak is greater than
the number affected by a poultry, beef,
eggs, or seafood case.
3. Produce Related Foodborne
Illness is Increasing. Why?
Americans eat more fruits and vegetables
than ever before
2x more than 50 years ago
Produce is often eaten raw -- no kill step
Washing cannot remove all pathogens
water cannot remove all pathogens
Nature of fruit and vegetable production
close to the ground
usually handled by several people from
production through packaging
water required through production - packaging
4. Important Recent Cases
2006 - E. coli on spinach
2006 - E. coli on leafy greens
2008 - Salmonella on tomatoes, peppers
Led to increased focus on PREVENTION by large scale
producers, packers and processors
Auditing programs, such as Good Ag Practices (GAPs),
are being adopted to reduce the potential for
contamination
Not mandatory, (at this time)
New food safety bills may impact small farms
H.R. 2749 Food safety enhancement act, passed
2009
S. 510 Food safety modernization act, waiting
5. Food Safety on the Farm
Not all microorganisms are pathogenic,
most are benign
Goal is not a ‘sterile’ environment
Contamination can occur throughout
production, harvest, post-harvest,
transportation, and marketplace
Goal is to reduce the risk of contaminating
produce with good production and handling
practices
Focus on areas in which you are in control
to reduce risk on your farm
6. Potential Sources of In-Field
Contamination
Greatest areas of concern:
Fertilizer: manure, compost & biosolids (not
allowed in organic)
Irrigation water
Employees (including self) - hygiene & health
But also:
Animals/wildlife in field
Chemicals & pesticides
Raw sewage contamination
Land/soil - flood zones are a greater microbial
Harvesting bins and equipment
7. Reducing Risk, in-Field
Raw manure
120 day window between application
and harvest (required for NOP) for
crops that come in direct contact with
soil or
90 days for crops that do not come into
contact with soil
Keep records/documentation!
8. Reducing Risk, Manure
Incorporate manure into soil
Do not store manure/compost near
production or post harvest areas, where it
can wash onto fields or be walked
through
Crop specific: avoid applying to crops
that can easily come in contact with soil
(root crops or leafy greens)
Apply to cover crop, incorporate cover
crop for added fertility
9. Reducing Risk, in-Field
Compost must be properly
composted based on NOP regulations:
C:N ratio of 15:1 to 60:1
Minimum of 131F for minimum of 3 days
Pile/windrow must be turned so that that all
materials reach temp
Must be cured or aged
10. Reducing Risk, in Field, cont.
Irrigation water – what is your source?
Drip irrigation is best
reduces splashing of soil/microorganisms onto
crop, decrease disease pressure for plants, less
evaporation
For overhead irrigation, use potable water
If water comes into contact with edible portion, you
know it’s safe
Test: bi-annually for well water and quarterly for
surface water sources
www.epa.gov/safewater/labs/index.htm
keep records
11. Reducing Risk, in Field, cont.
Know potential for animal confinement
contamination (neighbors)
Human hygiene & health
accessible bathrooms - clean & sanitary, hand
washing available - also important for U-Pick
do not allow sick employees to handle
produce – change responsibilities
employee training, education – develop a
handbook for reference
12. Reducing Risk, in Field, cont.
Clean & sanitize harvest bins, tools,
knives before & after use
all sanitizing chemicals must be NOP
approved if certified organic
Exclude animals from production area
13. Potential Sources of Post-
Harvest Contamination
Employee health and sanitation
Contaminated rinse water
Improperly working refrigeration unit
Animals/wildlife/pests
Unsanitary surfaces in contact with
produce
Where do you put your clean produce?
14. Reducing Risk, Post-harvest
HANDS!! - clean hands are very
important when handling harvested
produce
accessible hand washing area w/ soap & single
use towels
Clean work clothes - aprons, (clean)
gloves if needed
Provide First-Aid station
Do not allow sick persons to handle
produce
Change responsibilities
15. Reducing Risk, Post-harvest, cont.
Clean & sanitize processing and packing
area before and after use, such as counter
top, harvest bins, etc
Prevent any animals/pets/rodents/wildlife
from entering packing area
Monitor rinse water, if rinsing - change
when dirty, use approved
sanitizers/disinfectants in produce wash
water
16. Reducing Risk, Post-harvest, cont.
Quickly cool produce to minimize
microbial growth
Make sure cooler is clean, sanitized
and working reliably
Improperly working cooler provides
environment for microbes (both
pathogenic and spoilage) to multiply
If using ice, ensure it is made from
potable water
17. Reducing Risk, Post-harvest, cont.
Transport in clean truck/refrigerator
truck/ car
For added traceability, use a
traceback system where produce can
be track back to the field and harvest
date
18. NOP Approved Sanitizers &
Disinfectants, Chlorine
Chlorine: approved as an algicide, disinfectant, &
sanitizer
Most effective at pH of 6.0-7.0
Becomes “tied” up and ineffective with contact to soil
and organic matter
use rinse steps first
Residual chlorine at discharge must be no greater
than 4 ppm chlorine (EPA drinking water standard)
can start at higher levels than 4ppm, but must end with ≤
4ppm
Inexpensive, but has potential harmful by-products
including bromate, chlorite, etc
19. NOP Approved Sanitizers &
Disinfectants, Ozone & PPA
Ozone
quick acting, effective as chlorine
attacks viruses, bacterial cell walls and spores
fewer harmful by-products than chlorine
must have an ozone generating machine on hand, must
replenish water often
Peracetic Acid (Peroxyacetic Acid), PPA
effective as chlorine and ozone
can be used up to 80 ppm in wash water
produce must be rinsed afterwards
Others are allowed, check certifier
ethyl & isopropyl alcohol, ammonium sanitizers,
detergents allowed with stipulations
20. Other Resources
Food Safety Begins on the Farm: A Growers
Guide
http://www.gaps.cornell.edu/FSBFEng.html
www.sfc.ucdavis.edu/docs/foodsafety.html
National GAP Program, Cornell,
www.gaps.cornell.edu/
NC MarketReady, www.ncmarketready.org
Good Agricultural Practices A Self-Audit for
Growers and Handlers,
http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/5453/4362.pdf
21. Other Resources
http://www.FoodSafety.gov/
Web resources for small farm post harvest handling,
www.cefs.ncsu.edu/resources/sfpostharvesthandling.pdf
Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for
Fresh Fruits and Vegetables,
www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/.../UCM169112.pdf
22. References
Pollack, S. 2001. Consumer Demand for Fruit and Vegetables: The U.S.
Example. In Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade,
May 2001. www.ers.usda.gov/publications/wrs011/wrs011h.pdf
Food and Water Watch. The poisoned fruit of the American trade policy.
2008.
www.foodandwaterwatch.org/food/imports/the-poisoned-fruit-of-american-trade-po
Center for Science in the Public Interest, Outbreak Alert!, December 2008.
cspinet.org/new/pdf/outbreak_alert_2008_report_final.pdf
Silva, E. 2008. Approved chemicals for use in organic postharvest systems
In Wholesale success: a farmer's guide to selling, postharvest handling,
and packing produce (Midwest edition).
http://www.familyfarmed.org/retail.html
http://www.extension.org/article/18355
Food Safety Begins On-the-Farm Brochure, http://www.gaps.cornell.edu
Production and Postharvest On-Farm Food Safety Self Audit and
Resource CD-ROM http://vric.ucdavis.edu
23. Acknowledgements
This presentation address general organic production practices. It is to be to
use in planning and conducting organic horticulture trainings. The
presentation is part of project funded by a Southern SARE PDP titled
“Building Organic Agriculture Extension Training Capacity in the Southeast”
Project Collaborators
•Elena Garcia, University of Arkansas CES
Heather Friedrich, University of Arkansas
Obadiah Njue, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
Jeanine Davis, North Carolina State University
Geoff Zehnder, Clemson University
Charles Mitchell, Auburn University
Rufina Ward, Alabama A&M University
Ken Ward, Alabama A&M University
Karen Wynne, Alabama Sustainable Agriculture Network
Editor's Notes
Food safety reform is needed but new legislation may have consequences for small farmers including increased regulation.
Prevention is favored over remediation
Focus on practical solutions to reduce risk in areas which you have control
3 “W”s – water, waste, workers
Rely on practical measures to reduce risk!
Raw manure requirement for organic certification (NOP, National Organic Program) are also good rules to reduce risk of contamination.
One option, apply the manure to a field where you will be seeding a cover crop; incorporate the cover crop at the desired growth prior to planting cash crop . Nutrients will be available to the cash crop over time. Risk of contamination, as well as nutrient leaching is greatly reduced.
Incorporate manure into soil to disperse nutrients and microorganisms. Manure contributes to microbial diversity in the soil and enhances competition among microorganisms. Beneficial organisms will out-compete harmful ones.
One option, apply the manure to a field where you will be seeding a cover crop; incorporate the cover crop at the desired growth prior to planting cash crop . Nutrients will be available to the cash crop over time. Risk of contamination, as well as nutrient leaching is greatly reduced.
Incorporate manure into soil to disperse nutrients and microorganisms. Manure contributes to microbial diversity in the soil and enhances competition among microorganisms. Beneficial organisms will out-compete harmful ones.
Most harmful microorganisms are not tolerant to high temperatures reached with optimal composting. That’s why it’s important that all parts of the compost pile reach at least 131F for 3 days.
Surface water, well water, city water?
With city water, risk is least. However, even if you’re using city water and are using overhead irrigation, may want to test water coming from the on-farm source/pivot – can harbor microorganisms in there.
Test water for fecal coliform or generic E. coli – more sensitive than total coliform.
Do you live near a animal confinement operation? Are they upstream from you? Are there wild animals that run between your farms?
Develop a food safety plan and make it available for any workers or volunteers to refer to.
It’s important that anyone who works or volunteers on the farm, whether it’s family, friends, paid employees, has good hygiene practices and has accessibility to washing their hands.
Excluding animals from the production area is not always a practical thing to do. Dogs and cats can be important members of the family but realize they increase the risk of contamination to produce.
For integrated systems where crops follow animal grazing, follow the same rules for raw manure applications. Its also a good practice to use cover crops to prevent nutrient leaching, make the nutrients available longer throughout the season and to put more days in between when the animals are rotated out and the cash crop is harvested.
Also includes volunteers, public (u-pick operations), and anyone else who handles produce
Rely on practical measures to reduce risk! Areas in which you have control. Each of these factors involves people who come on your farm to work, whether volunteers, relatives or paid workers.
Develop a Food Safety Handbook or Food Safety Plan for employees and keep it visible so they can have access to it.
Where do you put your cleaned produce? Next to dirty produce? In a dirty harvest bin?
Quickly cooling the produce (hydro cooling, cooler, etc) will reduce all microbial growth, reduce evapotranspiration and extend the shelf life, overall.
Traceback systems come in many forms and complexities. If you keep any farm records at all, are selling produce, measuring yield and keeping documentation you may have already have the elements for a simple traceback system.