Compare And Contrast Alternative Family And Nuclear Family

Compare And Contrast Alternative Family And Nuclear Family
The nuclear family vs. alternative family structure
Initially a picture of a nuclear family would best describe a so called family but today alternative family structure is increasing because of the
changing nature of families. This is due to things such as technology, changing structure of families e.g. women entering workplace and divorce rate
that cause's initial structure to be broken down as people live as they please. In this essay nuclear family structure verses the alternative family structure
will be discussed through sociological imagination. A family is a group of people that are interlinked through blood, the law (marriage), co–residence
or share the same resources. They are further described as adults of the same sex with children. Through ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This then as stated above increases families such as single parents (by choose) and much more. Today a lot of people strive for emotional security, if
they cannot find it in a particular relationship they are currently involved in, they are able to terminate that relationship and persuade it elsewhere.
This difference in these structures, from financial security to emotional security, makes it flexible for people to move about because of the decrease
in dependence on men from women. This had been said, does not make the people incapable of raising of children, but highlights their level of
independency. They are also able to provide a safe and nutritious life for their children as in nuclear families.
This structure also comes with great benefits like children not getting exposed to conflict that may detriment them physically and emotionally due to
things such as parents fighting, they develop a stable mentality on who they depend on, do not have to experience tragic events such as when the
parents get a
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Nuclear Families Research Paper
In society, there are many nuclear families that have different ways of raising their children due to social classes that remain present. Nuclear families
consist of a pair of adults and their children. Due to the different social classes parents take into account different childrearing methods, cultural logic,
and religion affiliation. When raising their children families in a higher Asantie–Yeboah 5 class, take care of their children through concerted
cultivation. They put their children in numerous activities such as club teams which control a family's life, particularly for the mothers. The reason
behind this is because parents believe these activities are important skills to learn for their children. Families also in a higher class talk to their
children to discipline them. Parents in the working class and poor class apply natural growth. Many parents of the working class provide love, food,
and safety anticipating their children will advance and succeed. They do not focus on developing their children's special talents. For this reason,
working class children have more free time and better relationships with their extended families. Working–class and poor also use ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Religion occupies a central role in nuclear families in a lower class as they use it as a way of life that assists families to survive life within a social
inequality. Religious beliefs continue to influence families' child–rearing practices. Many children from nuclear families have parents that are very
spiritual in child–rearing; their families rely on the principles underlying their spiritual beliefs. Families that are religiously affiliated use advice from
the teachings of religious books when discouraging behavior such as drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes, consuming illegal drugs and having sexual
relationships (Ochieng 2013) and said that spiritual meditation is a form of relaxation that promotes good mental

Nuclear Family
Title Page
In Hist. Perspective
Traditional Family
Modern Family
New Family Models
The Modern Nuclear Family
THE MODERN NUCLEAR FAMILY
The "nuclear", "isolated", or "restricted" family is not a recent phenomenon, but has existed in many cultures throughout human history. Indeed, the
extended family of several generations is found mostly in relatively advanced, stable, and affluent, but not yet industrialized societies. Very primitive
and very sophisticated societies seem to prefer the nuclear family model.
However, nuclear families can vary in the degree of their isolation and restrictedness. For example, before the Industrial Revolution the Western nuclear
family was often embedded in a larger social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In an extended family these freedoms are always restricted, because a "wrong" choice would affect too many relatives. Thus, people who want to
take full advantage of the new possibilities normally marry late and keep their families small. However, this rule also has its exceptions. Sometimes
large families are more useful, because they can serve as a "back–up unit" by providing shelter and aid at crucial moments. This may be especially
important for lower–class individuals who try to "move up", although the higher classes often also maintain extensive family ties. Thus, even in fully
industrialized societies one can find many men and women who appreciate the traditional extended family or at least a large network of relatives.
Still, by and large, the closely–knit nuclear family has been dominant in Western societies for the last several generations, and thus it has shaped the
general perception of what a family should be: A man and a woman marry for love, have two or three children, live alone by themselves in a "family
home" or apartment, and spend all their free time together. The man leaves for work in the morning, while the woman takes care of the children and
the house. She also cooks dinner and ministers to her exhausted husband when he returns at night. Once or twice a year, at Thanksgiving or Christmas,
there is a brief, ceremonial get–together with other relatives at "Grandma 's house", but otherwise everyone keeps

Subcategories Of The Nuclear Family
Sociologists agree to an extent, there are different subcategories of sociologists who have different views on the family. First, what is meant by the
typical family is (in terms of sociological studies) the nuclear family. The nuclear family make reference to a mum, dad (whom are preferably married
but at least cohabiting), one or more children (usually two or three). The nuclear family is occasionally referred to as a cereal packet family in a satirical
or mocking way, this is by the sociologists who think the typical family is a destructive or even a complete fallacy.
Firstly, there are different family types other than the nuclear one. The first one is a lone parent family, this is when a child lives with one parent
usually due to relationship

The Nuclear Family
American families have changed tremendously over the past years. Families did not only face the change in their status or social behavior, but also
faced a change in their lifestyle. Now there are different types of families with different types of norms and values. Families are socially, ethnically
and very expressively diverse than ever before. Back in the time, the role family was totally different, the parents were more strict than today. It could
be said that the nuclear family is the nucleus of a society that reproduces through this type of family. what is the meaning of the nuclear family?.
Basically, the nuclear family has as main characteristic that it is a concept of family that is a role and perfect familiar group that conforms ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
33). In addition, today we can see so many families that does not fit in the traditional family. Now most of the families both parents work and take
care about the kids and the households. It is common to see unmarried couples with two or three children. For example, my parents started a
relationship when they were eighteen years old, after two years my mom got pregnant. My older brother born and three years later my parents got
married. In that time was not very common to see families like mine, but my parents did not care about it. Nevertheless, some people still think
that the nuclear family is the same that was in the 50's, but the truth is that the time is changing and a lot of people are focusing more in the
modern families. Back in the time, being a single parent was considered wrong. It was completely different and out of the typical and traditional
nuclear family. But now single parenthood is considered more acceptable. One parent families may still result from the death of a significant other,
but now also come about through decisions or divorce. For example, I have so many aunts that are single moms, some of they are divorced, others
are widows, and a few of them does not know who are the father of their kids. I grew up in Guatemala and this is so common to happen in my
country. Being raised by only one parent seems impossible, but children of single parents can be just as progressive with emotional, social and
behavioural skills as those with two

The Struggle Of Nuclear Families During The Great Depression
Background
For the purpose of this article one must know the following references being defined by The American Oxford Dictionary. A Nuclear Family is
defined by as "A couple and their dependent children, regarded as a basic social unit."(The American Oxford Dictionary). A Stepfamily is considered
as "a family that is formed on the remarriage of a divorced or widowed person and that includes a child or children." (The American Oxford
Dictionary) . A Single Parent Family is considered as a "A person bringing up a child or children without a partner."(The American Oxford
Dictionary). A Same Gender Family " Relating to or involving people of the same sex raising children"( The American Oxford Dictionary). A Childless
Family "Not having any children."(The American Oxford Dictionary).
, Divorced Family
Introduction
Do you know what the American Family is? Chances ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Once the Great Depression hit America, families were put to test their own stability. The Great Depression lasted from 1929 to 1939, and was
considered the worst economic crisis in the history of the industrialized world in America. The Depression began around the time after the stock
market crashed on October 1929, which wiped out millions of investors. During this time there was a severe lacking in employment and by 1933,
15 million people were unemployed. The option of having a family was strained since there were financial issues. In addition the divorce rate was
also in decline seeing as no one could acquire a job, because it was to expensive and by 1940 about 2 million married couples were living apart and
the few families who had adjusted to their current situation, many husbands began to desert their families, children started to work part–time jobs and
women also began to contribute by working in sewing, laundry, or even lodgers. When it seemed like the Depression would never end another obstacle
began to

Are Nuclear Families Ever Changing
Family dynamics are ever changing. In the past, nuclear families were widely considered to be the "typical american family", with 45% of families
fitting into this category in 1960, compared to the less than 25% of families today. There were also many differences in how the families functioned
even when compared to today's nuclear families. Job Pressures, new relationships within families, and the different expectations for each member of a
family now all prove to be admirable barriers in family life. Today, more than ever, being part of a family presents many challenges.
One of the biggest challenges in modern day families is the increase in job related pressures. Unlike in the past, it is not common for both the mother
and father figures

The Decline Of The Nuclear Family
Assignment 5: The Decline of the Nuclear Family In college classes, the traditional nuclear family is defined as a family consisting of one or both
parents and their dependent children in a single family unit without any extended relatives (Kendall, 2013). Some sociological perspectives suggest that
any departure from what is known as the "traditional," or nuclear, family indicates a social problem, while others maintain that the definition of family
has simply evolved beyond the nuclear family. Some even suggest that the social constructs of marriage and the traditional nuclear family actually
undermine the notion of community ties by discouraging any kind of extended family inclusion (Gerstel, 2011). According to Kendall, the concept of
the traditional family is rooted in kinship, which encompasses anyone with ancestral or legal ties to the individual (2013). Interestingly, this definition
of the traditional family also includes extended family who live both in and out of the home. However, the concept of the nuclear family does not
include this extended family. Prior to industrialization, families relied on this family for survival in many ways. Extended family members have
reduced familial strain by assisting with harvesting, child care, and other items essential to survival. While industrialization reduced the need for
reliance on extended family members in some nations, others continue to rely and thrive on a bigger support system (Kendall, 2013). With rising

Chipewan Family Vs Nuclear Family Essay
When it came to the Chipewyan, first marriages were arranged by parents, and girls were often betrothed in childhood. Patrilateral cross–cousin
marriage may have been preferred. Polygyny was permitted and occurred most often among group leaders and skilled hunters. In aboriginal and
early–contact times marriage was unaccompanied by ceremony, but today is attended by a Roman Catholic service. In the past the newly married
couple resided with the bride's family until the birth of their first child, at which time they might take up residence with the husband's family. And when
it came to divorce, it was available to both husband and wife, but was rarely done. Divorce is also not common in today's time. Positions of leadership
and authority were not there among the early times of the Chipewyan, but individuals with unique abilities were given respect and had a great
influence. These men were usually hunting group and band leaders. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Majority of Netsilik clothing was cut from caribou fur. When it came to the Eskimo kinship, they had the joint family system and that means that
there is no difference between patrilineal and matrilineal relatives. This system is heavily focused on the nuclear family which means it only
identifies with the parents and the siblings and the other relatives are grouped into categories. This system is somewhat common among today's
kinship systems and is widely used in western societies. Now their political life is completely different from the Chipewyan because they didn't have
any leaders. They also didn't have chiefs, honored elders or judges so there was no label for them. Each group had a sense of unity and the only
hostility in this was within different

Nuclear Families In The 1950s
Understanding 1950s, families is a possibility of a new form of family in order to understand the family dynamics of new modern family and gender
role specialization. In 1950 families have showed greater practice of gender role style in family social function setting. Various factors that led to strong
affinity of the understanding of family dynamics among sociologists. Women being viewed as home makers and men as breadwinners in a family set
up both enjoying their predefined norms on roles. Thus, this paper seeks to provide a greater insight of family dynamics to understand the ideology
behind gender role specialization as depicted by Parsons and Bales.
In 1950s, various factors increased dependence of women in marriage which was contrary ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Relations among the members of the nuclear families diminishes and creates an unstable emotional intensity. Increased divorce rates and intense family
relationship are no longer there leading to unstabilized relations. Increased legal protections against discrimination among women, increased access to
high education and high–ranking jobs with increased women movement to put across their rights to crush the gender role style that was dominant in
men. It is proved by the second shift where women are happy with paid employment rather than the stay at home mothers. Secondly, decrease in
alcohol and tranquilizers as a form of satisfaction prior seen in the 1950s used by homemakers due to limited life

Social Construction Of The Nuclear Family
Additionally, the social construction of the nuclear family can be understood by the significant changes in the laws and rights of individuals. Within a
nuclear family, marriage is considered mandatory for some individuals but its main bond is between a heterosexual male and female. As a society,
communities base a nuclear on this particular ideal but social change began. The legal institution of marriage is not only gendered but also dictates how
individuals shall live socially accepted lives. To put it in other words the legal institution of marriage is a system that allows the state to regulate
relationships (Mule, Chapter 19 p. 182). It is important to realize that the process of marriage for either heterosexual beings or same –sex

The Nuclear Family
Today the idea of the nuclear family being normal has changed. It is now common to see the mixture of two families connected by a second or
subsequent marriage, with one or both partners having children from prior relationships, thereby creating half siblings. Prior to the advent of no–fault
divorce, most commonly the idea of blended families included a stepmother or stepfather and mother or father, and stepchildren, born to one of the
parents in a previous marriage. The previous marriage had been terminated by abandonment or death and the stepparent was seen almost as a
replacement parent. With the advent of no–fault divorce and the family dynamics changing, the roles of the parents are modified, no longer is a
stepparent a near replacement for an absent or deceased parent, but rather an addition to existing parents not part of a relationship but still on the scene.
This can create turmoil in the family as the new couple as parent and stepparent and the children and stepchildren each try to find their own role.
Some would argue it is better for the child or stepchild to be raised in a two–parent home than a single parent family. This creates a positive
environment for the child. Conversely, as the relationship lines are not clearly defined, there is the possibility of confusion and uncertainty for the
child, as they are not certain of the role of the step parent versus the biological parent. There is also cause for concern, as the biological dynamic of the
family is

The Role Of The Nuclear Family During The Industrial...
During the industrial revolution, the nuclear family was considered the norm, consisting of a mother and father living together with two biologically
related children. Traditionally, the wife stayed home as the homemaker and looking after the children without pay. While the husband earns the money
through working at a job away from the home. Furze (2015 p. 174) states that 'in the 1940s and 1950s, many sociologists and the general communities
of Western countries such as Australia and New Zealand considered the traditional nuclearfamily the most widespread and ideal family form.'
Additionally, backing this statement up Fletcher (2017) claims that 'from a functionalist perspective the nuclear family is ideally suited to meet the
necessities

Stereotypes Of Women In A Nuclear Family
It is a nuclear family being "advertised" in the film. According to the chapter 1 in book, nuclear family includes a breadwinner father, a homemade
mother and children living together in and independent household. Family structure like nuclear may have commons like: equal relationships and
democratic atmosphere, good for young people's independence, and easy to meet different generations of different lifestyle pursuit.
The film descried the process from children back from school to prepare the dinner and wait for the father then introduced some table manner during
the "pleasant" diner time. The stereotype I noticed is that women play the role to arrange the whole family like cooking the dinner, and providing the
family a warmer atmosphere. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before the start of dinner, the whole family prey for the grace of the mealtime, which shows the respect of the nature gift. And then father served mother
first, which shows the equality of men and women. Men at the time presented the gentleness and high standard civilization to the women. While in
return, everyone should wait for father finish server himself, and begin dinner after mother begins. It could regard as another aspect of respect. As
for the conversation during the meal time, although they are following the key note as pleasant and relax, the atmosphere was actually pretty formal
and stiff. Table manner like conversation are supposed to be led by father and mother, and family members are not encouraged to manipulate the
conversation, which make others uncomfortable. Thus noticing whether others are bored with the topic is important for the speaker. Moreover, they
are not supposed to discuss some unpleasant topics or discontent of the standard living, at this point, children show great respect to the parent and bet
thankful to the life they provide. Besides, young generation should show respect of each other as well. No offensive remarks assault to brothers or
sisters or even outside the family cycle. I highly agree with the point narrator said in the film that "be yourself but be the best of yourself". Being
relaxed does not mean that just be yourself regardless the negative effects of your

The Problem Of Nuclear Family
Imagine being on the cusp of adulthood during the 1950s when the term "nuclear" was becoming more common in regards to the matter of families.
The idea of that a nuclear family, a family consisting of a man, his wife, and their children under one roof, is the only type of family that should exist
was often shoved into the faces of young Americans. The nuclear family had been around for centuries, only truly developing the title of "nuclear" in
the early twentieth century. It's the concept that any family that doesn't fit the structure laid down by the idea isn't a family that should be welcomed
into society. During the 1950s, this took a step farther. It was expected for someone to marry once they reached a certain age and many people
considered something to be wrong with someone if they weren't. . Though it is of note that not even before the 1950s had passed, changes had already
begun. Its best for families to move out of the narrow–minded structure it had before that isolated and secluded several groups. The positive changes
show up in many different forms over the years, whether in movements, expansions of personal freedoms and choices, and/or in the most basic
extension of open–mindedness in new generations. Movements of various strengths and sizes funneled into a dynamic shift of responsibilities in
relationships. Back in the 1950s example, it was commonplace for the father to work while the wife took care of the house and children. Though early
in the 1960s, the

Elements Of A Nuclear Family In Franz Kafka's Metamorphosis
Most familial conflicts can almost always be solved with communication, a seemingly simple idea; yet, society has manipulated this concept into an
exceedingly strenuous activity. What makes this task so unbearable and problematic? Is it simply the inability to comprehend and acknowledge human
emotion or could it be a deep–rooted fear of unacceptance? Franz Kafka utilizes the profound elements of a nuclear family and alters these stereotypes
in order to expose countless faults within a disjointed bloodline in Kafka's novella Metamorphosis.
A nuclear family: a mother, father, sister, and brother the basic outline of every family worldwide. The Samsa's fit within this shell yet many grow
and change and need new shells. Gregor attempts to follow in the footsteps of his family and the historical stereotypes during Gregor's early
adulthood. By having to obtain a job and provide for the entire family can be seen as a major responsibility and Gregor seems overwhelmed hence
his chance in physical and emotional demeanor. Kafka states: "He felt very proud that he had been able to provide such as a life in so nice an
apartment for his parents and his sister. But what now if all the peace, the comfort, the contentment were to come to a horrible end?" (Kafka 22).
Gregor embodies the typical young man in a growing home where the men are sent out to work and the women stay home to cook, clean, and assist
the men. Kafka continues to add pressure on Gregor with feelings of guilt, pride,

Examining the View that the Traditional Nuclear Family is...
Examining the View that the Traditional Nuclear Family is in Decline
When evaluating the view that the traditional nuclear family (of two opposite sex married parents living in a household that contains only them and
their own dependant children), is in decline, I will be taking various pieces of research and evidence from Sociologists, Journalists and other sources,
into consideration in order to try to determine how true this view is. The nuclear family would appear to be found internationally and would be
described as 'universal' by Murdock, varying in popularity from country to country, however I will be concentrating mainly in the UK. The idea that the
'traditional' nuclear family is in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the beginning of the twentieth century the role of the average woman and family was very different to that of the later twentieth century, most
women would stay at home with their children while their husbands went out to earn money. It was at this time that the average amount of children
per woman was six; recent statistics show that it has dropped, alarmingly, to 1.7 (National Office Of Statistics), with many women choosing not to
have children at all. Mike Featherstone (1991) proposed that in modern day living, individuals have a great deal more choice and freedom over how
to live their lives. They do not have to battle with the parts of their lifestyle that in pre–industrial Britain would have stopped them from doing as they
wish. He suggested that it would not be unsurprising at all if family types did not become more diverse and less obscure family types would not
rise. This would indeed appear to be so; there is evidence to show that the extended family is increasing at the moment due to the problem of a lack
of care homes, rising directly from the increase in life expectancy. This coupled with the idea that teenage pregnancies are on the rise (UK has one of
the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe!) would suggest that a slight rise in the extended family would be almost definite. It can also be seen that
more people are

Family Analysis Essay On Nuclear Family
Family Analysis A nuclear family consists of a mother, father and children living in one household. Every nuclear family has advantages and
disadvantages in them. The advantages are strength and stability, financial stability which equals more opportunity, consistency which means lucrative
behavior, health benefits, conflict resolution and better communication skills. In my nuclear family we incorporate these advantages to become a better
family and to be brought closer together. Strength and stability refers to a child that is born into marriage tend to have more stability than children born
into cohabitation. Spouses that are committed to each other teach their children to lead positive and healthy relationships and interact with others.
consistency for behavior successes refers to a nuclear family that provides their children with consistency in providing care. Children who exemplify
positive behavior have more consistency in their lives rather than children with no consistency. The main goal of consistency in a nuclear family is to
retain positive relationships and build a foundation for future goals. Health benefits suggest that a happily married biological parents have better social,
emotional and physical health than other children. Happily married parents are less likely to abuse their children opposed to parents that aren't happily
married. Nuclear families that have good communication skills have fewer obstacles and disturbances. Although, we live in

The Nuclear Family
The idea of the nuclear family was highly valued in the American culture during the 1950s, where romantic love was the central reason for marriage in
America; however, love in modern America is not enough to make a marriage last. Likewise, the 1950s was the time for many American marriages to
undergo many socioeconomic changes including the rise of the gender minority in the workplace. Due to these developments, marriage is under
enormous socioeconomic pressures have given the rise to family structures such as those headed by single parents, multigenerational families and
gender roles. The 1950s nuclear family was defined as a heterosexual married couple with children. In addition, social expectations were attached to
this idea which was the predictable gender roles of male breadwinner and a female homemaker. The 1950s definition of a nuclear family has for long
been engraved as an ideology in America society, but we have failed to see that the contemporary America has experienced dissolution of the 1950s
nuclear family. The gradual dissolution of the 1950s nuclear family has had both positive and negative social effects. However, the problem of the
1950s ideology of a family is no longer functional or representative of the contemporary American society.
In order to address the negative effects and strive for more positive outcomes, contemporary American must attempt to understand that family structure
are in continuous change, that there is not one ideal way to define

The Effects Of Nuclear Family On Modern Society
Over the past few decades social scientists have been engaged debates about family change and influences in modern society, with one of the main
themes being the strength and relevance of the nuclear family. Those who believe that the nuclear family unit is breaking down often site the fact that
social structures holding up the nuclear family, such as marriage, are collapsing 'The chances in some societies are now less that 50–50... that a child
will live continuously to adult–hood with both natural parents' (Popenoe 1999). Those on the opposite side believe that the concept of a nuclear family
is a traditional and naturally occurring phenomenon that passes from generation to generation. Evidence exists on both sides of the debate leading to
conclusion that while the nuclear family is not as prevailing in modern society as it was in the past but still holds a certain level of relevance.
Due to the question being asked being debated over is based on the prevalence of a concept breaking down in modern society it is important to
understand where the concept came from and where it stands in today's society. The concept of a nuclear family, which can be defined as a 'social unit
composed of two parents and one or more children' (Dictionary.com), is viewed as the standard modern family unit and this concept and perception
emerged around the industrial revolution (Bengtson, 2001). While families in history prior to the industrial revolution upheld these standards marriage
was

Nuclear Family Systems Theory
Leroy understands that his treatment would hinder him from working the long hours that he is used to. Leroy is also considering the doctor
appointments, which will cost money and time. According to the family systems theory, Leroy would not see this as being in the best interest for his
family. Dr. Bowen would also suggest that Leroy has a role that he has to fulfil (Priest, 2015). The role that Leroy has in thefamily is that of a provider.
Leroy believes that his diagnosis of prostate cancer, will in some way impact his role as a provider. The level of incapacitation is also another
aspect of the diagnosis to be taken into consideration. If Leroy's diagnosis of prostate cancer does not inhibit him from fulfilling his role as a
provider, he may be more accepting of the illness. The nuclear family system may experience a change in relationship patterns, depending on the
level of incapacitation (Priest, 2015). Tiffany would have to embrace a new role in the family, if Leroy now has to be dependent on her. This would
be difficult for not only Leroy, but for Tiffany as well. This major life incident has caused both of them to possibly reverse roles in the family (Priest,
2015). This may also cause marital conflict, which is a theme in the family systems theory. The idea of marital conflict can be thought of as tension...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A normal response according to the social learning theory may cause Leroy to see his illness as a test from God. Faith is an important instrument in
the community of low income African American males (Maliski, 2010). This could also be understood under the social learning theory. Social learning
theory asserts that this is behavior, that is learned from the community, and environment. The faith that Leroy displays can be seen as learned behavior.
This learned behavior that Leroy displays, can greatly affect the way he approaches his

Family Formation And Structure Of The Nuclear Family
Combining the multitude of factors that contribute to family formation and structure parallels to mixing ingredients to make a soup that does not
always come out with the same taste, as even with the same contributing factors such as race, gender, and social, economic, and political pressure, one
family can greatly differ from another. The ideology of the nuclearfamily shape clashed with my family's more extended and traditional family
structure, and upon arrival to the United States from Korea, initially resulted in opaque gendered behavior and thinking along with muddled male and
female constructs. As the family's stay continued, the idea and shape of the nuclear family began to whittle away at my grandparents' and father's
initial ideals, albeit at a different pace. As a result of my grandparents directing joining the workforce and contributing, the nuclear family ideals had
little influence; on the other hand, my father, after growing up through schooling and having more in depth experience with American culture, was
more affected, and the transition into the ideology of the nuclear family was nearly complete after having children. As my father came to be the main
breadwinner of the family, the nuclear family shape and ideology was fortified and increasingly embraced, as my dad was pressured to provide, which
promoted male dominance within the household.
In order to comprehend and identify a family's ideals, it is important to know the structure first. My family

The United States And Nuclear Families
Though most people would believe that the majority of families in the United States are nuclear families, because that is what is considered to be
normal, that is untrue. The majority of families in the U.S. deviate from nuclear households. My family is no different. My family has not been
considered nuclear for several years now. My family constists of my mother, stepfather, my older stepbrother, me, my younger stepbrother, and my
younger biological brother. As for extended family, I still have all four of my grandparents, one great grandmother, three aunts, three uncles, and
several cousins. Each of these people all still play a role in my life, and I am very close to them. The people I live with–which are my mom, step father,
brother, and youngest step brother, play the most significant roles in my life. They especially play the biggest parts when it comes to rule creation and
enforcement and use of power within the family–more so than my extended family do in those areas. As with most families, the parents in my house
were in charge of rule creation and enforcement in my household. When my step father first moved in to our house this was a big issue. His
parenting style was extremely different from what my mom and dad's was. I was fifteen and my brother was eleven when my mom married our
stepdad; it was a hard age to be making an adjustment to a whole new parenting style. Our family went from a loving environment where the children
had freedom as long as they proved

What Does Your Family Fit The Nuclear? Essay
Question: To what extent does your family fit the 'Nuclear' family, which is still, against the evidence seen as the norm in Western society?
Growing up, I never really understood what a "normal" family was supposed to look like. Before I was even born, my parents had split for good
(although the were never married). I stayed primarily with my mother, and it was just the two of us for about four years, although we stayed with others
along the way. I interviewed my mother about this time in her life and the struggles she went through, that those in a nuclear family might not
experience. When I was born, my mother already had a college degree in education, but no teaching job. We lived with a friend of hers when I was
just a newborn baby, and we were technically homeless. She had government assistance for childcare, and that was all at that point in time. One day,
the woman we lived with at the time, named Lee, told her about a program called WIC (Women, Infants, and Children). To give some background on
WIC, their mission statement reads "To safeguard the health of low–income women, infants, and children up to age 5 who are at nutrition risk by
providing nutritious foods to supplement diets, information on healthy eating, and referrals to health care."(1) Previously, I did not know WIC could
be used at co–ops and other grocery stores that offer an array of healthy options. My mother explained to me that she utilized the program very
efficiently though, she
1
stated, "you

Decline Of Nuclear Families In The 20th Century
An interesting and complex modern departure from a societel norm is acting as the downfall of what is referred to as the nuclear family. The nuclear
family of a husband and wife with dependant children, or a basic communal unit, acted as a catalyst of growth and societal stability in the United States
for quite some time. The late 20th century appeared to experience a decline in married couples. With multifaceted forces at play, that nuclearfamily
appears to have been destabilized by three important societal factors: a unique shift in cultural values, difficult economical environments and
conditions, and ever changing statistics in population. The decline in the number of married couples and nuclear families in the late 20th century ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A statistic imbalance, referred to as a marriage squeeze, appeared to effect the next generation in a way that resulted in "... millions of baby boomers
looking for husbands discovered that they were a few million men short–that is, the supply of 22–year–old women greatly exceeded the supply of
25–year–old men." (Cohen, 271) This delay in marriage for the future generation can simply and mathematically explain the decline in marriage in the
late 20th century. To make matters worse, the shift in industrial jobs around large urban centers in the 1970s and 1980s resulted in a lowering of
marriage rates among lower income and african–american women; where "men without steady employment or income potential found themselves shut
out of the marriage market". (Cohen, 271). Obviously, these issues led to lower marriage prospects for females of that

Pros And Cons Of A Nuclear Family
1).Write at least four pros and cons for each type of family discussed
Nuclear Family
Nuclear Family is a household consisting of father, mother and children. Four pros and cons of this type of family are as follows:
PROS
Strength and Stability
Two parent families, whether married or common law relationship, tend to be more stable. Partners or spouses are role model of a loving, caring and
supportive relationship for their children. This will transform into future accomplishment by teaching children how to seek out positive relationships
and interact well with others. These children will benefit from watching their parents work together to solve problems, assign domestic responsibilities
and support each other through positive and negative ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Four pros and cons of this type of family are as follows:
PROS
Discipline
This should be easier with two adults but the truth is that it is often easier with only one particularly if the other one fails to agree with the type of
discipline involved.
Competition
Most times mother and father are in competition for a his or her child love but if the other partner is not involved in the child's life or less interested in
bringing up that child, the single parent can face no significant competition for their child's love.
Individual Time
Each child needs his or her time alone with their parent because nothing says I love you like parents spending time with their children. When a parent
is by themselves, it is a challenge to find time alone with each child sufficient to meet the needs, but it is worth it!
Peaceful Atmosphere
Most single parents are in that situation because they have left a family which has looked more like a conflict zone. While any class of parenting may
be stressful and may cause hostility within the family, hostility between mother and father can often be the most destructive, so one advantage of
parenting alone is having a peaceful atmosphere in the

The Meltdown Of Nuclear Families In The 1900s
A nuclear family is a family composed of a married father and mother and their children. This type of family became increasingly popular
following the industrial age in the 1900s. The nuclear family soon became the norm as people transferred from large kin groups to smaller
independent families (Pulsipher, 2015). This posed a problem in the beginning because close relatives no longer played a role in raising children
and no longer had anyone to look after them in old age as they did when kin groups were common. However, as time went on, nuclear families faced
challenges and soon began to fallout as a result of changes in couples. The meltdown of nuclear families are largely impart by couples not getting
married or by couples getting divorced.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In order for a family to be considered nuclear, the parents must be married and have children However, the number of unmarried couples in the United
States nearly doubled in the 1900s as it grew more common for people to not further their relationships. This caused the number of homes consisting of
nuclear families to reach their lowest level––"falling from 45% of all households in 1960 to just 25.6% last year" (Feder, 2001). Not only did it grow
common for couples to not get married, divorce grew common. This influenced the number of children who, instead of being a part of a nuclear family,
were a part of a single– parent family. In fact, due to divorce, 43% of American children spent at least part of their childhood in a single–parent family
in 1996 (Feder, 2001). Don Feder, author on human events, explains that these shifts in attitude towards marriage and nuclear families has been caused
by changes in cultural influences such as media. In the early 1900s, marriage and family were regarded as an integral part of existence, but as time
went on the importance of nuclear families

Is The Nuclear Family Means?
What is considered the nuclear family? Everyone in society has their own definition of what the nuclear family means to them and raises an interesting
question as to which definition is said to be true? Society has constructed their own set of beliefs and terms in their way of living that the nuclear family
can literally mean, and be constructed by almost anything. Depending on people situations, their built up version of what a family means to them
can consists of uncles, aunts, grandparents, and even pets, just to be brief. This is where the term can become problematic. Since there can be many
interpretations of what the real nuclear family means, and what it consists of, the state ultimately plays a big role into determining whether or not
citizens, can be a family. Simply put, the state decides if a family can in turn, become nuclear. Using a variety of evidence, this essay will first define
what a nuclear family is, and how it is socially constructed, based on what the majority of society believes it to mean. Followed by this it will explain
how the nuclear family is a historically specific institution. Finally, it will focus on how the nuclear family is constructed by the Canadian state, and
will raise such questions as to why the state has the determining say on whether or not citizens can construct their version of a nuclear family.
What is a Nuclear Family? As stated previously there are many definitions to what a nuclear family can mean to someone. To get a

The Nuclear Family Replaced the Extended Family After...
The Nuclear Family Replaced the Extended Family After Industrialisation
Talcott Parsons believed that the nuclear family developed mainly as a result of industrialisation. He thought that before the industry took over the
functions of the family, the families were extended units of production. This means that the work and home lives were combined and so eachfamily
member taught another one skill for life such as education. Parsons says that the extended family stayed together so they could provide health care for
one another and look after the old people whilst the old people looked after the young children whilst the parents were out working. They also pursued
justice on behalf of one another; if ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the first stage, the Pre–Industrial family was extended and they all lived and worked together. In the second stage, the Early Industrial family were
extended families beginning to become geographically mobile, dying out and becoming less common. In the third stage, the Symmetrical family was
the beginning of the nuclear family, where they had split up from extended family into father, mother, and two children.
However, there are criticisms to the functionalist view that the industrial revolution brought about the nuclear family. Peter Laslett was a social
historian who believed that pre and post industrial families were mostly nuclear. He studied Northern Europe and found that families were not likely
to consist of a nuclear family structure, but he also found that the average size of families in Western Europe stayed constant at 4.75 persons, which
gives us reason to believe that nuclear families were around before the industrial revolution. Laslett therefore does not agree with Parsons or Willmott
and Young, as he believes families were already nuclear pre–industry and still are today.
=====================================================================
Michael Anderson was also a social historian who agreed with Parsons because he believed that the pre industrial families were mainly extended. He
argued that the extended family was a

The Creation of the Romanticized Nuclear Family
One of the most romanticized family institutions in North American is the nuclear family. Although the nuclear family was created to appear as the
'traditional' and normative ideal, it has never been the reality for all families (Kimmel & Holler, 2011, 154). The nuclear family was created after the
end of the Second World War when women were taken out of the workforce and placed back into their homes. "Men and women embraced this
nostalgia, marrying and having children early, and divorcing little. The 1950sfamily model they created was almost immediately enshrined as the most
'natural' and healthiest form possible" (Kimmel & Holler, 2011, 185). In Kimmel and Holler (2011), they define the nuclear family of the 1950s as "a
lifelong sexually exclusive, heterosexual monogamous marriage, based on affection and companionship, in which there is a sharp division of labour
with the female as full time housewife and the male as primary provider and ultimate authority'" (Kimmel & Holler, 2011, 141). It is the family
structure where women stay at home, do household chores and child care, while men work and be the sole breadwinner for the family. In North
America, the 'traditional' family was characterized by: high rates of marriage (and young age at marriage), high fertility, and low and stable rates of
divorce – 'was the product of a convergence of an unusual series of historical, demographic and economic circumstances unlikely to return again', in the
words of two leading family

Imagery In Nuclear Family
"Nuclear Family" is a phrase that is very loaded with imagery. For me, this phrase is very heavily associated with the fifties, a time of pastel
hardware, and boys and girls playing on the lawn as mom cooks dinner and waits for dad to come home from the office, imagery that is often
reinforced by TV shows and movies set in this time. This picturesque family is so descriptive of modern American families, not just from what it
shows, but also from what it leaves out. There's never any People of Color in these portrayals, nor anyone on the LGBT+ spectrum. America is a
nation for white heterosexual families, and they view any attempt to change this as an attack on their livelihood. The nuclear family set the new
"normal" and those that fell outside ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The typical portrayal is obviously very heteronormative. This was a time of the beginnings of the LGBT movement, so it's not as if this just wasn't a
mainstream concept yet. It was willfully left out. The Kinsey Scale was a test created by Alfred Kinsey in 1948 that was used to determine whether
someone was homosexual or heterosexual, and to what degree as well. Many would consider this to be ahead of its time, not only addressing issues
like homosexuality, but also bi– and pansexuality, which some people still struggle to conceptualize. Despite there being an understanding of this
level even back then, it begs the question why they were left out of any portrayals of "family" or "home". This often led to issues within the
community, such as Alison Bechdel's father Bruce, as is detailed in her 2006 graphic memoir, Fun Home. In it, she addresses her father's struggle to
accept his homosexuality and his struggle with her being able to be out. "Sometimes, when things were going well, I think my father actually enjoyed
having a family. Or at least, the air of authenticity we leant to his exhibit. A sort of still life with children." (Bechdel 13) In this we see her father
struggling with his own sexuality as he tries to meet that expectation of a traditional family even though he knows he doesn't fit within

Challenges Faced By Nuclear Families In The 1950's
Nuclear family is described as then the traditional family structure which consist of two adult male and female that are legally married and have
biological children together. The nuclear family was most popular in the 1950's and 60's. They tend to have stronger bonds because they work together
and rely on one another to overcome challenges.in this family children observe their parent supportive and loving relationship, which help the children
learn how to interact appropriately. Children in this family are well structure and generally have more opportunity due to financial easy and stability of
two adults. Nuclear family tend to be hardier when faced with difficulty as they learn to how solve problems together and support each other
emotionally.

The Effects Of Nuclear Family On Children
As Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Model suggests, the nuclear family typically provides the first and most important environment in the child's early
development (Siegler, Eisenberg, DeLoache, Saffran, & Graham, 2014). However, due to its strong influence on the child and to the intensity of early
attachments, any disruptions to the family's structure threatens to trigger a series of "risk factors" that most children are not equipped to handle
(Kostelnik, Soderman, Whiren, Rupiper, & Gregory, 2012). Amongst these disruptions, parental divorce and family reconstitution present stressful and
disturbing challenges for children. Young children–in particular five years and younger– are in greater risk of failing to cope with such circumstances,
as their cognitive and social development has not yet provided them with the necessary mechanisms to understand and handle the complexities of the
circumstances (Elliott & Richards, 1991; Kostelnik et al., 2012). Under these events parental support becomes vital, and an array of tools that parents
can use to help their children to successfully navigate these difficult situations is available. In many countries, picture books addressing divorce,
remarriage, and stepfamilies are often used as effective useful venues to aid children cope with these stressful situations (Mo, 2007). In light of these
statements, and using the impact of "family conflict and marital dysfunction" in children's emotional development as a framework (Kostelnik et

1970s Nuclear Family
The 'new family' of the 1970s grew up as children with no father figure, did not remember wartime hardships and saw family life depicted through
American movies. Civil law changed the system to nuclear family through the exposure of Western influence that was seen as the ideal for the Japanese
family. The concept of nuclearfamily has influenced the increase in "singles, martial couples and single–parent units" which by Nonoyama (2000) sees
this as a disorganization of the framework of nuclear structure. Imamura (1990) discusses that love marriages were encouraged with the influence of
the western culture, where young people saw to reconsider the ways of courtship before marriage, which decreased numbers of traditional arranged
marriages. This

Sociological Theories Of A Nuclear Family
In a sociological perspective, family is interpreted as a social group whose members are bound by legal, biological, or emotional ties or a combination
of all three. The sociological theories the connect to this concept are functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionalism. First, functionalism
states that the family socializes children, it provides emotional and practical support for its members, and it provides its members with a social identity.
Secondly, conflict theory states that members create disagreements, and create emotional support and comfort. Finally, symbolic interactionism claims
family members and intimate couples interact on a daily basis. "Families are defined as a relationship by blood, marriage, or affection" (Seccombe 5).
My family is a nuclear family. A nuclear family consists of a mother, father and children living in one household. Every nuclear family has advantages
and disadvantages in them. The advantages are strength and stability, financial stability, which equals more opportunity, consistency which means
lucrative behavior, health benefits, conflict resolution and better communication skills. In my nuclear family, we incorporate these advantages to
become a better family and to be brought closer together. Strength and stability refers to a child that is born into marriage tend to have more stability
than children born into cohabitation. Spouses that are committed to each other teach their children to lead positive and

Deterioration of the Nuclear Family
Deterioration of the Nuclear Family
What is a family? The meaning of family has changed throughout history. It means something different to many people. According to the U.S. Census
Bureau: "A family includes a householder and one or more people living in the same household who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or
adoption. All people in a household who are related to the householder are regarded as members of his or her family. A family household may contain
people not related to the householder, but those people are not included as part of the householder's family. Thus, the number of family households is
equal to the number of families, but family households may include more members than do families. Not all households ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Teen Health and Wellness" expresses that the result on children ages six to eight is most profound. It says they are old enough to realize what is
happening but do not have adequate skills to deal with the disruption. It asserts that they often feel a sense of responsibility, experience tremendous
grief, and have a pervasive sadness and yearning for the departed parent. According to this article, adolescents' reactions to divorce include anger, a
desire for a stable home, and a need for clear boundaries between them and their parents, especially around such issues as sexuality, dating, and
household responsibilities. "Dysfunctional Family" testifies that teens that already have to deal with their maturing bodies and minds, divorce is just
an added burden (Dysfunctional Family).
There are instances where divorce is essential. In cases such as verbal or physical abuse of a spouse or child, divorce may be the only solution.
However, the negative effects of divorce have a large impact on family structure. Divorce can be very stressful for young adult children, with a sense
of increased responsibility to their parents and a vulnerability to loyalty conflicts with both parents. In addition, this article proclaims that young adults
may experience a sense of loss of their family home, abandonment by their parents, and a concern

The Simpsons Nuclear Family Essay
In The Simpsons cartoon, the ideological construction of the nuclear family was challenged. The nuclear family concept was debunked and exposed in
this cartoon series. To begin, a nuclear family has a variety of factors and elements which contribute to its unnatural appeal. A nuclear family is
primarily composed of a pair of heterosexual adults and their children. The nuclear family was familiarized and primarily catered towards the white and
middle–class individuals. The ideological construction of a nuclear family is a homogenized ideology of what human kind and society should be. The
development of the nuclear family ideal was a cultural and political response to World War II. It was a concept which perpetuated and expressed
that any other form of family was unacceptable, such as, families which were composed of a single parent, or families with parents of the same sex.
This ideal, therefore, created a false understanding of normality. Due to political power, the nuclear family was an ideal pushed to control what was
occurring in the homes of individuals and a method of displaying the "American Dream" because people were unaware of how such an ideal family
could be created and maintained. By ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The eighties were also referred to as, the Age of Reagan. Within the hold of the Reaganism era, ideals and beliefs were highly publicized through
media. The nuclear family concept, for instance, held a pristine stature in media. It was a popular concept and theme reflected in various television
programs. The arrival of The Simpsons distrupted all the cultural and sociological narratives surrounding the concept of the nuclear family. The
Simpsons challenged the factors considered necessary to be recognized as a nuclear family, and confronted the false ideals surrounding the theme. The
Simpsons went even further and displayed how the nuclear family structure is a mask which hides a real functioning

The Decrease of the Nuclear Family
Decrease in the amount of nuclear families
There are several possible reasons for the decrease in the number of nuclear families, particularly in the past forty years. This includes rising
cohabitation, higher divorce rates, secularisation, rising same sex relationships, more career seekers and the rise in feminism.
Firstly, a nuclear family is a family consisting of a man and woman (usually married) in a sexual relationship with one or more children. One reason
for this type of family becoming less common is due to the rising number of divorces. Getting divorced has become much easier than in the past.
40% of all marriages end in divorce. There is much less stigma attached to divorce in modern society so people are less afraid to do it, ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rules such as no sex before marriage direct people onto the pathway of family and would increase the number of nuclear families. Secularisation
however means people are not following rules such as these and therefore leading to a decrease in the number of nuclear families as more people did
follow these rules in the past.
Fourthly, over the last 40 years more same sex relationships are occurring due to change in legislation and reduce in stigma. Same sex
relationships in the past were highly frowned upon and even illegal. Linking back to secularisation, stigma has decreased on the topic of
homosexuality as most religions state same sex relationships are not allowed. So in the past more people agreed with and followed these rules
however now people are much more accepting and open about same sex relationships. The civil partnership act of 2004 meant that gay couples could
have the same rights as married couples. This lead to a large rise in the amount of same sex relationships and as this was increasing the amount of
nuclear families started decreasing as a nuclear family cannot consist of two people of the same sex.
Fifthly, the rise in career seeking people has risen. People who are dedicated to their work often do not have time to sustain a relationship and settle
down and have a family. This means there are less first marriages today as the facts show. In England and wales 143,000 first marriages occurred in
2007. This is significantly

The Nuclear Family Essay
The Diminishing Nuclear Family
Hadar Mustafa
Jun29, 2015
Introduction More often than not, stable and functional families serve as a prerequisite to a good society. Hence, the society's support system for
families must be flexible because needs and goals of families vary over time (Loveless, 2007). However, nuclear families face many challenges
because parenting, child–rearing, and other economic responsibilities had to be done by two adults only (Bowden & Smith, 2010). In this paper, we
look into the development of the nuclear family: its origin, evolution, and status today. We also look into the most influential factors that led to the
current status of nuclear families. We also look into the recommendations that represent different values and belief systems that promote the revival of
degraded idealization and decline of the nuclear family.
The Modern Nuclear Family The development of the modern nuclear family is considered as a truly remarkable element in the history of the human
social organization. The modern nuclear family is composed of a monogamous married couple living with their children, apart from their relatives. The
husband is working outside the home, while the wife is a full–time mother and housewife. So, the mother's role comprises cooking for the family and
looking after the kids while father's role comprises providing for the family and performing as a role model toward the kids. Unlike the traditional
nuclear family, the nuclear

Compare And Contrast Alternative Family And Nuclear Family

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Veronica Rogers

More from Veronica Rogers (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Compare And Contrast Alternative Family And Nuclear Family