Tradition In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson Essay

Tradition in The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson Essay
Tradition in "The Lottery"
There are many things that people do every day without questioning why they do them. These are
our habits and traditions, and though for the most part they are unimportant they can be a crucial
part of our culture and our interactions with each other. Sometimes there are traditions that can
cause harm or are morally unacceptable. What should be done in this case? Edmund Burke, a
nineteenth century politician and author, argues that it is best to stick with tradition rather than
causing dramatic changes in people's behavior. This is a key component in his argument against the
French Revolution in his essay "Reflections on the Revolution in France." In this essay he argues
that the revolution will only lead the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Families stand together and
there is quiet conversation between friends. Mr. Summers, who runs the lottery, arrives with a black
box. The original box was lost many years ago, even before Old Man Warner, the oldest person in
the village, can remember. Each year Mr. Summers suggests that they make a new box, but no one is
willing to go against tradition. The people were willing to use slips of paper instead of woodchips as
markers, as the village had grown too large for the wood chips to fit in the box. A list of all the
families and households in the village is made, and several matters of who will draw for each family
are decided. Mr. Summers is sworn in as the official of the lottery in a specific ceremony. Some
people remember that there used to be a song and salute as part of the ceremony, but these are no
longer performed. Tessie Hutchinson arrives in the square late because she has forgotten what day it
was. She joins her husband and children before the lottery can begin. Mr. Summers explains the
lottery's rules: each family will be called up to the box and draw a slip of paper. One of the villagers
tells Old Man Warner that the people of a nearby village are thinking about ending the lottery. Old
Man Warner laughs at the idea. He believes that giving up the lottery would cause nothing but
trouble, and a loss of civilized behavior. A woman responds that some places have already given up
the lottery. Everyone finishes drawing, and each
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The French Revolution And The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment was an extensive intellectual, philosophical, and cultural movement that spread
throughout Europe, predominantly England, France and Germany during the 18th century. The
Scientific Revolution, which began in the 16th century, gave way to a new and revolutionary way of
thinking. It encouraged independent thought, the capacity to ask questions, and a progressive
attitude. Additionally, the enlightenment arose during a time when there was absolute monarchy and
an extremely powerful church. Political, philosophical, cultural, and religious ideas were in the need
of reform. The French Revolution was arguably an effect of the growing ideas of the enlightenment.
People within France finally had enough of absolute monarchy and wanted reform. Philosophers and
thinkers were crucial to the progress of the enlightenment. Thinkers such as Immanuel Kant, Jean–
Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, and Adam Smith were prominent figures of the enlightenment. They
questioned religion, promoted secularism, and freedom. Most believed that the government was to
be an extension of the people and should not be totalitarian. Locke and Rousseau were focused on
protecting the people's rights. Adam Smith focused on the economic aspects and promoted a free
economy without restrictions from the all powerful monarchy. He is the founder of modern
economics. Immanuel Kant focused on the problem with government and how the absolute
monarchy had been detrimental to the people. He argued that the

Kenneth Burke Definition Of Rhetoric
The importance of recognizing identification as a key element to the study of rhetoric is highlighted
by Kenneth Burke is his book titled "A Rhetoric of Motives." Burke states that there is no pure form
of identification in rhetoric and suggests that depending on how we want to draw out our study of a
rhetorical situation, we should focus on persuasion, identification, or communication
consubstantiality. Applying these ideas to a nation wide issue, we can juxtapose Burke's definition of
identification to the NFL protests that are currently taking place. Furthermore, we see ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
For Burke, rhetoric can be about persuasion, but is more than mere persuasion and is more than
simply convincing you that an action is right. Rhetoric on a more fundamental level is a way of
connecting your intrinsic ideas to a shared extrinsic idea. The process of identification is always
about making that connection from the intrinsic to the extensive which Burke says can be done in
three ways. The first can be seen by describing or identifying two extrinsic ideas together, which can
be seen in the NFL protests by connecting the US flag to patriotism. Secondly, identifying both the
speaker and audience, or looking for the intrinsic motivation shared between the speaker and the
audience is another way the process of identification works. Identification is also about
transcendence, as Burke identifies us with ideals or things larger than ourselves as a way of moving
beyond who we are.
Considering these ways in which the process of identification functions, we can apply these ideas to
the NFL controversy from a number of perspectives. To begin, Burke's definition of identification
has helped NFL players identify

What Is Edmund Burke's Idea Of The American Revolution
Edmund Burke was very against the idea of Revolution in France and Enlightenment movement as a
whole. He believed that they were both detachments from the old government and ideas that kept
France functioning for hundreds of years. He believed that revolution would turn France into a
chaotic state, and the countries future after the revolution would be uncertain. He believed that a
Republic could not provide France with peace and would destroy the morals that had existed in
France for hundreds of years. Burke thought that a Republic would just cause more problems that
the people of France could not understand/handle. Burke believed that principles of monarchy and
Christianity of the Ancien Régime helped French society function and stay a reputable society. He
states that the last French Revolution was complete chaos that did nothing but kill people and
destroy rationality and morals. Lastly, he asks the reader if the chaos another revolution would bring
is worth obtaining equality. Though I disagree with Burke, I can understand that his point; his
opinion is definitely a product of the time he lived. I do agree with him on his point of the previous
Revolution being surrounded by chaos; it was truly a circus. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is an abuse of liberty as well as freedom and it goes against the natural rights of humanity. By
silencing an individual, you may as well be silencing mankind; just like a monarch who is not able
to suppress the opinions of the people under a liberal constitution, the same goes for the entire
nation that should not have the right to suppress the beliefs of any one man. I find Mill's beliefs to
be refreshing, and I think it is the beginning of the freedom of speech as a widely accepted belief in
the Western world. I agree that though some people's beliefs are toxic and may be infuriating (for
example, Trump) it is unfair to silence

The French Revolution And The Revolution
When people think of the French Revolution, they immediately think of the country of France and
how the Revolution affected it. What most people do not think about however, is how the
Revolution affected other countries, specifically the country of England. England was affected
positively and negatively by the Revolution in that there was an increase of political involvement,
but there was a collapse in the economy due to war declared by France. The French Revolution
created a battle of conflicting ideologies in England that did not only last the entirety of the
Revolution, but caused the formation political divisions that would last for many years (Mather).
The majority of people of England seemed to be quite supportive of the Revolution at first. When
news of the Storming of the Bastille reached them, they were hoping that it would be a new start for
France, and a chance for a more friendly relationship between the two countries (Tombs 383).
The first major response was given by a Preacher named Richard Price, when he gave his keynote
address, A Discourse on the Love of our Country, to the Society for the Commemoration of the
Revolution of Great Britain at the Old Jewry, a meeting house, in London November 4, 1789. He
thought positively about the ordeal in France, comparing the revolution to a light that would
illuminate Europe and a warning against oppressive governments, as well as an encouragement to
those who strived for liberty (HistoryGuide).
A few intellectuals

Summary Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau And Mary Wollstonecraft
Eighteenth century Europe was an incredibly repressive environment for women. Patriarchal
expectations governed not only women's physical and legal rights, but even inhibited their
emotional states. Women were limited solely to the domestic sphere while their brothers, fathers,
husbands, and sons pursued livelihoods outside the home. For a woman to be dissatisfied with the
status quo and yearn for greater purpose than just raising children and obeying a husband was
considered abnormal and unfeminine. Women had very few choices in life and very few
opportunities to assert themselves, but they found that exploiting men through sex and romance was
an effective way to gain some form of autonomy. Two influential political and philosophical authors
of the time, Jean–Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft, both found this kind of manipulation
to be a prevalent issue. However, while Rousseau believes that this behavior proves women's
cunning and inferior natures, Wollstonecraft is more forgiving. She argues that if the sexes were
equal, women would not be forced to derive power by influencing men.
In Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, published in 1755, Rousseau attempts to answer the
question of what causes suffering in society. Throughout his treatise, when referring to the human
race as a whole, he uses the word man. The masculine vernacular was an continues to be common
shorthand for humankind, but in this particular case, it is significant. It indicates Rousseau's

Kenneth Burke Dramatism
One of my favorite rhetorical theorists, Kenneth burkes need completed wonders to correspondence.
Not main may be he proficient to correspondence theory, at he will be also referred to inventive
writing, social psychology, and semantic dissection. As much the vast majority noted theory, in
which I will make examining for this paper, will be that of dramatism.
Burke needs finished stunning things on state the thing that we realize something like
correspondence theory. As stated by Littlejohn (2002), any individual who may be composing
around correspondence today, somehow is restating something that burke required generally made.
Burke composed a few books in a period of fifty a considerable length of time managing principally
with typical theory.
Concerning illustration I said earlier, a standout amongst Burke's the majority noted hypotheses may
be dramatic. That primary idea of dramatism may be broken less than two parts: activity Also
movement. Activity may be something individuals do intentionally in method for their voluntary
conduct technique. Motions are practices that need aid non–purposeful what's more non–
meaningful. Littlejohn (2002) demonstrates that best people have activities and Questions Also
animals bring movement.
Activities manage the fundamental types from claiming thought. As stated by burke over a standout
amongst as much books entitled, "Grammar from claiming Motives" (1945), fundamental types for
thought cam wood a chance to be constructed predominant

The Pentad Analysis : Everything Isn 't Black And White....
Pentad Analysis: Everything isn't Black and White Kenneth Burke's Pentad Criticism is a theory
used to analyze and describe any symbolic act or action. The Pentad is the tool that is used to
analyze the five basic elements of drama. Burke (1945) describes the pentad in depth in his essay,
"The five key terms of dramatism." The five terms are, of course, act, scene, agent, agency, and
purpose. Burke says that these terms, or some variant of them, will always figure into any statement
of motives, and we can explore how a rhetor attributes motives by looking at how he or she uses the
five terms. Act is central as dramatism is a theory of symbolic action and refers to how a person
describes what was done or what happened. Scene refers to the setting of the act. Agent, of course, is
the person or entity that committed the act, and agency refers to how the act was committed (means,
method, etc.). Finally, purpose refers to why an act was committed (toward what ends). According to
Burke, humans use the terms of the pentad to attribute motive (either to themselves or to others),
and all five of these terms will figure into any rounded statement of motive. Burke (1967) teaches us
that if we study the language or "terministic screens "of people, we can gain good insight into how
they are able to attribute intentions or purposes to themselves and also to those around them. Motive
and terminology are related, and dramatism is concerned with this connection. As a system,
dramatism is

A Vindication Of The Rights Of Men By Mary Wollstonecraft
Many would say that the process of living a virtuous life is determined by many different variables
such as religion, race, and gender. However, Mary Wollstonecraft shows in "A Vindication of the
Rights of Men" that true virtue is defined by moral excellence of a person. In "A Vindication of the
Rights of Men" by Wollstonecraft, the path to virtue is through equality. The effects of virtue are
illustrated through the characteristics of morality, individualism, and humility. Mary Wollstonecraft
emphasizes morality throughout the letter to Edmund Burke. Wollstonecraft quotes that "customs
were established by the lawless power of an ambitious individual" (Mary Wollstonecraft 212). This
means that even though someone of greater power entrenches laws into a society does not determine
the justification of the law itself. Although laws are created to establish sense of order, not all laws
are made proper. Wollstonecraft expresses herself to Burke in a moral manner, but Wollstonecraft
also attacks Burke 's political theories in a cruel manner. Wollstonecraft continues on by saying "a
weak prince was obliged to comply with every demand of the licentious barbarous insurgents, who
disputed his authority with irrefragable arguments at the point of their swords" (Wollstonecraft 212).
This refers to the current society Wollstonecraft lives in. Wollstonecraft states that the society she
lives in corrupt and rotten. The society itself is forced to follow unspoken rules by "the point of

The Man Of The Modern Conservatism
Burke, the father of the modern conservatism, is well known for his criticism, or contempt of the
French Revolution; assuming so, it is not hard to doubt that he in fact sympathized with the
American cause. If he is the true father of the conservatism, then the reader may be surprised to hear
that he sided with the colonists; however, his decision makes a sense if we acknowledge that Burke
regarded the American Revolution as a revolution that is not too far apart from that of the Glorious
Revolution, unlike the French Revolution. Paine would argue otherwise by using the Universalist
language that the French would used; however, in the eyes of Burke, the colonists are the true
Englishmen, who are asking for returns that are entirely rational, and perhaps historical to the
English culture of pursuing liberty. French, in the other hand, did not have any concrete foundations
for their pursuit of liberty. The rule by the mass under equal findings were never heard of nor
realized, which makes Burke to beg the question of feasibility. In short, Burke, who finds the
justifications from the traditions as a conservative, fully acknowledges that the American colonists
are articulating their needs of self–governance and liberty within reason and within reach; in
contrast, Burke despises the French Revolution, since it is to dispose the traditions and the societal
mechanisms that France developed over time, through complete overturn of the society and denial
of the past. Turning to

A Political Philosophy Of Erich Przywara 's Analogia Entis
There is no explicit political philosophy found in Erich Przywara's Analogia Entis. While he seems
to analyze nearly every school of Western philosophy, the one philosophical movement he barely
acknowledges is the Enlightenment, which arguably lays the groundwork for much of Western
political thought. However if one compares Przywara with political thinkers of the Enlightenment,
he shares quite a lot with Edmund Burke, the father of conservatism. Before analyzing their
ideologies, it is important to recognize both men lived through similar circumstances. Burke and
Przywara both lived through a turbulent time of political instability. During the French Revolution,
Burke recognized the faults with the French. In his Reflections on the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With this being said it is not the midpoint between these positions; Przywara uses Lateran IV's
formula "for every similarity there is an ever greater dissimilarity." Burkean conservatism, similarly,
is almost a spanning of other political philosophies. Take two other political philosophers Thomas
Hobbes and Jean–Jacques Rousseau, specifically regarding the nature of the state. Hobbes seems to
take the univocal position; the state is the unification of the people, the body, and the king as the
head, forming the Leviathan. With this being said the position flips into equivocity, because the king
is seen as the "greater dissimilarity." The problem Hobbes runs into is his absolutism; if the king
becomes a tyrant, all the citizens can do is to wait for a new king. (Duncan) On the other hand
Rousseau seems to take the equivocal position, believing the formal nature of the state is almost
unnatural. Rousseau however falls into the same dialectical flipping, switching to a univocal
position, specifically his notion of the social contract. Since all men are created equally, it becomes
the duty of the citizenry to depose of tyrannical ruler. (Bertram) These two ideologies lack the
"rhythm" of analogy, leading to the ideological collapse. Przywara explains this collapse as the
"either–or abrupt change" cause by the dialectic (Przywara 206). Burke, however, does not seem to
make the same

Analysis of Vindication of the Rights for Women by Mary...
A wise man once said "Man is only great when he acts from passion." When you hear the word
passion, the first thing that might come to your mind is something related to love, and you're not
entirely wrong. According to Merriam– Webster's dictionary, passion is defined as a strong feeling
of enthusiasm or excitement for something or about doing something or a strong feeling (such as
anger) that causes you to act in a dangerous way. All in all, it is a strong feeling, be it happiness,
sadness, anger or liberality. You can be passionate about many things such as love, sports, food, or
intimacy. However, it can also mean having a strong yearning for something. Vindication of the
Rights for Women by Mary Wollstonecraft was published in 1792, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Throughout her manifesto, Wollstonecraft points out that if women were only taught to please men
on a daily basis, men would grow tired causing the women to cheat. She also points out renowned
writers such as Jean–Jacques Rousseau. Ten years before this, Jean–Jacques Rousseau had published
his tell–all called Confessions. This was during the Romanticism period, a period where there was
rejection of rationality and reason while in favor of feelings. There was more emphasis on
subjectivity, the way the individual perceives their experience. From reading Vindication, you
understand why Wollstonecraft wrote this. She claims that Rousseau's view towards women were
very double standard. He states that Women are smaller compared to men, both in their physical
frame and mental frame. So because of that, they should all be submissive towards men. Thus, the
prejudice of women being the weak and sensitive sex prevails. Both men and women, live their lives
believing that women are weak minded. At an early age society teaches that a woman's mind is
weaker than a man's mind, justifying it with the fact that a woman's body is weaker than that of a
man's. This conclusion seems fully plausible, however if investigated further, one will find that that
is not the case. A woman's mind is as fully capable of reason as a man's mind. Wollstonecraft had
two options to pick from. Either start a revolution in regards to women rights and allowing them to
be equal or to skillfully inject the

In Sorte Diaboli By Kenneth Burke Summary
In Sorte Diaboli (In League with the Devil) Symbols have formed the basis of our society. Our
language, our numbers, emojis, and every facet of our society has been based upon symbols.
Kenneth Burke in his Definition of Man essay brings up how every aspect of our reality has been
built up through our symbol systems (Kenneth Burke). He describes humans as symbolizing
animals, however extends his definition into more specific terms. We are symbol using, symbol
making, and symbol misusing animals (Burke). This is an important distinction to make because
how it differentiates how symbols are used by us. As it so happens, this three headed definition
applies perfectly to the metal community. To say symbols created that subculture is an
understatement, as use of symbols is prevalent in many different regards. When attending local bay
area metal shows, it was clear that there were many different symbols present. Using
communication, one can see how symbols create the stigma that metalhead are Satanic. At all of the
metal shows I've ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I have, and while I love freaking people out with all the creative band names out their, it also shows
symbols fluctuate from person to person. See, Septicflesh is a band that gives me happy memories,
as their shows are great and their singer is one of the nicest metal musicians I've met. Yet in name
alone, people shudder at the thought of such a thing. This is an example of fluctuating symbols of
the metal community. As Celeste Condit explains in her essay about the symboling animal, symbols
are in a constant state of flux (Condit). This of course creates different meanings and confusion
amongst the people. Looking at how symbols are fluctuate from one group to another can explain
how the negative stigma continues to grow about

Kenneth Burke Psychology And Rhetoricicae Summary
Kenneth Burke, in "Psychology and Form" and "Lexicon Rhetoricae," two brief essays in his book
Counterstatement (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968), writes that the most profound
effects of a work of art are created by the repetition of form; the creation of expectations in a reader
through repeated and carefully varied devices, as well as through information, enhances our
excitement about information by baffling our emotional expectation, and finally satisfies us with
increasingly complex style and devices as well as with plot complications. Language, symbolism,
and dramatic action fuse at the end of the work. Burke cautions us to beware of the tyranny of the
informational, as characters, and even authors–especially the humorist

Rights of Man Essay
Rights of Man
The identity of a society is verified through the rights which are given to the citizens. The rights of
man have been at many different standards throughout time. Often being very one sided, and at
times striving for a median between the two sides. In Edmund Burke's essay Reflections on the
Revolution in France Burke states that a king is in one sense a servant but in everyday situations
they are above every individual. All persons under him owe him a legal agreement to serve his
hopes. This essay will demonstrate why Thomas Paine's essay The Rights of Man is more
convincing than Edmund Burke's through examination of a heredity government, the nature of rights
and the uselessness of the monarchy.
Edmund Burke's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
All individuals of the state should have say in selecting an individual to represent him and everyone
else.
Paine states that rights by nature cannot be granted. He supports this by saying that if rights are
granted then they can be revoked, and if they can be revoked then they can be considered privileges,
not rights. He claims that they should not be an agreement between the living and the dead, but the
sole benefit of the entire constituent of these two groups. This is a very good argument on Paine's
behalf. For if rights leaned to the deceased side then the living will be sold short on what they are
deserved. On the other hand, if it supported the other side, we would be excluding the necessary
component of tradition and example. Without the component of precedents and tradition, legitimacy
would be lost. The rights are constantly changing through time. Rights which are appropriate in one
decade do not necessarily mean it is applicable in the next. Mans morals and expectations of each
other change drastically through history. So how is it possible to accept a forever binding right?
Rights are often looked upon as rewards for abiding to the regulations set out by the higher party. In
my mind rights are not earned, but they are rather an extension of our social contract. Rights must be
applicable to all individuals.
Paine's looks down upon the monarchical

Kenneth Burke The Rhetoric Summary
Kenneth Burke, a twentieth century scholar, devoted his work to "the definition of man". His
definition includes the notion that man is a symbol using animal, and that our symbol systems
mediate reality. Simply, our perception and use of language shapes our reality. In conjunction with
this definition, Burke also believed that rhetoric is a symbolic means of inducing cooperation.
Rhetoric was not a means of persuasion for Burke, but more man's way of achieving identification.
Identification refers to the way people try to relate to each other and build relationships through
language. Today, politics in the United States engulf us in the drama of it all and is greatly reflected
in the people we choose to cultivate relationships with. For example, there is quite a wide
polarization between the two major parties in the U.S., which makes it difficult to have a
relationship with someone of the other party because their views are wildly different, and even
opposite, of your own. As the reading puts it, "The Rhetoric deals with the possibilities of
classification in its ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Consubstantiality is how identities are joined, or how common ground is achieved. Our text helps us
relate to this, "For substance in the old philosophies, was an act; and a way of life is an acting–
together; and in acting together, men have common sensations, concepts, images, ideas, attitudes
that make them consubstantial" (1020). This image of the Parkland survivors creates
consubstantiality because it is clear that the deaths of innocent students is a tragedy and it is
understandable that these survivors feel strongly about their experience. Neither side of this issue
thinks that mass shootings in the U.S. are a good thing. It is seen as terrorism by both sides. Seeing
the faces of the survivors helps the two sides come together to work out a solution to stop this
terrorism, even if they have different views about how to achieve

A Cluster Criticism Analysis : Where Is The Love, By The...
A Cluster Criticism Analysis of "Where is the Love" By the Black Eye Peas Michael A. Giron, AA
of Communications, AA of Psychology San Francisco State University Author Note 1600 Holloway
Ave.San Francisco CA 94132 WHERE IS THE LOVE CLUSTER CRITICISM 2 A Cluster
Criticism Analysis of "Where is the Love" By the Black Eye Peas Literature Review Kenneth Burke
is a specialist in symbol–systems and symbolic action, he defines rhetoric as: the use of words by
human agents to form attitudes or to induce action and other human agents (Foss 63). Cluster
analysis is a method developed by Kenneth Burke to help the critics identify the motive of the
rhetor. In this method, the meanings that key symbols have for the rhetor are discovered by charting
what symbols cluster around those key symbols in the rhetoric (Burke 59). Three important
components to cluster criticism our identification, consubstantial, and persuasion. Identification is
when individuals form selves or identities through various properties for substances such as physical
objects, occupations, Friends, activities, beliefs, and values. As two entities are united in substance,
through common ideas, attitudes, material, possessions, or other properties they will exemplify
consubstantial entities; "one in the same, but separate". Our symbolic ways for marking
consubstantiality are identifications, upon which rhetorical action is based. Kenneth Burke states
"You persuade a man only insofar as you can talk his language by

The Rhetoric Of Motives Kenneth Burke Summary
In "The Rhetoric of Motives", Kenneth Burke talks about the fact that rhetoric has a magnificent
power to affect not only our action but also our attitudes. He says the purpose of rhetoric is to
persuade one's ideas, actions, and attitudes (Burke, 1969). I believe Burke's work key point is
identification, where according to him the individual uses rhetoric to make himself "consubstantial"
with another person (Burke, 1969, p. 21). Identification comes from the fact that as human beings
we are basically separated. Burke (1969) says that when identification and division are put together
"you cannot know for certain just where one ends and the other begins" and the distinctive line
between those cannot be "scientifically" identified (p.25). I think

Romanticism Era
The Romanticism era of 1785–1825 was an age of which many people had their own idea of how
the period worked. Writers, philosophers, poets, artist and musicians all explored their mediums of
music, art and writing to express their own concepts. The key themes and ideas of romanticism
involves emotional expression, nature/natural worlds, imagination and individualism. A common
interest for many of these illustrator was to reveal something that we usually don't notice, similar to
showing the ordinary in extraordinary event. Within the romanticism period the French revolution
broke out a plethora of commentary; good and bad on this historical matter. Writers and
philosophers like William Wordsworth, Edmund Burke, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Burke's associating the liberty and government system of France to that of a crazy person suggest
that he really opposes, as he so boldly gives his opinion.
Burke again reassures us that he won't do anything until it can be proven. As if the French revolution
was not enough 'proof' of reestablishing new social and political views. He actually argues that the
Revolution should have does not deserve his applaud suggesting that it should cherish the traditional
principles to get an applause. These statements challenge the work of the Revolution, which should
have been a resolution instead of a temporary fix that won't last. Burke uses those words
"congratulate", "power" and "blessing" to convince that high praise are to desire. (2) Burke uses
vocabulary such as "doubtful" and "do they/these" to question their decision and maybe consider his
claims, as this tone of wisdom draws attention he directly makes the argument that he is right and
the revolution is wrong. (6) While Coleridge was apologetic of his hopes, Burke want to control
them. In England the government ordered with a parliament. There were revisions and management
in the monarch, but Burke plays it down. As though the Parliament was created as a

Language Analysis : The Big Screens
The Big Screens
Language is our ability to understand the systems of communication. Language helps shape how we
perceive the world around us. Language can be used in various forms of text, speech and written
communication to inform, engage and even persuade. The focus of this analysis however will be on
the persuasive aspect of language. The use of language to persuade is interesting because it can
unconsciously filters our view of reality. Terministic screen is a term attributed to Kenneth Burke
which describes this concept of persuasive language. Terministic screens are also used to identify
who we are and what we believe. Viola Davis's Emmy Acceptance Speech uses elements of
terministic screens to persuade her audience to create more opportunities on television for women of
color. The use of terms impacts how we come to understand an act or person. As Burke sates
terminology is a reflection of reality, by its very nature as terminology it must be a selection of
reality; and to this extent it must function also as a deflection of reality." (Terministic Screens, 45). A
reflection of reality can be defined as our perception of reality what we believe is to be true.
However, in the same sense we must also understand that our truth may not be what someone else
believes. Nonetheless, the acts that we question are but a selection of reality. For example, in Viola
Davis's acceptance speech she starts off with a quote by Harriet Tubman. The quote reads " 'In my

Censorship In Penguins
Penguins: Not So Black and White
In a modern age where communication through publication plays such a significant role, censorship
challenges on some forms of media are not all that uncommon. A particular area of concern is how
certain messages are being relayed to young children, and whether this information is necessarily
age–appropriate. One ongoing debate is whether the children's book, And Tango Makes Three, co–
written by Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell, should have its place in libraries of elementary
schools. The main source of conflict arising from this book is the implications of homosexuality.
The book focuses on two penguins, Roy and Silo, who very clearly shows feelings of affection
towards each other, and are determined to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Whether a parent in question is for or against the censorship of And Tango Makes Two, they have
the best interest of their child in mind, and are encompassing what they believe to be their "parental
rights" (Magnuson 12). In The Courier's article, Bengu Tekinalp, a Drake University professor and
parent fighting to keep the book on the shelves argues that the message given out with censorship is
that, "it's not OK to be different, it's not OK to be unique". Although Tekinalp is not explicitly
advocating the normality of homosexuality, she is emphasizing on promoting acceptance of
differences and diversity to her 3–year–old daughter, rather than preaching discrimination. However,
the main concern for those adamant on censorship is that parents wish to be able to decide when it is
appropriate for their children to be introduced to controversial material and content, such as
homosexuality. Whether a parent believes that homosexuality is too mature of a topic, or if they
simply consider any non–heterosexual relationship to be wrong due to religious beliefs, it is still in
their best interests to protect their children from being what they believe to be 'wrongfully

Feminist And A Work Of The Sublime
Kathy Acker: Postmodern Feminist or a Work of the Sublime?
Much has been said about Kathy Acker who was known as a punk feminist who dared to cross the
line between writing about living in a patriarchal society and becoming a patriarchal writer herself.
Acker is known for her novels such as Blood and Guts in High School and her retelling of George
Bataille's My Mother to the last novel that was a retelling of Robert Louis Stevenson's Treasure
Island. A common divide among the critics of Acker is whether she was a true postmodern feminist
writer or if she failed to achieve postmodern feminist status. Another argument is that Acker was, in
fact, a post–modern feminist but that she worked under the Sublime as detailed by Edmund Burke in
his 1757 book entitled The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. I and later
Immanuel Kant in his novel entitled Observations of Feeling of the Beautiful and The Sublime.
Although Kathy Acker is known as a postmodern feminist, she was also a writer of the Sublime
through her works such as Blood and Guts in High School, My Mother: Demonology, and Pussy,
King of The Pirates. Acker was, in fact, a postmodern writer who "created fictions that were
theories–in–performance, speculative fictions that act out suppositions of poststructuralism and
feminism" (Sciolino, 438). Each of the characters in her novels was a mix of sex–positive women
who have power while also not having power over their own bodies. Kathy Acker would often take
an

Compare And Contrast Burke And Thomas Paine
Two men, both fighting for the same cause during the American Revolution took different sides in
the French Revolution because of their political views. Thomas Paine took the side of the French,
opposing his own country, because he believed in a system where people can govern themselves.
Edmund Burke took the side of the English because he was supporting his country and believed in a
system where there needs to be a higher power to keep people in their place. Thomas Paine was a
radical in the way he thought and believed in a total reform of the way people were living at that
time. Burke was a Conservative and believed that things were fine just the way they were. Paine
also believed in Thomas Jefferson's statement all men are born equal ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The second contrasting point is that Paine believed in the total reform of society and Burke believed
that things were fine just the way they were. Paine thought that if people wanted something to
change, they could get it done. He wrote in his book Rights of Man that "revolutions were necessary
to destroy this "barbarous system" in order to create the conditions for peace, commerce, lower
taxes, and the "enjoyment of abundance." He was referring to the American and French revolutions
to get rid of the monarchy hold on them. Burke believed that wisdom of the past generations should
rule current generations. He believed that everything set up by the past should not be reckoned with.
He thought that laws, religious commandments, scriptures, and general ways of living were perfect
just the way they were. Paine attacked this theory once again in his book Rights of Man by stating,
"Governing from dead generations is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies." Paine
continuously attacked everything that Burke supported. These two men disliked each other very
much. They continued to spread their theories though. The third contrasting point is that Paine
believed that all men are created equal and they should be able to make something of themselves no
matter their level of class.

Kenneth Burkes The Philosophy Of Literary Form
In Kenneth Burkes essay "The Philosophy Of Literary Form" he looks at the differences between
Semantic and Poetic language. One–way "semantic ideas" are seen, as sub–classifications that
within the right operations and the right process together make the "total" act (141). As "poetic
meaning" goes this looks at more of the attitude that goes into the "implicit programs of action"
(143). Semantic ideals are the "idea" that there is an organizational process that works through "sub–
classifications", for example of mail. When sending a piece of mail, a person has to write an address
to who will be receiving it. After sending this mail, it goes through the long sorting process that can
isolate one person out of two billion (140). When looking ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
A good example of what poetic meaning is the "New York City is in Iowa" quote. We know that this
statement is not true in the since of where New York City is. Through the invention of the train one
can say that "New York City is in Iowa" only on the idea of progressive encompassment because of
mutual exclusions (145). This example is prime for a "poetic" meaning, because of the fact that the
railroad system passes through both of the states one can be in two places at once. Poetic Meaning
has truthiness and falseness to its meaning, it depends largely on what it is related to. When putting
Semantic and Poetic Meanings side by side both are clearly very two different idea, but when
looking at how semantic ideas are formed and how there is a form of attitude too. Burkes idea of
people creating there own "style" is this idea that "Each brand of imagery contains in germ its own
"logic"". Showing that these ideas can have a persons own twist to them but that it must imply
stylistic act. This last paragraph for me is one of the hardest to compare. These two very different
subjects have mass difference but within the lines they fit together making new

Analysis Of The 2011 Riots
A 'riot' is commonly defined as a disorderly behaviour, which often involve violence and the
destruction of property (Andrews, 2014, p. 292). Riots can be viewed from a Conservative point of
view and from a Radical point of view. Conservatism and Radicalism are both political ideologies.
Although ideologies are 'explanatory frameworks that help to make sense of society' (Andrews,
2014, p. 306), conservatism and radicalism contrast in many ways. Conservatism is associated with
wisdom, limited politics, and natural hierarchy, legitimising the existing order. Radicalism is linked
to progress, universal rights and popular sovereignty, suggesting alternative to the existing order
(The Open University, 2016b). Conservative view and radical view on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The conservative view is illustrated by then Prime Minister David Cameron, in his 2011 speech on
the riots where he disregarded social poverty and unemployment as motive for the 2011 riots.
Cameron then stated that: "And this riots were not about poverty", furthermore blaming
'Irresponsibility. Selfishness. Behaving as if your choices have no consequences' (Cameron, 2011
cited in Andrews, 2014, p. 309). This is an example of conservative ideology on riots. Geoff
Andrews in his analysis of David Cameron's speech, highlights how Cameron is using words such
as irresponsibility and selfishness, and is placing the blame on individuals rather than social
inequalities (The Open University, 2016b). Although this was not a new idea. In Reflection of the
Revolution in France, published in 1790, Edmund Burke argues that French Revolution was
'motivated by self–interest and disruptive elements' (Burke, 2003 [1790] cited in Andrews, 2014, p.
304). Burke further pinpoints that the riots were induced by 'greed and violence', citing the actions
of the 'mob' (Burke, 2003 [1790] cited in Andrews, 2014, p. 305). This reference to the power of the
mob is still used today when Ian Kinsella describes the 2011 riots on the BBC in the film
'Newsnight on the 2011 riots' (The Open University, 2016a). Mr Kinsella, a Business Man from
Manchester with conservative view, pinpoints the fact that there were no rules and that the disorder
was reflected in the power of the mob. In summary, the conservative view of riots stresses the
disorder, the irresponsibility, the individual lack of moral, the threat to private

Edmund Burke French Revolution
Summary Assignment Reflections on the Revolution in France by Edmund Burke depicts the French
revolution as an event which is both dreadful and prone to ridicule. The author goes further by
describing the French revolution as an incident varying disdain and atrocities. To start off his
reflection, Burke asserts that liberty is a legacy left to us from our ancestors, not as a human right,
but rather as a belonging. He then depicts the incidents involving the King and Queen as a
bloodshed by describing the scene of the kidnapping of the royal family in a rather violent manner.
The author thinks of the death of the king and queen of France as a disgrace. Burke claims that a
king is nothing but a man and that his murder is similar to the murder ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He claims that human beings share a common ancestor with other mammals. To start his work,
Darwin states that the structure of a human at an early embryonic stage is very similar to the ones of
other species which hints that humans and animals are somehow genetically connected. He then
asserts that in many species, the males are the most active in courtship and that the decision of
whether coupling occurs or not is left to the female. The author believes that man's unconscious
selection towards certain caracterisitics would result in offsprings being modified in such a way that
the said caracteristic is present in the offsprings. Darwin then claims that the female in many species
also plays a role in sexual selection by knowing which caracteristics to look for in a male. The
author explains that not all genetic modification has the same purpose. He then precises that our
cerebral system indirectly affected the way we now are physically and mentally. In conclusion,
Darwin states that humans still carry physical traces of their less intelligent

The Rhetoric Of Hitler's Battle Kenneth Burke
On June 4, 1939, at the Third American Writers' Congress in New York, Kenneth Burke presented a
paper–"The Rhetoric of Hitler's 'Battle'"–arguing that Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, a full English
version of which was published for the first time that year, deserved a serious rhetorical analysis by
all those intellectuals who sought to prevent the rise of Nazism, fascism, and other overtly racist
political movements across the globe. Most members of the audience (the majority of whom were
affiliated with the Communist Party, and many of whom were Jewish) found Burke's argument
difficult to stomach. At least one listener, though, found the essay extremely compelling. Ralph
Ellison, then a 26–year–old novice writer, thought Burke's mixture of Marxist ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Notions of "style," "attitude," and "way of life" are not lost in this translation, yet the newer
theorization carries less of an emphasis on verbal utterance and on the figure of the individual
speaker. Because Burke's 1939 lecture–while exceedingly concerned with the nation of Germany
and with the global implications of Nazism–focused so heavily on the rhetoric of one particular
Führer, and because Ellison was so interested in the question of how "a Negro writer" might
communicate to a national audience through words on a page, I want to bring the verbal and
rhetorical conceptions of ethos back into the mid–twentieth–century discussion in order both to
demonstrate that the anthropological or sociological notion of ethos is much more classical–
rhetorical than at first it might seem and to showcase the fullness of the political–literary project on
which Burke and Ellison embarked simultaneously. According to Aristotle, certainly the most
prominent rhetorical theorist in Ancient Greece and probably the most lasting rhetorical theorist in
the Western tradition, an effective speech is made up of three "proofs"–logos, pathos, and ethos.
Logos is the speech's logic, pathos is the speaker's appeal to the audience's emotions, and ethos,
finally, is "the most authoritative form of persuasion"–one that emerges

Edmund Burke An Enlightened Thinker Analysis
The first three weeks of this course have focused on 18th century political and aesthetic treatises, on
what we would call Enlightenment thinking. Use Kant's definition of 'enlightenment' in his essay
"What is Enlightenment," and evidence from his speeches in the trial of Warren Hastings, to argue
whether Burke is actually an enlightened thinker.
In a lecture about 'The Burkean Outlook' at Yale, Dr. Ian Shapiro states that Edmund Burke was
anti–enlightenment. This lecture was based on Burkes's book called 'The Reflections of the French
Revolution'. This text provides a deep insight into the political philosophy Burke believed in and can
help us to make analysis about Burke's point character. This outlook, as the professor describes, is
based ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To Burke, putting Hastings to trial was equal to putting the entire machinery of East India Company
on trial. However, a racial bias that Burke holds inside him soon surfaces in another of his
addresses. He blatantly criticizes the Indian agents, and them them for enticing Hastings as he
otherwise would not be able to act as he did. Hastings' agent, Krishna Nandy, was the target of
Burke's greatest contempt, and in doing so he generalized Nandy's caste to the same fate. He went so
far as to call them 'low caste'.
Edward said in his book about orientalism explains the problem with orientalism. The two aspects of
orientalism are to sexualize and simultaneously brutalize the east. Enlighten requires one to wash of
such notions about people, places, cultures etc. and to focus purely on rationale, something that
foundations of orientalism opposes.
The biggest evidence of this is in one of the charges he presented against Hastings regarding the
treatment of the two begums of Awadh and their property, and the treatment of the women in
Rangpur of northern Bengal. The latter report was yet unconfirmed, but the spectacle that was
created out of the event was unlike any other. He asked a playwright to help him write the speech for
recounting the happenings of the case. If there has ever been a case of romanticizing the harassment
eastern women had to face at the hands of British officers,

Wordsworth, Social Reform Literature, and Politics of the...
Wordsworth, Social Reform Literature, and Politics of the 1790s
The historical mix of social fictions in England and France at the end of the 1780s greatly impacted
the literature of the period. Tom Paine's The Rights of Man (1791) and Edmund Burke's Reflections
on the Revolution in France (1791) were the two most widely read works that spurred a decade long
debate on how the nation of England was to be governed and by whom. As a young man during this
period, William Wordsworth formed part of the circle of writers who fought for the Republican
cause of democracy and its ideals. Similar to the poet William Cowper, Wordsworth's early poetry
contributed to a larger framework of social reform literature that the publisher Joseph Johnson ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In countering the politically conservative ideals sweeping the nation in the early 1790s reaction to
the French Revolution, reform publishers like Johnson, and his coterie of writers, actively
confronted writers like Edmund Burke and his proponents. Burke's criticism of radicalism in his
Reflections on the Revolution in France is salient to the debates, warning of the spread of French–
Jacobin ideals to British soil. He criticized heavily the reform works like those Joseph Johnson and
his circle of writers published. Burke's attack (in part a reaction to the reformer Dr. Price, a leading
advocate of social reform[3]) set off a storm of political controversy concerning the most
fundamentally esteemed principles that many saw as the basis of English civilized life in the 1790s:
Reason, Truth, Liberty, Virtue, Justice, and God. In order to persuade his readers, Burke attempts to
justify the historical abuses that France's monarchy perpetrated toward its citizens. He constructs a
history that constituted the same "leading principles on which the commonwealth and the laws are
consecrated" in Britain, one that he felt all patriotic British citizens implicitly agreed with.[4] His
aim was to sanitize the French aristocracy's complicity as political agents of an abused monarchy,
and to

Causes Of The French Revolution
Bloodshed, hunger, anger, chaos, and abuse. These were all things that characterized the French
Revolution. Through the terrible depression of this time, many people were driven to rise up against
the French government, resorting to violence and inciting chaos, as this seems like the only way for
the voices of the French citizens to reach the ears of the nobility. The simplest thing such as the
hunger of the people and the prices of bread are being ignore by the ruling class of the nation.
Though the weight of these issues is quite hefty, there are better ways to go about addressing them
than nonsensical violence. The French Revolution brought many issues to the country, it came to
quickly causing instability from rapid change to radical new ideas based on somewhat flawed views
of human nature, and as the Revolution progresses the violence will get worse, causing the
government to strike back at its own people.
One of the main issues with the French Revolution is that it's trying to incite change to quickly,
causing a rapid expulsion of traditions and in turn causing the civilization to become unstable.
Civilizations are built over centuries and much of the foundation for a country are built over time
with the buildup of the traditions of that country's people. These beliefs and traditions are what
made that country function and flourish in the first place, so if you remove them, in essence the
nation is being forcefully returned to a previous state which in turn causes a

Summary Of A Reflection On The Revolution In France
After watching The Square and reading the Reflection on the Revolution in France, I find it's
plausible to say that Edmund Burke will disagree with the Egyptian revolution for three reasons.
First of all, regarding the purpose of revolution, Edmund Burke holds a different view with the
Egyptian revolutionaries. In the Reflection on the Revolution in France, Burke points out "The
revolution was made to preserve our ancient indisputable laws and liberties, and that ancient
constitution of government which is our only security for law and liberty... the very idea of the
fabrication of a new government is enough to fill us with disgust and horror"(Burke, 117). Edmund
Burke believes that the goal of revolution is to secure the inherited rights and forefathers' legacies.
He suggests that instead of demolishing the castle, which means to depose the former government, it
is better to repair it, which means to reform and improve its imperfect parts, laws for example
(Burke, 121). Thus, in his prospective, the idea of overthrowing the regime is extremely undesirable
and ineffective, comparing to the idea of reforming the old system and "making compromises" with
different political forces (Burke, 122). However, according to The Square, for Egyptian
revolutionaries, the ultimate purpose of the revolution is to completely abandon the old regime, to
remove the whole political system, together with its laws, its ruler, its government, institutions and
militaries, and to rebuild it by

Thomas Paine And America A Prophecy
Thomas Paine and America a Prophecy William Blake, poet of the Romantic Era, wrote in 1793 the
prophetic story America a Prophecy. The story begins with Orc breaking the chains that held him
down and sexually assaulting a young woman that has been taking care of him. The woman is
revealed to represent America and that she has been waiting for Orc to help her. Soon Orc and other
colonies under British rule attack the Prince of Albion and King George III. Alongside Orc are
historical figures such as; George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Paine who fight for
the liberty of their country. The story ends with Orc liberating America from tyrannical rule and
influencing other countries to rebel.
The mention of Thomas Paine's in the prophetic story is not coincidental, as he and Blake were
involved with one another in real life. I believe that by having Thomas Paine appear in the prophecy
shows the importance of Paine's work to the American Revolution and Blake's own political views
and writing. I will analyze the text of America a Prophecy to have a better understanding of the
prophetic book and then give historical context to Thomas Paine's work and beliefs. By doing this I
will finally analyze the two writers and see where Blake's America a Prophecy, and Paine's own
work, specifically Rights of Man, agree and differ from one another.
In America a Prophecy, Blake has mixed his own mythology with historical figures and events. Orc
is a positive figure in Blake's

How Does Edmund Burke Reflect On The French Revolution
Edmund Burke was a British statesman who was deeply involved in English public life. He was
born in Dublin in 1729. He was a prominent political thinker and took part in many political issues.
Burke became a significant character in political theory. He was also a Whig politician and served in
parliament from 1765–1794. While Burke served in Parliament, he became convinced that the
government responds to the practical needs of the people in which they govern. Burke anticipated
that the French Revolution would cause anarchy.
France was ignoring the very institutions that upheld order in their society. The chaos this was
creating caused corruption. Burke believes that the French revolutionaries were destroying the
French society. Throughout ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Even though a tradition may have worked for the people at one point, it is not guaranteed to work
for the people at another time. The world is always changing around us. However, instead of
throwing away a whole tradition that has been used in the past, and clearly worked, just repair the
tradition for it to fit the way of life. Moving on, I completely agree with Burkes argument on private
property. The government cannot unfairly portion a man's property. Burke's "Reflections on the
Revolution in France" was such an interesting text to read. His ideologies may have seemed absurd
at the time, but they have been used through out history. Burke involved a lot of philosophy in his
writings and this is why his ideas were unheard of at the

A Vindication Of The Rights Of Men
Mary Wollstonecraft's epistolary essay "A Vindication of the Rights of Men" acts as a direct,
scathing response to Edmund Burke's opinionated piece regarding the French Revolution,
"Reflections on the Revolution in France". This essay will examine the use of satire as a mode in the
opening sections of Wollstonecraft's "Vindication", as well as comparing her lexical choices to those
of her addressee, Edmund Burke. The Oxford English Dictionary states that "satire" is "... [A] work
of art which uses humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize prevailing
immorality or foolishness, esp. [sic] as a form of social or political commentary." Humour is too
exaggerated to relate to Wollstonecraft's work, but ridicule as a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, her use of "manly" is not designed to encourage masculinity, but instead parodies his
ideas of political masculinity. "You see I do not condescend to cull my words to avoid the invidious
phrase, nor shall I be prevented from giving a manly definition of it, by the flimsy ridicule which a
lively fancy has interwoven with the present acceptation of the term" By refusing to be "prevented"
from "manly definitions", she is defining and rejecting the gender stereotypes that are pressed upon
her by being a woman whilst simultaneously parodying Burke's use of the term. There is a sense of
sarcasm within this that accentuates Wollstonecraft's subtle use of satire. She refuses to
"condescend", thus refusing to lower herself to his level, which is an attempt to invalidate his
arguments by drawing attention to Burke's own condescension within "Reflections". As Conniff
argues; "she adopted from classical rhetoric the stance of a virtuous and honest commentator intent
on revealing Burke 's corruption" – she places herself above Burke with her style of argument and
her semantic choices, working to deconstruct the core of Burke's argument and break down his
elevated political stance.
When writing "A Vindication of the Rights of Men", Wollstonecraft was a woman in a "man's
world". Her voice was a lone female amongst the opinions and politics of men and she "went up
against two of the

Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France and...
In this paper I will compare the theories and ideas from both Edmund Burke's Reflections on the
Revolution in France and John Stuart Mill's On Liberty. In comparing these two philosophers, I will
be paralleling their ideas and my own ideas I will be attributing them towards the modern day
whistleblower, Edward Snowden. Political figures, government representatives and philosophy
advocates have carefully studied Burke's and Mill's writings over hundreds of years to better
understand their theories on governmental control in a society. One of, if not the most noteworthy
concept in both their famous writings revolved around the concept of governmental control in a
society. Both Burke and Mill have their own theories; they also have many ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
He was a committed advocate of utilitarianism. Mill made it known that he was a strong supporter
of giving the power back to the minorities. The minority citizens in a society are the people who
always challenge the system and keep the society advancing and evolving. He recognized that the
only way we as a society can evolve and prosper is to find a way to give the minority a voice.
Edward Snowden is an infrastructure analysis for the NSA. Snowden disclosed classified
information to the general public and confidential government mass surveillance programs to the
press. He was announced as the NSA's public whistleblower. His views for these actions are based
upon the underlining truths of both Burke and Mill's theories. He believed that giving the minorities
a voice in what their superiors are doing is the right thing to do. As Snowden stated in his interview
"The public is owed an explanation of the motivations behind the people who make these
disclosures that are outside of the democratic power." (Kevin M. Gallagher) It is with his great
power that they had to make a decision. Knowing he did not like the fact that the public does not
know what he is capable of doing, does he tell everyone openly and possibly put himself at risk? Or
does he keep everything still to himself and not worry about the following consequences or what
could happen to him.
Edmund Burke was a true leading figure of the conservative party. While he was writing his piece

The Spell of Sensibility
The Spell of Sensibility
Although the Romantic Era's general perspective regarding a woman's "sensibility" may seem
distasteful to most contemporary readers, the viewpoint was commonplace during the period. To be
clear, this was mainly the assumption that women were dominated by their 'specially configured'
and 'delicate' senses, rather than reason and intellect. Authors like Edmund Burke passively
promoted these fragilities in his verbosely titled piece A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of
Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. While this point of view retained popularity, there were
thankfully those who sought to tear it to shreds. The author Mary Wollstonecraft, widely lauded as
"the first Feminist", actively addressed sensibility and more in her political and polemic treatise
"Vindication of the Rights of Woman". She cites deprivation of quality education for women, as
well as their condescending treatment in society as reasons for this sort of behavior. But to better
understand why women were seen this way in the first place, it will help to briefly to define what
"Romanticism" really is, in a cultural and literary context. And while it is no longer as potent as it
once was, the spell which tricks society into believing women are a secondary and frail sex, is one
that still has power today, and it is a spell which should be permanently broken.
Regarding women and their so–called sensibility, Edmund Burke writes:
Among animals, the greyhound [dog] is more

Essay On The Sublime By Edmund Burke
While Edmund Burke posits the sublime as a passive feeling elicited in the viewer in the presence of
the superior powers of nature, William Wordsworth challenges this passivity by demonstrating the
role of viewer participation and active imagination in the creation of the sublime experience, thereby
reversing the power dynamic between man and nature, of which man is now in control.
Outline:
This essay examines the concept of viewer participation (or lack thereof) and by extension, the
power dynamics between man and nature through Burke and Wordsworth's work. Firstly, I will
demonstrate Burke's argument that the sublime is a passive feeling of the viewer through his
emphasis on the sense of 'sight' in his discussion of the sublime as a way ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By analysing the structure (shift from external to internal landscape), language (tenses, pronoun),
and presentation of the experience of seeing the daffodils, I seek to demonstrate that feelings of the
sublime are only evoked when the narrator's imagination participates in the scene he has internalized
in his memory. While the first three stanzas exemplify a merely physical stimulus and response
mechanism to nature, the last stanza shows how active poetic imagination enables man to recreate
and amplify emotions encountered, thus resulting in feelings of the sublime. Why does the observer
not recognise the 'wealth' the scene brings in that moment? How does poetic imagination connect
the physical eye and the inner eye to allow for sublime, transcendental experience? Hess argues that
the poem "depend[s] for [its] power on the narrator's ability to fix a single, discrete, visually defined
moment of experience in his mind, to which he can later return in acts of private memory and
imagination" (298). An example of the recapturing of emotions is seen where "gay" (I. 15) is
recaptured as "pleasure" (I. 23) at the end. Active imagination, which draws inspiration from
memory of the initial encounter, is now a permanent possession that

Rhetorical Analysis Of Bullying In The Age Of Trump
Many people fear that the impending induction of the president–elect into office will erase efforts to
decrease bullying. Since Donald Trump's election as president, hate crimes have piqued, not only in
adult society, but also on high school and college campuses.
According to New York Times journalists Caitlin Dickerson and Stephanie Saul, over the past two
weeks, college campuses have experienced resurgence in discriminatory behavior that has been
unmatched since the September 11 attacks over fifteen years ago. Emily Bazelon adds in her New
York Times article, "Bullying in the Age of Trump," that these acts of terrorism against minorities
are not limited to college campuses, but that they are even displayed in even in middle and high
schools. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many of these perpetrators act under the slogan "make America great again," which is frequently
translated into "make America white again" (Dickerson and Saul 2). By committing these heinous
acts of violence, many students are able to silence minority groups by making them feel threatened.
Thus, the scene drives the purpose, which in turn influences the act. Furthermore, these areas are
densely populated, so information travels fast amongst this specific demographic whether by word
or mouth or even social media. As a result, the scene has a direct impact on the agency because this
fear can quickly and easily be transferred to the targeted group. Through a Bitzerean lens, the
indented audience– minority groups– has been reached because it has invoked responses out of fear.
Moses Karngbaye, a high school junior admitted that after seeing offensive graffiti on a bathroom
wall, "was the first time [he] honestly felt like crying at school" (Bazelton). These acts of violence
are effectively spreading a simple message to the audience: you are not welcome here. Abdalla
Husain from the University of Tennessee admitted that many Muslim students are "scared that
Trump has empowered people who have hate and would be hostile to them" (Dickerson and

John Locke And Edmund Burke 's Political Rebellion
Both John Locke and Edmund Burke support political rebellion under specific circumstances. What
differentiates these two political theorists in their discussions of revolution? Please make reference
to both Second Treatise of Government and Reflections on the Revolution in France when
answering this question. Cite the texts and be specific.
Many philosophers and theorists have spoken on the value, or lack thereof, of revolution. In Second
Treatise of Government, John Locke builds the concept of a "social contract," which outlines
responsibilities of the government and what can be done if the state fails to uphold its duties.
Edmund Burke views political rebellion in a different light. He writes in Reflections on the
Revolution in France that upheaval does excessive harm to the state, and, by extension, the people.
While both Locke and Burke agree that rebellion is useful to the growth of a state, they differ on a
few main points. First, they disagree in terms of what circumstances warrant revolution. Second,
they each believe it should take different forms and work to different extents. Finally, Locke and
Burke believe revolution tends to have positive or negative effects, respectively. Their views on each
of these points will be discussed in turn. To understand their views on revolt, and when it is justified,
one must first review the responsibilities each believes the government to have. To Locke, the
government works to preserve innate rights, that is, rights

Tradition In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tammy Moncrief

More from Tammy Moncrief (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Tradition In The Lottery, By Shirley Jackson Essay