Canadian Immigration Policy Analysis: SEO Optimized Title

Canadian Immigration Policy Analysis
To further add to the strengths of Canadian immigration policy, Canadian views on immigration are supported by a qualitative support, rather than
misconceived narrative of immigrants. To elaborate, the media has created a narrative where certain races of immigrants are more prone to committing
crimes through the over–reporting of immigrant crimes and incidents (Rossiter & Rossiter, 2009, p.2). This then creates a false impression of them that
is reflected in the immigration policy, which then further fuels the discrimination. Statistically speaking, this impression is false as immigrants do not
commit crimes at a greater rate than native population (Rossiter & Rossiter, 2009, p.5). In fact, according to empirical research, immigrants who have ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While not perfect, if Canada did allow its law enforcement agencies to use torture to extract time sensitive information, it might help reduce and prevent
terrorism, but the negative backlash from Canadians and the international community may be too great. As well as running the risk of actually
increasing the rate of terrorism by providing terrorist organizations with propaganda for their recruitments. In terms of immigration, by having an open
immigration system, other countries may view Canada as being a safe haven for terrorist (McCoy & Knight (p.255), especially with our pro–human
right policies. Nonetheless, by having a multi–cultural approach to immigration and fair and just immigration systems, it does reduce the potential push
for people towards
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Issue Of Immigration Policy
Although the issue of immigration policy has been at the center of political debates, largely discussed in the media and newspapers, no one has yet
found a solution to this ill–defined problem, that would comply with the America's core values. While I think the immigration policy does need a
reform, the solution to this problem certainly is not a deportation of all undocumented residents.
Currently, there are nearly 40 million United States residents that were born abroad.About 11 million of them are undocumented. The federal
government has significantly increased the rate at which it removes noncitizens from the U.S. For example, U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) removes about 400 thousand immigrants per year, or about 1000 per day. (Quevedo, 2015) Originally, Congress established that there are three
crimes, for which a noncitizen can be deported for. Those crimes included: murder, illicit trafficking in firearms, and drug trafficking. (Cuahtemoc &
Hernandez, 2013) Before 1986, deportation was reserved for violent crimes and those crimes that carried long prison sentences. The Immigration Act of
1990 expanded the category of crimes that required mandatory deportation. (Blake, 2015) And Congress stayed very far from its original intentions. I
agree with the fact that noncitizens who commit violent crimes, gang members, drug dealers, etc. should be punished through deportation. But, harsh
immigration policies are not effective, simply because

The Immigration And Refugee Policies
This paper will examine the immigration and refugee policies applied to Cubans and Salvadorans from the late–20th century, marking the initial surge
of migrants from this region to the United States. The main reason that led to differences between Salvadoran and Cuban granted refugee status in the
U.S. was the fact that Salvadorans were fleeing violence of regimes that the U.S. supported while Cubans were fleeing the U. S's primary enemy,
communism. This in turn led to different integration processes and acceptance into the state.
The U. S's Cold War policies of preventing the spread of communism depended on the U.S.'s Military interventions. However, the U.S. military
occupations did not lead to democratic governments and more ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
President Ronald Reagan argued that this threatened the U.S. way of life and hemisphere as a whole and on May 9, 1984 addressed U.S. foreign
policy allowing Cubans to come into the state as "political refugees" (Guerra,331). For the U.S. government, Cuban emigrants provided the rationale for
continuing foreign policy aimed at containing communism and expanding the forces needed for battle (Guerra,340).
Among the waves of Cubans who migrated to the United States, those who were benefited the most were the the elite and working class (Pedraza,265).
Being made up of the upper class that had a good education and expertise resulted in a warm welcome and substantial economic opportunities. Cubans
enjoyed near automatic entrance in the the U.S. through President Lyndon Johnson's "open door" policy that allowed the entrance of refugees from
communism. Under this joint policy the U.S. and Cuban government set up Freedom Flights that daily brought in Cubans for eight years which totaled
more than 250,000 people (Pedraza,313). These social classes enjoyed automatic permanent residency status and additional benefits such as food, cash
allotments, Cubans–only education programs, and other privileges never extended to other immigrants or minority groups.
However, the third wave of migrants, the Marielitos, instead of being welcomed like they were in the past 20 years, the U.S. focused inordinately on
the criminal element (Pedraza,270). This group

Immigration Policy Essay
Today, the United States is home to the largest immigrant population in the world. Even though immigrants assimilate faster in the United States
compared to different developed nations, immigration policy has become an highly controversial topic in the Unite States, while much of the debate is
around culture and religion, the effects of immigration on economy is clear. Immigration policy has become a highly pressing issue in America. While
much of the debate centers on cultural issues, the economic effects of immigration are clear. Economic analysis finds little to no proof to support that
influx of foreign labor have reduced jobs or American wages. Economic theoretical predictions and a bulk of academic research confirms that wages
are unaffected by immigration over the long term and the economic effects immigration are mostly positive for natives and for the economy over all.
Research from the Wharton School of Business, Pennsylvania, shows that the foreign–born population has grown rapidly in recent decades, rising from
less than 5 percent of the U.S. population in 1970 to 13 percent in 2013. Although immigrants comprise a larger share of population today since World
War II, the foreign born share is roughly the same as in 19th century and early 20th century, where 15 percent of U.S residents were immigrants. The
evidence increasingly suggests that when supply of labor is boosted by immigration, investments by firms increase to offset any reduction in capital per
worker,

Cuban Immigration Policy
My initial reaction is shock, I had no idea about the Cuban immigration policy. Irritation sets in at the injustice of it, immigrants of all races leave
their countries to pursue better lives. The process that any immigrant is subjected too should be equal to Cubans as well, equal opportunity for entry is
fair. However, this policy allows Cubans to bypass the entire process, regardless of race its unfair to allow one race and not the other. By granting
automatic legal amnesty within hours of them entering the U.S. can lead to resentment from other races. Segregated immigration is an issue that affects
the general public of the U.S., but its not discussed. Why?
Central Americans are becoming more aware of their situation when immigrating to a new country. The problem isn't Cubans but the immigration
system itself is flawed. Allowing Cubans, a free ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In 2014 central immigration spiked due to hostile environments in their country. Seeking refugee, they came to the U.S. "Land of the free". Only to be
questioned, not admitted, and finding more problems then they left their own country with. Why is the government favoring a race for entry to the
country? The problem is Cubans have the luxury of walking in to the U.S. while central Americans can only dream. Citizens of Central America have
compromised safety issues, if you don't feel safe in your own home, and you would rather leave all you have ever known, that's a real problem.
Cubans influence immigration as an idea for central Americans, hope. It trickles down Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, all the way to
panama. Everywhere in between gets this notion of a "better tomorrow" that never comes. Meanwhile Cubans walk right on in, and central Americans
are suddenly creating an immigration problem. One that Obama called on congress to grant 4 billion to

Problems With Immigration Policy
A famous journalist Jorge Ramos once said, "The greatest nations are defined by how they treat their weakest inhabitants." Immigration has been a
prominent topic throughout time. There is a vast stigma seen on media depicting peoples feeling towards immigration. There are different sides to the
debate to what should be done with immigration policy also many other related topics to the issue. There are different beliefs yet what are scholar's
beliefs towards the topic of immigration.
To solve a problem, you must first be willing to accept the problem by acknowledging that problem exists, identifying the problem, and committing
yourself to trying to solve it (Chaffee 112). There are many dilemmas when dealing with the topic of immigration.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Many families get detained, as a society we have put ourselves in immigrants' shoes and take in consideration their perceiving lenses. A lot of families
take great measures to come to the united states for a better future and sometimes it does not occur because of being detained. To further add there is
other scholars that have a different view point on detention centers for immigrants. In the article From Bare Life to bureaucratic capitalism: analyzing
the growth of the immigration detention industry as a complex organization by Matthew Flynn states
Although it remains very much a contested issue, many observers have concluded that deterrence policies and tactics employed by wealthy, advanced
capitalist states of the West will not over the long term curtail efforts by migrants and asylum seekers to make perilous journeys across international
borders in search of safe havens and better living conditions (Sampson 2015).
The article shows that not all scholars think alike. The author is stating that even though there a lot of focus on the detention process against
immigrants that will not stop people's effort to migrate in search of a prosperous

Immigration Policies Of The 1920s
The 1890s to the 1920s was the first time that the federal government was taking a real stand and control over immigration policies. It also saw the
two greatest waves of immigration in the country's history. War, poverty, political turmoil, social upheaval, food shortages, lack of available jobs and
more prompted people from foreign countries to move to the United States because it was the land of dreams and prosperity. After the depression of the
1890s immigration jumped from 3.5 million to 9 million in a ten year period. By 1900, New York City had as many Irish residents as Dublin and
more Italians than any city outside Rome and more Poles than any city except Warsaw. It had more Jews than any other city in the world, as well as
large amount of Slavs, Lithuanians, Chinese, and Scandinavians (Collier). The government began to limit these new immigrants. From 1882 until 1943
most Chinese immigrants were barred from entering the United States under the Chinese Exclusion Act, the nation's first law to ban immigration by
race or nationality. In 1892, Ellis Island was opened in New York evaluate immigrants before allowing them to enter the United States. On the West
Coast, Angel Island, a similar immigrant station opened near San Francisco. World economies slowed and other problems occurred that caused people
to become desperate for work and a fresh start.
Immigrants entering the U.S. that couldn't afford first or second–class passage came through the processing center at

Immigration Policy Summary
The author of this article about the immigration policies created and enforced by President Donald Trump is Stephen Dinan. Stephen is a spectacular
writer for The Washington Times. Although he has worked for a majority of companies, Stephen is the Washington Times's National Political
Correspondent; this means he handles the political aspect in the news. Overall, the Washington Post has hinted a bias towards conservatives, but the
author so far hasn't done much when it comes to bias. This news article may hold a minimal potential bias toward conservatism, but the fact remains
that it is minimal. In this article, the main focus is put upon President Donald Trump and his strategy to work around the problems when it comes to
illegal immigration ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this module two key concepts that can be related to current events are suffrage and progressivism. In the Progressive Era, there were many
immigrants that moved into the United States in order to get a better life. According to loc.gov, "more than 15 million immigrants arrived in the
United States. That was about equal to the number of immigrants who had arrived in the previous 40 years combined." Since more and more people
started to pile into the USA, more and more people started to realize that these people could vote. Because of this, many representatives paid these
people to vote for them, which caused an imbalance in the system. This was one of the reasons why more and more people started protesting to create
quotas to limit the amount of people coming into the country. This relates back to the original article where President Trump is trying to stop the
movement of people into the country illegally since it is causing problems, just as it had done before. Also, the idea of progressive getting worried
about the amount of people immigrating into the

Immigration And Immigration Policy
When immigration policy is discussed, typically, it is discussed within the confines of egalitarian notions and sentiments, and inside the boundaries and
parameters set by generally Marxist–influenced social democracy. Characteristically, it is not discussed pertaining to the concept of a social order built
on the rights of property owners, sharers, and contributors to and of the common stock– which at their discretion– may exclude bad apples, lazy
contributors, rotten characters, trespassers, and terrorists. Once egalitarian sentiments and notions are rejected full–scale– (only giving credence to
those that have empirical weight or logical consistency) more proper, more substantive interdisciplinary analyses may reveal that the current
investigative techniques employed by current mainstream political theorists are– in the context of reality, incorrect, superficial and quite shallow.
––
Immigrants– illegal or not, do not have the first claim to ownership of common stock or common land. Immigration isn't necessary for the benefit of
the host nation's economy. In any case, one might prefer lower living standards rather than higher living standards in exchange for greater distance
from others. Moreover, no multicultural society has ever lasted very long. In fact, diverse neighborhoods report less social cohesion than
neighborhoods with a less diversity.
Citizens who are of the host nation fall under jurisdiction of the host nation. By coming into the jurisdiction of the host nation, naturally, all trespassing
parties are breaking the law.
Stakes of common land/stock per citizen will shrink, while shares per illegal immigrant will grow.
Law abiding citizens are punished (taxpayers) by following laws while illegal immigrants are rewarded for refusing to abide (tax consumers).
Incentivizing illegal immigration will lead to more of it.
According to TIME Magazine (2006):
"The U.S.'s borders, rather than becoming more secure since 9/11, have grown even more porous. And the trend has accelerated in the past year. It's
fair to estimate, based on a TIME investigation, that the number of illegal aliens flooding into the U.S. this year will total 3 million––enough to fill
22,000 Boeing 737–700 airliners, or

Immigration And Open Immigration Policy Essay
On November 10, 2015, two National Economic Experts argued on "what the U.S. Immigration policy should be?" Mark Krikorian, Executive Director
of the Center for Immigration Studies argued against open immigration, while Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration policy analyst for the CATO Institute
argued in favor of freer immigration. Reporter Jonathan Gonzalez of 9News Denver moderated the debate. The argument made by both experts was
supported by strong evidence even though the ideas appear to be on two extreme ends with no middle ground ideas or compromises. At one extreme
there is a need to reduce or stop immigration while the other extreme advocates for open borders. Even though Immigration has been an important part
of American history, recently it has become a contentious issue, which is mostly about borders or no borders, and does not take in to account the
macroeconomic aspect of this movement. The two experts argue on how the U.S. immigration program needs to adjust by scaling back or blocking
further immigration vs. open immigration policy consistent with American values that promotes free–market economy.
One of the debate question was about the increase in population from immigration It was estimated that population will increase up to 35 percent in 50
years from immigration only. Alex Nowrasteh argued that throughout history the U.S. adult immigrant population has never been over 15 percent. He
asked, "what if the U.S. stopped all immigration in the 1800s, what will be

Immigration Policy Essay
In immigration policy, there has been several programs and acts that are represented through significant moments. The first to discuss is the Chinese
Exclusion Act, which was among one of the first immigration policy to exist within the United States. As stated in American immigration: a very short
introduction, Gerber explains that Dennis Kearney, a Californian politician, had a disdain for Chinese immigrants and feared they would take over the
workforce in California. In 1882, Kearney succeeds in promoting his agenda and passes the Chinese Exclusion Act, which calls for the deportation of
Chinese immigrant workers (Gerber 35). Furthermore, Gerber quotes historian Mae Ngai, as she states that this act soughts "for massive racial
engineering"... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As such, the Bracero program is also another immigration policy that is significant in United States history. Also, this program was created with an
intention for Mexicans to return back to Mexico after the war ended, but several of them stayed which is also why this program is significant in the
immigrant narrative. Lastly, another piece worth noting is the internment of Japanese folk which happened after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Due to
this act, Japanese immigrants and Japanese–Americans were forced into internment camps, revoked of rights as citizens for Japanese–Americans, and
lost all their belongings, such as homes, businesses, and cars (Daniels 88). Between the three of these moments, they have differences, For example,
they all targeted different population, the Japanese were placed in internment camps, the Bracero program encouraged immigration, and the Chinese
Exclusion Act forced Chinese immigrants to leave the country. Some of the similarities that these moments share is that they all targeted a specific
population and sentiments towards these populations grew after these moments

Immigration Policy
Our President Barack Obama recently made changes to our immigration policy. He announced some major changes to the United States immigration
policies. President Obamas recent changes was made through executive action. The executive action included a series of steps towards fixing our
immigration policies. According to a guide to the immigration "The series of changes updates relies on the expansion of successfully implemented
programs, enhanced efforts to coordinate immigration enforcement and benefit policies across agencies, and attempts to use immigration as a tool of
economic and social change."(A guide to immigration). The President executive action would retool critical aspects of the immigration system. It
would change how we enforce... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some were brought to the country by their parents when they very young ages, some even in infancy. They know absolutely nothing about their home
country. They have no connection to their home countries. They might not even speak the language of their parents' country. Deporting these young
immigrants' would be downright cruel. These young immigrants have as much to offer to the future of America and American economy as a citizen
than any other legal American. Given equal opportunities as an American, these immigrants' might be tomorrow's entrepreneurs, scientists, politicians,
teachers, soldiers, the options are limitless. Furthermore, the beneficiaries of the DREAM Act were not purposely trying to break American
immigration law. It's not fair to condemn the illegal immigrants' who were brought here by their families for better opportunities. Some of these
immigrants are smart enough to go to college but are stuck in a lifetime of low–paying underground, black market labor because they wouldn't be allow
to go college. President Obama summed it up perfect in an immigration speech in El Paso, Texas. He stated "These are kids who grew up in this
country, love this country, and know no other place as

Trump Immigration Policy
Under the new immigration enforcement policies of the Trump administration millions of people living in the United States illegally could soon be
targeted for deportation. Any immigrant who is in the country illegally and is charged or convicted of any offense, or even suspected of a crime, will
now be an enforcement priority, according to Homeland Security Department memos signed by Secretary John Kelly. Under the Obama administration,
immigrants whose only violation was being in the country illegally were generally left alone.
Donald Trump's deportation policy focuses on anyone who has been charged with a criminal offense, even if it has not led to a conviction. He also
includes anyone who has "committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense," (Medina, J). Which means anyone the authorities believe has
broken any type of law, regardless of whether that person has been charged with a crime. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To get this done, he mainly plants to build the wall he has promised, as I mentioned. "Trump initially demanded for Mexico to pay for the building of
the wall– and Kelly's memos reiterate calls for Homeland Security to start planning for the costs and construction" (Baker, A). Also, during Trump's
earlier immigration orders, he banned all refugees as well as foreigners from seven Muslim–majority countries, which he has had extensive criticism
and legal action.
While I do see immigrants coming to the United States illegally as an issue, the focus on which immigrants or priority deportees is not efficient. It
seems that most presidential administrations, especially Donald Trumps have chosen to focus on immigrants with non–threatening charges. I think
instead the focus should at least be on the illegal immigrants who are a threat to citizens like those in gangs or other illegal activities, rather than those
with small

Economics And Immigration : The Economics Of U.s....
Economics and Immigration Immigration is a topic on everyone 's minds these days. With presidential candidates vying for votes in debates and
political campaigns, immigration has been talked about quite a bit. But what is truly known about immigration? Since it is such a divisive issue, it is
hard to know what is true and what isn't. Unfortunately, the information most readily available to us comes in the form of opinionated articles and
biased speeches by presidential candidates. Because the information we receive is biased, not necessarily true, and only a piece of a larger picture, it's
hard to know what to believe. With some saying immigration hurts our economy and others arguing for the benefits of immigration, no one truly
understands the actual economic impact of immigration. For this paper, I have chosen three academic journals on the topic of the economics of
immigration that agree on one important point: our immigration system is broken. The first article is entitled "The Economics of U.S. Immigration
Policy." This article was written by Pia M. Orrenius, the Assistant Vice President and Senior Economist in the research department at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, and Madeline Zavodny, a professor of economics at Agnes Scott College. This article explains that the public has become
concerned with the issue of immigration because of the fiscal impacts of immigrants on our labor markets. Orrenius and Zavodny relate a plethora of
facts about the economics of

Immigration Policy Institute ( Mpi ) Immigration
Chapter 1: Introduction
Background and Justification According to Migration Policy Institute(MPI) immigration is a prominent part of the United States ' DNA. Among
different immigrant groups in the United States it is highly uneven, and the size of the unauthorized population continues to be a powerful barrier to
social cohesion, full social economic, and political integration. (Jimenez, 2016)
The Research Problem Concerns still exist about immigrants ' ability to integrate into broader society. Americans feel as if they have to adjust to the
different ethnicity because their language can take over their country and they can maybe lose their jobs from the illegal immigration that is happening
in the United States. Also, the fear of our citizens are that any immigrant that illegally come over to the United States; can be a dangerous terrorist or
even a criminal felon. What the U.S. Americans want is the illegal immigration to stop and have the immigrants come over and learn English and take
the test and get their citizenship the right way. (Jimenez, 2016)
Deficiencies in the Evidence There is no deficiencies in the research. The researcher had no lack of evidence to support the research on illegal
immigration.
Audience
The audience are the people of the United States that is affected who are Americans and naturalized citizens. People in other countries that deal with
immigration in their country are also affected. The government and businesses who can use these

Immigration Policy On Immigration
The famous singer–songwriter, Conor Oberst, told huffington post, "How we treat the undocumented says a great deal about us as a people and
whether or not we'll continue to fulfill the fundamental American promise of equality and opportunity for all." According to the U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, 240,255 people were deported in the year 2016. However, this year the number of arrest have rose up to 38 percent (Gomez).
The number of people being deported have been increasing every year. The reason behind the increase of number is unfair hearings and policy of
deportation. The United States Immigration System should change their policies on deportation because it violates the constitutional rights and exposes
the inequality towards immigrants. Current The United States Immigration System (USIC) policy is inhumane to the country and its legal system.
There have been many incidents of brutal deportation where person is being hurt or experienced inhumanity. As stated by Mallory Shelbourne in the
article published in The Hill, "The administrative complaint includes accounts from multiple women who were detained by [Immigrations and Customs
Enforcement] while pregnant, including one woman who said she was unable to obtain medical attention after telling officials she was pregnant and
bleeding." This exemplified the cruelty of officials in the process. Pregnant women or any medical seeking person should be taken care by officials
regardless of their immigration status.

Immigration Policy Of 1924
Immigration is the act of coming to a country of which one is not a native to, usually for permanent residence. The immigration policy of the united
states is very extensive and complicated. The immigration policy has been disputed by many, those who agree with it and those who do not agree with
it. I for one disagree with the immigration policy ranging from Job displacement, all the way to the border security, even the Pathway to Citizenship. In
1924 the original priority of border control was to prevent terrorists and terrorists weapons, including weapons of mass destruction, from entering the
United States, but due to the influx of many illegal aliens trying to escape to a new life, border control has changed their priorities. Border control

Immigration Policies Essay
There are many countries around the world that have very limited opportunities within the sphere of immigration policies. A few examples are Italy,
Japan and United Arab Emirates. Now that being said all of these places aren't necessarily unfavorable places for immigrants, they are just found to still
hold restricting policies. These policies include paying money for immigrants to leave, detaining them, and refusing rights. Through all established
immigration policies there is heavy debate and controversy, but it's usually pretty easy to agree on policies that come off as too harsh.
In Italy, immigration is managed from North Africa and the Mediterranean by enforcing strict immigration policies. Their current policies allow
immigration officials to fine illegal immigrants anywhere between в‚¬5,000–10,000 and detain them for up to 6 months. This is only one of their
immigration laws and it made people furious. There were two days of riots that left everything destroyed, officers in the hospital and rioters detained.
Though this immigration policy is still in place Italy is ranked fairly well by MIPEX (Migration integration policy index).
Japan is another state that has always had immigration problems, but in an attempt to help their unemployment rates, they put in place a policy that
slowed down the importation of cheap labor. They have had labor shortages because of their aging population and their change in needs. Though labor
shortages have been a problem the government,

Canadian Immigration Policy Essay
The history of Canadian immigration highlights that the immigration policies has been selective about the immigrants coming to Canada. The basis of
the choice of immigrants and corresponding policies and laws were motivated and shaped by the political, social and economic position of Canada
throughout the decades. Through the historical records the Canadian immigration policies had been heavily influenced by ethnicity, race and religion
factors.
The most unconcealed act of discrimination of excluding immigrants on basis of their ethnicity was by implementing the Chinese Immigration Act of
1885. The restrictions on Chinese immigrants were placed until 1947.The immigration policies of 1906 and then 1910 became more restrictive in type
of immigrants

Immigration Policy Thesis
Solving the immigration problem in 300 words is going to be extremely hard, considering it has been 140 years since the United States created its first
immigration stance with the removal of the open–door policy, and we still have problems with the laws surrounding immigration. I am going to focus
specifically on changing the major flaws in our system and am going to leave the details vague. My first target would be in changing the laws
regarding the guest worker program. If we want to hire workers from other countries to come and work for US companies, I feel like the workers
should be considered American citizens. The book highlights poor working conditions and lack of workers' representation if they are injured on the
job. If citizens of... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Temporary citizenship and full citizenship for guest workers would work the same as applying to become a US citizen, but I would
simultaneously be working to lower the requirements to become a citizen. Instead of being a US resident for an X number of years, I would have
potential immigrants be evaluated by a series of mental and emotional tests, and make sure they could comprehend English to some extent. As long
as the people who want to enter the country have morals and can interact with US citizens, I see no reason why they should not be considered US
citizens. Ultimately, they add to the workforce and provide an economic benefit to the country. Because the process of becoming a US citizen would
be altered to make it more achievable, I would want to increase border security and grant illegal citizens in our nation amnesty to pursue the new
program. The only group of people I could think of that would want to enter our country illegally after the implementation of my legislation would be
people trying to smuggle drugs over the border, or people hiding

Refugee Immigration Policy Analysis
1. This paper is on Germany's open–door policy on refugee immigration and the impact it has on its political and social relations. As a result, from the
increase immigration, there was an economic effect on Germanys job market. Lastly, this paper states the United States' interest in German policy and
the effect it has had on legislation regarding refugee immigration.
2. Germany's Chancellor, Angela Merkel, elected an open–door policy toward refugee immigration. Since the implementation of the policy, Germany
has admitted over one million refugees in the country.1 Germany's Prime Minister, Horst Seehofer believes the refugees in Germany have led to an
increase in attacks and terrorist threats.2 Seehofer is questioning Merkel's policy as many immigrants are entering unchecked into Germany.3 These
immigrants, in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States' interests on refugees entering the nation has become a concern for many, especially with the increased attacks in Germany after the
immigration.10 The Deputy Director of the German Marshall Fund, Sudha David–Wilp stated that many Americans were at first impressed with
Germany's decision on refugees, but now question the absence of management that went into the policy.11 Another problem with refugee immigration
is how to integrate over a million refugees into the country without disrupting the safety and welfare of the economy.12 The United States viewed these
events and has chosen the nation's security over humanitarian efforts. It stands by strict immigration laws so as not to mirror the events in Germany
caused by its allowance of refugees under the unfiltered policy.13
5. In conclusion, Germany's open–door policy has resulted in controversy within its nation. The economic impingements of the large immigration have
resulted in both positive and negative effects on the workforce. Due to the events in Germany, the United States stands firm on strict immigration laws
for refugees in order to secure the nation's best

Canadian Immigration Policy
There are various issues that revolve around Canadian politics. These issues can include various subjects, such as economics, multiculturalism, health
care, immigration, and foreign policy. An important issue in Canada that is discussed in this essay is Canada's constant changes to its immigration
policy in order to improve its economic goals and the labour market. These issues are changing by different policies that the Canadian government are
putting into place, which creates a more strict system in choosing who can immigrate into the country. Three articles that thoroughly analyze Canada's
immigration policy in order to implement these changes are the following. The first article is named: "New Directions in Immigration Policy: Canada's
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This article provides detailed information that give statistics based on distinguishing immigrant classes: "Tables 2 (for males) and 3 (for females)
present descriptive statistics by broad immigrant class across the three cycles of the survey. ... For both genders, it is clear that skilled worker principal
applicants have higher educational attainment, and it is also apparent that males have higher averages than females". This article is distinct from the
other two articles by the fact that many more statistics are offered. These extra statistics offer more insight into the descriptions of the economical
immigrant policies. Moreover, the article offers an insight into a range of policy proposals in determining how immigrants can immigrate into Canada.
The articles introduction mentions important policies that the Canadian government put into place: Recent examples include the Ontario Expert
Roundtable on Immigration (2012) and the Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Canada. The paper presents a basic description of differences in
labour market outcomes, including both earnings and employments. This is an important statement as it informs the reader about the various types of
concepts, along with their sources, that have

Immigration Issue Over Immigration Policy
Immigrants' Rights
Immigration is a kind of movement of people into destination land, which can be traced back to a million years ago. Also, the debate over whether
immigrants should be given more rights has been an intractable problem for a long period. According to statistics from Wikipedia, as for 2005, the
United Nations reported that there were nearly 191 million international immigrants worldwide, about three percent of the world 's population (
Immigration). Although it does not seem to take up a large proportion, actually the amount of the immigrant population is particularly huge. In this way,
policies on immigration are considered remarkably significant. Moreover, recently the attacks in European countries have also poured fuel on the
already–heated debate over immigration policy. In most cases, local citizens and governments do not welcome immigrants into their own country,
which is partly due to the discrimination. Obviously, it is unfair to them. Immigrants should be treated equally and given more rights than the rights
they possess now because they contribute to boosting economy, creating a harmonious society and they are legal immigrants.
Many people assume that if immigrants are given more rights, there will be more immigrants into the country, which will result in an economic burden
to society. However, by focusing on the negative effects they bring, people overlook the value and the social wealth created by immigrants. Recently,
researchers collected a large

US Immigration Policy
The Intersection of Immigration Policy and Compassion
US Immigration Policy in modern America is an embarrassment, compounded by many politicians apathetic and sometimes avaricious stance
regarding these human transplants. For example, The Immigration Act of 1990 requires that those seeking Diversity Immigrant Visas obtain a high
school diploma and have two years' work experience, as well as two years' job training before applicants can be considered to receive said Visa. In
countries with destitute economies and little access to education for the masses, what chance do ordinary citizens have of meeting these criteria?
These prerequisites share parallels with Jim Crow Laws of the 20th century such as a literacy tests and poll taxes, which not only disenfranchised
blacks but also poor whites. If we only allow the educated and previously employed a foot through the door, we are doing a disservice to those not
afforded the same opportunities and stealing from them the possibility of a new life in the land of opportunity. I... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A Ph.D. Postulates that "Today we ask too little of too many of our immigrants. We apparently don't care whether they come legally or learn English
–or how they fare when they're not at work" (Hanson). This is an attitude many Americans have adopted as more Mexican immigrants flood into our
country. As the best friend of a Mexican woman who recently obtained citizenship, I must vehemently disagree. The exorbitant fees paid, unadulterated
racism and hate speech directed at her and her child, fears of paralleled corruption between the US and Mexican government at the law enforcement
and judicial level pertaining to womens' rights, and poverty are all extremely high fees to be asked of any person. Basic human dignity is something
that all people

Immigration And Immigration Policy
Immigration policy has played an important role on the federal level; however, it has gained momentum in terms of the direct involvement from state
and local governments. Over time, state and local governments have become increasingly involved in creating and enforcing immigration policy in
response to the federal government's inability to address this specific issue. The consequences of these policies have generated controversy regarding
the ethical, economic, and legal implications of these aggressive immigration policies along with an increase in copycat legislation by other states.
Although the federal government has not been able to fully address this issue, it is still an important matter that would be better handled by the federal
government in a universal approach as opposed to individual state and local actions. Therefore, this paper will be examining the ways and implications
in which state and local governments have attempted to address immigration policy through actions of their own and how that has only reinforced the
argument that this specific issue would be better handled in the federal level. With the federal government's failure to address immigration policy
along with high levels of polarization between Democrats and Republicans, states have taken the initiative of directly getting involved in immigration
policy. Perhaps the most notable piece of legislation regarding immigration on the state level was Arizona's passage of SB 1070 in 2010. This law

Salvadoran Immigration Policy
Caught in the crosshairs of a vicious war fueled by military aid from the United States, Salvadorans throughout the 1980s and 1990s strived to make a
life for themselves. Running from El Salvador in hopes of a better future, they found themselves deadlocked in a marginalized life north of the
US–Mexico border in Los Angeles. Without the law on their side, many Salvadorans struggled to obtain legal admittance to theUnited States due to
inconsistent and inadequate immigration policies implemented throughout President Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan's administrations. In Los Angeles
during the mid–80s, a young group of Salvadorans emerged and called themselves the Mara Salvatrucha Stoners 13 in hopes of defending their
neighborhood from other ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Salvadorans that wished to remain indifferent from the violence and not align themselves with either the government or the guerrilla groups were
left in a hostile threshold of neither here or there. The vicious civil war lasted twelve years and took more than 70,000 lives (Valdez, 2011, 25).
Surrounded by death, many Salvadorans found it "difficult ... to imagine El Salvador without violence. As if violence was part of its story, of its
identity" driving "entire families, young people, and both army and guerrilla deserters" to flee the country (Garsd,

New Immigration Policy
Today, there are almost 11 million immigrants, living illegally in the U.S., creating a massive problem for the U.S. government. What could be a
possible new immigration policy? For the past several years, the government has been seeking a solution to this difficult task, yet the issue still remains
unsolved. Groups like the Task Force, and even former U.S. President Bush proposed different ideas pertaining to change in the U.S.immigration
policy, which can be compared and contrasted to a recently proposed Option 5. First and foremost, there were many similarities between the ideas
suggested by Option 5, the Task Force and President Bush. It was agreed between the groups that, despite numerous problems pertaining to the
immigrants, the vast majority of them are people who came to America to work hard to support their families, practice their faiths, and lead responsible
lives. For that reason, all three groups believe that a temporary work permit program would greatly benefit both the illegal immigrants and the U.S.
government.
The ideas of each group were comparable, in terms of giving the immigrants an option to apply for temporary visas or green cards. This option may
solve the major problem with illegals trying to sneak across the Mexico border, and encourage them to take the proper route into America. The
temporary work permits will provide low wage employees for employers in America, to fill in the gaps that no ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Part of the problem with no change in immigration policy is the struggle in Congress; the President is of a different party than majority of Congress
and policies are constantly being blocked or vetoed. Hopefully, however, perhaps sometime in the long run, a new favorable and effective
immigration policy will be sorted out, and a better life can be provided for the future U.S. and its next generation of

Immigration Policy
Based on what was read in the Schneider and Ingram paper, it mainly states that each policy theory has a lot to offer people but not usually enough for
a society or population that has grown to have less trust in the government. Noticing that space between citizen and government, the paper tells about
how certain policies can bring the citizens of a country back to having trust in the government again. Seeing that the government has many policies
affecting people in our nation and around the world, I zoned in on one particular issue. How does immigration policy affect hispanic people trying to
enter America?
My target population is made up of people who primarily don't speak english and are trying to move to America in search of a better life. Hispanics are
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is only a limited number of visas into the country and it's usually families that preference or those who have a relative already in the country
(american immigration council). Many hispanic people try to gain access to america through the visa system but because of how selective and
family oriented it is we end up having a lot of illegal immigrants. If America is able to relax the current immigration laws in order to accommodate
more people as well as make it easier to enter the country legally, then there would be less of a problem of people sneaking across the border
illegally. Therefore having less illegal hispanic immigrants there would be less negative word spread about them, and they would have the chance to
move from the deviant category out and up to contenders. I think if we can solve these issues we can lower crime rates, illegal immigration, and
spending on border patrol as well as police finding illegal immigrants. Helping those south of us can only help us move

Immigration Policy In Canada
In 2013, according to the United Nations there were approximately 231 million people residing in a country other than their place of birth. Amongst
western societies, Canada is considered one of the generous countries to immigrate to with one of the highest per capita admission rates. It has, on
average, offered placement to more than 200,000 immigrants per year over the past decade, earning Canada a global reputation for its "open arms"
attitude.
Since Confederation, Canada's immigration landscape has been in a state of constant transformation. In 2014, the federal government announced major
changes to its immigration system pressing many Canadians to raise questions about the immigration strategies sponsored by the country's political
parties. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gergin (2011) suggests that the Conservatives have crafted an immigration policy that is less compassionate and more economically based. He goes on
to argue that the family–class immigration initiatives has virtually vanished under the Harper government and that the leadership continues to amend
the formula towards the entrepreneurial and well–educated individual who should easily integrate successfully into the state's economy and social
spheres.
Scholars assert that the key theme in the evolution of Canada's immigration strategy is the perceived trade–off between short–term and long–term
objectives. Canada's shifting immigration policy and the emphasis placed on specific immigration goals will always invite critics and expose
competing immigration principles amid Canada's political parties.
Approach to

Australia's Immigration Policy
Immigration, especially from Asia, was a contentious issue in Australia during the 1980s and 1990s. This was largely a direct result of Australia's
involvement in the Vietnam War, and a responsibility we had to help the large group of refugees that were a result of the war. The Blainey debate also
impacted heavily on public perception on immigration, as Professor Geoffrey Blainey, began a critique of Australia's immigration policy. This paper is
going to focus on the Blainey debate and its impact on immigration, as well as the changes made to Australia's immigration policy beginning in the
1970s, and the Vietnam War, which caused for the number of refugees and people immigrating to Australia, to increase.
After the end of the Vietnam War in... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As mentioned above, the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 was a key part in changing of attitudes to how refugees were welcomed in Australia. This act,
however, had its beginnings as an amendment to the 'Migration Act' in 1973, which introduced a non–discriminatory immigration policy. This vastly
changed Australia's immigration policy, as well as changing Australia from a largely white country, to a new multiethnic society. The way that
immigrants were selected, to come to Australia, also changed from the 1970s onwards. Stewart West, the Federal Minister for Immigration and Ethnic
Affairs, addressed this selection during a speech in 1984; "Our first commitment is to honor responsibilities to those migrants already in Australia, to
honor international obligations and to accept that humanitarian considerations apply to both these areas" (Foster, 1988, pp.). One of the new
categories introduced, was the skilled migrant. This allowed immigrants with useful and professional skills and trades to have an advantage over
other immigrants when being considered to gain visas. Family reunion is another one of these new categories, which gave priority to the relatives of
immigrants and refugees who have already relocated to Australia. The family reunion policy also played a large role in the influx of Vietnamese
refugees after the war, as those who had escaped the communist regime, now were able to bring their families to safety in Australia as well.
Humanitarian migration is another of these categories, which specialised specifically in refugees and providing both offshore and onshore resettlement
programs. These new categories of immigrants, as well as pressure from other countries, encouraged Australia to increase the amount of immigrants
allowed entry into Australia every

The Struggle Of Immigration Policy
Since the first settlers of Texas to the present day, the rugged and individual attitude of the Texan people has often resulted in serious squabbles and
disagreements between the federal government and the state. These issues stem from education to environmental policies and also include welfare
problems, such as women's rights and social policy. However, the struggle of immigration policy dating back to the start of the century has evolved
into a very complex issue. On one hand, the U.S government is currently a divided government, as the results from the General election of 2014
identified rapid gains by the Republican Party in the House of Representatives and the Senate cultivating a strong conservative viewpoint while the
office of President is currently dominated by a Democratic president, Barack Obama, which backs a liberal attitude of protecting the immigrants.
Meanwhile in Texas, The intense conservative view of the state allows a common battle with the federal government, as the issue is much more
relevant to the border state and does everything to curb federal legislation from protecting immigrants to deporting them and securing the borders. The
issue that arises in this fierce standoff between the state and the federal government is that the poor, low income immigrants are held in a perpetual
sense of deportation and lack of citizenship for their children or other people who wish to immigrate.
The current policy of Texas regarding illegal immigration is very

Immigration Policy And Foreign Policy
Immigration policy and foreign policy are in many ways interlinked, as they are often used to meet goals in one another's policy areas. Together, they
are used to enhance the safety of our citizens, making this topic particularly important. Immigration is specifically linked to our foreign policy efforts
with underdeveloped countries (Keely 1978). To fully understand onepolicy area, you must understand aspects of the other. Thus, one should consider
these relationships when analyzing and evaluating Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's policies on immigration reform.
Immigration policy can often be used as a tool for foreign policy goals. This usually occurs when national safety is threatened, and it is sparked by
merely the perception that immigration and terrorism are linked. Many believe that terrorists can enter our country by manipulating Immigration laws
such as refugee asylums, which leads to stricter immigration policy to better secure our national safety (Franzblau 1997, 4–11). Even now, the
Republican Nominee for President of the United States, Donald Trump, makes statements like, "our immigration system is being used to attack us"
(Hensch 2015). Regardless of the truth value behind his statement, it is relevant to note that the notion itself by such an important political figure could
create a push for stricter immigration policy. The change in policy may be surrounding the issue of immigration, but the actual goal is the foreign
policy goal of enhanced national

Immigration Policy Issues
Mitt Romney in his speech to the RNC just four years ago would be considered near traitorous to the republican party in the divisive politics of the
present. In this presidential campaign season, as in many previous ones, one of the largest issues continues to be that of immigration. The fundamental
disagreement is not whether an issue exists, but as to how the United States should react to the ones waking up at night hearing that voice telling them
to come to America. This paper will examine the roles of federal, state, and local governments have regarding the question: should state and local
governments have the authority to draft and execute immigration policies? First, it will delve deeper into this topic by studying the history of
immigration ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This legislation required that an individual reside in the country for 14 years prior to becoming a citizen, and, established one of the first deportation
systems for the United States. (Englund & Svoboda 2007) Between 1790 and 1820 immigration begins to gradually increase, and between the 1830's
and 1860's there is an influx in movement into America from Ireland and Western Europe. (Cannato 2012; Schultz 2010; Ewing 2012) Cannato writes
that "This pattern began to change in the 1830s, which saw more than 500,000 immigrants arrive (again, almost entirely from Western Europe,
especially Germany and Ireland)." (Cannato 2012) Ewing tells us that " During the 1840s, 50s, and 60s, approximately 6.6 million immigrants arrived
in the United States." (Ewing

U.s. Immigration Policy Policies Essay
U.S. immigration policy has always been an important topic debated by Presidential candidates for decades. Immigration reform has been ignored by
Congress, leaving decisions up to the President and Supreme Court. In the meantime, the hopes of about eleven million illegal immigrants in the U.S.,
as well as future rules for legal immigration, rest on the shoulders of those decision makers. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump both agree that changes
to U.S. immigration policy are needed; however, Donald Trump is taking a radical approach suggesting mass deportation and completely revamping
U.S. immigration policy, whereas, Hillary Clinton is overlooking some issues and wants to continue to support the policy set forth by the Obama
Administration. Regardless of who becomes President, they will have a hard time getting these issues passed through Congress.
Deportation
Donald Trump's signature topic during his presidential campaign has been illegal immigration. He has generated headlines and controversial remarks
during his plans for change. In 2015, when he announced he was running for president, Donald Trump claimed Mexico was sending all their rapist and
violent criminals into the U.S. (Gabbatt, 2015). He also called for the deportation of an estimated eleven million illegal immigrants. Donald Trump has
built his campaign on his willingness to deport a projected eleven million illegal immigrants; however, most recently his stance has changed. In a recent
interview, Fox News

Haiti Immigration Policy
This article discusses the history of immigration policies between the United States and Haiti and the consequences of these policies. On September 22,
2016 the Obama administration made the drastic decision to close its doors to Haitian migrants. The administration announced that it would tighten its
immigration policy on Haitians, limiting the amount of refugees that would enter. Which was a drastic change from their 2010 immigration policy that
open its doors to the Haitian refugees. This new policy affected many migrating Haitian who where just days from their immigration appointments. The
article recalls personal experiences about the racism and the dangers Haitians face throughout the journey. Also describing the poor conditions
immigrants ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
We can begin by talking about migration and its effects on a global scale. Migration is one of the main areas of focuses in Latin America and Latino
Studies. It helps us understand the effects of globalization on Latin American countries, the global relationship between theUnited States and Latin
America, and how this relationship affects the Latin American people. This article goes through explaining the push and pull factors of why Haitians
are being both pushed into the United States and pulled away from their home country. With the 2010 earthquake that hit Haiti, economic as well as
political factors pushed Haitians to migrate. They started with Brazil but as their economy worsen, Haitians looked furthered to the United States. And
the United States allowed them to do so as a humanitarian provision that came as the result of the 2010 earthquake. This pulled further struggling
Haitians with the promise of a better life to make the dangerous journey. But with the abrupt change in policy, this shatters the already struggling Latin
American countries with several displacements. We can go even further, analyzing other areas of study such as how the displacement of these
immigrants will affect Latin America itself. Or how, on a national scale, the displacement of the migrating Haitians will affect

Improving The Immigration Policy
Many immigrants feel like it is a challenge to be accepted into another country. Some minorities feel as if congress is not doing an exceptional job on
how their immigration policy runs. The Immigration policies between the United States of America and South Africa are incredibly similar; it seems as
if both countries are not considering minorities to be important in another country. Even though they don't highly appreciate minorities, they both have
an elevated focus for defense of security and health. Congress is blind to the fact a majority of the workforce going on in the United States are not
documented. Improving the immigration policy will differ from the lives in both South America and The United States. In the United States the
immigration

Immigration Policy Summary
In the spring of 2013, the 'Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act', or S.744, was introduced by a bipartisan
group of eight Senators. In this bill, five key reforms are proposed. Firstly, that of Border Security: This clause proposes an increase of spending by a
whopping $40 billion, and an addition of fencing and 20,000 new Border Patrol agents to hopefully achieve a 90% apprehension rate of illegal
immigrants in the border within the next five years. Secondly, Legalization: This clause aims to facilitate the immigration process. Thirdly, Legal
Immigration: This clause aims to shift visa priorities from family based immigration to employment–based immigration in hopes of reducing backlogs.
Fourthly, Interior ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
immigration policies as the legalization of undocumented immigrants could strengthen the economy. Taking into consideration the New Economics of
Labor Migration Theory, this bill provides protection of human rights (such as that from domestic violence) that might compel women and children to
want to legally migrate into the United States. Once they are legalized, they will be part of the taxpaying, American population. Therefore a plausible
conclusion that can be derived from this theory and the Neo–Classical Theory, I opine that if this bill is passed, it will increase the number of legal
Mexican immigrants in the US. Subsequently, I view the issue of undocumented immigrants as one that is impossible to fully 'solve'. However, there
are measures that can be taken to lessen the number of illegal immigrants to the smallest number possible. The legalization of undocumented
immigrants is important because it not only betters the economy, but also betters working conditions for the migrants and opens a bigger possibility for
family reunification. Additionally, immigrants contribute to the economy through their immigration application fees, additional tax payments, lower
costs of goods and services, and many more. Therefore, I vouch for this bill, so long as it enhances the legalization of undocumented

Immigration Policy And The Immigration Sector
Immigration
PAD 3034
Juan Sarmiento
Florida International University
July 9th, 2015
Abstract
In this paper, I decided to analyze the immigration policy. The immigration policies have had a deep history. The policies have been twisted, in the
long run, to meet the demands of the time. However, most of the times, the policies have been unfair especially in regard to the immigrants. The
overview contains a rich history of the policy progression and advancements in the immigration sector. In this paper, I decided to extrapolate on some
few contemporary issues that are as a result of the immigration policies and laws. One of the contentious issues is the Visa policy. This is a system that
is widely used by the US government. Though formulated with a good purpose, the formulation did not cater for everything that is associated with
immigration. For instance, the immigrants who are on transit for employment are not selected based on the employment demand in the market, hence,
they end up being stranded and thus are forced to accept low–paying jobs with poor working conditions. The solution to this is also discussed in the
paper. I have also discussed on the open door policy and its implications which include overpopulation. Overpopulation on its part has directly affected
both the immigrants and natives with many adverse effects. I was able to do research, and I consequently came up with a set of alternative methods
that could be of help. However, I have also discussed

Essay On Immigration Policy
Immigration Policy
The two presidential candidates that I selected were Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Most people would say that I picked them because they are
the most simple to do. When in all actuality I picked them because they are like both day and night when it comes to immigration policy. Immigration
is becoming a problem for the United States. It has been said that University of Texas researchers found that young immigrants have a lower crime rate
than American–born teens –– call it an immigrant paradox. For the Simple fact that there is a ten step process to get citizenship in the United States
most people come into the country illegally. America's immigration system is broken. Too many employers game the system by hiring undocumented...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They are as follows; a nation without laws is not a nation, a nation without borders is not a nation, a nation that does not serve its own citizens is not
a nation. Trump believes that there must be a wall across the southern border. Not only does he believe there should be a wall along the southern
border but he wants Mexico to pay for the wall. Laws passed in accordance with the United States constitutional system of government must be
enforced. Any immigration plan must improve jobs, wages, and security for all Americans. Trumps states, "America will only be great as long as
America remains a nation of laws that live according to The Constitution". And to do that he plans to triple the number of ICE (Immigration and
Customs Enforcement) Officials. He wants there to be a mandatory return of all criminal aliens and he wants all American workers to be put first.
Trump wants to cut–off federal grants to any city which refuses to cooperate with federal law enforcement. Millions of people come to the United
States on temporary visas but refuse to leave, without consequence. This is a threat to national security. Individuals who refuse to leave at the time
their visa expires should be subject to criminal penalties; this will also help give local jurisdictions the power to hold visa overstays until federal
authorities arrive. Completion of a visa tracking system – required by law but blocked by lobbyists – will be necessary as

Canadian Immigration Policy Analysis: SEO Optimized Title

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sunshine Blackburn

More from Sunshine Blackburn (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Canadian Immigration Policy Analysis: SEO Optimized Title