Is Animal Cruelty Free

Cosmetics Research Proposal
Proposal Do we really know what is cruelty free in the fashion and beauty industry?
This dissertation is going to look mainly at animal testing in the fashion and beauty industry and
whether customers know what they are purchasing is really cruelty free. It is also going to give an
insight of what cruelty is and whether or not there can be alternatives. Although this topic is not
directly linked to fashion, cosmetics are a big part of fashion shows and are used widely by fashion
designers and models. This a very important and controversial topic as even though people are
aware of animal testing and feel negative towards it they are not doing enough or don't know how to
help stop it for good. All evidence including peer–reviewed journal articles and books will be
sourced from the library and the online library catalogue. Information sourced from British Union
for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) articles.
Chapter 1
What is Cruelty and why should it be spoke about?
This Chapter will be uncovering what animal cruelty is and what affect it is having on the animal
world. Animal testing is a horrific and disturbing event were an animal is forced to undergo tests
that will cause them stress, suffering and in some cases lasting harm. In worse cases the animal is
killed after the experimentation. Mainly looking at animal testing in the cosmetics industry this
chapter will also discuss what happens in the experiments and why animals are tested for these
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Animal Testing And Veterinary Purposes
"Scientists told to stop wasting animal lives," this is an article from The Guardian, written by Robin
McKie. It addresses the issues about using animals to test products for us to use such as, medicines
to try help treat serious illnesses and also for veterinary purposes. Animal testing is carried out by
scientists to also test items we use daily such as makeup but this article is not talking about those
particular issues. This article is discussing about undergoing new guidelines for those that are
carrying out research using animals. The Research Council UK say they are now making scientists
show their work will not only produce physiological understanding but will also generate
statistically sturdy data. If not they will end up losing their funding.
This article made me understand more about the research scientists undergo using animals to
conduct their research. UK scientists have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some statistics that overwhelmed me was that in Great Britain, 2013, 4.12 million scientific
procedures were done on animals, they were mostly rats and mice. About half of them involved
animals being gentically modified when breeding. The other half involved experiments on normal
animals, 58% of those were carried out for regular research, 26% for human medicine and only a
frightening 8% for veterinary purposes. I personally think that scientists just keep using animals
because their project isn't flawless and because they don't care about the animals and use as much as
they like and I thinlk that is cruel because they are wasting animals lives. Neuroscientist Malcolm
Macleod says, "there has been an increasing awareness that some

Using Animals Symbolically by Using Poetic Devices Essay
Using Animals Symbolically by Using Poetic Devices
I will be discussing the ways in which the poets use animals symbolically by using poetic devices.
The three poems that I have chosen are "The Tyger" by William Blake, "The Eagle" by Alfred, Lord
Tennyson. Lastly, Pied Beauty by Gerard Manley Hopkins. Alfred Lord
Tennyson has used an image of an eagle to give the reader an image of a man standing on a cliff top
waiting for his world to fall around him. He is in a desolate area; there is no society near him
"ringed with the azure world. He stands". He watches the sea pass lower than him his world
collapses beneath him n he falls.
"And like a thunderbolt he falls"
The sun has symbolized God. And his closeness to the eagle. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, the poem is trying to tell us that the eagle is standing "close to the sun in lonely lands" and
that the enormous sea is beneath him. These are the ways that the poet has used the eagle
symbolically and to illustrate his strength and power standing high in the sky.
"Tyger! Tyger! Burning bright"
This is an example from "The Tyger"
Metaphors of fire and blazing are emphasize by duplication of the "B" sound. The "B" sound makes
it stronger and powerful to use.
My second choice is "Pied Beauty". Gerard Manley Hopkins who was born in 1844 wrote this
poem. The poem is tells us about all the different creatures that God has shaped. Explaining how for
many belongings in nature there is a contradictory. He is also telling the reader that we should be
thankful towards it and the entire God gifted.
In the poem, there are uses of some oxymoron's by using them it shows the different extremes that
exist within nature. This is similar to the Tyger. In addition, that shows the readers that to
keep the balance on the planet God has created an opposite. "Adazzle, dim". "With swift, slow;
sweet, sour"

He uses animals as one of God's gift for our nature and used them symbolically for the exquisiteness
of the planet.
My third choice of poem is "The Tyger" written by William Blake. This poem shows the evilness of
the

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay
Look at the tag of your shirt, where does it say its from? Now, does it say how many people it took
to make it or how much time it took? Apply that same logic to when you buy shampoo. Does it say
how many animals died when they tested the product? No, it does not. Companies and factories do
this for a reason, they want us to be unaware of the facts. Within the next few moments I hope to
enlighten you with information you may not know about animal testing.
Animal testing can be traced all the way back to the 4th century BCE. Charles Darwin documented
evidence that Aristotle began using live animals for experiments. But testing products on animals
began in 1922 when testing insulin on dogs. This began after a woman lost her eyesight due to
chemicals in a mascara she used. This incident forced the federal government to create the federal
food, drug, and cosmetic act. This act that was passed in 1938 and made it mandatory for companies
to test on animals before ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Two of the most common methods used are the draize test and the LD50 test. In the draize test a
drop of the substance is placed into the animal's eye and the reactions are observed. LD50 means
lethal dose. The LD50 test is when researchers feed or apply a particular substance dermally to the
animals until half of the animals being tested die.But, just because a certain thing does not affect
animals does not mean it will not affect humans. For example, theobromine in chocolate cake is
toxic to dogs, and aspirin causes a reaction in cats. Another example is the thalidomide tragedy. The
thalidomide tragedy was caused by a sleeping pill, pharmacists thought the medication would be
safe for pregnant women as well. However, it caused many newborns worldwide to be born with
deformed limbs. Then there is LC which means "lethal concentration." LC50 is the chemical in the
air or water that will kill 50% of the test animals with a single

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Around 100,000 to 200,000 animals are suffering and dying from makeup testing yearly OR In
2013, India abolished mandatory cosmetics testing on animals. There are places such as Israel, India
and the European Union which have banned cosmetics testing on animals. On the other hand, there
are countries like the United States and China that still allow makeup testing on animals. Many
organizations and groups are trying to find alternatives to help end cosmetics testing on animals.
There have been about 50 non–animal tests that have already been authorized. A wide variety of
animals are tested on. Some of the more common animals that are tested on can include mice,
rabbits, rats, and guinea pigs. Cosmetics testing on animals is a very ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, also known by their acronym P.E.T.A., is a serious and
dedicated organization trying to help end the cosmetic testing of animals. People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals is very large; they have over 5 million people working and/ or supporting this
organization. P.E.T.A. has four main objectives or areas that they focus on. The section about
laboratories is where P.E.T.A. fights for animals whole are being tested on for cosmetics. People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals has had many extraordinary accomplishments. One is their
creation of the In Vitro test, which is an alternative to using animals to test on. P.E.T.A. also has
spent a large sum of money, around one million dollars, to find alternatives to animal testing.
Another group is the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments. They have been around for
about 25 years. This coalition worked to help end cosmetic testing in the European Union, which
they ultimately did. Their huge goal is to completely abolish any tests on animals. In addition, The
European Coalition to End Animal Experiments also helped to set the rules for a product to be
identified as cruelty–free. Those rules were named the Humane Cosmetics Standards. The Johns
Hopkins University Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing is another organization. This
organization works hard to find

Should Animal Testing Be Used In Biomedical Research
Did you know that the shampoo that you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or
evan a dog. Each year millions of animals are tested for how safe and effective products are. They
are being forced–fed harmful chemicals that can have severe damages to the animal.
Animals testing should be banned from being tested because it is very cruel and harmful, and also
there are also alternate testing methods to use.
Around 17 to 22 million animals are being tested for harmful products a year. They are having to go
through physical pain by being cut up, poisoned, burned, irradiated, gassed, shocked, dismembered
or genetically designed to suffer. Animals are being forced to have to go through so much pain
trying out the products you use today and then having to be trapped in cages for the rest of their
lives just because they might of not had a home. They are being abused for the scientists
experiments. In 2017 studies found that most of the data they gathered was false, and wasting the
animals lives. According to the article from procon.com¨Since the majority of animals used in
biomedical research are killed during or after the experiments, and since many suffer during the
studies, the lives and wellbeing of animals are routinely sacrificed for poor research.¨ ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Scientists have found a new way that could possibly save all of these animals lives. It's easy, you can
donate human tissues that the scientists can use to test their products instead of using animals. "The
methods for engineering tissue samples are among the most complex of an expanding portfolio of
technologies intended to eliminate or reduce animal testing." this method can save millions of lives
without having to harm anything and anyone in the process. These alternative methods for testing
human tissues instead of live animals will prove to be much more efficient than past

Animal Surgery Research Paper
The problem is that they are doing surgery on live animals and potentially hurting and changing the
way these animals are. I think the problem is unethical because the animals can become endangered.
It's more risky than doing surgery on humans. Animal's body cannot handle the pain and pressure
that it puts on their body. You have to know what you are doing before doing surgery on living
things. If we touch or do the wrong thing in their body, they can easily lose blood and die. Animals
are brought uncared for. Veterinarian schools for pets say 30–50% of endangered animals because of
schools doing surgery on mostly live animals. Veterinarian learning school also said 10% of animals
during surgery. Vet schools discovered that 20% of animals (of all kinds) being killed because of this
cruel mess. To stop the percentage of dying animals, is to use 100% of techniques and equipment's
you use on humans. Research says that "A significant number of students at every educational level
are uncomfortable with the use of animals in dissection and experimentation". 90% of people think
giving off, percentages help explain my claim.30% of people said researching how its effecting
animals. Veto said "20% of people come to them to ask questions". It helps 90% by giving ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They are made to be killed. They think even though we use them as pets they are still animals.
They're not humans, we kill them all the time to eat. Despite the cuteness of dogs, they can also be
used to do surgery on too. It helps to know what humans can do to help cure illness. The animals are
made to be treated Like that. They say "it's not cruel as it looks". Human veterinary Education says
that they learned that veterinary schools and veterinary – technology programs often expect their
students to perform painful and medically unnecessary procedures on live animals. Most people say
they think the schools should do

Animal Testing Research Paper
Did you know that 19,500,000 animals are killed each year for animal experimentation? Animal
testing is one of the highest leading causes of animal death. Many people don't think about how their
makeup product or lotion doesn't cause skin reactions. The products are first used in a number of
tests on a number of animals to make it safe for human use. These tests led to harming a handful of
helpless animals just for the benefit of one product for humans. Animals are put under microscopes
to try and figure out diseases that are contracted in humans. Animals are being killed in research
laboratories every day for no reason and no benefit. Animal testing should be banned due to the
animal cruelty involved, human and animal differences, and new ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
First people need to understand that using animals for testing isn't a cheap way to go. When testing
the protection of products, animal experimentation can become a very expensive process. The
United States spends roughly $12 billion to $14.5 billion on just animal experimentation in 2013
(University Wire). With such a large amount of money used just in one area of research, the results
should be way more accurate than they are. The United States is just losing all of its money in
animal testing because there is no end benefit in most cases. If experimentations on animals were
gone, there are more cost friendly testing methods. "In vitro testing is up to twelve times more cost
efficient in comparison to animal testing and does not involve an invasive procedure that infringes
on a sentient beings life" (University Wire). Vitro testing was a recently discovered form of testing
that has seen great results in such a small amount of time. Animal testing is an old procedure that
now has a new safer and cost–effective alternative. People think that if there wasn't animal
experimentation that humans would have to be the next test subjects. That might of been the case
back in the day, but now there are other ways in the always expanding technology world. An
alternative to animal testing is the ToxCast, which is a robot–powered system that is already found
to be as accurate as animal

Animal Experimentation Is Unnecessary?
People have animal, especially dog and cat, as a pet. They take care of animals and spend their lives
together. However, sacrificing animals is necessary to survive human's life. Moreover, using animals
as a laboratory table is become common because this can improve our health. Therefore, argument
about animal experimentation often leads to vigorous debate. Animal Experimentation Is
Unnecessary by Sarah A. Millar pointed out that animal experimentation wastes money and
brutalizes. Animal Experimentation Is Unethical by Robert Garner asserted that the social status of
animals is on a par with that of mortals. Animal Experimentation Is Necessary by Carl Cohen
claimed that vaccines about diseases, such as polio, have not practicalized unless animals were used
as a trial of side effect. Animal Experimentation Is Ethical by Henry E. Heffner argued that animal
experimentation profits not only humankind but also animals. On the surface at least, arguments
about animal experimentation seem different such as ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is no doubt that animal experimentation profits human. It can safeguard human health. Animal
experimentation is not only helpful but also crucial advances for human. For example, people make
striking progress on vaccine about malaria, which killed three hundred million, by using mice as a
test. Therefore, people can gain advantage using animals. Moreover, Heffner pointed out that "
[animal experimentation] benefits humans, which in turn benefits lab animals" (Heffner 72).
According to him, the relationship between human and animal is mutualistic, which can profit both.
For example, the author pointed out laboratory is secure than in wild. In the wild, animals suffer
food and shelter and so on, so morality rate are high. However, in the laboratories, animals do not
have to worry about that because people will take care of them. Therefore, animals are bound to
reproduce

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
Should We Test Animals ? Everyone has seen or heard "against animal testing," "animal cruelty
free," "no animals were harmed in the making of this."Many companies put these disclaimers on
their labels, but in reality these companies still use animals to test products. Animal testing is a very
controversial issue in many communities. It is believed that animal testing is used as a safer and
money– saving way to test products and medicines. Although animal testing has shown that many
products and medicines are harmless to people and has cured diseases, there are other ways that
exist to test these products. Certainly, people believe that using animals to test medicines has cured
diseases and saved people's lives. In addition to animals saving people's live's, people think that
animals are an easy way to test and then compare to humans because of how similar ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Researchers test these medicines that have saved lives on animals but testing these animals to get
cures is very cruel and inhumane. According to the Humane Society International, "Animals used in
experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water
deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to
study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by
carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck–breaking, decapitation, or other means"(Humane Society
International).Animals should not have to go through this type of pain and suffering to test products
when other, more available ways of testing products exist. Also, laws do "protect" these animals
while being tested,95% of animals are not protected during testing. Apparently the Animal Welfare
Act does not protect all animals, "The AWA does not cover rats, mice, fish and birds, which
comprise around 95% of the animals used in

Stop Using Products That Have Been Tested On Animals And...
Specific Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to motivate my audience to stop using products that
have been tested on animals and show them the other choices that they have out there.
Introduction:
Attention Step: According to PETA, "Animals are also used in toxicity tests conducted as part of
massive regulatory testing programs that are often funded by U.S. taxpayers' money. The
Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Toxicology
Program, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture are just a few of the government agencies that
subject animals to crude, painful tests." (PETA.org)
Establish Need/Relevance: What you have just heard is an example of what a portion of taxpayers
money goes toward. Certainly, there is a need for you as my audience to be aware of what goes on
during animal testing and what we can do to stop this.
Establish Credibility: I have 3 dogs at home that I absolutely love. I couldn't imagine one of my
sweet, loving animals being tested on. I decided to use products, especially make up brands that are
animal cruelty free. I want to see a change in the industry so I figured I would take a step towards
doing so.
Thesis Statement: Today, I will share 3 main points. (1) We should recognize what animal testing is
and the facts about it. (2) Specific brands that use animal testing. (3) The affects it has on animals.
BODY:
Description of the problems:
1. What is animal testing
A: use of animals for research purposes,

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
Although many view using animals in medical experiments in a negative light, testing is necessary
to develop new medications and to advance medical research. Testing has brought many
advancements in the medical field, including lifesaving procedures and treatments for diseases.
Also, as a result it brought forth ethical laws of animal test subjects and development of veterinarian
medicine.
Animal experiments date back long ago, the first use of animals in experiments date back to when
ancient Greek physicians first used animals as models for anatomy and physiology. (Franco) Since
then testing has been an ongoing even into the twenty first century. During that time, many
treatments of diseases and procedures for humans and animals alike owe ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
"Vaccines, antibiotics, anesthetics, surgical procedures, and other approaches developed in animals
for human use are now commonly employed throughout veterinary medicine. Pets, livestock, and
animals in zoos live longer, more comfortable, and healthier lives as a result of animal research"
(Committee on the Use of Animals in Research (U.S.) 14). Most people who own pets know that
giving pets vaccines and booster shot will help them and prevent them from deadly disease that
often prove fatal such as, rabies. Being one of the most recognizable disease in domestic pets testing
has given prevention to these pets. Furthermore, this has led to the promotion of humane treatment
of animals involved in experiments. The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act was passed by congress in
1966 in this act it regulates the standards for housing handling, feeding, veterinary care and use of
pain relieving drugs (Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (U.S.), National Research Council
(U.S.) 31) Thus, many other different committees and regulation have been pasted to aid support in
this. One of the biggest changes that has come about is the approach of the Three Rs advocating the
replacement, reduction and refinement of experiments on animals. (Bottling, Bottling xix) Which
means scientists are cognitive in their studies and showing that trails are not meant to cause pain and
suffering to the test

Vet Schools Research Paper
Should Vet Schools Be Allowed to Use Live Animals For Training?
Should Veterinarian students have to practice on animals before they become a Veterinarian? This
very question is causing a debate in the veterinary community. Many people have very strong
opinions on the topic. Students should be allowed to pick their classes regarding animal use.
The first vet school was opened in 1879, and animal rights have changed drastically since then.
Since the first vet school was opened, the number of protests about animal rights has grown.
Research shows that 140 reported animal deaths that occur at universities every year. " A national
leader in protecting animals and human health, the full– service laboratories at VDL [Veterinary
Diagnostic Laboratory]process ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When vet schools used to use animals it wasn't thought as of being cruel to the animals it was
thought of as an educational experience (¨Are Live–Terminal Laboratories Necessary?¨). Although
these are good arguments there are also several arguments against using animals in vet school. Many
schools have backed away from using animals in their studies. " Fortunately only a dozen of the
nation's 125 accredited medical schools still use live animal labs" ("Medical Training Using
Animals"). This quotes is saying that 12 of the 125 schools still use animals for educational
purposes. That is only 9% of the medical Universities, in the United States ("Medical Training
Using Animals"). Common animals used in vet schools are dogs,pigs,mice, rats, and birds. These
animals are picked because of their body type, and by the procedures that can be done on them.
These 5 animals are commonly used because they are the most common animals that a veterinarian
will see in their office. These are also the easiest animals for a University to get their hands on
(¨GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS¨). In labs, animals are anesthetized then injected
with medicine, tested, and later the animal will die. Many people find this cruel but others look at it
as the circle of life. Thousands of animals have been killed due to scientific demonstrations. The
operation that is being done that day will depend on what animal will

Accept Animals Testing or Not
Everyday, thousands and thousands of animals are being hunted, caged and killed for the purpose of
animal testing. This is a very controversial topic regarding the life of many innocent animals. There
are some people who believe that using these animals for testing is wrong. On the other hand, there
are just much people believe that there are many benefits for using animal for experimentation. I
myself think that people are the most important animal on this planet. Therefore, using animal for
testing to protect our livelihood is the top priority.
The first reason to use animals for testing is to study their behavior. Markedly, we have already
known that the trained dogs can direct the blind and also help to alert ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is clear that cosmetics can contain chemicals which may have many dangerous side effects.
Before introducing new cosmetic products, the first important steps which the producer has to do is
testing the safety of the products. However, testing new cosmetic ingredients on human will lead to
the dangerous reactions and human skin cell testing is more expensive even though it is more
accurate. So, cosmetic companies use animals because they closely related to human if the animals
react badly then the companies know they need to fix their product. It may be bad to hurt animals
but it's certainly better than causing harm to people. In addition, it is common that many animals are
used in military defense. In the war, dogs especially Belgian Malinois and German shepherd are
trained to be friend and protect soldiers. You might not know that "The U.S.Navy has used dolphins
in a variety ways, including to detect under water mines" (Lamothe, "Elephants, rats, and dolphins:
Eight ways the U.S. military has used animals")
The opponents of animal testing claim that this method is cruel and inhumane. Furthermore, they
state that nowadays, with the development of our technology, we do not need to use those pitiable
animals for testing. On the contrary, animals for example– according to Walton "mice, men shared
99 percent of genes" and Dr.DeWitt "...genetic similarity between human and chimpanzees
suggested they were 98.5–99.4 percent identical." So, using animal for testing is the best alternative
to human

Using Animals In Research And To Test Products Has Been
Using animals in research and to test products has been a topic of heated debate for many years.
Animals have contributed to research and we have found many cures to diseases that would have
otherwise killed us. Many individuals view animals as companions that exhibit emotion and have a
personality, they're not viewed as lab subjects. The fact remains that animals are utilized by research
facilities and cosmetics companies, not just across the country but around the entire world. Although
humans do benefit from animal research, the pain, suffering, and annual deaths of over one hundred
million animals are not worth the human benefits. Why should animals suffer unnecessarily for the
human benefit? Animals are given diseases that they would ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But babies also do not have those rights and cannot express themselves through language, but they
are treated with respect and are not tortured (Mur 10). PETA stands for People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals, the case that launched it was the Silver Springs Monkey experiment that took
place in Silver Spring, Maryland. In this laboratory, 17 monkeys were held in small wired cages
with feces and urine that have accumulated over several years. The experiment was run by a
Psychologist named Edward Taub who had no previous medical training. The monkeys would be
subjected to many spinal surgeries that would cause one or more of their limbs to become useless.
They would be forced to regain mobility of their useless limbs by constantly being shocked. These
monkeys would lose fingers by getting them caught in the cage, some only had three out of ten
fingers left. They were food deprived and they would scavenge through their feces to find something
to eat (The Silver Spring Monkeys: The Case That Launched PETA).
There are many alternatives to animal testing. For example, synthetic skin; the synthetic skin has
been made and may replace the use of animal subjects. The Draize test, for example, was an "eye
irritancy test, in which cosmetics, dishwashing liquid, drain cleaner, and other substances are
dripped into the animals' eyes, often causing redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration, hemorrhaging,
cloudiness, or blindness" (Rabbits in Laboratories). More than 170,000 rabbits

When Animals Communicate, They Are Not Using Language
Have you ever gone home to hear your dog say 'hello'? Most likely not, but you might've seen it
jump or joyfully bark. These actions may be adorable, but they don't have things that language
needs. Animals can't use language because they lack attributes that it needs.
When animals communicate, they don't have or use tributes that language needs. In the article"
When Animals Communicate, They Are Not Using "Language" ", it says "...animals communicate
with each other using...sounds, signals, even smells and vibrations...these communication methods
are not the same as language. They lack one or more of the many attributes that make up the human
language, such as displacement, discreteness, and productivity". These communication methods are
useful to the animals, but aren't the same as language. They lack the 3 main traits of language which
are, as stated in the evidence, displacement, discreteness, and productivity. Animals also lack
something in their brain that enables them to learn real language. In paragraph 3, it states " Many
linguists, zoologists, and scientists say...we have something in our brains that enables us to use
language in a way that animals never can". Since animals don't have this 'thing' in their ... Show
According to "When Animals Communicate, They Are Not Using "Language" ", Mia Lewis says
"...scientists insist that when chimpanzees or other animals are taught to use words or signs, more
often or not they are simply performing a kind of trick in order to receive a reward – usually food.
That is why animals don't go on to create more words or complex sentences. A human baby, on the
other hand, rapidly progresses from saying a single word to being able to form complex sentences".
Animals only perform actions of language for treats or rewards because of the 'thing' that they lack
in their brain. However, since humans have this 'thing', we start saying words as a baby, than as we
grow, form them into complex sentences, and make

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
There are many reasons as to why animal testing is an unethical and outdated practice, yet it is still
being carried out in this day and age. Thanks to advances in scientific research, animal testing is no
longer a necessary evil, so its use is more of an inconvenience than an advantage. And although
there are many reasons as to why animal testing should be discontinued, costs, alternative testing,
and its psychological effects on animals are the strongest arguments as to why it should be banned.
Animal testing is a very pricey business on which millions of dollars are wasted each year –– money
that could be lent to more ethical and reasonable fields of research. Many of these tests take up to
four or five years, and during that time a higher and higher price is being accumulated. In the United
States, tests studying sister chromatid exchange can cost up to $22,000 when using an animal, but
the in vitro alternative of this test only costs $8,000, saving about $14,000 (Humane Society
International, 4). Another form of animal testing – androgen hormone interactions – can cost up to
$37,000, but in vitro costs only $7,000, saving $30,000 per test (4). Over time, the outrageous prices
of animal testing build up and only add to the debt that many countries already face. This results in
more unwanted and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Testing methods like in vitro, computer models and simulations, stem cell testing methods, and tests
like MRIs and CAT scans are all possible alternatives (Neavs 4). All of these alternatives are both
less expensive and more accurate than animal testing is, so one can only wonder why animal testing
is still being practiced at all. It can be assumed that many people are uncomfortable with the idea of
using human subjects for some alternative research methods, but that must also mean that humans
are aware of just how cruel animal testing can

Does Using Animals As Entertainment Violate Their Rights
Have you ever seen those animals at the zoo? Most people love visiting the zoo because you see
animals normally you wouldn't see in everyday life. Some people complain about the treatment of
the animals in the zoo. What if you could see the animals you can see at the zoo in everyday life?
Now it may sound absurd but imagine looking out your window and seeing someone walking a
giraffe! In many of the articles that I've read people have made very valid arguments about how if
not taken care of correctly exotic animals can be very dangerous animals.
My thoughts about this is that only certain people should be able to keep these animals as pets. Sort
of like a type of license to care for these animals, like a carrier's license for a firearm, only the
license for the exotic animals would be to prove that the people owning the animals meet the
requirements and proper education for caring for these animals. Basically how you would obtain the
license is taking tests to be sure you know how to take care of these exotic animals. Like a permit
for driving or license you would take an education course about the care and needs of the animals
you house and care for.
With this system in place people will learn how to take care of these animals and the animals will be
happier under the ownership of caring people. Many states have different laws on exotic ... Show
There has been many findings of abuse of animals in travelling circuses, zoos, even places where the
main goal is to save a species from extinction. In some articles the authors talk about how normal
people abuse animals, which is very true, but with these exotic animals and our everyday animals
we need to have stricter laws about abuse of these animals and put way more thought into how every
animal is being treated, both exotic and

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay
Animals are not objects like trash that they can just be used then disposed. Animal are being used all
around the world for something that they really are not needed for. So many animals are being
harmed and dying because of animal experimentation. Maybe if it was for science it might have
been important but animal experimentation is not needed for science anymore because scientist have
found alternate ways to experiment things without taking lives. Just like us animals also have rights
and animal experimentation is something that violates their rights. People need to stop using animals
for experimentation. First of all,Animal experimentation is not necessary for things that are not
really that important and do not need experimentation.The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Before, animal experimentation was something that people needed to do to find cures but it is not
needed anymore. "For many laboratory scientists, this waning approval isn't cause for concern,
because a near–identical trend is emerging within the research community, and more and more U.S.
labs are using innovative cross–disciplinary technologies to spare at least some of the 25 million
animals used for research annually"(Ericson).Now, in the 21st century scientist have developed
countless things that can be used for experimentation than animals. So many labs and scientists are
using theses new ways to end animal experimentation. Also, scientist can test and do experiments
for countless things without worrying about laws and the amount of animals that are dying
now."The innovation takes the place of animal mediums: Instead of running the drug through an
animal liver, a chemist can now force the drug to react with the chemosynthetic liver. "
(Ericson).This is just one of the things that scientist have discovered to do experimentation with
animals. This method is so much better than using animals. This is not just beneficial to animals but
it is also beneficial to scientist because now they can know more about what is happening when they
test things. These new ways of experimenting do not just save the lives of animals but they also help
scientist do

Charles Siebert 's An Elephant Crackup?
Over the past few decades, relations between animals and humans have been modified drastically.
From domesticated species' to wildlife, it seems as though human interaction has taken a dramatic
toll on the way animals' function in the 21st century. Particularly, an account that focuses on this
dramatic toll is that of Charles Siebert's, an essayist whose observations bring a fascinating
perspective to the correlation between wildlife habitat disruption and uninhibited human nature.
Siebert's essay for The New York Times Magazine, entitled, "An Elephant Crackup?" has raised
many eyebrows over the past few years with regard to the destruction of a species that might suffer
from something more than meets the eye. The author of this essay is aware of his audience, so
respectively, the tone of his essay diverges into a new plane, a plane that is dreary and drab, yet in
the same way, remains thought provoking and systematically contingent. Siebert doesn't waste a
second pushing his account across the table. New information is provided within each paragraph,
which proves his use of systematic contingency. Charles Siebert, who is also responsible for writing
"Wickerby: An Urban Pastoral" (1999), a tale that revolves around the surroundings and
observations of Siebert, understands what it means to tie in environmental awareness with solution,
and his solution is hidden within the text. Extinction is a topic that is commonly discussed when
issues like this are brought up, however, a

Arguments Against Animal Testing
Imagine walking into a cosmetic or medical research laboratory and seeing thousands of animals
locked up in cages, deformed, injured, even dead. In 2010 a total of 26 million animals in the US
were tested on (thehastingscenter.org). Animals have the closest genetics to humans than anything
else yet animal testing is a cruel and inhumane job and not all animals have similar organ functions
to humans. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing.
Some people might argue that there is no better alternatives for testing then animals. Over the years,
however, science has created many alternatives for animal use in testing. One alternative is, using
donated human tissue and organs. With this method less animals will die for human research. This
has also been proven to be up to 20% more accurate than an animal testing (Neavs). Another
alternative would be microdosing. Microdosing would take human volunteers and give them small
doses of drugs high enough to cause an effect but not high enough to affect the entire body (The
Hastings Center). By using these alternatives, less animals will be used ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The truth of animal testing is that it is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being forced to eat, sleep,
drink, starve, or even die in order for humans to test the reactions of human made products (HSI).
As more animal testing continues the worse it gets. Tobacco, a popular addictive plant found in
cigarettes, cigars, etc. As the tobacco industry spreads the factories look towards animals to test the
product. Animals have forced smoke being directly pumped into their noses. These actions cause
their hair to fall out and skin to peel off (PETA). As animals are forced through these dangerous
testing procedures they learn to become hostile towards humans. This leads to the animals attacking,
injuring, even killing

Is Animal Testing Wrong or Right? Essay
Ninety two percent of all animal testing that is effective on animals are ineffective on humans
(ASPCA). Despite this alarming statistic, scientists still use animals in these experiments. Scientist
give the animals no choice in whether they or going to be used in an experiment. Animal testing is
when scientist use products, vaccinations or other things they develop for humans and use on
animals. Scientist use all types of animals, but the most common are rats, mice, birds, reptiles and
amphibians (ASPCA). Animal testing can result in an injury and or death to the animal that is being
tested on. Scientist should find healthy and safe alternatives to figuring out information they need,
rather than using helpless animals.
Animal testing has ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Scientist preforms thousands of experiments on animals yearly and ninth two percent of them end in
the injury or even death of the animal (ASPCA...). Some scientist disregards the value of an animal's
life and preform experiments that should be banned from the use of animal testing in general. They
inject animal with horrible diseases such as HIV and AIDS that seriously harms or even kill them
("HIV Drugs, Vaccines and Animal Testing"). Animal testing comes in a lot of form but injecting
animals with things such as that should not be tolerated, something should be done about it. Not
only do they hurt the animal but millions of dollars goes to these testing yearly which is ridicules
because they get government money to basically kill animal Animal testing has evolved over the
years, but not for the better. Scientist has so much technology but they cannot figure out ways to
solve problems they run into without using helpless animals. This is becoming a hug problem in the
scientific community and has raised a lot of questions though out the society. Animal testing is done
all over the world and brings a lot of controversy no matter the place. Things are getting worse due
to the constant rise in animal testing that is being performed each year. Statistics show that 12,000
animals are being tested on right now, but that is not reality because they only show ten percent of
all test done in the lab. So that means there is ninety percent more animals being tested on

Do Animals Enjoy The Circus Like Us?
Do Animals Enjoy the Circus Like Us? "The wild, cruel animal is not behind the bars of cage. He is
in front of it"–Munthe, Axel 1857. Animals have been used in circuses for generations around the
world. You will never find monkeys dance waltz, bears ride bicycles, or tigers jump through burning
hoops in the wild. Circuses have broken the law of nature. Circus performers collect money easily
by using animal to do stupid tricks and they even do not take care of them properly. Animals should
live in cramped cages and travel in the dark cold trailer. That's why I think using animals as
entertainment in the circus should be forbidden. You may laugh while enjoying animals performance
in the circus, but let's see if you still can laugh after read ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
According to teenink.com, during training session, trainers are often use whips, tight collars,
muzzles, electric prods, bullhooks and other painful tools to force animals learn tricks. Trainers drug
some animals to make them "manageable" and surgically remove the teeth and claws of others
(Ashley Palmer, 2016). As well as using direct physical contact to make the animals learn tricks,
they are often forced to go without food and water for prolonged periods when they haven't
performed well during training sessions, as well as during travel periods. Eventhough it's clear that
animals training in circus is cruel, but some people think animals circus can be a chance for children
to see wild animals that they may never see again and learn about animals. But I think this is the
wrong way to learn about animals for children.
So now we know that how suffer is animals live in the circus. They have the same right to live like
human's because we are the same life creatures in the same world. Using animals as entertainment in
the circus should be banned because it's an animals abuse, it's threathen public safety, and has cruel
training of animals. Only bad things we get when see animals circus. We should stop this serious
problem from

Using Animals in Research is Bad! Essay
Have you ever wondered about what a product or a medicine goes through before it gets to us on the
store shelves? Products from deodorant to Viagra to weed killer go through years of tests before a
regulating body decides they are safe for us to use. The FDA approves drugs and cosmetics and he
EPA regulates chemicals that are used and may be harmful to the environment. However before
these products are even considered by these regulatory bodies they must go through years of testing.
Testing that is unfortunately done on defenseless animals. Each year 50 to 100 million vertebrate
animals, such as mice, rats, rabbits, cats and dogs are used in experiments to test products such as
medicines, lipstick, household cleaners and pesticides. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This type of test is disturbing due to the fact that there are several highly sensitive non–animal tests
that can be done to detect chemical–induced genetic mutations but the government still requires
companies to poison animals to see whether or not they will develop cancer. The standard test of the
kind is the "rodent cancer bioassay." Mice and rats are subjected to a lifetime of chemical exposure
to the chemicals in all new or reformulated pesticides, food additives, and drugs. Studies have
proven that these tests are found to have more than a 70 percent false–positive rate. The final group
of tests that are performed on animals is product tests. No law requires that cosmetics and household
products be tested on animals however, the FDA does urge companies to conduct whatever tests are
necessary to establish that their products are safe and the Consumer Safety Product Commission that
regulates household products does not require animal testing yet many companies do it anyway. I
have saved what I feel is the most cruel aspect of animals testing is that done on primates. Primates
are known to be sensitive, intelligent beings that share many important biological and physiological
characteristics with humans. Baby primates that are born in labs are forcibly torn from their
screaming mothers usually within three days of birth and the

"Animal experimentation is the term used to explain the use of animals in education, training and
research" ("Animal Experimentation" ) in order to enhance medical and cosmetological
experimentation for humans, and involves keeping animals locked up in a laboratory. The sole
purpose of animal experimentation and the use of animals in research dates back to when humans
started looking for ways to cure and prevent deadly diseases. Today, "the majority of animal
experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal
experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable" (People for the Ethical Treatment
of Animals. par. 1). In other words, animal experimentation is not justified in the world we ... Show
5). Animal testing by the manufactures of large companies seek to market that a brand new product
may be used safely, without damaging humans. Some companies believe animal testing is the best
alternative to assure the safety of a product. Eye make up, skin cream, perfume, lipstick, nail polish,
shampoo and hair color (Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing" par. 1) are examples of the products most
commonly manufactured and sold to people. Majority of people buy these products without the
consideration of what animals went through in order for someone to dye their hair or put on lipstick.
When used for cosmetic tests, rodents and rabbits are often subjected to skin and eye irritation tests
where different types of chemicals are rubbed or dripped into their eyes without any pain relief to
see the reaction. Repeated force–feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general
illness or specific hazards like cancer or birth defects. "Lethal dose" tests, in which animals are
forced to swallow large amounts of chemicals to determine the dose that'll cause death. When the
experiment comes to an end, the animals are normally killed by asphyxiation, neck–breaking, or
decapitation and pain relief is not provided. A large percent of

Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
Animal testing has been used in the cosmetic companies for over years. Would you still buy its
projects if you were to reach for puppies, bunnies or other animals off the shelves? Cruelty free
products and advertisements have been popping up all over society, showing images of what
cosmetic companies do to the animals when being tested or even the after effects of what the
animals look like. The advertisement that will be analyzed is from the society for the protection of
animals. The image shows a beautiful woman, face full of makeup, holding a small brown and black
puppy as she is pushing down on the puppy's head, out of the puppy's mouth is liquid in a spray
formation. There's a message on the right hand side that says "Help us fight the effects of cosmetic
testing".
This advertisement uses the two rhetorical appeals, ethos and pathos when delivering its message.
The image was created to spark conversation and movement from its audience who are cosmetic
companies and people buying their products. With the cosmetic companies as the audience it may
decrease their sales and prompt them to take an alternate route to cosmetic testing. With the buyers
as audience it may change their minds when purchasing cosmetic products as to look for cruelty free
products and to make a movement to stand up for animal rights. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The creators of this advertisement are a known society for protecting animals. The audience can
determine their character and credibility with such issues, this gives the audience more reason to
accept the message they are stating. The message written "Help us fight the effects of cosmetic
testing" expresses their moral beliefs and values when it comes to cosmetic and testing on animals.
It helps us understand that they know the effects that are caused when animals are tested on and can
use their knowledge to promote others to fight for their cause to stop animal

When Animals Communicate They Are Not Using Language
Many researchers over the years have been testing if animals can learn and use language, however,
technically, animals do not use the same "language" that we do. They don't communicate like we do,
so these studies don't serve much purpose. Animals don't use "language", but instead they just
respond to keywords and signals people train them to do. In the passage "When Animals
Communicate They Are Not Using Language" by Mia Lewis, she states that "...can be trained to
recognize and respond to many words and signals...does any of this constitute the ability to use
language?...other scientists say no. They believe that the ability to use language is unique to
humans." To add onto that, would they physically or mentally be able to? Nope! The

I Run Away : A Short Story : Running Away
I ran away when I was ten years old. It was a small argument with my parents that provoked it. The
situation was contentious and furor. I wanted to have a sleepover with five girls from school, they
said that we couldn't fit five other girls in our apartment. I lashed out at them, throwing a full–
fledged tantrum, and then I left. Marched out of the door, ignoring their calls for me to come back.
My plan was to spend the night at my grandparents house and go back in the morning. It was a short
walk, only four blocks to my grandparents, but I didn't make it. On the second block the light was
about to turn red. I convinced myself I could make it and ran out into the middle of the street, only
to get struck by a car. Funny, I don't even remember dying. I don't remember what it felt like, or if I
saw God waiting for me. As soon as the car hit me, my eyes closed, only to be snapped open a few
seconds later. But I was no longer in the street, I was in my favorite park. I looked down to see my
wrinkled t–shirt and jeans had been replaced with a long, flowy white dress. I felt odd, almost
hollow. I broke out into a sprint, and ran in the direction of my house, but when I reached the front
gate of the park, I was thrown backwards by an invisible force. I hit the ground hard, and let out a
painful groan. I slowly got up, ignoring the pain in my side. I started to run out of the park when I
was thrown backwards again. I couldn't leave. Why couldn't I leave? Out of the corner of my eye I

The Pros And Cons Of Cloning Animals
Today, scientists are trying to clone animal DNA to keep endangered animals safe. The anticipation
that a breakthrough such as this makes people feel is astonishing. Even though it is appalling to
certain religions to "play god", protecting our environment from getting completely destroyed,
protecting the human food sources, and ridding of the diseases or flaws found in the animal DNA
should be our main concerns. Using cloning, we can ensure a better quality of life for everyone, and
everything. To begin, The Author of Cloning Animals Pros and Cons List is for saving endangered
species by cloning. The last paragraph of Cloning Animals Pros and Cons List, it says, "This is
because it has its merits and it can help humanity in several ways." This says that the author believes
in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The article says, "...ensure the public that they will be eating healthier, safer meat in the near future."
All the society wants these days is a trustworthy economy and government. Using cloning, we can
live longer as a race! To add on, "Rights activists groups are against using animals..." says the
article. This says people are out there trying to make a difference for the animals. Then, the author
states that to "solve this problem is by cloning muscle and flesh samples of animals..." and
"..growing them in laboratories." The author believes that animal cruelty consists of a limit. When
you have the choice of keeping animals locked up in a lab their whole life, and then cloning them in
a lab for about a month, choose the one that helps them get home faster. We need to change the tides
and help these poor creatures evolve and survive on what we have made the Earth out to be. As time
progresses, animals might get out there to change the tides for humans. Food is a very large part of
society today. Without quality food, humans and animals would be at the same civilization level as

Should We Still Be Using Animals As Our Test Subjects?
Should we still be using animals as our test subjects in 2014? Some people say animal testing is
good because it helps us find cures to serious illnesses, but in fact the chances of a cure which works
on humans has a very slim success to failure ratio. The best DNA match for humans are humans
themselves. I strongly believe that we should not be testing on animals and should be using
alternative testing methods such as in vitro (test tube) or in silico (computer modelling).
One of the main reasons for my the strength conviction is the fact that the animals do not have a
choice and are being forced to be tested, which can lead to them getting seriously ill or dying as a
result of the testing. Each year in the USA alone, an estimated number of 70 million animals are
taken away from their natural habitat and are blinded, scalded, force
fed chemicals and hurt and
killed in the name of science by private institutions, household product ,cosmetics companies and
scientific centres. This is not right in my opinion and I do not particularly see how it can be right in
any morally correct human being's opinion. So many animals experience pain or suffering and they
can not do anything about it. They are powerless in these situations and this is not fair, it's not right.
According to the Humane Society, registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50
experiments and the use of as many as 12,000 animals for testing. This statistic horrifies me and
makes me fear for the

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
Over 26 million animals are experimented on each year in the United States. Animals are very
different from human beings, Medicine that cures mice or rats,sometimes can cause death or
diseases to humans. Although products tested on animals are generally safe, it can be a horrible
thing to everyone. Animal testing is cruel because it harms and/or possibly kills animals,
merchandise that is experimented on animals may have damaging side effects on their health, and it
interferes with their growth and development Although animals are so different from humans that
the results are often useless (Animal testing,Newsela) ,The products being tested on animals are
good for us and for our health. One study found that it is only reliable 70 percent of the time(one
benefit of using organ on a chip technology,Newsela). This shows that harming animals for the use
of people won't necessarily work all the time. This is important because animals were not made to
be used in labs,they were made to be pets or be free in the wild. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Humans are not elite towards animals, which means that we are not justified to experiment on these
helpless creatures. Therefore, animals are not alike to humans.This proves that animals are getting
hurt for everyone in the world. It still is not clear whether the drug or chemical is dangerous to
humans (one benefit of using organ on a chip technology,Newsela). This shows that scientists don't
know if it's okay to give the medicine to people. Animals were made to be pets not lab animals, in
fact animals can be great as a pet and they can also help you be healthy because they bring joy to a
dull lonely house,let's not animals as labs for scientists. Animals are not things to be tested on. Any
object that is drug and/or medicine have a chance to have horrible side effects on human

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
As society grows with age, it strives to advance in all areas of life. With the turn of the century, a
major advancement in all aspects of science, including medicine, is to use laboratory animals to test
potentially dangerous substances and research if the substances would be compatible with humans.
Many people have issues with animal testing as they believe it is inhumane to use animals to put
them in potentially dangerous situations. However, much progress has been made using animal
research. The information gained from animal research has paved the road to everything from hair
restoration to cancer treatments. Animal research has progressed humanity into new levels it could
only dream of and should remain an essential practice. Modern regulations have strict guidelines on
what actions may be performed on a living specimen. Before tests on any animals begins, a detailed
action plan must be approved by a board of scientists to determine whether any harm will come
from the procedure. Once approved, the experiment can proceed into its next stages. Commonly
overlooked, if an experiment does not meet these rigid rules, the whole experiment is terminated.
This is to ensure no harm ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to the fact there are many mutations and unknown factors in the human DNA strand, an
accurate test cannot be achieved by human subjects. What may be deadly or irritating to one person
may not affect another in the least. Using animals to test the product beforehand remove any
inconsistencies in the data that would potentially cause the project to be dismissed. Even though it
may take longer, research via animals is overwhelmingly cheaper than using human subjects too. An
animal does not need insurance premiums, paid compensation, or signed waivers, but human
subjects do. In animal research, an animal needs only nutrition, shelter, and comfort, and it receives
all three plus

Anti Tumor Effect On Tongue Cancer Using Animal Model Essay
Anti–tumor effect of Streblus asper extracts on tongue cancer using animal model
OBJECTIVE:
1) To determine the effectiveness of Streblus asper extracts in the rat tongue cancer epithelium cells
via the induction of apoptosis.
2) To identify the actual proteins responsible for the tongue cancer chemopreventive activity of
Streblus asper extracts, especially the ERK ½, caspases, and Bcl–2 family together with the proteins
related to the cells proliferative activity such as Ki–67, PCNA, cyclin D1, p21 and p27 as well as the
signal transduction pathway such as Mitogen–activated protein kinases (MAPKs) pathway.
INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW:
Cancer is a growing health problem around the world. According to a report by the World Health
Organization (WHO), there are more than 10 million cases of cancer per year worldwide and the
disease causes over six million deaths a year (Jemal et al., 2009). By 2020, it is projected that there
will be approximately 15 million new cancer cases and 10 million cancer deaths per year (Petersen,
2008). Oral cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers worldwide. It is the world's 11th
most common human neoplasm and account for 3% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases with
estimated 400,000 new cases annually (Parkin et al., 2005). Oral cancer mortality has risen and is
among the largest recorded for any common neoplasm (Vecchia, 2004). Consequently, oral cancer
incidence in Malaysia has been increasing with an increasing number of

Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? The practice of animal testing has
been a contentious topic for many years and the debate on the subject seems never ending. There are
pros and cons, both of which have well thought out points. Many people support the act of animal
testing, however many are against it. I, for one, am opposed to animal testing and have been for
years. I am a lover of animals, as many people are, and this topic has always bothered me. There is
no doubt in my mind that this cruel, inhumane action is wrong, but many Americans and others
around the world think otherwise. This is why I decided to write about this subject; I want to know
what causes people to think animal testing is acceptable. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
In order for scientists to get a better understanding of the healing process, the animals also endure
plenty of burns and other wounds. They also state that there are better alternatives to testing that
don't require the use of animals. Testing and studying cells inside a petri dish has been proven to
display more accurate results than testing on animals, because they would be using human cells. On
the other hand, the pro side argues that there is no other alternative to animal testing, because there
are certain side effects that certain drugs could cause. These side effects would not be visible if the
drug was tested on human cells in a petri dish. Using live animals helps researchers know and
understand exactly how living things react to various drugs and they can apply their understandings
to benefit humans and

Essay about Using Animals in Research and Experimentation
Animals should be used for research and Experimentation because if the animals get sick or show
any signs of acting abnormal then the scientists know it isn't safe for humans to use. Animal
research has played a big role in nearly every medical breakthrough over the last decade. Animals
have the same organ system that perform the same task, which helps determine if what is being
tested is safe for humans to use. Most of the medicines animals use the same medicine as humans
like antibiotics, pain killers, and many more this helps to see if the medicine cures the animals
without any harmful consequences then it would be safe and useful for humans to use. Using
animals for research and experimentation has led to cancer survival rates to ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The scientists make sure the animals are not in very much pain, the scientists make sure they use
proper safe tools when doing the tests on the animals. Scientists are very respectful of test animals.
They make sure that the animals are treated well and do not suffer at any point in an experiment.
The scientists do all they can for the animals when it comes to actually testing on them. If they think
it will be uncomfortable for the animals they give them pain killers to relieve the stress and the pain
if pain is even involved. The scientists don't do the tests with intentions on hurting the animals they
do it in hope to save lives of many people or make life easier on someone's life. Using animals for
experiments and tests can be more useful than using lab tools and chemicals for many reasons.
Using animals can actually show you what could happen to humans, but when just using lab tools
the scientists can't actually see what problems the humans could face. Using animals can also be
useful when you do not know what kind of chemical you are looking for. The changes in the gene
expression patterns give clues about what kind of chemical is used. If animals were not tested on we
would not have some of the products that we have today. Animal testing has led to many of our
cleaning products we use every day. Without animal testing we wouldn't have these products
because we wouldn't know if the product were safe for humans to use. Animal testing can

Describe Your Personality Using A Color, Animal, And An...
Describe your personality using a color, animal, or an object of your choice.
If I had to describe myself as an animal, I would choose a dog. Surprisingly, I didn't just choose this
because I like dogs. Don't get me wrong dogs are fantastic; but I chose a dog because of its
characteristics. Everyone knows about that little dog that barks louder than any dog on the block.
That dog is me; except lucky for you I don't bark, nor am I covered in hair with a tail. What I mean
to say is, from a distance I might seem intimidating, but once you come closer and get to know me
you'll realize I 'm actually a teddy bear. (metaphorically of course) I love to greet people, whether it
be friends or family, with open arms and make them feel ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Taking advantage of the opportunity to attend college is a priority in my life. Furthermore, I am
passionate about being able to provide for my parents when I'm older. I hope to be able to, one day,
take care of my parents how they have for me during the past 16 years. Another passionate concern I
have is being able to help others. This is a concern of mine because I would love to be able to work
for something bigger than myself. An example of this would be the opportunity to work towards
curing a disease with no known cure. These passionate concerns are not all fully in my control, but
through hard work I feel as though I can bring them closer to reality.
3. During your senior year, discuss the area within yourself that you would like to see some growth
or improvement.
During my senior year, I would like to see myself grow through my contributions to the community.
In the past and present, I have volunteered through clubs such as National Honor Society and Class
Council. I would like to not only volunteer more through school clubs, but also through outside
facilities. Making a difference has always been something that is important to me. Through added
community service and volunteer work, I hope to be able to make a lasting change in the local
community.
4. Who is your hero? Why?
My dad is my hero. Throughout his life, my dad has proved himself to be hardworking, dedicated
and selfless. When my dad moved to America as a child, he had to

The Benefit Of Omitting Animal Products
The Benefit of Omitting Animal Products Americans, as well as others throughout the world,
consume meat, dairy, and eggs practically every day. Because using animal products is a constant,
most people are not prompted to ask the question, "why?" The behaviors of eating a burger, using
makeup that was tested on animals, and buying products made from leather and fur, are deeply
ingrained into cultures in varying geographical locations, including the United States. Humans are
creatures of habit, and often don't sway from the "normal" way of life, because is known and
comfortable. Staying within comfort zones, inhibits people from learning and growing.
Unfortunately, individuals' health, the environment, and innocent animals all suffer injurious
consequences when a person makes the decision to buy the flesh, fur, skin, and by–products of
animals. Our one and only Earth is impacted significantly by our seemingly arbitrary daily choices.
Animal agriculture is the main contributor to global warming. Water is not an unlimited source, and
coincidentally is necessary for all living beings to survive. Animals in the agriculture industry
require a substantial amount of water to live and produce meat and other superfluous animal
products. Ironically, humans have constructed a sense of normalcy around the idea of using water, a
scarcely expendable source, in an exponentially wasteful manner. Humans are unconsciously
sabotaging every living being, through the destruction of earth. Often

Is Animal Cruelty Free

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Stephanie Roberts

More from Stephanie Roberts (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Is Animal Cruelty Free