1) The document discusses transferring the British concept of community enterprises (CEs), which are locally-run organizations that provide services, to the Netherlands.
2) There are some opportunities to adopt the CE model, but also significant challenges due to differences in organizational cultures and the role of government between the two countries.
3) Key questions remain about whether a policy of "forced active citizenship" in the Netherlands will be effective, what the proper role of government should be, and how to ensure all community needs are met and interests represented.
Barbra Kohlo: We Effect work with Housing Cooperatives in Africacooperatives
Barbra Kohlo, Programme coordinator Adequate Housing, East and Southern Africa at the International Co-operative Alliance Global Conference in Cape Town, November 2013.
Dr Simon Duffy gave this talk at a seminar organised by the Erasmus+ funded project the SDS Network which shares expertise on self-directed support globally. The talk explains why human and disability rights support a shift towards Self-Directed Support.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and UBI Lab Sheffield talks to members of NAWRA (National Association of Welfare Rights Advisors) about why he thinks the conflict over social security will turn into a choice between Universal Credit and Basic Income Plus. He describes some of the benefits of Basic Income Plus and also shares new research on the principles that should underpin the welfare system.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and the UBI Lab Network set out the case for Universal Basic income to the AGM of Sheffield Church Action on Poverty. He argued that UBI was going to continue to be the main alternative to the main broken social security system and that Christians should support it.
Barbra Kohlo: We Effect work with Housing Cooperatives in Africacooperatives
Barbra Kohlo, Programme coordinator Adequate Housing, East and Southern Africa at the International Co-operative Alliance Global Conference in Cape Town, November 2013.
Dr Simon Duffy gave this talk at a seminar organised by the Erasmus+ funded project the SDS Network which shares expertise on self-directed support globally. The talk explains why human and disability rights support a shift towards Self-Directed Support.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and UBI Lab Sheffield talks to members of NAWRA (National Association of Welfare Rights Advisors) about why he thinks the conflict over social security will turn into a choice between Universal Credit and Basic Income Plus. He describes some of the benefits of Basic Income Plus and also shares new research on the principles that should underpin the welfare system.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform and the UBI Lab Network set out the case for Universal Basic income to the AGM of Sheffield Church Action on Poverty. He argued that UBI was going to continue to be the main alternative to the main broken social security system and that Christians should support it.
27Mar14 - Community Matters Semiar Series - At Home - ppt presentation ILC- UK
The slides from the second in a series of three seminars from ILC-UK and Age UK on Community Matters - are our communities ready for ageing?
Full details here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/community_matters_are_our_communities_ready_for_ageing._at_home
Simon Duffy and Caroline Richardson of UBI Lab Disability talked about the need for UBI+ system - a system which reflects the reality of what people need. This talk was given at the 2021 World Congress on Basic Income.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform describes the reality of welfare reform and describes the harm it is doing to already disadvantaged groups. He proposes that there is a better version of welfare reform that has not yet been explored.
This presentation discusses "In from the Margins: A Call to Action on Poverty, Housing and Homelessness", a report from the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology that offers 72 practical recommendations to “go beyond the ‘path dependency’ paralysis that has typified federal and provincial policy under governments of all affiliations for decades.”
Senator Art Eggleton
www.wellesleyinstitute.com
Follow us on twitter @wellesleyWI
The presentation was a workshop at NCVO's European Funding Network's event LEPs, Growth and EU funds on Wednesday 25 September 2013.
The presentation was by John Hacking from Network for Europe and looks at ESF Community grants.
Find out more about the event 'LEPs, Growth and EU funds': http://europeanfundingnetwork.eu/events/engaging-with-your-leps
Find out more about NCVO's European Funding network: http://europeanfundingnetwork.eu/A
The Future is Citizenship: creating the ecology for communityCitizen Network
Dr Simon Duffy spoke in Dorset to disabled people, families, supporters, community and social workers and commissioners in an event sponsored by iDirect. In this talk he described a range of innovations that - despite a hostile public policy environment - are restoring community life. He explored the kind of approach to public policy that would help us empower citizens and create inclusive communities.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform explains how the bankruptcy of Northamptonshire County Council has been triggered by austerity, but was built on hyper-centralisation, privatisation and the failure of the commissioning model. He argues that its people need to head upstream to develop better social solutions and it needs more devolution of power and genuine democratic reform.
Global Challenges Local Solutions Partnership OfferARFP_GCLS
Join the Global Challenges Local Solutions programe!
For more information, visit: partnership.localsolutionsfund.org
There are many challenges facing European society nowadays.
Real sustainable answers to the biggest, most crucial social problems can be found and applied by starting on the local level, in other words by working bottom up.
Community foundations play a key role in change on the local level – they support self-organizing, local citizens to responding to problems and challenges by leveraging local resources, such as social, human and financial capital.
From our rich experience we know that social and human capital can be mobilised to great ends, but that financial support is essential, both for community philanthropy to thrive in a changing and competitive landscape, and to sustainably address social problems.
Join us! Become a partner and help us build strong and sustainable community philanthropy and communities, capable of taking up global challenges on the local level.
(From Norrie Disease to Norrinopathies)
Dr. Wolfgang Berger discusses the research milestones and the mechanics of Norrie Disease.
(Norrie Disease Association First International Conference, August 2009)
Entrepreneurs know that hiring great employees is the key to success, but few invest in the hiring process. As a result, small business owners waste tons of time on hiring the wrong people or hiring the right people the wrong way. Investing in the hiring process is a worthwhile use of your time. It may be the single most important action you take for your business.
Resultaten 15 jaar stedelijke vernieuwing in Hoogvliet, RotterdamReinout Kleinhans
Vijftien jaar stedelijke vernieuwing in het Rotterdamse Hoogvliet heeft de woonsituatie van bewoners en de leefbaarheid in deze wijk flink verbeterd. De oorspronkelijke bewoners zijn er in sociaaleconomisch opzicht echter nauwelijks beter op geworden. Aldusonderzoekers van de TU Delft en de UvA in hun onderzoek "Terugblikken en vooruitkijken in Hoogvliet".
De stedelijke vernieuwing in Hoogvliet, een voormalige Rotterdamse deelgemeente, is in fysiek-ruimtelijke zin een succes. Ten aanzien van de woonsituatie en wooncarrière van bewoners, de buurtontwikkeling, de leefbaarheid en de reputatie is er een behoorlijke vooruitgang geboekt, ondanks de crisis. De aanpak bestond primair uit herstructurering (o.a. sloop, nieuwbouw) en een reeks van sociale en economische maatregelen. Ook veel Hoogvlieters schrijven de verbeteringen toe aan de vernieuwingsoperatie. Vooral de doorstromers en instromers in Hoogvliet hebben van de vernieuwing geprofiteerd. Voor bewoners die helemaal niet verhuisd zijn, geldt dat in mindere mate.
De grootschalige sloop en nieuwbouw hebben nauwelijks invloed gehad op de sociaaleconomische positie van de oorspronkelijke bewoners van Hoogvliet. Juist de instroom van nieuwe bewoners met (beter) betaald werk en de uitstroom van bewoners met een uitkering zorgen voor hogere scores op de sociaaleconomische status van Hoogvliet. De instromers hadden gemiddeld een hogere opleiding, een hoger inkomen en een betere werksituatie dan de oorspronkelijke Hoogvlieters.
De kansen op het krijgen van een nieuwe huur- of koopwoning zijn wel toegenomen. Daardoor is Hoogvliet beter in staat om sociale stijgers vast te houden. Onder de blijvers en doorstromers binnen Hoogvliet is de mobiliteit met betrekking tot opleiding en inkomen beperkt; de winst wordt primair geboekt door het gestegen eigen woningbezit. De stijgende trend in het eigenwoningbezit en de dalende trend in de uitkeringsafhankelijkheid lijken door de crisis enigszins tenietgedaan.
In het debat over de participatiemaatschappij staan terugtrekking van de verzorgingsstaat, zelfredzaamheid en eigen kracht van burgers centraal. Uit het onderzoek blijkt dat zowel burgers als professionals het belang van eigen kracht en maatschappelijk nuttig zijn onderschrijven. Lang niet iedereen kan aan de nieuwe norm te voldoen. Bij sommige kwetsbare burgers overstijgt de hulpvraag de spankracht van het eigen sociale netwerk. Bij anderen is zelfredzaamheid een brug te ver.
De Hoogvlietse professionals willen burgers graag helpen bij de ontwikkeling van hun eigen kracht en hebben dat eerder ook gedaan. Politici zetten onder verwijzing naar termen zoals zelfredzaamheid en burgerkracht juist het mes in de uitgaven voor sociale professionals. Door de politieke nadruk op meetbare en korte-termijn resultaten, kunnen sociale professionals zich vaak alleen maar richten op het oplossen van acute ‘crises’ en zich hierdoor niet adequaat inzetten voor het (re)act
For small business owners and private practices. What do you do to market yourself? What should you not do? Information about networking, social media marketing, branding, and more.
27Mar14 - Community Matters Semiar Series - At Home - ppt presentation ILC- UK
The slides from the second in a series of three seminars from ILC-UK and Age UK on Community Matters - are our communities ready for ageing?
Full details here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/community_matters_are_our_communities_ready_for_ageing._at_home
Simon Duffy and Caroline Richardson of UBI Lab Disability talked about the need for UBI+ system - a system which reflects the reality of what people need. This talk was given at the 2021 World Congress on Basic Income.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform describes the reality of welfare reform and describes the harm it is doing to already disadvantaged groups. He proposes that there is a better version of welfare reform that has not yet been explored.
This presentation discusses "In from the Margins: A Call to Action on Poverty, Housing and Homelessness", a report from the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology that offers 72 practical recommendations to “go beyond the ‘path dependency’ paralysis that has typified federal and provincial policy under governments of all affiliations for decades.”
Senator Art Eggleton
www.wellesleyinstitute.com
Follow us on twitter @wellesleyWI
The presentation was a workshop at NCVO's European Funding Network's event LEPs, Growth and EU funds on Wednesday 25 September 2013.
The presentation was by John Hacking from Network for Europe and looks at ESF Community grants.
Find out more about the event 'LEPs, Growth and EU funds': http://europeanfundingnetwork.eu/events/engaging-with-your-leps
Find out more about NCVO's European Funding network: http://europeanfundingnetwork.eu/A
The Future is Citizenship: creating the ecology for communityCitizen Network
Dr Simon Duffy spoke in Dorset to disabled people, families, supporters, community and social workers and commissioners in an event sponsored by iDirect. In this talk he described a range of innovations that - despite a hostile public policy environment - are restoring community life. He explored the kind of approach to public policy that would help us empower citizens and create inclusive communities.
Dr Simon Duffy of the Centre for Welfare Reform explains how the bankruptcy of Northamptonshire County Council has been triggered by austerity, but was built on hyper-centralisation, privatisation and the failure of the commissioning model. He argues that its people need to head upstream to develop better social solutions and it needs more devolution of power and genuine democratic reform.
Global Challenges Local Solutions Partnership OfferARFP_GCLS
Join the Global Challenges Local Solutions programe!
For more information, visit: partnership.localsolutionsfund.org
There are many challenges facing European society nowadays.
Real sustainable answers to the biggest, most crucial social problems can be found and applied by starting on the local level, in other words by working bottom up.
Community foundations play a key role in change on the local level – they support self-organizing, local citizens to responding to problems and challenges by leveraging local resources, such as social, human and financial capital.
From our rich experience we know that social and human capital can be mobilised to great ends, but that financial support is essential, both for community philanthropy to thrive in a changing and competitive landscape, and to sustainably address social problems.
Join us! Become a partner and help us build strong and sustainable community philanthropy and communities, capable of taking up global challenges on the local level.
(From Norrie Disease to Norrinopathies)
Dr. Wolfgang Berger discusses the research milestones and the mechanics of Norrie Disease.
(Norrie Disease Association First International Conference, August 2009)
Entrepreneurs know that hiring great employees is the key to success, but few invest in the hiring process. As a result, small business owners waste tons of time on hiring the wrong people or hiring the right people the wrong way. Investing in the hiring process is a worthwhile use of your time. It may be the single most important action you take for your business.
Resultaten 15 jaar stedelijke vernieuwing in Hoogvliet, RotterdamReinout Kleinhans
Vijftien jaar stedelijke vernieuwing in het Rotterdamse Hoogvliet heeft de woonsituatie van bewoners en de leefbaarheid in deze wijk flink verbeterd. De oorspronkelijke bewoners zijn er in sociaaleconomisch opzicht echter nauwelijks beter op geworden. Aldusonderzoekers van de TU Delft en de UvA in hun onderzoek "Terugblikken en vooruitkijken in Hoogvliet".
De stedelijke vernieuwing in Hoogvliet, een voormalige Rotterdamse deelgemeente, is in fysiek-ruimtelijke zin een succes. Ten aanzien van de woonsituatie en wooncarrière van bewoners, de buurtontwikkeling, de leefbaarheid en de reputatie is er een behoorlijke vooruitgang geboekt, ondanks de crisis. De aanpak bestond primair uit herstructurering (o.a. sloop, nieuwbouw) en een reeks van sociale en economische maatregelen. Ook veel Hoogvlieters schrijven de verbeteringen toe aan de vernieuwingsoperatie. Vooral de doorstromers en instromers in Hoogvliet hebben van de vernieuwing geprofiteerd. Voor bewoners die helemaal niet verhuisd zijn, geldt dat in mindere mate.
De grootschalige sloop en nieuwbouw hebben nauwelijks invloed gehad op de sociaaleconomische positie van de oorspronkelijke bewoners van Hoogvliet. Juist de instroom van nieuwe bewoners met (beter) betaald werk en de uitstroom van bewoners met een uitkering zorgen voor hogere scores op de sociaaleconomische status van Hoogvliet. De instromers hadden gemiddeld een hogere opleiding, een hoger inkomen en een betere werksituatie dan de oorspronkelijke Hoogvlieters.
De kansen op het krijgen van een nieuwe huur- of koopwoning zijn wel toegenomen. Daardoor is Hoogvliet beter in staat om sociale stijgers vast te houden. Onder de blijvers en doorstromers binnen Hoogvliet is de mobiliteit met betrekking tot opleiding en inkomen beperkt; de winst wordt primair geboekt door het gestegen eigen woningbezit. De stijgende trend in het eigenwoningbezit en de dalende trend in de uitkeringsafhankelijkheid lijken door de crisis enigszins tenietgedaan.
In het debat over de participatiemaatschappij staan terugtrekking van de verzorgingsstaat, zelfredzaamheid en eigen kracht van burgers centraal. Uit het onderzoek blijkt dat zowel burgers als professionals het belang van eigen kracht en maatschappelijk nuttig zijn onderschrijven. Lang niet iedereen kan aan de nieuwe norm te voldoen. Bij sommige kwetsbare burgers overstijgt de hulpvraag de spankracht van het eigen sociale netwerk. Bij anderen is zelfredzaamheid een brug te ver.
De Hoogvlietse professionals willen burgers graag helpen bij de ontwikkeling van hun eigen kracht en hebben dat eerder ook gedaan. Politici zetten onder verwijzing naar termen zoals zelfredzaamheid en burgerkracht juist het mes in de uitgaven voor sociale professionals. Door de politieke nadruk op meetbare en korte-termijn resultaten, kunnen sociale professionals zich vaak alleen maar richten op het oplossen van acute ‘crises’ en zich hierdoor niet adequaat inzetten voor het (re)act
For small business owners and private practices. What do you do to market yourself? What should you not do? Information about networking, social media marketing, branding, and more.
The UK experience of person-centred planning and self-directed supportCitizen Network
Dr Simon Duffy of Citizen Network spoke to Netzwerk Persönliche Zukunftsplanung (the germans speaking community for person-centred planning) at their gathering in Luxembourg 2019. He explored the interaction of person-centred planning with self-directed support and the challenges of implementing social innovations within a time of neoliberal thinking and austerity.
Developing Community Assets: Innovative ways to empower communitiesInterfaceOnline
Interface –The knowledge connection for business and Heriot-Watt University present at webinar for third sector organisations and social enterprises. The event discussed developing community assets and looked at innovative ways to empower communities with reference to the Scottish Community Empowerment and Renewal Bill. It also highlighted the range of expertise, knowledge, research and funding available within Heriot Watt University that could help your organisation.
Prospect Community Housing Association presented their innovative ways to empower local communities by partnering with Heriot-Watt University and the University of Edinburgh.
Community development - a different way to think about local economiesJulian Dobson
This is a presentation given to the Local Government Information Unit's economic development learning network in London on 26 January 2010. I was asked to explore how community development and economic development are linked and the implications for economic development practitioners of a community development approach.
NCBOR 2014 | How social enterprises work in the (green) maintenance of public...CROW
In de UK is het veel gebruikelijker dat bewoners en bedrijven (mede)verantwoordelijk zijn voor hun directe leefomgeving. Premier David cameron maakt zich hard voor het ontwikkelen van de "Big Society" om locale gemeenteschappen meer kracht te geven. Onze hoofdspreker Steve Clare van Locality, een Britse netwerk van vijfhonderd buurtbeheerorganisaties, vertelt ons over zijn praktijkervaringen in de UK. Hoe zijn de locale bewoners actief in het beheer van hun buurt? Wat levert dat de buurten en de gemeente op? Met welke wetgeving en organisatievormen hebben ze dat voor elkaar gekregen? En wat kunnen wij in Nederland van hen leren? Doen wij al veel aan bewonersparticipatie, of staan wij pas aan het begin van een onomkeerbare verandering...?
2 - Social Economy Innovation-Bill Slee.pdfOECDregions
The 13th OECD Rural Development Conference was held in Cavan, Ireland on 28-30 September 2022 under the theme "Building Sustainable, Resilient and Thriving
Rural Places".
These are the presentations from the Pre-conference session "The Role of Social Economy and Social Innovation in Rural Communities".
For more information visit https://www.oecd.org/rural/rural-development-conference/.
This presentation introduces a framework for creating socially sustainability places. Future Communities is a partnership between the Young Foundation and local partners in the UK, Europe and Asia, exploring how to make new communities places that work socially in the long term.
This presentation describes Social Life's work with the City of Malmö's Environment Department to develop a new placemaking model that can be funded by social investment. This work is part of the City's "Regeneration Dialogue", which aims to comprehensively regenerate the City's 1960's and 1970's apartment blocks. The work is part of the Social Life of Cities collaborative - a global innovation program run in partnership with Cisco and the Young Foundation.
This presentation was made at a TelePresence bringing together experts in social investment and placemaking from Sydney, London, New York, Malmo and Brussels.
Ageing Well - Vicki Sellick presentation to the Leadership AcademyNMJones
Vicki Sellick from the Young Foundation presents: "Innovation: Ideas for applying the Big Society ethos to older people's services and how to think differently to find more effective ways of delivering services.
Edward Andersson, Deputy Director of Involve, reflects on where engagement is heading in a time of Localism and Austerity, looks at creative methods of engagement and gives advice on when and how they should be used.
A recording of the presentation can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2Ej3NbCjes
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Transferring British Community Entreprises to the Dutch Context
1. 1Challenge the future
Transferring British Community
Enterprises to the Netherlands
Context: Sense or Nonsense?
Dr. Reinout Kleinhans
Delft University of Technology,
OTB – Research for the Built Environment
2. 2Challenge the future
Context
• Prolonged crisis, budget cuts, and
retrenchment of welfare states
• Searching for alternative ways to regenerate neighbourhoods
and combat social inequality
• Looking for innovative ways to realise important goals in service
provision without spending large sums of tax money
• Stimulating active citizenship and promoting citizen self-organisation
is high on the political agenda
• UK: Big Society -> community empowerment
• NL: Active Citizenship and self-responsibility
3. 3Challenge the future
A Cross-Channel Interest
• Strong Dutch interest in the British concept of Community
Enterprises
• UK: more than 600 community-led organisations
which are supported by Locality
• NL: national program of experiments with a presumably Dutch
equivalent of community enterprises (bewonersbedrijven)
• Two-year program initiated by LSA (Netherlands Organisation
representing residents in Priority Neighbourhoods)
• Support by Ministry of the Interior (BZK)
• Also commissioned our two-year monitoring study
• Will CEs truly ‘work’ in the Netherlands?
4. 4Challenge the future
Defining Social Enterprises (Pearce, 2003)
1. Having a social purpose or purposes;
2. Achieving the social purposes by, at least in part, engaging in trade
in the marketplace;
3. Not distributing profits to individuals;
4. Holding assets and wealth in trust for community benefit;
5. Democratically involving members of its constituency in the
governance of the organisation;
6. Being independent organisations accountable to a defined
constituency and to the wider community.
•CEs define their social purpose in relation to a defined population
or sub-group living in a spatially defined area (Bailey, 2012).
5. 5Challenge the future
CEs Aims and Activities
• Many CEs arise from a particular local demand, need or service
deficiency not taken up by government or commercial entrepreneur
• Activities and projects undertaken by CEs (Bailey, 2012: 28):
• Provision and management of workspace, or even property management
• Out of school education, training and advice
• Provision of nurseries, childcare, play space and community facilities
• Provision or facilitation of social and affordable housing
• Provision and enhancement of parks and open spaces
• Health and healthy living programmes,
• Sports, leisure, recreation, festivals, theatre and the arts
• Income generation and welfare benefits advice,
• Programmes for sub-groups, e.g. young people, pensioners, BME groups
• Potential for ‘new’ forms of neighbourhood regeneration
6. 6Challenge the future
Critique on the Big Society (UK)
• CEs may take a crucial position in the Big Society Agenda, but
…
• “The Big Society is nothing more
than funding cuts in disguise, hitting
those in deprived neighbourhoods
hardest.”
• "Big Society rhetoric is all too often
heard by many therefore as
aspirational waffle designed to
conceal a deeply damaging withdrawal of the state from its
responsibilities to the most vulnerable.“ (Archbishop of
Canterbury Rowan Williams, 2012)
8. 8Challenge the future
Active Citizenship in the Netherlands
• No ‘Big Society’ but the term citizenship has increased in
popularity since the late 1990s. Now a key policy tool to address
many issues.
• ‘Active citizenship’ entered the public spotlight on the back of two
developments (Hurenkamp et al. 2011):
• Fear that rising self-centeredness handicaps civic engagement.
• Fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion and
leads to a lack of shared language and solutions.
• New momentum by the Social Support Act (2007), promoting:
• Participation and active involvement of vulnerable groups within society
• Active citizenship: participation of able-bodied citizens and their
associations in the development and implementation of local social policy.Source: Lub, V. & Uyterlinde, M. (2012). Evaluating State-Promoted Civic Engagement and Participation of Vulnerable Groups …
9. 9Challenge the future
Can the British concept be copied
to the Dutch context …..?
(1)
• Ample opportunities for “bottom-up” self-organisation
• However: it takes decades to establish sound CEs
• Acquiring long-term assets is a slow and difficult process
• Crisis lowers value creation of many assets (land and properties)
• Difference in organisational and civic cultures
• UK has a long tradition of co-operative and mutual organisations
• NL: government as main provider of public services
• Dutch residents groups inevitably face a cultural transition to a more
entrepreneurial form of governance
10. 10Challenge the future
Can the British concept be copied
to the Dutch context …..?
(2)• Netherlands: Government calls upon the responsibilities of
people. It is your duty to help. Citizens should not get more
power… only more responsibility. It is OK to be negative about
citizens who are not responsible and help others.
• UK: Government aims to empower people. You are invited
to take action, show initiatives. In the UK moving
responsibilities and power from national to local governments and
local communities is seen as necessary to give citizens more
power.
• In UK there seems to be more energy, optimism, and funding.
In the NL, policy may instrumentalise citizen action at
the cost of the intrinsic motivation of citizens to help each
other.
Source: Verhoeven, I. & Tonkens, E. (2013). Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands
11. 11Challenge the future
Can the British concept be copied
to the Dutch context …..?
(3)• Paradox: localities with the greatest need to solve social problems,
usually have the lowest capacity for self-organisation
• Well-equipped citizens may develop activities to the benefit of their
own interests, but not to the interest of other community members
• Exclusion from CE benefits
• Self organisation can thus lead to selection and more inequality.
Issues important to the most vulnerable might not be taken up.
• Governments torn between self-responsibility discourse and fear
• Officials have difficulty in behaving supportively (“affectionate neglect”)
• What if residents’ initiatives fail …..?
• Citizens not necessarily do what the government thinks is good for them
12. 12Challenge the future
Some BIG questions remaining
• Does the Netherlands approach of ‘forced’ active citizenship
work? What role should the government play?
• Do citizens have time for all of this? Do they all want to
participate and take action themselves? What if not?
• Are citizen initiatives allowed to fail?
• Who looks after the interests of those who cannot
successfully organise themselves?
• Who is responsible for our key services (education, health,
housing)… and the liveability of our neighbourhoods?
Editor's Notes
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
Netherlands already has high level of informal care and voluntary work. The Government says we need to do much more. The government prefers informal care, but citizens indicate that they prefer help from professionals. Almost 50% of all adults are already doing some form of voluntary work, mostly sport clubs, followed by schools, informal care, and religious organisations. Most participation in 35-44 age group and pensioners Rural areas Higher educated people http://www.rotterdam.nl/nieuws:winnaarstadsinitiatief2013bekend Citizens of Rotterdam could vote on initiatives in the city for which 2,5 million Euro was available. Only 41,000 people voted out of 500,000 adults.
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.
In the UK there is a similar movement called the Big Society, but according to Tonkens there are large differences: Tonkes analased government reports and speeches on … 4 Contradictions: 1.The view in the Netherlands is that the citizens behaviour has caused the welfare state to get out of hand. Consumers of government services instead of citizens. In the UK the government is blamed. Centralistic, top-down… this stops the citizen from being responsible 2.In NL the citizens should not get more power… only more responsibility. It is ok to be negative about citizens who are not responsible and help. In the UK moving responsibilities and power from national to local governments and local communities is seen as necessary to give citizens more power. 3.In NL all is about duty… You MUST contribute to society, social cohesion, stability…. Be active. In UK there is more energy, optimism, government tries to lure (verleiden) citizen to do more and get more power. 4.NL there is a lot of emphasis on own responsibility, individual responsibility. Using the vehicle of voluntary work. YOU YOU. In UK there is more emphasis on community and source of hope for the individual. WE WE. In the Netherlands there is emphasis on budget cuts, responsibilities, necessary. In UK more emphasis on making a difference, change, energy, more power for citizens. NL government is as a parent telling a child what to do. In UK more emphasis on empowerment. BIG QUESTION is which approach works best and works best in the Netherlands? The Netherlands citizen might not feel that the government message is for them, but for others in society…
Citizenship new buzzword since the early 1994s. Key policy tool to address issues of social cohesion. Citizenship entered the public spotlight on the back of three developments. First, there is the fear that rising self-centeredness is putting an end to civic engagement, for which a communitarian idea of citizenship is billed as the solution. Second, there is the fear that growing diversity is putting an end to social cohesion. A republican idea of citizenship, stressing nationalism as the new uniting force, is presented here as the answer. Third, growing diversity requires another aspect of republican citizenship: the debating of differences to find a new shared language and new shared solutions.