Reachey
www.reachey.com
1
1
2
Ease the college discovery process for students
Enable colleges to reach students through targeted search
What we do
2
Our mission is
to unlock
student
potential by
enabling the
brightest
students to
pursue the best
opportunities
3
Search
Looking for the “right” school is
confusing, stressful, and time-
consuming
Metrics
Standardized scores
dominate the initial
evaluation process
Fit
Anxiety and uncertainty
about cultural fit
2400
$
Opportunities
Potential is wasted as some students
do not apply to selective programs
Fees
Admission expenses are large and these
costs continue to rise
For students, college application process is difficult…
4
Adverse Selection
All schools, but particularly 2nd and 3rd
tier schools, compete for the same
pool and many face adverse selection
Time
Evaluating thousands of prospective
applications takes time and money
Precision
Reaching out to students today lacks
focus
Selection
Crafting the perfect class, meeting
admissions goals, and doing additional
due diligence is tough
…and for schools, reaching students is just as painful
5
High school
student
Have colleges reach you
through our website
Colleges
* Future plans: to address money constraints and drive students to the site
Solution: connect college admission officers and high
school students
6
StudentsUniversities
Pull
colleges come to students
Push
students seek out colleges
Before After
• Stressed and confused
• Time constrained
• Concerned about costs
• Unaware of what “could be”
• Scatter-shot strategy
• More options
• Less work
• Apply to selective schools
• Show your best (not just SAT)
• Difficult to craft the right class
• Money and time spent
• Imprecise outreach
• Find the students you need
• Money and time saved
• Outreach is razor-sharp
• Enhance diversity
• Help talented students unlock
their true potential
We flip the model and enable universities to seek out
applicants
7
ResultsBefore
1.7 M paying users
$109 M 2 revenue
Dating
After
259 M members
$1.5 B1 Revenue
Professional
Search
1 2013 estimate
2 Q2 2013 revenue, excluding Meetic
Push
applicant searches
for end-game
Pull
end-game “comes”
to applicant
This model led to results in other areas so why not
education?
8
5.58M HS students apply to colleges every year
$1.1B in application fees per year
2,474 4-year colleges in the U.S
>$1,750 cost for AdCom to recruit one student
$4.8B in admission expenses
$4.8M revenue in year 2 from AdCom subs
Student:: 16.4M undergrad students, 1% penetration for premium, $4.8M SOM for premium sub (not included until LT)
College: conservative scenario assuming 5% penetration, cost/student = 2% of AdCom cost; 4-year schools only
College admissions market is large and growing
9
CollegeBoard CollegeWeekLive BeRecruited CommonApp Linkedin College Scout
Only 500 schools
Time consuming
Push
Not personalized
Time consuming
Push
Saves time
Pull
Time
consuming
Push
Time
consuming
Push
Prof. focus
Saves time
Pull
Personalized
Free
Doesn’t reduce
any costs
Free
Doesn’t reduce
any costs
$ to join
Doesn’t reduce
any costs
Free
Doesn’t reduce
any costs
Free
Doesn’t
reduce any
costs
Free
Reduce some
costs
Stats-driven NA Stats-driven
Focused only on
athletes
Stats-driven NA Multiple angles
Recognized and
trusted brand
Massive budget
500 schools on
board
Pull model with
cross-sell ops
Freemium
Known brand
Deep pockets
Known brand
Deep pockets
Strong social
Easy/save time
More then a #
Enable fit
$
2400
There is no direct competitor that addresses student problems
Competition is focused on maintaining status quo
Pros
CS has an edge over competition…
10
…and CS dwarfs current outreach options for colleges
Targeted search saves time and marketing dollars, solves adverse selection,
increases efficacy of outreach, leading to more talented and diverse student body
College Fair HS Visit &
Reception
QR Codes/Ads
Direct Mail
College Scout
Ease of Use
Very time-consuming
Compete for student
attention
Difficult to find the
students they want
Very time-consuming
Difficult to find the
students they want
Imprecise
Difficult to find
students they want
Hard to stand out
Low efficacy
Intuitive and
personalized search
Outreach is razor-sharp
Costs
$$$
Need $, time, and staff
to organize and attend
$$$
Need $, time, and staff
to organize and attend
$$$ $
Benefit
High-touch in person
interaction
High-touch in person
interaction
Fairly simple to
execute
Meet AdCom goals
Help students unlock
their true potential
Add. due diligence lens
11
Prototype: landing page
12
Prototype: landing page
13
Prototype: student profile adds depth and personality
14
Prototype: student dashboard
15
Prototype: college dashboard enables precise search
16
“We definitely want this…there is currently no way
to get a holistic view of a kid” – former admissions
officer at top 30 university
“Schools need to do a lot more outreach
nowadays. All the information makes it very hard for
students to understand what’s a good school and
what’s a good fit…We would find this a helpful
substitute to direct outreach” – Assistant Director of
Admissions at top 10 university
31interviews with students
5interviews with Admissions
Committee and industry experts
68 high-school student
respondents to an online survey
Based on this mock-up, would you want to
create a profile to use this?
Positive feedback from each side of the market
reaffirms our hypothesis and suggests demand
92% 8% 54% 40%
4--07--510--8
6%
How likely would you be to recommend this service to
a friend (10 very likely, 1 very unlikely)?
“Didn’t know what to do so applied to a million places”
- NU freshman
“I think I just stuck with tradition” -sophomore
at UW
Yes No
17
Colleges
2nd tier
College
For each state
1st tier
College
Community
Colleges
Personal Contact: co-design and onboard early adopters
Internet
Press:
Students
1 High Schools/ Counselors: Personal contact
2 Students: Word of mouth, blogosphere & publications (hero story), viral,
forums, direct opt-in mail, on-campus reps
Make the case for other states
We will take a curated approach to acquire users
State
Schools
18
State of Illinois
• Rely on education
grants for funding
Additional services
• Scholarships from
partners from
corporate partners
or private sponsors
• Advertisement
Geographic
Expansion 2
• National presence
• Introduce social
component
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Geographic
Expansion 1
• Launch in NYC,
MA, DC, CAL
Estimate: 2014 2015 and 2016 2017 2018
Launch pilot in IL and gradually expand nationally
19
Colleges pay flat monthly subscription fee
(+) Premium model for students
(+) Advertisement
Engage early adopters through co-design
Offer access to platform for free to 1-2 schools
Early the focus is on growing the network, but revenue
sources will expand over time
20
25%
20%
25%
90%
75%
50%
5%
10%
Now EventuallySoon
“Recruiting”
Social
Data
0%
100%
As the network grows so will our sources of value
Participants:
Students
Colleges
Students
Colleges
Students, colleges
and sponsors
21
Empower ad
business: more
targeted and
greater reach
Enter a large and
growing domain
(education)
Boost Google+
network
Seamless
integration with
existing business
Enter a large and
growing domain
(education)
Increase
engagement of
existing users
Easy to sell given
existing
relationships with
schools
Natural
integration with
college prep
services
New sources of
revenue
Easy to sell given
existing
relationships with
schools
New sources of
revenue
Natural
integration with
college prep
services
New sources of
revenue
Increase
engagement of
existing users
There are several realistic exit opportunities
22
Let’s recap
College application process is broken
Large and growing market
Solution: Flip current model from push to pull
Competition is content with status quo
Continuity: multiple revenue streams and expanding
value with network growth
Passionate team
1
2
3
4
5
6
Our ask: mentorship and introduction(s)
23
Questions?
24
Appendix
25
Market sizing calculations and assumptions
26
Launch Sites / MVPs
We used launch sites/MVPs to validate our hypothesis
Advertisements and Social Media Posts to drive traffic to…
27
What additional areas would you like to share with the
universities?
28
Prototype: student registration
29
Prototype: student registration
30
Prototype: student registration
31
We would bring together college admission officers
and high school students
High school
Have colleges reach you
through our website
Colleges
Companies and Families
Scholarship*
* Future plans: to address money constraints and drive students to the site

Why is the college discovery process so broken? Our solution (1st pitch)

  • 1.
  • 2.
    1 1 2 Ease the collegediscovery process for students Enable colleges to reach students through targeted search What we do
  • 3.
    2 Our mission is tounlock student potential by enabling the brightest students to pursue the best opportunities
  • 4.
    3 Search Looking for the“right” school is confusing, stressful, and time- consuming Metrics Standardized scores dominate the initial evaluation process Fit Anxiety and uncertainty about cultural fit 2400 $ Opportunities Potential is wasted as some students do not apply to selective programs Fees Admission expenses are large and these costs continue to rise For students, college application process is difficult…
  • 5.
    4 Adverse Selection All schools,but particularly 2nd and 3rd tier schools, compete for the same pool and many face adverse selection Time Evaluating thousands of prospective applications takes time and money Precision Reaching out to students today lacks focus Selection Crafting the perfect class, meeting admissions goals, and doing additional due diligence is tough …and for schools, reaching students is just as painful
  • 6.
    5 High school student Have collegesreach you through our website Colleges * Future plans: to address money constraints and drive students to the site Solution: connect college admission officers and high school students
  • 7.
    6 StudentsUniversities Pull colleges come tostudents Push students seek out colleges Before After • Stressed and confused • Time constrained • Concerned about costs • Unaware of what “could be” • Scatter-shot strategy • More options • Less work • Apply to selective schools • Show your best (not just SAT) • Difficult to craft the right class • Money and time spent • Imprecise outreach • Find the students you need • Money and time saved • Outreach is razor-sharp • Enhance diversity • Help talented students unlock their true potential We flip the model and enable universities to seek out applicants
  • 8.
    7 ResultsBefore 1.7 M payingusers $109 M 2 revenue Dating After 259 M members $1.5 B1 Revenue Professional Search 1 2013 estimate 2 Q2 2013 revenue, excluding Meetic Push applicant searches for end-game Pull end-game “comes” to applicant This model led to results in other areas so why not education?
  • 9.
    8 5.58M HS studentsapply to colleges every year $1.1B in application fees per year 2,474 4-year colleges in the U.S >$1,750 cost for AdCom to recruit one student $4.8B in admission expenses $4.8M revenue in year 2 from AdCom subs Student:: 16.4M undergrad students, 1% penetration for premium, $4.8M SOM for premium sub (not included until LT) College: conservative scenario assuming 5% penetration, cost/student = 2% of AdCom cost; 4-year schools only College admissions market is large and growing
  • 10.
    9 CollegeBoard CollegeWeekLive BeRecruitedCommonApp Linkedin College Scout Only 500 schools Time consuming Push Not personalized Time consuming Push Saves time Pull Time consuming Push Time consuming Push Prof. focus Saves time Pull Personalized Free Doesn’t reduce any costs Free Doesn’t reduce any costs $ to join Doesn’t reduce any costs Free Doesn’t reduce any costs Free Doesn’t reduce any costs Free Reduce some costs Stats-driven NA Stats-driven Focused only on athletes Stats-driven NA Multiple angles Recognized and trusted brand Massive budget 500 schools on board Pull model with cross-sell ops Freemium Known brand Deep pockets Known brand Deep pockets Strong social Easy/save time More then a # Enable fit $ 2400 There is no direct competitor that addresses student problems Competition is focused on maintaining status quo Pros CS has an edge over competition…
  • 11.
    10 …and CS dwarfscurrent outreach options for colleges Targeted search saves time and marketing dollars, solves adverse selection, increases efficacy of outreach, leading to more talented and diverse student body College Fair HS Visit & Reception QR Codes/Ads Direct Mail College Scout Ease of Use Very time-consuming Compete for student attention Difficult to find the students they want Very time-consuming Difficult to find the students they want Imprecise Difficult to find students they want Hard to stand out Low efficacy Intuitive and personalized search Outreach is razor-sharp Costs $$$ Need $, time, and staff to organize and attend $$$ Need $, time, and staff to organize and attend $$$ $ Benefit High-touch in person interaction High-touch in person interaction Fairly simple to execute Meet AdCom goals Help students unlock their true potential Add. due diligence lens
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    13 Prototype: student profileadds depth and personality
  • 15.
  • 16.
    15 Prototype: college dashboardenables precise search
  • 17.
    16 “We definitely wantthis…there is currently no way to get a holistic view of a kid” – former admissions officer at top 30 university “Schools need to do a lot more outreach nowadays. All the information makes it very hard for students to understand what’s a good school and what’s a good fit…We would find this a helpful substitute to direct outreach” – Assistant Director of Admissions at top 10 university 31interviews with students 5interviews with Admissions Committee and industry experts 68 high-school student respondents to an online survey Based on this mock-up, would you want to create a profile to use this? Positive feedback from each side of the market reaffirms our hypothesis and suggests demand 92% 8% 54% 40% 4--07--510--8 6% How likely would you be to recommend this service to a friend (10 very likely, 1 very unlikely)? “Didn’t know what to do so applied to a million places” - NU freshman “I think I just stuck with tradition” -sophomore at UW Yes No
  • 18.
    17 Colleges 2nd tier College For eachstate 1st tier College Community Colleges Personal Contact: co-design and onboard early adopters Internet Press: Students 1 High Schools/ Counselors: Personal contact 2 Students: Word of mouth, blogosphere & publications (hero story), viral, forums, direct opt-in mail, on-campus reps Make the case for other states We will take a curated approach to acquire users State Schools
  • 19.
    18 State of Illinois •Rely on education grants for funding Additional services • Scholarships from partners from corporate partners or private sponsors • Advertisement Geographic Expansion 2 • National presence • Introduce social component Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Geographic Expansion 1 • Launch in NYC, MA, DC, CAL Estimate: 2014 2015 and 2016 2017 2018 Launch pilot in IL and gradually expand nationally
  • 20.
    19 Colleges pay flatmonthly subscription fee (+) Premium model for students (+) Advertisement Engage early adopters through co-design Offer access to platform for free to 1-2 schools Early the focus is on growing the network, but revenue sources will expand over time
  • 21.
    20 25% 20% 25% 90% 75% 50% 5% 10% Now EventuallySoon “Recruiting” Social Data 0% 100% As thenetwork grows so will our sources of value Participants: Students Colleges Students Colleges Students, colleges and sponsors
  • 22.
    21 Empower ad business: more targetedand greater reach Enter a large and growing domain (education) Boost Google+ network Seamless integration with existing business Enter a large and growing domain (education) Increase engagement of existing users Easy to sell given existing relationships with schools Natural integration with college prep services New sources of revenue Easy to sell given existing relationships with schools New sources of revenue Natural integration with college prep services New sources of revenue Increase engagement of existing users There are several realistic exit opportunities
  • 23.
    22 Let’s recap College applicationprocess is broken Large and growing market Solution: Flip current model from push to pull Competition is content with status quo Continuity: multiple revenue streams and expanding value with network growth Passionate team 1 2 3 4 5 6 Our ask: mentorship and introduction(s)
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
    26 Launch Sites /MVPs We used launch sites/MVPs to validate our hypothesis Advertisements and Social Media Posts to drive traffic to…
  • 28.
    27 What additional areaswould you like to share with the universities?
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    31 We would bringtogether college admission officers and high school students High school Have colleges reach you through our website Colleges Companies and Families Scholarship* * Future plans: to address money constraints and drive students to the site