This document discusses second language acquisition. It defines language learning vs acquisition, and what second language acquisition is. Second language acquisition is the study of how people learn a second language with limited exposure, why most don't achieve native-like proficiency, and why some do. Learners acquire a second language through their first language knowledge, learning strategies, and language universals to develop an interlanguage. Individual differences like age, aptitude, motivation, and cognitive style affect second language acquisition rates and levels. Learner strategies and a natural order of strategy development also influence the process. Factors like motivation, first language, language distance, access, age, personality, peers, and instruction quality further impact second language acquisition.
The Acculturation Model is a model of second language acquisition designed by John H. Schumann (1978) and it is based on the social-psychology of acculturation
1.Natural route of development and It's theory
-All learners irrespective of their L1 , learnt the grammar of the L2 in a fixed order.
-encouraged in research in L1 acquisition which showed that children learning their mother tongue followed a higly predictable route in the acquistion of structures such as negatives and interrogatives
(Klima and Bellugi 1996) and a range of grammatical morphemes (R .Brown 1973)
The L1 and L2 hypothesis
-whether the route of development in L1 acquisition matched that of SLA
-Reason be that language learners apply a common set of mechanisms which have their origin in the special characterstics of the human language faculty.
Investigated in 2 ways
1) Analysis of learner errors
-A large proportion of development errors was evidence that processes of L1 acquisition and SLA were similar.
-It was assumed that structures in which errors were very common were learnt later that structures containing few errors.
2) Longtituatonal studies of L2 learners
-many originatning in the university of California , Los Angeles ,under the supervision of Evelyn Hatch .
2.Types of Contextual Variation
1) situational context
learners use their knowledge of the L2 differently in different sitations.
2)Linguistic context
learners produce errors in one type of sentence but in another.
3.What does Variability in SLA refers to?
Variablity in language learners is the result not only of contextual factors but also it occurs because of individual differences in the way learners learn a L2 and the way they use their L2 knowledge.
It can also be the factors that are affecting SLA such as :
Age , Aptitude , cognitive style, motivation and personality.
4)Define Input .
How we acquire new language
-The input constitutes the language to which the learner is exposed.
-It can bbe spoken or wrotten.
-Input serves as the data which the learner must use to determine the rules of the target language.
5.What is the role of input in SLA?
-Input may be in the form of exposure in natural setting or formal onstruction. It may be spoken or written.
-Early theories of SLA
1-based on the notion of habit formation through practice and reinforcement.
2- language learning
first or second -was an external not an internal phenomenon.
-In the 1960s this view of learning was challenged.In many instances there was no match between the kind og language to be observed in the input and the language that learners produced.
Chomsky
1) emphasize the learner's "LAD"
2) played down the role of the linguistic environment.
Input served merely as a trigger to activate the device.
The Acculturation Model is a model of second language acquisition designed by John H. Schumann (1978) and it is based on the social-psychology of acculturation
1.Natural route of development and It's theory
-All learners irrespective of their L1 , learnt the grammar of the L2 in a fixed order.
-encouraged in research in L1 acquisition which showed that children learning their mother tongue followed a higly predictable route in the acquistion of structures such as negatives and interrogatives
(Klima and Bellugi 1996) and a range of grammatical morphemes (R .Brown 1973)
The L1 and L2 hypothesis
-whether the route of development in L1 acquisition matched that of SLA
-Reason be that language learners apply a common set of mechanisms which have their origin in the special characterstics of the human language faculty.
Investigated in 2 ways
1) Analysis of learner errors
-A large proportion of development errors was evidence that processes of L1 acquisition and SLA were similar.
-It was assumed that structures in which errors were very common were learnt later that structures containing few errors.
2) Longtituatonal studies of L2 learners
-many originatning in the university of California , Los Angeles ,under the supervision of Evelyn Hatch .
2.Types of Contextual Variation
1) situational context
learners use their knowledge of the L2 differently in different sitations.
2)Linguistic context
learners produce errors in one type of sentence but in another.
3.What does Variability in SLA refers to?
Variablity in language learners is the result not only of contextual factors but also it occurs because of individual differences in the way learners learn a L2 and the way they use their L2 knowledge.
It can also be the factors that are affecting SLA such as :
Age , Aptitude , cognitive style, motivation and personality.
4)Define Input .
How we acquire new language
-The input constitutes the language to which the learner is exposed.
-It can bbe spoken or wrotten.
-Input serves as the data which the learner must use to determine the rules of the target language.
5.What is the role of input in SLA?
-Input may be in the form of exposure in natural setting or formal onstruction. It may be spoken or written.
-Early theories of SLA
1-based on the notion of habit formation through practice and reinforcement.
2- language learning
first or second -was an external not an internal phenomenon.
-In the 1960s this view of learning was challenged.In many instances there was no match between the kind og language to be observed in the input and the language that learners produced.
Chomsky
1) emphasize the learner's "LAD"
2) played down the role of the linguistic environment.
Input served merely as a trigger to activate the device.
Perspectives on First and Second Language Acquisition and Factors Influencing...MichaelArgonillo2
Perspectives on First and Second Language Acquisition and Factors Influencing Learning. This will help learners to engage and learn about their native and second language acquisition.
La Psicologia y aprendizaje de las Lenguas es un vocabulario, fonología, gramática, y otros aspectos de la estructura lingüística.
Al hacer uso de la palabra (o no), ¿qué decir a quién y cómo decirlo adecuadamente en cualquier situación dada.
El conocimiento social y cultural que permite a los oradores a usar e interpretar las formas lingüísticas.
Summarise an integrated perspective—linguistic, psychological and social—to expound on the complexity of processes and conditions involved in SLA;
Apply the learned knowledge and suggest implications for L2 learning and teaching
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
3. What is Second
Language Acquisition?
In second language learning, language plays an institutional and social role
in the community. It functions as a recognized means of communication among
members who speak some other language as their native tongue.
In foreign language learning, language plays no major role in the community
and is primarily learned in the classroom.
The distinction between second and foreign language learning is what is
learned and how it is learned.
5. What is the Study of Second Language
Acquisition?
It is the study of:
how second languages are learned;
how learners create a new language system with limited exposure to a second language;
why most second language learners do not achieve the same degree of proficiency in a
second language as they do in their native language; and
why some learners appear to achieve native-like proficiency in more than one language.
6. How Do Learners Acquire a
Second Language?
Learners acquire a second language by making use of existing knowledge of
the native language, general learning strategies, or universal properties of
language to internalize knowledge of the second language.
These processes serve as a means by which the learner constructs an
interlanguage.
Communication strategies are employed by the learner to make use of existing
knowledge to cope with communication difficulties.
7. The Language Learner
Individual differences affect L2 acquisition. These may include: (1) the rate of
development and (2) their ultimate level of achievement.
Learners differ with regard to variables relating to cognitive, affective and social
aspects of a human being.
Fixed factors such as age and language learning aptitude are beyond external
control.
Variable factors such as motivation are influenced by external factors such as social
setting and by the actual course of L2 development.
Cognitive style refers to the way people perceive, conceptualize, organize and recall
information.
Field dependent learners operate holistically. They like to work with others.
Field independent learners are analytic and prefer to work alone.
8. Learner Strategies
Learner strategies are defined as deliberate behaviors or actions that
learners use to make language learning more successful, self-directed
and enjoyable.
Cognitive strategies relate new concepts to prior knowledge.
Metacognitive strategies are those which help with organizing a personal
timetable to facilitate an effective study of the L2.
Social strategies include looking for opportunities to converse with native
speakers.
9. Strategies of L2 Development
Chesterfield & Chesterfield (1985) identified a natural
order of strategies in the development of a second
language.
1)Repetition (imitating a word or structure);
2)Memorization (recalling songs, rhymes or
sequences by rote);
3) Formulaic expressions (words or phrases that
function as units i.e. greetings);
4) Verbal attention getters (language that initiates
interaction);
5) Answering in unison (responding with others);
6) Talking to self (engaging in internal monologue);
7) Elaboration (information beyond what is necessary);
8) Anticipatory answers (completing another’s phrase or
statement);
9) Monitoring (self-correcting errors);
10) Appeal for assistance (asking someone for help);
11) Request for clarification (asking the speaker to explain
or repeat); and
12) Role-playing (interacting with another by taking on
roles).
11. Factors that influence SLA
1. Motivation
2. First language experiences
3. Language distance and attitude
4. Access to the language
5. Age of acquisition
6. Personality and learning styles
7. Peers and role models
8. Quality of instruction