Johnny Au	s827839Davey Chu	s928872Lucas van Oordt	s921916Nora Fezliyska	u1239907Matri(x)Weekly Progress				Week 4ENHANCING THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT USING IT
Task DivisionJohnny – Documentation of application/Writing the reportDavey – Application developmentLucas – Literature research/Writing the reportNora – Literature research/Writing the report
ProgressLiterature:Three possible timing of instruction: before, during, after (Pol, Harskamp, and Suhre 2008)Each alternative has its pro’s and con’sApplication:Let the user choose / combinePossible because of ‘infinite’ generated questions
Screenshot
ProgressLiteratureDeadlines force students to become activeIncrease in class average of 5-10% (Penn & Nedeff, 2000)ApplicationHomework section containing questions that need to be filled in (before certain deadline).Answers checked by the application itself.Automatic update notice send to lecturer if input by student is correct.
Screenshot
PlanningLiteratureEarly pilot study (Hodge, Richardson, York, 2008) concluded that randomization could cause frustration if the generated equation could not be retrieved againDisagreements between students lead to synthesis of their ideas and better understanding Additional reason => Extra helpApplicationPost to Forum’ button will post the step-by-step transcript to a forum (perhaps even link it to BlackBoard?)
Screenshot
PlanningFinalize literature researchFinalize applicationContinue writing reportConduct questionnairesBegin Final video
Thank you for your attention!Any questions?

Seminar IM. Presentation Week 4

  • 1.
    Johnny Au s827839Davey Chu s928872Lucasvan Oordt s921916Nora Fezliyska u1239907Matri(x)Weekly Progress Week 4ENHANCING THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT USING IT
  • 2.
    Task DivisionJohnny –Documentation of application/Writing the reportDavey – Application developmentLucas – Literature research/Writing the reportNora – Literature research/Writing the report
  • 3.
    ProgressLiterature:Three possible timingof instruction: before, during, after (Pol, Harskamp, and Suhre 2008)Each alternative has its pro’s and con’sApplication:Let the user choose / combinePossible because of ‘infinite’ generated questions
  • 4.
  • 5.
    ProgressLiteratureDeadlines force studentsto become activeIncrease in class average of 5-10% (Penn & Nedeff, 2000)ApplicationHomework section containing questions that need to be filled in (before certain deadline).Answers checked by the application itself.Automatic update notice send to lecturer if input by student is correct.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    PlanningLiteratureEarly pilot study(Hodge, Richardson, York, 2008) concluded that randomization could cause frustration if the generated equation could not be retrieved againDisagreements between students lead to synthesis of their ideas and better understanding Additional reason => Extra helpApplicationPost to Forum’ button will post the step-by-step transcript to a forum (perhaps even link it to BlackBoard?)
  • 8.
  • 9.
    PlanningFinalize literature researchFinalizeapplicationContinue writing reportConduct questionnairesBegin Final video
  • 10.
    Thank you foryour attention!Any questions?