8. How it looks
Where the
content lives
What it says
What it says +
how it looks
Web writing
requires a
holistic set of
decisions
Agenda
5 min
15 min
10 min
15 min
37. A diagram that shows
relationships among
organisms.
A branching, treelike
diagram in which the
endpoints of the branches
represent specific species
of organisms. It is used to
illustrate phylogenetic
relationships and show
points at which various
species have diverged from
common ancestral forms.
Cladogram showing 3
families of the order
Crocodilia: Gavialadae,
Crocodylidae, and
Alligatoridae.
38. Image of a gavial: a large,
crocodile-like reptile about
350 pounds and 20 feet
long, dark gray in color and
an elongated snout about
12 inches long with a large
boss at the end of the nose.
68. Topic-style syllabus headings
Grades
Classroom policies
Office hours
Academic dishonesty policy
Contact your instructor
Summary-style syllabus headings
You will complete a grade contract
Please silence your phone during class
Attend office hours if you need assistance
Do original work
Tell me if you need additional assistance
69. How to write a hyperlink
embedded
descriptive
starts
with a
keyword
70. Click here for library eReserves readings
Click here for library eReserves readings
Click here for library eReserves readings
eReserves (new window)
73. How it looks
Where the
content lives
What it says
What it says +
how it looks
Web writing
requires a
holistic set of
decisions
What will you
take away?
Web writing is a goal-oriented activity where people are driven (and impatient) to find the information they're looking for, but course authors don't write that way, especially academics who are used to explicating details and developing arguments in a certain expected way. Therefore, you must learn some tips and tricks for doing it differently than the way you write for print.
z.umn.edu/webWritingForOnlineCourses
This is an optimal screen reading experience
https://themission.co/13-things-you-should-avoid-telling-yourself-every-day-da4c03f94fcd
What do you notice here?
https://medium.com/the-mission/13-things-you-should-avoid-telling-yourself-every-day-da4c03f94fcd
The web typography, formatting and body copy of this article all contribute to helping you feel like you can achieve reading it.
Assumptions:
You are using a learning management system, rather than your own hosted fancy website
You have little or no experience with HTML or CSS
This is just stuff you can do if you have plain old access to HTML web pages
Web writing requires a holistic set of decisions based on how your audience will interact with it.
When we talk about how they interact with it, we’re asking questions like how they will interact with it: come back to it often? search it, read it, get tested on it?
these decisions can be broken down into 4 categories: where this material will live in the ecology of their academic lives, what it says, and how it's displayed on the page
When you’re writing for your course website, remember that you’re writing for everybody, not just the person who thinks and processes information the same way you do.
This is a golden rule of communication.
The tips and techniques in this presentation are meant to help you think INCLUSIVELY. Because you will have someone in your courses who is someone who's perennially behind, English language learner, using assistive technology, busy - and what we all have in common is that we read on the web, and web writing is a goal-oriented activity
Let’s start with where the content lives.
In this talk I make a distinction between course content and administrative information
Course content = Journal articles, book chapters, long-form journalism pieces that live on external websites
Administrative info = the syllabus, assignment sheets, online web pages that talk about the flow of the course
Historical discussion: is screen reading still bad?
you read faster and remember more on paper than is possible on screen
brightness of the visual display, environmental conditions in the room and glare on the screen, compared the angles of people’s faces to the screen versus paper, resolution of typeface on screen versus print, screen flicker, aspect ratio--really all of the physical attributes of both mediums
30 years ago people did read slower on screen, understood less, remembered less, and on top of that they had greater rates of visual fatigue and blurred vision as compared to reading from paper.
Interestingly, they were not blinking more often! People blinked the same amount when looking at those old CRT computer monitors as they did when they were reading from paper!
screen flicker is barely perceptible anymore with today’s backlit LCD/LED displays, screen resolutions are much crisper, and font technology CLICK has addressed those very tiny pixelated bitmaps that once contributed so much to visual fatigue
no difference in comprehension between reading on a mobile device and reading on a laptop screen, which was the comparison condition in this study. In fact, some participants did better reading from a mobile device. The researchers believe this is because they actually slowed down during the reading of the most complex material--so there was a speed-accuracy tradeoff that was explaining their success
Most of the studies mentioned in my readings were from the early 2000s, and students were still reportedly printing paper copies of assigned readings, stating they preferred paper because they felt they remembered information better when they read it in print than on screen. Some students also said it was easier to highlight and annotate paper copies.
As recently as 2014, students still reported they preferred paper copies when they had to study--these were eTextbook surveys, one of which was an EDUCAUSE survey that included U of M participation. Students’ decision to purchase eTexts was primarily driven by cost, and they would rather have had a print copy of their textbook if the cost was the same.
Students also said they liked paper because it helped them focus and not be distracted by activity in other tabs and windows.
In general, it seems we can conclude that it’s likely students may still do better at deep, active reading when they read from paper than from digital texts
Depending what level of students you have, don’t assume that they know how to change the display width of their PDFs, how to annotate, have a good way to capture notes they make in PDFs, etc.
For these reasons, my recommendation to instructors is that course content should be downloadable and allow the student to choose their preferred format for study.
WHAT IT SAYS
All screen reading is goal-oriented activity. Students have goals. Their goals are
Find and get at the content as quickly as possible
Due dates
Check their grades
Your goals are to get them to read every word that you’ve provided for them.
How can you support both these sets of goals?
Blah blah text is any text that is not scannable that doesn’t directly support
Know what blah blah text is and learn to recognize when you may be writing it
Blah blah text can sometimes be useful and should still be included on the page. That top sentence still has some orienting information but also allows readers to proceed to the main points so they can accomplish their goals.
5 steps to plain language
Identify and describe the target audience.
Structure the content to guide the reader through it.
Write the content in plain language: short and to the point, helpful tone, right words: strong verbs in active voice in words the audience knows
Use information design to help readers see and understand: headings, typography, whitespace, images
Test the design and content with target users
Inverted pyramid is a term borrowed from journalism. It can be a good way to remind yourself to start with the main point. Kill the suspense--don’t expect students to scroll all the way to the bottom.
Start with the conclusion! Kill the suspense. Don’t assume they’ll scroll all the way to the bottom.
Out on the “open web”, there are so many examples of images that are there for the express purpose of giving the eye a break
We can learn a lot from commercial web design practices, but decorative images isn’t one of them. This is a wasted opportunity to use blah blah images on course websites
Web usability - people learn your site. Students quickly learn whether you are using filler images that have no instructional content, and then they will overlook the image when you DO want them to look at it.
Therefore, use them to augment the instruction that’s taking place on the page OR give them a preview of the content to entice them, put a question in their minds that will motivate them to engage with the content.
The risk with images is that you need to be aware of the effect of the image’s presence and placement on the screen.
Especially when you consider that some of your students will be accessing on mobile devices.
This is an issue not just for length of scroll, but also for all the other visual context of your instructional pages that might be stripped away.
Alt text = alternative text. It is seen and read by people who use adaptive technologies
I often have instructors say to me, especially in the professional schools, “I know I don’t have any blind people in my courses.” Which may be true, but an instructional image can always benefit from an
Every image on your site should should have either alt text or
alt text can describe an image even if the image doesn’t load on the page.
should describe content and function, NOT the image’s properties. Only describe the properties if they’re germane to the discussion
content = what is the information contained in the graphic? summarize and draw conclusions, as necessary. If the image is a clickable button, that should be described too.
Most modern learning management systems make alt text unavoidable--but also easy to ignore. Don’t ignore this field!
In Canvas it will default to the image file name. You of course want to overwrite that attribute so it describes the content of the image, rather than the name of the file.
Context is everything. You would describe different things in the alt text of this image depending on what you want your students to get from the image.
If the point of this picture is to show what a gavial looks like, then yes.
We’ve heard different things about what you should do with decorative graphics. Suggest “decoration”
alt=""
Behold the humble potato. Raw. On its own, it is hardly digestible. We *could* eat it, but it would take awhile and we certainly wouldn’t enjoy it.
Compare to the French fry, which has been chunked into digestible and tasty bits. You can eat quite a lot of them--several potatoes’ worth--and enjoy them to boot!
I posit that unformatted web page text is like a raw potato. You don’t really know where to start--and you don’t really want to.
But a web page where some thought and care has been given to user goals and helping do some of the initial digestion, this makes the page feel like you could actually get it done.
Information designers call these interventions the document’s macrostructure
Find the white space.
Preserve or create more white space
Use numerals
All of this is about either preserving or, more likely, CREATING white space.
White space is the single best static tool for focusing attention.
Rethink your idea of paragraphs.
On-screen writing feels more digestible--more achievable in a sea of other information inputs--if it looks like some of the work has been done for us
I’m toggling back and forth a little bit between web formats and document formats, but essentially you can do the same thing both places.
format headings with paragraph styles rather than manually
Shorter isn’t necessarily better.
52% said that when searching for information, shorter didn’t matter
What mattered as that they could do a page search.
Learnability
Nielsen/Norman Group, first 11 characters OR first 2 words
http://www.businessinsider.com/eye-tracking-heatmaps-2014-7
Enticing AND descriptive are sometimes at odds with each other
microdecisions
create a question in the learner's mind
heading strategies: topic style versus summary style
write with hyperlinks, anatomy of a hyperlink
emphasis techniques: use bolding, be aware of the effect of hyperlinks in drawing the eye
headings are pickup lines
The following are 3 techniques for landing pages, that is, use them on a
Techniques for landing pages
cheap ‘n clickbaity method
Technique for landing pages - I would not use these for the
create a little good old fashioned cognitive dissonance
Both of these techniques inspire clicks out of interest rather than obligation.
Examples of each
Advantages of the topic-driven is the quick searching--as long as you’re using the same terms that student use--
The advantage of the summary is the
What heading style does this article use?
Stop doing: Click here, read more, learn more, here, read, or go to
Screen readers are able to isolate and read all the hyperlinks in a list, so a list of click here’s doesn’t do a lot of good.
Visually our eyes are drawn to the blue underlined text, which helps for scannability - but can be problem for dyslexia
Beware (or use to your advantage!) the fact that hyperlinks act like bold/emphasis in your course web pages!