This document outlines the development and contents of a Cost-Benefit Advocacy Toolkit being created as part of the CESSDA-SaW project to help social science data services demonstrate their value. It describes conducting a user requirements survey and focus groups with stakeholders. The toolkit will include factsheets on ROI, benefits and costs, worksheets, a Development Canvas tool, case studies and links to external tools. It was designed to be easy to use and allow customization. The goal is to help data services advocate for support by showing their economic and social impacts.
Presentation on the Value and Impact of Social Science Data Archives and the CESSDA SaW Toolkit
A set of 38 slides used for the Focus Group Cost-Benefit Funding Advocacy Program (Task 4.6) session at the CESSDA Saw Workshop in The Hague 16/17 June 2016.
This was an interactive focus group repeated over two parallel sessions. It was aimed at European social science data archive staff with responsibility for bidding for funding or promotion and advocacy of the archive to key stakeholders.
The presentation covers some of the key ideas on how the CESSDA Saw funding advocacy toolkit will be structured, its components, and key facts and approaches it will include.
We expect the cost-benefit funding advocacy toolkit under development to support the negotiation with ministries and funding organisations across Europe.
The results of the toolkit user requirements survey with responses from 24 European social science archives were presented and discussed, together with suggested approaches and content for the toolkit. 22 people attended the two sessions overall, representing a mix of countries at different stages on the development path for social science archives (none, new/emerging, mature). There was strong interest and support for the emerging toolkit together with open discussion of how it can be applied in the specific political and administrative context of different European countries.
The slide set presented here is an extended version including a number of hidden background/ reference slides not used in the presentation. The focus group is one of a series guiding further development of the toolkit and its adoption being given to either: (a) social science data archive staff or (b) their key stakeholders (senior management in their universities, research councils and academies, funding ministries, national statistics offices, research users and depositors).
CESSDA is the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives. The CESSDA SaW project “Strengthening and widening the European infrastructure for social science data archives” is funded by the European Commission as part of its Horizon2020 programme.
Value impact researchdataservices_esip_2017Neil Beagrie
Presentation to the Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP) in Bloomington Indiana 27 July 2017. Presentation covers value and economic impact studies by Charles Beagrie Ltd and our CESSDA SaW cost -benefit advocacy toolkit. A particular focus given to Earth Sciences.
PaNOSC: EOSC for Photon and Neutron Facilities Users EOSC-hub project
This document discusses the Photon and Neutron Open Science Cloud (PaNOSC) project. It summarizes the current status of photon and neutron research facilities in making their data FAIR. It then outlines the goals and key performance indicators of the PaNOSC project to further improve data management and services by 2023 to fully integrate these facilities within the European Open Science Cloud. Open questions are also discussed, such as how to engage users, develop common standards and services, and ensure long-term sustainability of FAIR data practices.
Vortrag im Rahmen der EERA-Session: Open Science and Educational Research? Inclusion and Exclusion at the European Open Science Cloud; am 5. September 2018 in Bolzano (Italien).
European Commission
DG Research and Innovation
RTD.A2. Open Data Policy and Science Cloud
Katarzyna Szkuta
Presentation on the Value and Impact of Social Science Data Archives and the CESSDA SaW Toolkit
A set of 38 slides used for the Focus Group Cost-Benefit Funding Advocacy Program (Task 4.6) session at the CESSDA Saw Workshop in The Hague 16/17 June 2016.
This was an interactive focus group repeated over two parallel sessions. It was aimed at European social science data archive staff with responsibility for bidding for funding or promotion and advocacy of the archive to key stakeholders.
The presentation covers some of the key ideas on how the CESSDA Saw funding advocacy toolkit will be structured, its components, and key facts and approaches it will include.
We expect the cost-benefit funding advocacy toolkit under development to support the negotiation with ministries and funding organisations across Europe.
The results of the toolkit user requirements survey with responses from 24 European social science archives were presented and discussed, together with suggested approaches and content for the toolkit. 22 people attended the two sessions overall, representing a mix of countries at different stages on the development path for social science archives (none, new/emerging, mature). There was strong interest and support for the emerging toolkit together with open discussion of how it can be applied in the specific political and administrative context of different European countries.
The slide set presented here is an extended version including a number of hidden background/ reference slides not used in the presentation. The focus group is one of a series guiding further development of the toolkit and its adoption being given to either: (a) social science data archive staff or (b) their key stakeholders (senior management in their universities, research councils and academies, funding ministries, national statistics offices, research users and depositors).
CESSDA is the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives. The CESSDA SaW project “Strengthening and widening the European infrastructure for social science data archives” is funded by the European Commission as part of its Horizon2020 programme.
Value impact researchdataservices_esip_2017Neil Beagrie
Presentation to the Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP) in Bloomington Indiana 27 July 2017. Presentation covers value and economic impact studies by Charles Beagrie Ltd and our CESSDA SaW cost -benefit advocacy toolkit. A particular focus given to Earth Sciences.
PaNOSC: EOSC for Photon and Neutron Facilities Users EOSC-hub project
This document discusses the Photon and Neutron Open Science Cloud (PaNOSC) project. It summarizes the current status of photon and neutron research facilities in making their data FAIR. It then outlines the goals and key performance indicators of the PaNOSC project to further improve data management and services by 2023 to fully integrate these facilities within the European Open Science Cloud. Open questions are also discussed, such as how to engage users, develop common standards and services, and ensure long-term sustainability of FAIR data practices.
Vortrag im Rahmen der EERA-Session: Open Science and Educational Research? Inclusion and Exclusion at the European Open Science Cloud; am 5. September 2018 in Bolzano (Italien).
European Commission
DG Research and Innovation
RTD.A2. Open Data Policy and Science Cloud
Katarzyna Szkuta
Service provisioning for Excellent Science (Daan Broeder - EUDAT/CLARIN) | Op...EUDAT
EUDAT is a project that started in 2011 to address the increasing costs and complexities of isolated data management solutions. It provides common data services through a federation of compute and data centers to serve a variety of research communities. EUDAT receives funding through Horizon 2020 and involves 37 partners. It offers services for storage, workflows, processing and archiving. While EUDAT engages broadly with communities, gathering requirements is very time-consuming. There are questions around how to be more efficient in requirements gathering and involving specialized organizations to help define services and standards.
How the Research Data Service supports Open Research (aka Open Science) at the University of Edinburgh. Abridged slides used for presentation to Open Access Scotland meeting in Edinburgh on Wednesday 27th of March 2019.
The Ascent of Open Science and the European Open Science CloudTiziana Ferrari
EOSC-hub receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme to integrate and manage services for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). The presentation discusses the need for open science, open data, and interoperable e-infrastructures. It provides examples like the LIGO and VIRGO collaborations sharing data and the WeNMR community using distributed computing resources. The EOSC-hub project aims to provide a single point of access to services across different providers through a marketplace. It has onboarded many services, engaged with users and service providers, and seen increasing usage of thematic, federation, and common services on the platform. The EOSC has the potential to boost support for open
This document discusses knowledge sharing and open access in the European Union. It notes that open access to publications and data from publicly funded research will help realize the vision of a unified European research area. The document outlines goals for open access, including having open access strategies in all EU countries by 2014 and 100% open access to publications by 2020. It also discusses barriers to open access and knowledge transfer between universities, public research organizations, and businesses. It proposes several actions to address these issues and foster scientific excellence and innovation in the EU.
The document proposes the AGILE Data Access Initiative to address issues researchers face in accessing core geospatial data from National Mapping and Cadastral Agencies across Europe. Surveys of NMCAs and academic users found that while most NMCAs make data available, barriers include cost, licensing restrictions, and difficulties obtaining cross-border data. The initiative seeks to negotiate national agreements for academic access and develop reciprocal licenses and access controls to enable easier transnational research.
This document summarizes an upcoming conference on open education in Scotland. It provides information about Open Scotland, an initiative to promote open education resources and practices. It also outlines the progress of the Scottish Open Education Declaration, including endorsements from the Scottish government and interest internationally. The conference called OER16 will focus on embedding an open culture in institutions and be hosted at the University of Edinburgh in April 2016.
A workshop at the Repository Fringe 2014 in Edinburgh looks at the new Jisc Publications Router service, how it works and what it offers suppliers and consumers.
An analysis of open data and open science policies in Europe - a SPARCEurope ...Kevin Ashley
A short presentation given at the SPARCEurope members meeting on July 5th in Patras, Greece. It summarises the findings of a recent joint report by the DCC and SPARCEurope on European national open data and open science policy.
PaNOSC and ExPaNDS commitment to Open SciencePaNOSC
This presentations showcase how the two H2020 sister projects, PaNOSC and ExPaNDS contribute to Open Science and to making FAIR data a reality for the community of users of photon and neutron facilities
The document discusses the EU INSPIRE Directive and its implications for UK academia. The INSPIRE Directive aims to create a European Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) to improve sharing of spatial information between public authorities and accessibility for the public. This will allow better environmental policies and outcomes. While initially for environmental policy, INSPIRE intends to extend to other domains. The directive may apply to UK universities as they are considered public authorities. This could mean universities would need to make certain spatial datasets available according to INSPIRE specifications. The directive presents both obligations and opportunities for UK academia as data providers and data users.
The state-of-play of the general EOSC policy worke-ROSA
Corina Pascu's presentation at the eROSA Workshop “Towards Open Science in Agriculture & Food”, a side event to High Level conference on FOOD 2030, Plovdiv, Bulgaria (13/6/2018)
UK e-Infrastructure for Research - UK/USA HPC Workshop, Oxford, July 2015Martin Hamilton
The document summarizes the UK's investments in e-infrastructure for research from 2011-2015. It discusses the major investments made in high performance computing (HPC), networking infrastructure, and big data projects. The investments totaled £160 million in 2011-2012, £189 million in 2012-2013, and £257 million in 2014-2015. It also summarizes the results of a survey of the UK's e-infrastructure, including details on the largest HPC systems and datasets. Finally, it mentions that the Research Councils UK (RCUK) developed a roadmap for the UK's e-infrastructure with a vision for an integrated infrastructure to support researchers.
Jisc held a strategic update meeting for stakeholders in Scotland on December 8, 2021. The agenda included presentations from Paul Boyle, vice chancellor of Swansea University and Jisc chair, on reviewing the last twelve months. Jason Miles-Campbell, head of Jisc Scotland, provided nation-specific highlights. Heidi Fraser-Krauss, Jisc CEO, looked ahead to upcoming priorities. Nicola Arnold, Jisc CFO, gave a finance update. Robin Ghurbhurun and Liam Earney then provided sector updates on further education/skills and higher education/research respectively. The meeting concluded with a question and answer session.
Presentation at the Open Knowledge Festival: Open Research and Education Stream, 20 September 2012, Helsinki; also
Presentation at the DINI-Jahrestagung - Bausteine für Open Science, 24 September 2012, Karlsruhe;
also Belgian Open Access Week: Open Access to Excellence in Research, 22 October 2012, Brussels.
Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Symposium PresentationsVITALISEProject
The Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Symposium is dedicated to showcasing the outcomes of the VITALISE project, which focuses on harmonizing Living Lab services and procedures while recognizing Living Labs as integral Research Infrastructures. Over the past three years, a collaborative effort among Living Labs in Health has actively demonstrated the significance of Living Labs as Research Infrastructures, effectively representing the global Living Lab community. The work undertaken in VITALISE aligns with the overarching vision of Living Labs developed over the last 15 years, manifesting in project results that advance the recognition and quality of harmonized Living Labs.
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101007990 The symposium's primary objective is to engage in collective reflection with the European Commission and relevant stakeholders and beneficiaries of Research Infrastructures. The aim is to discuss and plan the next steps toward a new era where Research Infrastructures are open and actively involve communities as powerful tools for co-research.
Service provisioning for Excellent Science (Daan Broeder - EUDAT/CLARIN) | Op...EUDAT
EUDAT is a project that started in 2011 to address the increasing costs and complexities of isolated data management solutions. It provides common data services through a federation of compute and data centers to serve a variety of research communities. EUDAT receives funding through Horizon 2020 and involves 37 partners. It offers services for storage, workflows, processing and archiving. While EUDAT engages broadly with communities, gathering requirements is very time-consuming. There are questions around how to be more efficient in requirements gathering and involving specialized organizations to help define services and standards.
How the Research Data Service supports Open Research (aka Open Science) at the University of Edinburgh. Abridged slides used for presentation to Open Access Scotland meeting in Edinburgh on Wednesday 27th of March 2019.
The Ascent of Open Science and the European Open Science CloudTiziana Ferrari
EOSC-hub receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme to integrate and manage services for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). The presentation discusses the need for open science, open data, and interoperable e-infrastructures. It provides examples like the LIGO and VIRGO collaborations sharing data and the WeNMR community using distributed computing resources. The EOSC-hub project aims to provide a single point of access to services across different providers through a marketplace. It has onboarded many services, engaged with users and service providers, and seen increasing usage of thematic, federation, and common services on the platform. The EOSC has the potential to boost support for open
This document discusses knowledge sharing and open access in the European Union. It notes that open access to publications and data from publicly funded research will help realize the vision of a unified European research area. The document outlines goals for open access, including having open access strategies in all EU countries by 2014 and 100% open access to publications by 2020. It also discusses barriers to open access and knowledge transfer between universities, public research organizations, and businesses. It proposes several actions to address these issues and foster scientific excellence and innovation in the EU.
The document proposes the AGILE Data Access Initiative to address issues researchers face in accessing core geospatial data from National Mapping and Cadastral Agencies across Europe. Surveys of NMCAs and academic users found that while most NMCAs make data available, barriers include cost, licensing restrictions, and difficulties obtaining cross-border data. The initiative seeks to negotiate national agreements for academic access and develop reciprocal licenses and access controls to enable easier transnational research.
This document summarizes an upcoming conference on open education in Scotland. It provides information about Open Scotland, an initiative to promote open education resources and practices. It also outlines the progress of the Scottish Open Education Declaration, including endorsements from the Scottish government and interest internationally. The conference called OER16 will focus on embedding an open culture in institutions and be hosted at the University of Edinburgh in April 2016.
A workshop at the Repository Fringe 2014 in Edinburgh looks at the new Jisc Publications Router service, how it works and what it offers suppliers and consumers.
An analysis of open data and open science policies in Europe - a SPARCEurope ...Kevin Ashley
A short presentation given at the SPARCEurope members meeting on July 5th in Patras, Greece. It summarises the findings of a recent joint report by the DCC and SPARCEurope on European national open data and open science policy.
PaNOSC and ExPaNDS commitment to Open SciencePaNOSC
This presentations showcase how the two H2020 sister projects, PaNOSC and ExPaNDS contribute to Open Science and to making FAIR data a reality for the community of users of photon and neutron facilities
The document discusses the EU INSPIRE Directive and its implications for UK academia. The INSPIRE Directive aims to create a European Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) to improve sharing of spatial information between public authorities and accessibility for the public. This will allow better environmental policies and outcomes. While initially for environmental policy, INSPIRE intends to extend to other domains. The directive may apply to UK universities as they are considered public authorities. This could mean universities would need to make certain spatial datasets available according to INSPIRE specifications. The directive presents both obligations and opportunities for UK academia as data providers and data users.
The state-of-play of the general EOSC policy worke-ROSA
Corina Pascu's presentation at the eROSA Workshop “Towards Open Science in Agriculture & Food”, a side event to High Level conference on FOOD 2030, Plovdiv, Bulgaria (13/6/2018)
UK e-Infrastructure for Research - UK/USA HPC Workshop, Oxford, July 2015Martin Hamilton
The document summarizes the UK's investments in e-infrastructure for research from 2011-2015. It discusses the major investments made in high performance computing (HPC), networking infrastructure, and big data projects. The investments totaled £160 million in 2011-2012, £189 million in 2012-2013, and £257 million in 2014-2015. It also summarizes the results of a survey of the UK's e-infrastructure, including details on the largest HPC systems and datasets. Finally, it mentions that the Research Councils UK (RCUK) developed a roadmap for the UK's e-infrastructure with a vision for an integrated infrastructure to support researchers.
Jisc held a strategic update meeting for stakeholders in Scotland on December 8, 2021. The agenda included presentations from Paul Boyle, vice chancellor of Swansea University and Jisc chair, on reviewing the last twelve months. Jason Miles-Campbell, head of Jisc Scotland, provided nation-specific highlights. Heidi Fraser-Krauss, Jisc CEO, looked ahead to upcoming priorities. Nicola Arnold, Jisc CFO, gave a finance update. Robin Ghurbhurun and Liam Earney then provided sector updates on further education/skills and higher education/research respectively. The meeting concluded with a question and answer session.
Presentation at the Open Knowledge Festival: Open Research and Education Stream, 20 September 2012, Helsinki; also
Presentation at the DINI-Jahrestagung - Bausteine für Open Science, 24 September 2012, Karlsruhe;
also Belgian Open Access Week: Open Access to Excellence in Research, 22 October 2012, Brussels.
Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Symposium PresentationsVITALISEProject
The Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Symposium is dedicated to showcasing the outcomes of the VITALISE project, which focuses on harmonizing Living Lab services and procedures while recognizing Living Labs as integral Research Infrastructures. Over the past three years, a collaborative effort among Living Labs in Health has actively demonstrated the significance of Living Labs as Research Infrastructures, effectively representing the global Living Lab community. The work undertaken in VITALISE aligns with the overarching vision of Living Labs developed over the last 15 years, manifesting in project results that advance the recognition and quality of harmonized Living Labs.
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101007990 The symposium's primary objective is to engage in collective reflection with the European Commission and relevant stakeholders and beneficiaries of Research Infrastructures. The aim is to discuss and plan the next steps toward a new era where Research Infrastructures are open and actively involve communities as powerful tools for co-research.
PaNOSC and Research Data Management / Battery2030+ Initiative Workshop / 12 M...PaNOSC
On March 12th, 2021, PaNOSC coordinator, Andy Götz, attended with an invited talk the 2nd online workshop of the Battery2030+ Initiative, focused on the benefits of research data management (RDM) and guidelines, through the showcase of best practice examples, including PaNOSC.
This presentation gives an overview of European Commission policies and initiatives aiming to promote open access to scientific information in the European Research Area (ERA). In this policy area, the Commission acts both as a policymaking and as a funding body. As policymaker, it defines policies within the context of European research and ICT policy. As a funding body, it lays down rules on access to the results of the research it funds within the Framework Programme for research development. This contribution introduces the European Commission's general approach regarding access to scientific information, presents specific initiatives in the field of open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications, and develops a first approach to open access to data.
This document summarizes the draft Horizon 2020 work programme for 2014-2015 related to e-infrastructures. It outlines 9 topics within the e-Infrastructures Call, including developing integrated e-infrastructures for scientific computing and data, supporting open access policies, establishing global data interoperability, high-performance computing, and virtual research environments. The call has a budget of 177 million Euros and topics will close between April 2014 and January 2015. Contact information is provided for questions.
NordForsk Open Access Reykjavik 14-15/8-2014: H2020NordForsk
This document summarizes the European Commission's policies on open access to research data and publications in Horizon 2020. Key points include:
1) Horizon 2020 will require open access to publications and encourage open access to research data through a pilot program. Projects will need to submit a data management plan and may need to deposit data in a repository.
2) The goals are to optimize the impact of publicly-funded research, enable better science, and promote economic growth and broader access.
3) Support for open access includes funding for e-infrastructure projects, training, helpdesks and guidelines on open data management.
The document discusses open data initiatives and tools for data sharing. It describes projects from the EDINA National Data Centre, DISC-UK DataShare project which investigated legal and technical issues around research data sharing, and tools for visualizing and sharing numeric and spatial data online like Many Eyes, Gapminder and OpenStreetMap. It also covers barriers to data sharing, harnessing collective intelligence through open science, and citizens contributing geographic data through tools like geograph.
This project received funding from the European Union to apply a service design approach to innovation in utility service ecosystems. Service design was used to understand stakeholders in the current utility ecosystem and develop ideas to address transformation forces. Interviews and modeling provided insight into customer and partner experiences. Ideation workshops generated concepts for a service platform to help the utility become a keystone player by integrating partner contributions into coherent service solutions. The project concluded service design is well-suited to address the complex challenges of transforming utility ecosystems.
The document summarizes the European Commission's policies and activities to support open science in Europe. It outlines the Commission's holistic policy agenda to promote open access to publications and research data, establish the European Open Science Cloud, and incentivize open science practices. It also presents the key findings of a new report on the state of open science across EU member states, which found most have adopted open access policies but progress on research data policies and incentives varies. Areas identified as needing more work include copyright, access for SMEs, skills and rewards, and indicators for open science.
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015, conference organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
Open Research Data: Present and planned EC Policy, Jean-Claude Burgelman impl...Platforma Otwartej Nauki
“Open Research Data: Implications for Science and Society”, Warsaw, Poland, May 28–29, 2015. The conference was organized by the Open Science Platform — an initiative of the Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling at the University of Warsaw. pon.edu.pl @OpenSciPlatform #ORD2015
Building a European Research Infrastructure for the Social Sciences: The Cons...UCD Library
Presentation given by Dr John B. Howard, University Librarian, University College Dublin Library, at the CONUL Annual Conference in Athlone, Ireland, May 30, 2017.
This document summarizes the results and future outlook of the EOSC-hub project. It discusses key exploitable results including the EOSC Digital Innovation Hub, the EOSC service portfolio, and the competence centre. It provides statistics on the growth of services, users, and training. Success stories are shared from research infrastructures leveraging the EOSC including increases in users, data, and computing resources. The presentation concludes by discussing priorities for further collaboration and engagement and announcing a new EOSC Early Adopter Programme.
Topics covered at the workshop address basic questions related to Research Data Management for open data, which include preparing a Research Data Management (RDM) plan, licensing data and intellectual property, metadata and contextual description (documentation), ethical and legal aspects of sharing sensitive or confidential data, anonymizing research data for reuse, data archiving and long-term preservation, and data security and storage.
Event: http://conferences.nib.si/AS2015/default.htm
Related material: http://conferences.nib.si/AS2015/BookAS15.pdf
Jarkko Siren is Project Officer in DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology at the European Commission.
Jarkko's presentation gives an introduction to public engagement in research at the European Commission
PrepData4Mobilty First Expert workshop, Lucie Kirstein, Project Coordinator.pptxFIWARE
This project received 1 million euros in funding from the Digital Europe Programme to develop building blocks for a future common European mobility data space. Over 12 months, the 17-partner project will inventory existing mobility and transport data ecosystems, identify gaps and overlaps, and specify building blocks. Success requires coordination, consensus on standards, governance, and providing incentives for adoption at scale. The project will involve desk research, surveys, interviews, and expert workshops with stakeholders.
- EOSC-Pillar is an EU-funded project that aims to coordinate national research data initiatives and support the development of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC).
- The project is conducting a survey of national research infrastructures, funding bodies, and universities to understand how they currently manage research data and identify opportunities to harmonize policies and services across countries to support EOSC.
- Respondents are asked questions about topics like business models, access policies, data management practices, and service usage to provide insights into each country's initiatives and help consolidate efforts.
Similar to Value&impact research dataservices_idcc_2017 (20)
Datanomics: the value of research data. Neil Beagrie
Twenty years ago format obsolescence was seen as the greatest long-term threat to digital information. Arguably, experience to date has shown that funding and organisational challenges are perhaps more significant threats. I hope this presentation helps those grappling with these challenges and shows some key advances in how to use knowledge of costs, benefits and value to support long-term sustainability of digital data and services.
These are the slides from my keynote presentation to the Digital Preservation Coalition and Jisc joint workshop on Digital Assets and Digital Liabilities - the Value of Data held in Glasgow in February 2018. The slides summarise work over the last decade in the key areas of exploring costs, benefits and value for data. The slides posted here have additional slide notes and references to new publications since the workshop and some modifications such as removal of animations. One day I hope to have time to synthesis this presentation in an accessible way as an article but hope this slide deck is a useful interim resource.
This slideshare, Maintaining a Vision: how mandates and strategies are changing with digital content, is one of the 12 that I like most and is a keynote given to the 2013 Screening the Future conference in London.
It is the penultimate of 12 presentations I have selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation. The final one to come will be published in December 2015.
My brief for this conference keynote was to focus on how institutional responses to collection and preservation mandates are realized and stretched by the digital...do existing institutions just 'go digital' but otherwise claim 'business as usual' [or not]?
The Talk had an AV focus given the nature of the conference but I think the messages will be of broad interest. It was in three parts:
The Changes: covering how digital content (including AV content) has changed the nature of typical collections across sectors; how it has shifted the scale of available content; and how content has fragmented and the number of content creators proliferated.
The Responses: covering how we have seen in response the growth of cross-sectoral preservation exchange (different sectoral membership of the DPC; Technology Watch Reports; the national coalitions worldwide such as nestor, NCDD, NDSA, etc); the development of shared services and outsourcing (e.g. digital preservation services in the cloud); and in some cases a range of cross-sector mergers (particularly of national archives and national libraries).
Conclusions:
What is changing? We are seeing multi-media permeating sectoral boundaries; greater shared interests and convergence of interests across different sectors; and a massive shift in the scale and management of digital media.
The responses? We are seeing new alliances and partnerships; digital preservation exchange across sectors; some mergers and partnerships across established boundaries; and more shared services and outsourcing.
Finally, if you want to know the answer to the question "When was the beginning of the Digital Age" posed in previous posts, the answer is here in slide 8
Keeping Research Data Safe (KRDS), a workshop presentation from 2010 is the ninth of 12 presentations I have selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation. The remaining two to come will be published at monthly intervals over November and December 2015.
This presentation was given as part of the KB Experts Workshop on Digital Preservation Costs, held at The Hague in the Netherlands in 2010.
Although very small in terms of budget, the KRDS projects were terrific examples of collaboration to achieve influential results and the pleasure and value of working with colleagues from many disparate fields and organisations. I’ve selected it as an example of doing great things on small budgets if you have the right people, and for its influence on subsequent work both by me (e.g. impact studies) and others. For me, in terms of personal follow-up and later projects, the costs element of KRDS has been less important than the benefits side which has led to a series of project on impact with John Houghton (more on this in the final Slideshare in December).
The KB requested a briefing document on each cost model presented at the workshop in the form of responses to their set questions. I have reproduced mine for the KRDS presentation on our blog at http://blog.beagrie.com - it captures lots of interesting context for the slides.
20yrs: 2007 Brussels Digital Preservation: Setting the Course for a Decade of...Neil Beagrie
“Digital Preservation: Setting the Course for a Decade of Change” , a conference keynote from 2007, available now on Slideshare is the ninth of 12 presentations I’ve selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation. The remainder will be published at monthly intervals over 2015.
This presentation was the opening keynote to a conference in 2007 held by the Belgian Association of Documentation (BDA) to celebrate its 60th anniversary. It dates from my time at the British Library.
The conference theme was "Europe facing the challenge of the long term conservation of digitalised archives". My keynote synthesised many of the topics I was focussing on at the time (and have featured in some of my earlier slide shares in this series) including encouraging University libraries to engage more actively with research data management in the sciences, to begin developing digital special collections of individuals, and to support international efforts to ensure continuing access and preservation of e-Journals as part of the scholarly record. In addition, given the European focus I briefly covered some of the major European initiatives in digital preservation at that time.
I have selected this presentation as one of the 12 in this series, not only as it is synthesising these key themes but also because it includes some thoughts on whether digital preservation needed to be evolution or revolution (or a bit of both) for libraries and archives.
Digital Curation and Preservation: Defining the Research Agenda for the Next Decade [2005-2015]: Warwick3 -How did we do?
The Warwick3 Workshop: Digital Preservation and Curation Summing up + Next Steps available now on Slideshare is the eighth of 12 presentations I’ve selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation. The remainder will be published at monthly intervals over 2015.
I’ve chosen it as it briefly allows us to look back at aspirations and achievements in Digital Preservation over a 20 year period from the very first (and seminal) Warwick 1 workshop held in 1995 to today. The first Warwick workshop considered the Long Term Preservation of Electronic Materials and a UK response to the final report of the RLG/CPA Task Force on Digital Archiving. Two further Warwick workshops followed in 1999 and 2005 to review progress and set a forward agenda.
The two-day workshop that took place over 7 - 8 November 2005 at the University of Warwick aimed for the first time to address digital preservation issues for both scientific data and cultural heritage and to map out a future research agenda for them. Sponsored by JISC, the Digital Curation Centre (DCC), the British Library and the Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils (CCLRC), the invitation-only event drew a wide range of national and international experts to explore the current state of play with a view to shaping future strategy. The slides are from my summing up and conclusions at the workshop close.
Part of my conclusions (slides 12-13), outlined the recommendations of the previous Warwick workshop held in 1999 and reviewed the progress that had been made in implementing them over the subsequent five years with a very subjective level of achievement √ (some) to √ √ √ (good).
The JISC Continuing Access and Digital Preservation Strategy 2002-5, presentation to the 2004 JISC-CNI conference, Brighton UK is the fifth of 12 presentations I have selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation.
This presentation from 2004 is important largely for the legacy of the Strategy that established bodies such as the Digital Preservation Coalition and the Digital Curation Centre, which still have a major influence today.
The presentation sets out the context and rationale for the Strategy including the predicted growth of electronic publications, scientific data, and data curation. The implications of that growth were seen as:
• Core funding for institutions would not grow in line with information growth;
• A need for more automation and tools;
• A need for new shared services and information infrastructure;
• A significant need for R&D and investment to prepare for this.
Therefore the objectives of the Strategy were:
• As an advocacy document to secure additional funding of £6m over 3 years (2002-5) for new programmes in electronic records management and digital preservation;
• Justify the accompanying implementation plan;
• Provide a longer-term framework and rationale for activity extending beyond 2005.
This is the fourth of 12 presentations I’ve selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation. It was one of the four presentations I gave as part of the very first iPRES conference at the Chinese National Academy of Sciences in July 2004. iPRES was conceived in 2004 by the Chinese Academy of Science and Electronic Information for Libraries, as a forum to exchange ideas and expertise in digital preservation between China and Europe. Since then, it has expanded to attract delegates from around the world. In subsequent years ensuring continuing access and preservation of e-journals has remained a major international concern for academic libraries .
20yrs: 2001 Preservation Management of Digital Materials [the Digital Preserv...Neil Beagrie
20 Years in Digital Preservation: 2001 presentation on the Preservation Management of Digital Materials [the Digital Preservation Handbook] at the Digital Continuity Forum and workshop, Melbourne Australia.
This is the second of 12 conference presentations I have selected to mark 20 years in Digital Preservation.
This one is selected because of the subsequent influence the Handbook has had (I believe 15 years later it is still the most heavily used resource on the DPC website). It also seemed apposite with the online Handbook currently being worked and updated to its first major “second edition”.
The presentation is in two parts a keynote to the Forum on the Handbook and a set of workshop slides – consisting of a digital preservation questionnaire and a set of [institutional] responses probably from a repeat performance and workshop at a separate event in Australia.
I have almost no information left on these events but fortunately the Pandora web archive at the National Library of Australia has an archived description of the Forum: it just shows how useful web archives are!
20yrs:1998 Society of Archivists ConferenceNeil Beagrie
This document summarizes current methods for preserving digital collections and ongoing research in the field. It discusses the growth of electronic records and need for digital preservation. A strategic policy framework is presented that is based on the lifecycle of digital resources, from creation to use. Case studies are described from various institutions implementing digital preservation. The document advocates for proactive programs, collaboration, and new technical approaches like migration and emulation. It also addresses legal issues and provides information on where to find further resources.
Candidate young stellar objects in the S-cluster: Kinematic analysis of a sub...Sérgio Sacani
Context. The observation of several L-band emission sources in the S cluster has led to a rich discussion of their nature. However, a definitive answer to the classification of the dusty objects requires an explanation for the detection of compact Doppler-shifted Brγ emission. The ionized hydrogen in combination with the observation of mid-infrared L-band continuum emission suggests that most of these sources are embedded in a dusty envelope. These embedded sources are part of the S-cluster, and their relationship to the S-stars is still under debate. To date, the question of the origin of these two populations has been vague, although all explanations favor migration processes for the individual cluster members. Aims. This work revisits the S-cluster and its dusty members orbiting the supermassive black hole SgrA* on bound Keplerian orbits from a kinematic perspective. The aim is to explore the Keplerian parameters for patterns that might imply a nonrandom distribution of the sample. Additionally, various analytical aspects are considered to address the nature of the dusty sources. Methods. Based on the photometric analysis, we estimated the individual H−K and K−L colors for the source sample and compared the results to known cluster members. The classification revealed a noticeable contrast between the S-stars and the dusty sources. To fit the flux-density distribution, we utilized the radiative transfer code HYPERION and implemented a young stellar object Class I model. We obtained the position angle from the Keplerian fit results; additionally, we analyzed the distribution of the inclinations and the longitudes of the ascending node. Results. The colors of the dusty sources suggest a stellar nature consistent with the spectral energy distribution in the near and midinfrared domains. Furthermore, the evaporation timescales of dusty and gaseous clumps in the vicinity of SgrA* are much shorter ( 2yr) than the epochs covered by the observations (≈15yr). In addition to the strong evidence for the stellar classification of the D-sources, we also find a clear disk-like pattern following the arrangements of S-stars proposed in the literature. Furthermore, we find a global intrinsic inclination for all dusty sources of 60 ± 20◦, implying a common formation process. Conclusions. The pattern of the dusty sources manifested in the distribution of the position angles, inclinations, and longitudes of the ascending node strongly suggests two different scenarios: the main-sequence stars and the dusty stellar S-cluster sources share a common formation history or migrated with a similar formation channel in the vicinity of SgrA*. Alternatively, the gravitational influence of SgrA* in combination with a massive perturber, such as a putative intermediate mass black hole in the IRS 13 cluster, forces the dusty objects and S-stars to follow a particular orbital arrangement. Key words. stars: black holes– stars: formation– Galaxy: center– galaxies: star formation
PPT on Sustainable Land Management presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
BIRDS DIVERSITY OF SOOTEA BISWANATH ASSAM.ppt.pptxgoluk9330
Ahota Beel, nestled in Sootea Biswanath Assam , is celebrated for its extraordinary diversity of bird species. This wetland sanctuary supports a myriad of avian residents and migrants alike. Visitors can admire the elegant flights of migratory species such as the Northern Pintail and Eurasian Wigeon, alongside resident birds including the Asian Openbill and Pheasant-tailed Jacana. With its tranquil scenery and varied habitats, Ahota Beel offers a perfect haven for birdwatchers to appreciate and study the vibrant birdlife that thrives in this natural refuge.
Anti-Universe And Emergent Gravity and the Dark UniverseSérgio Sacani
Recent theoretical progress indicates that spacetime and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory. These ideas are best understood in Anti-de Sitter space, where they rely on the area law for entanglement entropy. The extension to de Sitter space requires taking into account the entropy and temperature associated with the cosmological horizon. Using insights from string theory, black hole physics and quantum information theory we argue that the positive dark energy leads to a thermal volume law contribution to the entropy that overtakes the area law precisely at the cosmological horizon. Due to the competition between area and volume law entanglement the microscopic de Sitter states do not thermalise at sub-Hubble scales: they exhibit memory effects in the form of an entropy displacement caused by matter. The emergent laws of gravity contain an additional ‘dark’ gravitational force describing the ‘elastic’ response due to the entropy displacement. We derive an estimate of the strength of this extra force in terms of the baryonic mass, Newton’s constant and the Hubble acceleration scale a0 = cH0, and provide evidence for the fact that this additional ‘dark gravity force’ explains the observed phenomena in galaxies and clusters currently attributed to dark matter.
SDSS1335+0728: The awakening of a ∼ 106M⊙ black hole⋆Sérgio Sacani
Context. The early-type galaxy SDSS J133519.91+072807.4 (hereafter SDSS1335+0728), which had exhibited no prior optical variations during the preceding two decades, began showing significant nuclear variability in the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) alert stream from December 2019 (as ZTF19acnskyy). This variability behaviour, coupled with the host-galaxy properties, suggests that SDSS1335+0728 hosts a ∼ 106M⊙ black hole (BH) that is currently in the process of ‘turning on’. Aims. We present a multi-wavelength photometric analysis and spectroscopic follow-up performed with the aim of better understanding the origin of the nuclear variations detected in SDSS1335+0728. Methods. We used archival photometry (from WISE, 2MASS, SDSS, GALEX, eROSITA) and spectroscopic data (from SDSS and LAMOST) to study the state of SDSS1335+0728 prior to December 2019, and new observations from Swift, SOAR/Goodman, VLT/X-shooter, and Keck/LRIS taken after its turn-on to characterise its current state. We analysed the variability of SDSS1335+0728 in the X-ray/UV/optical/mid-infrared range, modelled its spectral energy distribution prior to and after December 2019, and studied the evolution of its UV/optical spectra. Results. From our multi-wavelength photometric analysis, we find that: (a) since 2021, the UV flux (from Swift/UVOT observations) is four times brighter than the flux reported by GALEX in 2004; (b) since June 2022, the mid-infrared flux has risen more than two times, and the W1−W2 WISE colour has become redder; and (c) since February 2024, the source has begun showing X-ray emission. From our spectroscopic follow-up, we see that (i) the narrow emission line ratios are now consistent with a more energetic ionising continuum; (ii) broad emission lines are not detected; and (iii) the [OIII] line increased its flux ∼ 3.6 years after the first ZTF alert, which implies a relatively compact narrow-line-emitting region. Conclusions. We conclude that the variations observed in SDSS1335+0728 could be either explained by a ∼ 106M⊙ AGN that is just turning on or by an exotic tidal disruption event (TDE). If the former is true, SDSS1335+0728 is one of the strongest cases of an AGNobserved in the process of activating. If the latter were found to be the case, it would correspond to the longest and faintest TDE ever observed (or another class of still unknown nuclear transient). Future observations of SDSS1335+0728 are crucial to further understand its behaviour. Key words. galaxies: active– accretion, accretion discs– galaxies: individual: SDSS J133519.91+072807.4
Signatures of wave erosion in Titan’s coastsSérgio Sacani
The shorelines of Titan’s hydrocarbon seas trace flooded erosional landforms such as river valleys; however, it isunclear whether coastal erosion has subsequently altered these shorelines. Spacecraft observations and theo-retical models suggest that wind may cause waves to form on Titan’s seas, potentially driving coastal erosion,but the observational evidence of waves is indirect, and the processes affecting shoreline evolution on Titanremain unknown. No widely accepted framework exists for using shoreline morphology to quantitatively dis-cern coastal erosion mechanisms, even on Earth, where the dominant mechanisms are known. We combinelandscape evolution models with measurements of shoreline shape on Earth to characterize how differentcoastal erosion mechanisms affect shoreline morphology. Applying this framework to Titan, we find that theshorelines of Titan’s seas are most consistent with flooded landscapes that subsequently have been eroded bywaves, rather than a uniform erosional process or no coastal erosion, particularly if wave growth saturates atfetch lengths of tens of kilometers.
TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: CENTRIFUGATION SLIDESHARE.pptxshubhijain836
Centrifugation is a powerful technique used in laboratories to separate components of a heterogeneous mixture based on their density. This process utilizes centrifugal force to rapidly spin samples, causing denser particles to migrate outward more quickly than lighter ones. As a result, distinct layers form within the sample tube, allowing for easy isolation and purification of target substances.
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...Sérgio Sacani
We present the JWST discovery of SN 2023adsy, a transient object located in a host galaxy JADES-GS
+
53.13485
−
27.82088
with a host spectroscopic redshift of
2.903
±
0.007
. The transient was identified in deep James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)/NIRCam imaging from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Photometric and spectroscopic followup with NIRCam and NIRSpec, respectively, confirm the redshift and yield UV-NIR light-curve, NIR color, and spectroscopic information all consistent with a Type Ia classification. Despite its classification as a likely SN Ia, SN 2023adsy is both fairly red (
�
(
�
−
�
)
∼
0.9
) despite a host galaxy with low-extinction and has a high Ca II velocity (
19
,
000
±
2
,
000
km/s) compared to the general population of SNe Ia. While these characteristics are consistent with some Ca-rich SNe Ia, particularly SN 2016hnk, SN 2023adsy is intrinsically brighter than the low-
�
Ca-rich population. Although such an object is too red for any low-
�
cosmological sample, we apply a fiducial standardization approach to SN 2023adsy and find that the SN 2023adsy luminosity distance measurement is in excellent agreement (
≲
1
�
) with
Λ
CDM. Therefore unlike low-
�
Ca-rich SNe Ia, SN 2023adsy is standardizable and gives no indication that SN Ia standardized luminosities change significantly with redshift. A larger sample of distant SNe Ia is required to determine if SN Ia population characteristics at high-
�
truly diverge from their low-
�
counterparts, and to confirm that standardized luminosities nevertheless remain constant with redshift.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...
Value&impact research dataservices_idcc_2017
1. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
IDCC Workshop February 2017 - Neil Beagrie (Charles Beagrie Ltd)
Demonstrating the Value and Impact of Research Data
Services
Illustration by Jørgen Stamp digitalbevaring.dk CC BY 2.5 Denmark
2. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Workshop Programme
13.30-13.45 Brief introduction to CESSDA and the CESSDA-SaW project (Peter Doorn)
13.45-14.30 Presentation and discussion of the Cost-Benefit Advocacy Toolkit (Neil Beagrie)
14.30-15.00 Bringing it together: The Archive Development Canvas
15.00-15.25 Coffee/tea break
15.30-15.45 Presentation and discussion of the Capability Development Model (Mike Priddy)
15.45-16.45 Breakout groups with hands-on opportunities to use and discuss the tools
presented
16.45-17.00 Final discussion and close
3. Strengthening and Widening
Title Text
Brief introduction to CESSDA
and the CESSDA-SaW project
IDCC17 Workshop - Demonstrating the Value and Impact of Research Data Services
12.30-17.00 Monday 20 February 2017
Quincentenary Conference Centre Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
Peter Doorn
Director DANS
Vice-Chair
CESSDA G.A.
4. What is CESSDA? 15 (16) members:
1. Austria
2. Belgium
3. Czech Republic
4. Denmark
5. Finland
6. France
7. Germany
8. Hellas
9. Lithuania
10. Netherlands
11. Norway
12. Slovenia
13. Sweden
14. Switzerland
15. UK
16. Slovak Republic (Observer)
CESSDA provides large-scale, integrated
and sustainable data services to the social
sciences.
CESSDA brings together social science
data archives across Europe, with the aim
of promoting the results of social science
research and supporting national and
international research and cooperation.
CESSDA is now a limited company under
Norwegian law and is owned and financed
by the individual member states’ ministries
of research.
Norway is hosting CESSDA, and the main
office is located in Bergen.
Originally established as an informal
umbrella organisation of data archives in
1976 (> 40 years ago!)
CESSDA will become an ESFRI ERIC later
this year
10 countries with activities aiming at membership: Bulgaria,
Croatia, Estonia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania,
Serbia, Spain
5. ESFRI Projects
ESFRI Projects have been selected for scientific
excellence and maturity
included in the Roadmap in order to underline their
strategic importance
ESFRI Landmarks
CESSDA and 28 other RIs that were implemented under
earlier ESFRI Roadmaps and that are now established
as “major elements of competitiveness of the European
Research Area”
“These are
successfully
implemented ESFRI
projects that are
featuring top science
services or effectively
advancing in their
construction.”
ESFRI Roadmap 2016
ESFRI = European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures
ERIC = European Research Infrastructure Consortium
6. Service Providers (data archives)
Constitute the operational distributed network
Participate in the governance in an advisory capacity
Deliver data services Service Level Agreements
Adhere to common quality rules and standards (such as the Data Seal of
Approval)
Carry out the CESSDA work plan jointly with Main Office
7. CESSDA Activities
Coordinating the network of European data service providers and
promotion of the results of social sciences;
Facilitating researcher access to important data resources regardless of
the location of either researcher or data;
Working continuously to include further data sources from Europe and
beyond, into the infrastructure;
Providing training within CESSDA and beyond on best practices of data
services and data management;
Promoting and facilitating wider participation in CESSDA;
Developing and coordinating of standards, protocols and professional
best practices pertaining to the preservation and dissemination of data
and associated digital objects.
8. Examples of CESSDA Activities
CESSDA Work Plan
Joint Catalogue of Data Resources and Services
Compliance with Data Seal of Approval
Common Data Access and Dissemination Policies (based on FAIR
data principles)
Metadata Management
Open Source Metadata Harvester
CESSDA Persistent Identier Policy
CESSDA Training & Expert Seminars
Euro Question Bank
Research Infrastructure Projects
9. Strengthening and Widening the European
infrastructure for social science data archives
Overall ambition: to establish the conditions for, and to initiate the
movement towards, a seamless social science data archive service for
the whole of the European Research Area (ERA), which is capable of
supporting the research needs of the next generation of social
scientists wherever in Europe they may be, or beyond.
Aims:
to achieve full European coverage of CESSDA
to strengthen the existing network
to ensure sustainability of its data for the widened network.
Overarching impact: transform the evidence base and research insights
available to those tackling the social and economic challenges of
Europe.
10.
11. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Measuring Value and
Economic Impact of
Research Data
Infrastructure
12. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Presentation Overview
• Measuring Value and Impact of Research Data
Infrastructure (briefly – note focussing on cost-benefit)
• ESDS Impact Study (briefly)
• CESSDA SaW and User requirements survey (briefly)
• Cost-Benefit Advocacy Toolkit (less briefly)
Informal – happy to take questions as we go
13. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Previous Work
Big Science and Innovation Study for BIS July 2013
• Desk review of c. 100 studies internationally;
• 3 studies highlighted to BIS as being particularly good
examples of ‘good practice’ in the measurement of
economic impacts:
• Berkeley Lab 2010
• Human Genome Project 2011
• Economic and Social Data Service 2012
14. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
John Houghton + Neil Beagrie 4 joint studies to date. 5th in
progress. Methods applied to:
Economic & Social Data Service (ESDS)
Archaeology Data Service
British Atmospheric Data Centre
European Bioinformatics Institute
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (in progress)
Value + Impact Analysis of Data Services
15. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Indicative Scale (1)
16. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Indicative Scale (2)
17. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Best Practice from ESDS study
• Applies range of
methods;
• Includes counter-
factual;
• Data collection
tailored to different
stakeholders:
depositors, users,
research, teaching;
• Data weighting -
survey value
responses weighted
to reflect the overall
pattern of use from
weblogs;
• Case studies/ KRDS
benefits illustrate
benefits and impact
pathways.
18. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
ESDS Study: Return on Investment (ROI)
(ROI - service) Benefit/cost ratio of
net economic value to
ESDS operational costs
5.4 to 1
(ROI - research data creation)
scenarios -Increase in returns
on investment in data creation
arising from additional use
facilitated by ESDS -counterfactual
up to 10 to 1
20. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
• UK Data Archive one of the largest European social
science data archives: perhaps the largest
• UK Data Archive established for 40 years: has built up
collections and users over time
• Only economic impact study for any social science
data archive to date
• How to extend work for other social science archives?
ESDS Study: Context
21. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Task 4.6: Cost-Benefit Advocacy Programme
Illustration by Jørgen Stamp digitalbevaring.dk CC BY 2.5 Denmark
22. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
CESSDA-SaW Task 4.6
Capturing and communicating the value and economic impact of social science
data services. Develop a benefit/cost advocacy programme and supporting tools;
assembling an evidence base to support the negotiation with ministries and funding
organisations; support advocacy with other core stakeholders such as data creators
and data users. Final publication this summer – presentation of advanced draft
materials.
Timetable
Milestone
number
Milestone name Due date
MS26 Survey to gather
and
validate
requirements
April 2016
MS27 Draft Toolset and
testing
Oct 2016
MS28 Focus groups and
case studies
March
2017
23. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
CESSDA-SaW
User Requirements Survey
24. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Survey Q1
IN WHICH COUNTRY IS THE DATA SERVICE BASED?
25. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Survey Q2
THE DATA SERVICE'S CURRENT STAFFING IS
APPROXIMATELY:
26. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Key Stakeholder Focus Groups
27. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Toolkit Responses
28. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Effort Grading Levels
hours days months
29. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Design criteria
• Easy for overloaded individuals/ smaller services
• Short documents
• Good Infographics
• Synthesis
• Making existing tools easier to use/tailored to
(social science) data services
• Creative Commons CC-BY wherever possible for
ease of re-use
30. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Toolkit Components
• Factsheets
• ROI, Benefits, Costs
• Worksheets
• Benefits Summary for a Data Archive
• Archive Development Canvas
• Case studies
• ADP, FSD, LiDA, UKDS
• Selected External Tools
• CCeX, KRDS, CDMA, ESDS Impact, ADP surveys ,
etc
• User Guide
31. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
The Factsheets
32. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
ROI Factsheet (1)
33. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
ROI Factsheet (2)
34. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Counter-factuals – “Costs of Inaction”
“Ideally, economic impact assessments should estimate
the counterfactual – i.e. what would occur in the
absence of the facility…However, counterfactuals are
rarely addressed in the [c.100] studies reviewed due to
lack of data. We found two exceptions that address this
issue partially. One is the evaluation of the economic
impacts of ESDS (2012) which partially explores the
counterfactual through a users’ survey…Another
exception is a review of economic impacts of large-
scale science facilities in the UK (SQW, 2008) …
however, this estimation is not done rigorously and
relies mostly on the estimation of the local benefits.”
Big Science and Innovation - Report to BIS -
Technopolis 2013
35. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
ROI Factsheet (3)
36. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
ROI Factsheet (4)
37. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Benefits Factsheet (1)
38. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Benefits Factsheet(2)
40. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Benefits Factsheet (4)
41. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Costs Factsheet(1)
42. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Costs Factsheet(2)
43. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Costs Factsheet(3)
44. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Bringing it all together:
The Archive Development
Canvas
45. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
46. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
The Archive Development Canvas (high-level)
47. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
The Archive Development Canvas (detailed)
48. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
The Archive Development Canvas (mapped)
49. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Capability Maturity Model
Mike Priddy DANS
50. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 674939.
Breakout Groups
Flexible session – you choose what you want to
focus on and if you do it individually or in group
(s)
• Factsheets
• ROI, Benefits - in paper copy – read, discuss
content, how you would use it
• Worksheets Benefits Summary for a Data Archive
• Archive Development Canvas Paper version
with prompts
• Capability Maturity Model
51. —thanks for your attention!
website: www.cessda.net / twitter: @CESSDA_Data