Usability and
Mobile Devices
Prepared by:
Mohammed Fahel
21012195
Mobile Usability

• Mobile applications are important for providing users with an
  alternate means of accessing your web page, as well as
  keeping connected anywhere and at any time.
Impact of Low Resolution

 recommendations for mobile
 interfaces:

 • Minimize the amount of scrolling
   required to find information

 • Include more search options
Impact of Download Speed

implementing a tactile feedback
mechanism to notify users if the
task is expected to take more than
four seconds.
The feedback would allow users to
direct their attention back to the
environment rather frequently
checking the screen status. This
should reduce the amount of
needed gazes and increase user
safety.
Impact of Limited Screen Size

 Horton’s changes include:
• Separate HTML mark-up language
   from content information using
   CSS
• Use a consistent, uncluttered page
   design
• Limit the amount of text used for
   non-semantic purposes
• Arrange information in an inverted
   pyramid styles (from most to least
   important)
Screen Readers for Mobile
Devices
• The software converts normal Web pages into a mobile
  friendly format. Borodin, et al (2007) described software
  (CMo) that analyzes the semantic content of each requested
  page and displays it in order of predicted importance to the
  user question.
• www. zuznow.com
RSS Feeds
• Garofalakis and Stefanis (2007) described a system that takes
  advantage of the existing formatting of content into RSS feeds.
  The authors used an algorithm that takes content formatted
  as RSS and adapts it to the mobile screen.
• Garofalakis and Stefanis asked participants to locate a Web
  news article within three minutes and compared their
  performance to the existing mobile browser. Results showed
  improved success rates on the search task with the new
  system as well as positive useful ratings by participants.
Mobile Usability Update

three categories of mobile phones:
 • Feature phones: primitive handsets with tiny screens and very
   limited keypads that are suited mainly for dialing phone
   numbers.
 • Smartphones: phones with midsized screens and full A–Z
   keypads.
 • Touch phones: devices with touch-sensitive screens that cover
 almost the entire front of the phone.

Mobile User Experience Improving Slowly
• Mobile site success rate: 64%
• Full site success rate: 58%
user testing
• design a separate mobile site
• horizontal swiping
• links from the full site to the mobile site

• Apps Beat Sites
• We measured a success rate of 76% when people used
  mobile apps, which is much higher than the 64% recorded for
  mobile-specific websites.

• The fat-finger syndrome will be with us for years to come.
• limit the number of features
Thank you

Usability and mobile devices

  • 1.
    Usability and Mobile Devices Preparedby: Mohammed Fahel 21012195
  • 2.
    Mobile Usability • Mobileapplications are important for providing users with an alternate means of accessing your web page, as well as keeping connected anywhere and at any time.
  • 3.
    Impact of LowResolution recommendations for mobile interfaces: • Minimize the amount of scrolling required to find information • Include more search options
  • 4.
    Impact of DownloadSpeed implementing a tactile feedback mechanism to notify users if the task is expected to take more than four seconds. The feedback would allow users to direct their attention back to the environment rather frequently checking the screen status. This should reduce the amount of needed gazes and increase user safety.
  • 5.
    Impact of LimitedScreen Size Horton’s changes include: • Separate HTML mark-up language from content information using CSS • Use a consistent, uncluttered page design • Limit the amount of text used for non-semantic purposes • Arrange information in an inverted pyramid styles (from most to least important)
  • 6.
    Screen Readers forMobile Devices • The software converts normal Web pages into a mobile friendly format. Borodin, et al (2007) described software (CMo) that analyzes the semantic content of each requested page and displays it in order of predicted importance to the user question. • www. zuznow.com
  • 7.
    RSS Feeds • Garofalakisand Stefanis (2007) described a system that takes advantage of the existing formatting of content into RSS feeds. The authors used an algorithm that takes content formatted as RSS and adapts it to the mobile screen. • Garofalakis and Stefanis asked participants to locate a Web news article within three minutes and compared their performance to the existing mobile browser. Results showed improved success rates on the search task with the new system as well as positive useful ratings by participants.
  • 8.
    Mobile Usability Update threecategories of mobile phones: • Feature phones: primitive handsets with tiny screens and very limited keypads that are suited mainly for dialing phone numbers. • Smartphones: phones with midsized screens and full A–Z keypads. • Touch phones: devices with touch-sensitive screens that cover almost the entire front of the phone. Mobile User Experience Improving Slowly • Mobile site success rate: 64% • Full site success rate: 58%
  • 9.
    user testing • designa separate mobile site • horizontal swiping • links from the full site to the mobile site • Apps Beat Sites • We measured a success rate of 76% when people used mobile apps, which is much higher than the 64% recorded for mobile-specific websites. • The fat-finger syndrome will be with us for years to come. • limit the number of features
  • 10.

Editor's Notes

  • #7 In 2011 - 500 million smartphones were sold worldwide; By 2015 number of smartphones to be sold is to 1 billion; By 2015 Smartphones and tablet will increase mobile web traffic by x 26; By 2103 more users will likely connect to the Internet via mobile devices than desktop PCs; More than 60% of mobile Internet users in the U.S. get their content through a mobile-browser