This document discusses using systems approaches to better understand peer-based programs for HIV and HCV. It summarizes work done with various organizations representing people who use drugs, gay men, people living with HIV, sex workers, and others. Systems approaches were used to develop more sophisticated theories of how peer-based programs work and influence communities. System dynamics maps showed how interventions engage with communities. Key functions and draft indicators were identified to demonstrate influence and help programs evaluate their work and influence on communities and policies. The document provides an overview of the Understanding What Works & Why (W3) project which aims to help answer questions about program influence and effectiveness using systems approaches.
Opportunities for local people to hold NGO’s to account for their actions have improved in recent years, but there has been little evidence to suggest that they can actually influence the quality and results of aid itself - until now.
This report provides concrete evidence of the way accountability mechanisms improve the value for money, effectiveness, relevance, and sustainability of humanitarian and development projects.
Opportunities for local people to hold NGO’s to account for their actions have improved in recent years, but there has been little evidence to suggest that they can actually influence the quality and results of aid itself - until now.
This report provides concrete evidence of the way accountability mechanisms improve the value for money, effectiveness, relevance, and sustainability of humanitarian and development projects.
Dear Kathleen Flowers,
Congratulations! The Hawaii International Conference on Education is pleased to inform you that your submission, “CONSORTIAL COLLABORATION AND THE CREATION
OF AN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR COMMUNITY-BASED LEARNING”, has been
accepted for presentation at the 16th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education to
be held from January 4 to January 7, 2018 in Honolulu, Hawaii. The decision to accept your submission was based on a peer review process.
Dr. Julie Plaut presented to the "Engage Your Teaching" workshop at the University of St. Thomas on May 26, 2015 on standard "best practices" when engaging in the community.
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 1: Strengthening the participation of local communities in resettlemment, compensation, livelihood, and greivance
Sustaining quality approaches for locally embedded community health services ...REACHOUTCONSORTIUMSLIDES
This presentation was given at the Bridging the Quality Gap - Strengthening Quality Improvement in Community Health Services Symposium which was held in September 2016
This is a 20-slides-in-20-minutes presentation (pecha kucha) about frameworks for evaluation of impact of Knowledge Mobilization or Knowledge Translation. The Co-Produced Pathway to Impact (CPPI) provides a framework for evaluation of impact from research to impact including dissemination, uptake, and implementation stages.
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...KBHN KT
Renee Leduc, Program Officer at Canada's NCE Secretariat presents on indicators, reporting and measurement for the NCE program with respect to Knowledge Translation, Commercialization and Socio-Economic benefit to Canadians (otherwise referred to as Knowledge and Technology Exchange and Exploitation KTEE). These slides represent part 1 of a 2 part co-presentation with NeuroDevNet NCE's KT Core. There is an accompanying handout that helps NCEs work through linking goals with outputs, outcomes and relates to the 2nd handout called "anatomy of an indicator" that helps users develop indicators.
Whole systems change across a neighbourhood
How can we collaborate with people to help them build their resilience? Get under the skin of the culture and the lives people live. Identify people’s feelings and experiences of community and understand what people think is shaped by different values and by the environment and infrastructure around them. The future of collaboration could bring many opportunities but people find it more difficult to live and act together than before. How can we help people…and communities build their resilience? Understand people’s different situations and capabilities to develop pathways that help them build resilient relationships. Help people experience and practice change together. Help people grow everyday practices into sustainable projects. Turn people’s everyday motivations into design principles. Support infrastructure that connects different cultures of collaboration. Build relationships with people designing in collaboration for the future…now.
Vicky Scott: Implementing research into practiceTHL
Presentation by Dr Vicky Scott, Clinical Associate Professor, RN, PhD, Canada, BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Ministry of Health, Canada at at Safety 2016 World Conference, 18-21 September 2016, Tampere, Finland
#Safety2016FIN
Community-based Peer Support: A participatory review of what works, for whom, in what circumstances
Author - Dr Janet Harris, The University of Sheffield
Dear Kathleen Flowers,
Congratulations! The Hawaii International Conference on Education is pleased to inform you that your submission, “CONSORTIAL COLLABORATION AND THE CREATION
OF AN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR COMMUNITY-BASED LEARNING”, has been
accepted for presentation at the 16th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education to
be held from January 4 to January 7, 2018 in Honolulu, Hawaii. The decision to accept your submission was based on a peer review process.
Dr. Julie Plaut presented to the "Engage Your Teaching" workshop at the University of St. Thomas on May 26, 2015 on standard "best practices" when engaging in the community.
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 1: Strengthening the participation of local communities in resettlemment, compensation, livelihood, and greivance
Sustaining quality approaches for locally embedded community health services ...REACHOUTCONSORTIUMSLIDES
This presentation was given at the Bridging the Quality Gap - Strengthening Quality Improvement in Community Health Services Symposium which was held in September 2016
This is a 20-slides-in-20-minutes presentation (pecha kucha) about frameworks for evaluation of impact of Knowledge Mobilization or Knowledge Translation. The Co-Produced Pathway to Impact (CPPI) provides a framework for evaluation of impact from research to impact including dissemination, uptake, and implementation stages.
Leduc Phipps Poetz: Development of indicators for measurement at each stage o...KBHN KT
Renee Leduc, Program Officer at Canada's NCE Secretariat presents on indicators, reporting and measurement for the NCE program with respect to Knowledge Translation, Commercialization and Socio-Economic benefit to Canadians (otherwise referred to as Knowledge and Technology Exchange and Exploitation KTEE). These slides represent part 1 of a 2 part co-presentation with NeuroDevNet NCE's KT Core. There is an accompanying handout that helps NCEs work through linking goals with outputs, outcomes and relates to the 2nd handout called "anatomy of an indicator" that helps users develop indicators.
Whole systems change across a neighbourhood
How can we collaborate with people to help them build their resilience? Get under the skin of the culture and the lives people live. Identify people’s feelings and experiences of community and understand what people think is shaped by different values and by the environment and infrastructure around them. The future of collaboration could bring many opportunities but people find it more difficult to live and act together than before. How can we help people…and communities build their resilience? Understand people’s different situations and capabilities to develop pathways that help them build resilient relationships. Help people experience and practice change together. Help people grow everyday practices into sustainable projects. Turn people’s everyday motivations into design principles. Support infrastructure that connects different cultures of collaboration. Build relationships with people designing in collaboration for the future…now.
Vicky Scott: Implementing research into practiceTHL
Presentation by Dr Vicky Scott, Clinical Associate Professor, RN, PhD, Canada, BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Ministry of Health, Canada at at Safety 2016 World Conference, 18-21 September 2016, Tampere, Finland
#Safety2016FIN
Community-based Peer Support: A participatory review of what works, for whom, in what circumstances
Author - Dr Janet Harris, The University of Sheffield
Emilie Robert realist review on free care in Africa 2012Emilie Robert
This presentation was given at the 2nd global symposium on health systems research, in a panel on realist synthesis chaired by Geoff Wong. The symposium took place in Beijing (China) in November 2012.
This presentation was given at the International Family Planning conference in Kampala, Uganda in November 2009 by IRH Georgetown and the Extending Service Delivery (ESD) Project.
Valuing Local Perspectives: Lessons Learned from Participatory Reflection and...Humentum
Hear from ActionAid, which recognizes that the learning and knowledge that informs programmatic impact comes from the communities we work with. Learn about their participatory approach to Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL). Leave with a tool and methodology that can be adapted to your needs and context, and with insights on how to work together to value local voices and their contribution to MEL processes.
Graham Brown (Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society) discusses the importance of maintaining a strong evidence base for health promotion.
A textbook must provide, first and foremost, information to assist the reader in better understanding the topic. Second, it ought to provide the information in a way that can be easily accessed and digested, and it needs to be credible. Textbooks
that have gone through multiple editions continue to improve as a result of reviewers’ comments and readers’ feedback, and this one is no exception. Looking back over the efforts associated with this Fifth Edition, the old wedding custom of “something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue” comes to
mind. We have built upon the solid foundation of previous editions, but then added “something new.” It almost goes without saying that we have “borrowed” from others in that we both cite and quote examples of program evaluation studies
from the literature. “Something blue” . . . well, we’re not sure about that. Those who have used the Fourth Edition might be interested in knowing what has changed in this new edition. Based on reviewers’ comments we have:
• Created a new chapter to explain sampling.
• Incorporated new material on designing questionnaires.
• Overhauled the chapter on qualitative evaluation. It is now “Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Evaluation.”
• Reworked the “Formative and Process Evaluation” chapter with expanded coverage on developing logic models.
• Added new studies and references; new Internet sources of information.
• Included new examples of measurement instruments (scales) with a macro
focus.
• Inserted new checklists and guides (such as ways to minimize and monitor for potential fidelity problems—Chapter 13).
• Revised the chapter “Writing Evaluation Proposals, Reports, and Journal Articles” to give it less of an academic slant. There’s new material on writing
executive summaries and considerations in planning and writing evaluation
reports for agencies.
• Deleted the chapter on Goal Attainment Scalin
The volume of research greatly exceeds its application in practice. Researchers must pay greater attention to the production of their research findings in a flexible range of formats in recognition of the varied needs of consumers.
This presentation on AFAO's recent work with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) communities was given by Michael Frommer at the SiREN Symposium in Perth, June 2016.
Scott McGill discusses ASHM's plan for developing online health promotion resources for people from CALD backgrounds. This presentation was given at AFAO's HIV and Mobility Forum in May 2016.
Darryl O’Donnell, Executive Director of AFAO, outlines changes to the organisation and sets out its priorities for 2016/17. In this context, he invited input on AFAO's future policy work from from participants at AFAO's HIV and Mobility Forum on 30 May 2016.
This presentation on key strategies for addressing HIV among people from CALD communities and people who travel to high prevalence countries was given by Corie Gray from Curtin University and CoPAHM at AFAO'S HIV and Mobility Forum on 30 May 2016.
This presentation on a directory of HIV health promotion programs and resources that engage with people from CALD communities was given by Jill Sergeant from AFAO at AFAO'S HIV and Mobility Forum on 30 May 2016.
This presentation on findings from a trial of providing HIV medication to people not eligible for Medicare was given by Tony Maynard from the National Association of People With HIV Australia (NAPWHA) at AFAO'S HIV and Mobility Forum on 30 May 2016.
This presentation on HIV diagnoses among people from CALD communities was given by Praveena Gunaratnam from the Kirby Institute at AFAO'S HIV and Mobility Forum on 30 May 2016.
Drawing upon HIV surveillance data and the Seroconversion Study, this presentation explores reasons for late diagnosis of HIV and barriers to testing among gay men and other MSM in Australia. The presentation was given by Phillip Keen from the Kirby Institute at AFAO's National Gay Men's HIV Health Promotion Conference in April 2016.
In 2015, AFAO developed a directory of health promotion programs and resources related to HIV and culturally and linguistically diverse communities. This presentation outlines how the directory was developed and can be used. This presentation was given by Jill Sergeant at AFAO's National Gay Men's HIV Health Promotion Conference in April 2016.
A report on findings from the AHOD Temporary Resident Access Study, which looked at access to HIV treatments for people not eligible for Medicare. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
Lea Narciso from SA Health discusses the changing epidemic in South Australia, which now includes an increasing number of people born overseas, and the government's policy response. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
This Report Card provides an overview of national momentum on HIV and mobility, highlighting areas with strong momentum and areas that are limited. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
ComePrepd is the Queensland AIDS Councils (QuAC) new campaign for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) which aims to encourage open discussion in the gay community. This presentation discusses the design of the campaign and its various stages. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
Alison Coelho from the Centre for Culture, Ethnicity and Health describes a program which partnered with faith & community leaders around preventing BBV/STI transmission in migrant and refugee communities. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
An overview of how the 2 Spirits Program at the Queensland AIDS Council adapts a western health promotion framework into a cultural framework to engage Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander communities around HIV and sexual health. This presentation was given at the AFAO Community Hub at the ASHM 2015 conference.
This presentation on the priorities and challenges for the HIV response in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities was given by Michael Costello-Czok (Executive Officer – Anwernekenhe National HIV Alliance - ANA) at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
This presentation on the expansion of AFAO's African communities project to encompass other CALD and mobile populations was given by Jill Sergeant, AFAO Project Officer, at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
This presentation on what social research indicates will be effective anti-stigma interventions was given by Prof John de Wit, Centre for Social REsearch in Health (CSRH), at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
This presentation on AFAO's Health Promotion Discussion Paper on treatment as prevention was given by Sean Slavin, AFAO Health Promotion Program, at the AFAO Members Forum - May 2015.
More from Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations (20)
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Saeid Safari
Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists like Ozempic and Semiglutide
ASA GUIDELINE
NYSORA Guideline
2 Case Reports of Gastric Ultrasound
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
Adv. biopharm. APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMSAkankshaAshtankar
MIP 201T & MPH 202T
ADVANCED BIOPHARMACEUTICS & PHARMACOKINETICS : UNIT 5
APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETICS : TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS By - AKANKSHA ASHTANKAR
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
New Drug Discovery and Development .....NEHA GUPTA
The "New Drug Discovery and Development" process involves the identification, design, testing, and manufacturing of novel pharmaceutical compounds with the aim of introducing new and improved treatments for various medical conditions. This comprehensive endeavor encompasses various stages, including target identification, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approval, and post-market surveillance. It involves multidisciplinary collaboration among scientists, researchers, clinicians, regulatory experts, and pharmaceutical companies to bring innovative therapies to market and address unmet medical needs.
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journeygreendigital
Tom Selleck, an enduring figure in Hollywood. has captivated audiences for decades with his rugged charm, iconic moustache. and memorable roles in television and film. From his breakout role as Thomas Magnum in Magnum P.I. to his current portrayal of Frank Reagan in Blue Bloods. Selleck's career has spanned over 50 years. But beyond his professional achievements. fans have often been curious about Tom Selleck Health. especially as he has aged in the public eye.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Introduction
Many have been interested in Tom Selleck health. not only because of his enduring presence on screen but also because of the challenges. and lifestyle choices he has faced and made over the years. This article delves into the various aspects of Tom Selleck health. exploring his fitness regimen, diet, mental health. and the challenges he has encountered as he ages. We'll look at how he maintains his well-being. the health issues he has faced, and his approach to ageing .
Early Life and Career
Childhood and Athletic Beginnings
Tom Selleck was born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, and grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. From an early age, he was involved in sports, particularly basketball. which played a significant role in his physical development. His athletic pursuits continued into college. where he attended the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. This early involvement in sports laid a strong foundation for his physical health and disciplined lifestyle.
Transition to Acting
Selleck's transition from an athlete to an actor came with its physical demands. His first significant role in "Magnum P.I." required him to perform various stunts and maintain a fit appearance. This role, which he played from 1980 to 1988. necessitated a rigorous fitness routine to meet the show's demands. setting the stage for his long-term commitment to health and wellness.
Fitness Regimen
Workout Routine
Tom Selleck health and fitness regimen has evolved. adapting to his changing roles and age. During his "Magnum, P.I." days. Selleck's workouts were intense and focused on building and maintaining muscle mass. His routine included weightlifting, cardiovascular exercises. and specific training for the stunts he performed on the show.
Selleck adjusted his fitness routine as he aged to suit his body's needs. Today, his workouts focus on maintaining flexibility, strength, and cardiovascular health. He incorporates low-impact exercises such as swimming, walking, and light weightlifting. This balanced approach helps him stay fit without putting undue strain on his joints and muscles.
Importance of Flexibility and Mobility
In recent years, Selleck has emphasized the importance of flexibility and mobility in his fitness regimen. Understanding the natural decline in muscle mass and joint flexibility with age. he includes stretching and yoga in his routine. These practices help prevent injuries, improve posture, and maintain mobilit
Colonic and anorectal physiology with surgical implications
Understanding what works and why in peer and community based programs for HIV and HCV
1. Understanding what works and why in peer and
community based programs for HIV and HCV
Dr Graham Brown and
Daniel Reeders
www.w3project.org.au
latrobe.edu.au/arcshsMelbourne, Australia
2. Peer Based Programs
• Peer programs underpin the partnership
approach in HIV and HCV
• Programs are inextricably linked to constant
changes in communities and context
• Complex relationship between activities and
the broader social impact – difficult to
demonstrate
• A simple linear approach assuming a stable
environment is blind to reality of the programs
3. Traditional program logic struggles to reflect the
complex role of PBP in the HIV/HCV response
Inputs Activities outcomes
Peer-based programs engage with peer interactions,
social networks, communities, politics and culture
None of which are linear or independent of each other
Led us to systems approaches as a tool to elicit what is
really going on
4. What Works and Why
Using systems approaches to:
• develop a more sophisticated understanding of the role of
peer based programs and how and why they work;
• help community & peer based organisations evaluate what
really matters to their work; and
• articulate how peer based programs add critical value to
HIV and HCV programs and policy
• Systems approaches – set of tools to improve
understanding of the whole, its components, and in
particular the relationships and interactions within and
between them.
5. What Works and Why
• People who use drugs – WASUA and AIVL
• Gay men – VAC and AFAO
• PLHIV – NAPWHA and the Poz Action Group
• Sex Workers – Scarlet Alliance and members
• Funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health
6. What Works and Why
• Combine mental models of practitioners to develop a
more sophisticated theory of peer based programs
and investments
• Developed system dynamics maps showing how
interventions are embedded in and engage with
communities-as-systems
• Identifying strategic considerations and key functions
within the system maps
• Identifying draft indicators to demonstrate influence
+ a LOT of trust
17. 2015 – Practical Indicators
To help answer key questions such as:
• Are programs doing what they’d need to do to improve
their influence on communities and policy environments
(understood as complex systems)?
• Are the programs’ understandings of those complex
systems close enough to reality to sustain effective
action within them?
• Can we explain how the program works to stakeholders
and justify their investment and trust?
• Are program activities, other programs in the sector, and
policy enhancing or diminishing each others
effectiveness?
18. 2015 – Practical Indicators
Flexible use of the functions and indicators
• As objectives in strategic planning for program activities
• As topic guides for sharing program and organisational
knowledge – such as team meetings or planning
workshops
• In combination - to craft for stakeholders coherent,
politically effective narratives of the complex
relationships that the program is seeking to influence or
activate
• To plan how different programs or activities could better
work together
20. Function Description
Engagement How well the program engages with the diversity and
dynamism of the affected community, including its different
networks and cultures.
Learning and
adaptation
The practices through which the program learns about its
environment and adapts its approach according to what it
learns.
Influence How effectively the program influences its target
communities and its policy and funding environment
(including indirect influence).
Alignment The extent to which different programs in the organisation
or sector adapt to achieve ‘value add’ from a coordinated
approach.
Editor's Notes
Australia’s response to HIV and HCV has often celebrated the partnership of affected community, clinicians, research and government. The key role of affected communities being underpinned by concept of ‘peer education’ – although this is rarely defined.
Peer-based programs engage with peer interactions, social networks, communities, politics and culture, which are dynamic and adapting.
Program and the context are constantly interacting with each other, and as a community driven program they are intended to operate at multiple levels – individual, network, community and structural.
However - understanding and demonstrating the complex relationship between an investment in peer based program and achieving improved outcomes is difficult. The inputs and outputs can have a complex and distal relationship
A simple linear approach assuming a stable environment is blind to reality of the programs
What this often results in is rhetoric about community mobilisation and peer based responses – but contracted, evaluated and managed as information dissemination or generic service provision.
Traditional evaluation methods struggle to capture what matters to practitioners and policy-makers about peer approaches. Our hunch is that practitioners have mental models of how peer programs work that may be more sophisticated than published evidence.
Very few community programs function as a simple input-output-outcomes framework.
If we were to really make a shift in the capacity of peer programs to demonstrate their role and influence, we needed to rethink the way we described and evaluated these programs. To do that – we needed a more sophisticated and less linear program theory.
We applied a systems thinking approach that conceptualises peer based programs, and the communities and policy environments they engage with, as complex adaptive systems.
This refers to systems that are constantly interacting, learning, adapting and influencing – and in ways that are not always predictable.
The W3 Project is working with CBOs using peer based approaches with a range of different communities and populations:
People who use drugs – WASUA and AIVL
Gay men – VAC and AFAO
PLHIV – NAPWHA and the Poz Action Group
Sex Workers – Scarlet Alliance and members
Our three goals were:
To develop an understanding of how peer based programs work that is more sophisticated than much of the peer reviewed published literature;
To help community and peer based organisations identify and evaluate what really matters to their work;
To articulate (primarily to funders) how peer based approaches add value to HIV and hepatitis C programs and policy.
So why would we want to do that?
Our approach..
W3 draws on practice based understandings of peer based programs that are often more sophisticated than the individual knowledge focus of much of the published evaluation evidence
Bringing together practitioner mental models.
Systems thinking is intended to improve the quality of those perceptions of the whole, its parts, and the interactions within and between levels.
We have developed ‘system logic’ diagrams showing how interventions are embedded in and engage with communities-as-systems.
This process has required a huge amount of trust from our partners – this is breaking new ground.
As you can see these complex spaghetti and meatball diagrams look very different to the traditional program logic. But these were a tool to that endeavoured to represent the complex reality of each specific program... We certainly had a WTF moment – meaning – what’s the function underpinning these complex maps…
We needed to find the commonalities between these four very different program theory diagrams
...so we needed a framework!
To answer:
What are the key functions any program needs to fulfil in order to be effective and sustainable in a changing context?
Focus on explaining the clouds – complex systems that are constantly adapting and evolving
These two aspects – and how the program interacted with them - were the parts that varied the most across the 4 case trials
We only include aspects of the program that mattered to our work as evaluation researchers
These represent the activities/
Peer skill is the ability to use personal experience in the context of a understanding of the broader collective experience to work effectively in program activities that depend on it – such as peer based program delivery, health promotion and/or leadership.
It less a focus on ‘what is a peer’ and more a focus on ‘what does a peer need to be able to do’.
It involves being able to bridge differences, differences between peers and between peers and non-peers in the system
Most evaluation only looks at two things: quality process in the activities and limited measures of impact, which would fall under the first of four key functions we identified: influence.
This is generally as far as the more linear program logics go – and is often simplified to knowledge or behaviour
What this misses is the broader community level influences we see - but don’t measure - in our community programs
To achieve broader community level influence – peer programs depending on the quality and depth of their engagement with those communities – which is our second function.
This is why we have a multiplying sign – without strong and sustained engagement – peer programs will have little effectiveness no matter how good they may be.
A key reason for this is our next function…
.
Learning and Adaptation
We found that peer and community based programs are constantly learning about changes in their target community. This is not just through the running of peer programs, but also peers directly in their own lives, and the organisation as a whole.
This is where the learning of peer programs needs to be shared and understood within the organisation so the organisation can support and guide a constantly adapting peer program. And so the organisation as a whole needs to be engaged with that community diversity and dynamism – not just the peer programs.
They use insights obtained via practitioner and organisational learning and adapt their approach to maintain or enhance influence.
But that knowledge and insight is a key asset for the whole sector and policy environment
They can also package up that knowledge and use it to influence their partners and stakeholders in the policy system.
This is something that is generally missed or ignored in most of the literature on peer based programs, and rarely recognised in the
Peer programs do not work in isolation in a broader system – but have a unique insight and perspective into communities as well as interpreting and understanding epidemiological and social research and new technologies and what it may mean for work with their communities.
The last function is alignment, which refers to the way programs recognise signals from the policy system and adapt their activities to contribute value to the overall prevention system.
For example – the more peer insights and leadership is valued, the more influence on the broader policy and sector system, and the more alignment may be achieved for community programs and policy change.
It is also about organisations and peer programs seeing changes in the policy and sector – understanding what this will mean for their communities - and identifying what strategies or changes they will need to undertake to maintain their influence in improving the health of their communities.
This diagram only shows key connections and flows – and could easily become as detailed as the very complex diagrams we started with across the four programs we were working with.
But in essence there seemed to be these four key functions we needed to watch…
We are now working with the programs to develop and trial indicators related to each of those functions
What are the indicators
In this framework, indicators are things that might happen or be observed that would increase a program manager or funder’s confidence that the key functions are being fulfilled.
- this includes but not limited to direct influence on individuals
What we find is that much of these are already present within the scope of the programs, but not recognised as signals for evaluation. So not so much ‘more data’ but nuancing and valuing what we have - and using it much more strategically.
How the indicators can be used
The indicators act as pegs for collecting and relating together many diverse sources and kinds of knowledge, both qualitative and quantitative, that help answer these key questions:
Are programs doing what they’d need to do to improve their influence on communities and policy environments understood as complex systems?
Are the programs’ understandings of those complex systems close enough to reality to sustain effective action within them?
Can we explain how the program works to external stakeholders and justify their investment of resources (funding, trust, etc) in it?
Are program activities and other programs in the sector working effectively together to achieve the goals of state and national strategies on HIV and hepatitis C?
They are intended to be used to refine and refocus existing evaluation indicators and activities.
The indicators are flexible, enabling them to be used in different ways:
As objectives in strategic planning for program activities;
As topic guides for facilitating team, program and organisational knowledge practices – such as team meetings or planning workshops;
In combination with each other to craft internally coherent, politically effective narratives that convey to external stakeholders a sense of the complex relationships that the program is seeking to influence or activate;
To plan how different programs or activities could better work together.