The document discusses the transformative potential of open education in theory, policy, and practice, emphasizing its ability to create more equitable and democratic educational institutions. It presents a three-paper approach focusing on theoretical frameworks, policy constraints through critical discourse analysis, and practical implementations, including examples from Virginia. The work argues for a critical examination of existing educational structures and the necessity of theoretical foundations to avoid the dilution of open education's principles.

1. TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIALS
OF OPEN EDUCATION
IN THEORY, POLICY, AND
PRACTICE
JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY
@MILLERJAMISON | JRMILLER@WM.EDU

2. ● BA & MA in urban and cultural geography
● Start PhD in educational policy + planning
in 2013
● Didn’t discover “open” until 2014 with
OpenVA
● GO-GN member since 2015
ABOUT ME:
Image: Public Domain | Une classe by Pieter van de Heyden, 1557

3. ● Introduction to the 3-paper approach and
overview of my dissertation
● The three projects
○ THEORY
○ POLICY
○ PRACTICE
● A synthesis
FORMAT:
Image: Public Domain | Une classe by Pieter van de Heyden, 1557

4. Open education has the
potential to sustainably
transform existing
educational institutions
into more equitable and
democratic forms.
Public Domain Image: The subscription room at Lloyd's of London in the early 19th century

5. OPEN EDUCATION IN
1) THEORY
Open Education as a Real Utopia
2) POLICY
The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse
Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia
3) PRACTICE
From EDUPUNK to Open Policy: Critical
Technology Praxis in Higher Education
Image CC (BY-NC) Jonathan Cohen

6. OPEN EDUCATION
AS A REAL UTOPIA
JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY
JRMILLER@WM.EDU | @MILLERJAMISON
Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

7. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
OPEN EDUCATION IS
“UNDER-THEORIZED”
Bayne, Knox, & Ross, 2015
Deiman & Farrow, 2013
Edwards, 2015
Knox, 2013
Moe, 2015
Nyberg, 1975

8. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
WHY THEORY?
● Without it, open education is vulnerable
to dilution and cooptation
● Not just a lens, but also as a keel

9. REAL UTOPIAS
Sociologist Erik Olin Wright has built a theoretical framework for a
critical and emancipatory approach in social science most
comprehensively presented in Envisioning Real Utopias (2010).
“Real utopias” aims to contribute a “normatively grounded sociology of
the possible, not just the actual” (2012, p. 2).
Image: DV Ltd. / Sigtryggur Ari

10. REAL UTOPIAS
Image: DV Ltd. / Sigtryggur Ari
A contradictory term?
UTOPIAS are fantasies, morally inspired designs unconstrained by
feasibility
REALists eschew such fantasies, condemning them as wasted time and
effort
Wright proposes embracing the tensions between dreams and practice.
What is pragmatically possible is not independent of our imaginations, but

11. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
FOUNDATIONS
1) Many forms of human suffering and many deficits in
human flourishing are the result of existing institutional
and social structures.
2) Transforming existing institutional and social structures
in the right way has the potential to substantially reduce
human suffering and expand the possibilities for human
flourishing.
(Wright, 2012, p. 2)

12. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
FOUR TASKS
1) Specifying moral principles
2) Diagnosis and critique of existing institutions
3) Developing an account of viable alternatives
4) Proposing a theory of transformation

13. THE CONSTRAINTS
OF POLICY
A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OPEN
EDUCATION POLICIES IN VIRGINIA
JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY
JRMILLER@WM.EDU | @MILLERJAMISON
Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

14. Two research questions guide this analysis.
● First, how is open education discursively
framed within institutional policies?
● Second, do discursive framings in policies
support open education and OER as
transformational for education, and if so,
how?
Image CC (BY-SA) Véronique Debord-Lazaro

15. THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORK
∎ Tkacz (2015), Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness
∎ Critical Theory (Horkheimer, 1947;1972) and
∎ Critical Approaches to Open Education (Bayne, Knox, and
Ross, 2015; Deimann and Farrow, 2013; Hall, 2011; and
Knox, 2013)
Image: Warwick University

16. Fairclough (1993, 1995)
Texts present ideologies,
beliefs, messages, and
meanings.
CDA proposes to illuminate
these messages, how they
are framed, and how they can
be resisted and usurped.
Gee (1999)
Language is not merely a
means of communication, but
also orders social activity.
CDA is concerned with how
text presents discursive
practices- the ways in which
we are in the world.
Martínez-Alemán (2015)
Has been applying CDA in
higher education policy
analysis.
Identifies its primary
purposes as 1) to reveal
ideological foundations of
discourse, and 2) to provide
evidence (data) to support
corrective action
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)

17. Image CC (BY-SA) Pleuntje
DATA COLLECTION

18. DATA ANALYSIS
Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett
Following Martínez-Alemán (2015), CDA is derived from an array of social science techniques
and not a singular method:
Establishing context(s)
● Identification of connections between aspects that construct and restrict discourse
○ CULTURE, SOCIAL IDENTITY, and LANGUAGE
● Identification of linkages between TEXT, STRUCTURAL POWER, and CONTEXT
Framing the text (McGregor, 2004)
● Power relations: who is depicted in power, who has agency, who does not?
● Omission of information, nominalization (converting verbs to nouns), passive verbs
● Presuppositions, what is assumed by the author?
● Insinuations and connotations
● Tone of certainty and authority
● Register, do the words spoken ring true?

19. DATA ANALYSIS
Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett
“improve student success through increased access and affordability, and
improve teaching efficiency and effectiveness through the ability to
focus, analyze, augment, and evolve course materials directly aligned to
course learning outcomes. Faculty will be supported in their use of OER to
achieve both of the stated outcomes.”
(TCC, 2014, p. 1-2)

20. DATA ANALYSIS
Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett
Faculty who incorporate OER materials into their courses shall assume all
responsibility for maintaining the integrity of the course content as
related to copyright and scholarly merit. In order for a course to carry a Z
designation within TCC’s Student Information System, faculty must
follow the procedures contained in this policy. (TCC, 2014, p. 2, emphasis
added)

21. DATA ANALYSIS
Image CC (BY) Angie Garrett
Faculty are to use only materials that are published under a Creative
Commons License or exist in the Public Domain. (TCC, 2014, p. 3, emphasis
added)
It is the faculty member’s responsibility to ensure that such content is
eligible for and meets the standards for a CC-BY license. As such, no
portion of such work may be claimed by others in whole, in part, or as a
derivative work. This requirement is mandatory for Z courses and
strongly encouraged for OER courses. (TCC, 2014, p. 3, emphasis added)

22. ASSUMPTIONS
● Built on the assumptions that language is more than the mechanics
of communication; it orders social practices and expresses ideology
and thus holds impact on actions
DELIMITATIONS
● Focused on institutional and state-level higher education policies
from Virginia from 2007-2016
LIMITATIONS
● As open education policies are only just emerging, there are relatively
few examples from which to draw
● This study will not be analyzing the impact of evident discourses
Image CC (BY-SA) Edith Soto

23. FROM EDUPUNK
TO OPEN POLICY
CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY PRAXIS
IN HIGHER EDUCATION
JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY
JRMILLER@WM.EDU | @MILLERJAMISON
Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier

24. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
BUILD A BRIDGE BETWEEN
CRITICAL PEDAGOGICAL
THEORY AND PRACTICES
AND
MY DISCIPLINARY HOME OF
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY.

25. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
CONTEXT
The neoliberalizing university
(Giroux, 2014; Newfield 2010; 2016)

26. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORKS
● Dewey, Freire, hooks, Montessori
● Connected learning, Networked learning, and
open education

27. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
1. EDUPUNK
a. DS106
b.A domain of one’s own
2.OER & Z-Degrees
3. OpenVA & Open Policy
EMPIRICS

28. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
Implications for a critical
technology praxis in higher
education, geography in
particular

29. OPEN EDUCATION IN
1) THEORY
Open Education as a Real Utopia
2) POLICY
The Constraints of Policy: A Critical Discourse
Analysis of Open Education Policies in Virginia
3) PRACTICE
From EDUPUNK to Open Policy: Critical
Technology Praxis in Higher Education
Image CC (BY-NC) Jonathan Cohen

30. TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIALS
OF OPEN EDUCATION
IN THEORY, POLICY, AND
PRACTICE
JAMISON R. MILLER | THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY
@MILLERJAMISON | JRMILLER@WM.EDU

31. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
REFERENCES
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. In The information age: Economy,
society,
and culture (2nd ed., Vol 1). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.
New York: Macmillan.
Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (2000 [1970]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the
American dream. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

32. Public Domain Image: N°. 2 – Les utopies de la navigation aérienne au siècle dernier
REFERENCES
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York:
Routledge.
McMillan-Cottom, T. 2017. Lower ed: The troubling rise of for-profits. New York, NY: The New
Press.
Newfield, C. (2008). Unmaking the public university: The forty-year assault on the middle
class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newfield, C. (2016). The great mistake: How we wrecked public universities and how we can
fix them. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets,
state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London, UK: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2012). Transforming capitalism through real utopias. American Sociological
Review, 78(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1177/0003122412468882