SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor:
Analysis of Malignancies Across the
Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Program
JR Curtis
Presentation Number: 802
JR Curtis,1 X Mariette,2 EB Lee,3 B Benda,4 I Kaplan,5 K Soma,5 D Gruben,5
J Geier,6 L Wang,5 R Riese5
1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2Paris-Sud University, Paris, France; 3Seoul National University,
Seoul, Republic of Korea; 4Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA; 5Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA; 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
802
Disclosure
 X Mariette and JR Curtis have received grant/research support from
Pfizer Inc, and have acted as consultants for Pfizer Inc
 EB Lee has acted as a consultant for Pfizer Inc
 B Benda, I Kaplan, K Soma, D Gruben, J Geier, L Wang and
R Riese are all employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc
2
802
3
Introduction
 Tofacitinib is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of
rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
 Tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily demonstrated efficacy and a
manageable safety profile in patients with RA in randomized Phase 21–6
and Phase 37–12 studies
 Certain types of malignancies may occur in higher frequency in patients
with RA
 Additionally, malignancies are a concern with therapeutic agents that treat
RA by modulation of the immune system
 Presented here is an analysis of malignancy data from the clinical
development program of tofacitinib in patients with moderate to severe
active RA. Data cut-off date: April 2013
1. Fleischmann R et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 617–629. 2. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 1895–1905. 3. Kremer JM et al.
Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 970–981. 4. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 1150–1158. 5. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis and
Rheumatism 2011; 63: S854. 6. McInnes IB et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 2013 Mar 12. [Epub ahead of print] 7. van Vollenhoven RF et al.
N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 508–519. 8. van der Heijde D et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 559–570. 9. Kremer J et al. Ann Intern Med 2013;
159: 253–261. 10. Fleischmann R et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495–507. 11. Burmester G et al. Lancet 2013; 381: 451–460. 12. Lee EB
et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(10 Suppl): S1049, Abst 2486.
802
Methods
 Data were pooled from 6 randomized Phase 21–6, 6 randomized Phase 37–12
and 213-14 open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies
 Tofacitinib was dosed as either monotherapy or with nonbiologic
disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
● Phase 2 studies were of 6 weeks’ to 6 months’ duration and Phase 3 studies were
of ≥6 months’ duration
● Two ongoing open-label LTE studies enrolled patients who participated in the prior
Phase 2 and 3 studies.
4
1. Fleischmann R et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 617–629. 2. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 1895–1905. 3. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum
2012; 64: 970–981. 4. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 1150–1158. 5. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2011; 63: S854. 6. McInnes IB
et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 2013 Mar 12. [Epub ahead of print] 7. van Vollenhoven RF et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 508–519. 8. van der Heijde D et al.
Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 559–570. 9. Kremer J et al. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 253–261. 10. Fleischmann R et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495–507.
11. BurmesterG et al. Lancet 2013; 381: 451–460. 12. Lee EB et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(10 Suppl): S1049, Abst 2486. 13. W ollenhaupt J et al.
Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: S548. 14. Yamanaka et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: S473.
802
Analysis
 Malignancies were identified by review of investigator-reported adverse
events (AEs), serious AE reports, and output from the central laboratory
histology review
 A malignancy over-read process involved a centralized, external, blinded
review of each biopsy case performed by at least two independent, board-
certified pathologists
● Discordance in opinion was resolved by using the most conservative
interpretation from either the local or central pathology review
● Patients with no pathology report were classified according to the type of
malignancy reported by the study investigator
 Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) compared with the Surveillance
Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (United States) were also
calculated for select malignancies
5
802
Patient demography in Phase 3 studiesa
6
aTofacitinib monotherapyor tofacitinib+ methotrexate (MTX) or other nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumaticdrugs (DMARDs); bPatients
randomized to placebo were advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3 or Month 6; cActive control arm of adalimumab(ADA) or ADA + MTX. ADA was
dosed 40 mg subcutaneouslyevery 2 weeks
Tofacitinib
5 mg BID
Tofacitinib
10 mg BID
Placebo to
tofacitinib
5 mg BIDb
Placebo to
tofacitinib
10 mg BIDb
ADAc
n=1216 n=1214 n=343 n=338 n=204
Mean age (range),
years
53.2
(18-86)
52.5
(18-85)
52.8
(18-82)
52.2
(18-80)
52.5
(23-77)
Gender, % Female 84.5 84.9 81.0 81.4 79.4
Race, %
White 60.6 61.0 66.8 62.1 72.5
Black 3.7 2.9 2.3 4.7 1.5
Asian 26.9 25.9 23.6 25.1 14.2
Other 8.8 10.2 7.3 8.0 11.8
Disease duration, years 8.7 9.1 8.9 9.7 8.1
 Phase 2 and LTE baseline characteristics were similar
802
2
Exposure to tofacitinib
 Number of patients receiving tofacitinib in Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies
(all doses combined):
7
 Duration of exposure (LTE studies only):
● Tofacitinib 5 mg BID up to 72 months; mean 554.0 days, maximum 2187 days
● Tofacitinib 10 mg BID up to 66 months; mean 997.2 days, maximum 1996 days
No. of
patients
Tofacitinib treatment
802
4748
3873
3080
1910
556
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
> 6 months > 1 year > 2 years > 3 years > 4 years
Common types of malignancies
 107 out of 5671 patients treated with tofacitinib were observed with malignancies
(excluding NMSC)
● 66 patients were observed with NMSC
8
 Placebo treated patients (≤6 month duration):
● No malignancies (excluding NMSC)
● 2 out of 681 patients receiving placebo were observed with NMSC
 Adalimumab treated patients:
● 1 renal cell carcinoma and 1 non-small-cell lung cancer
66
24
19
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
NMSC Lung Breast Lymphoma
No. of
patients
†
802
†all female patients; NMSC, non-melanomaskin cancer
Incidence rates for all malignancies
(excluding NMSC)
9
Rate/100
patient
years
of
observation
(95% CI)
†Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses
ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE; long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event;
NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; PBO, placebo; pyo, patient years of observation
0
4
3
2
1
5671
107
12664
1609
13
1501
681
0
203
204
1
179
1452
41
4005
3375
42
5191
1587
8
1464
4827
83
9196
N
n
pyo
Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib)
Tofacitinib
All†
10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All
0.85 0.90
0.55
0.87
1.02 0.81
0.00
0.56
802
Incidence rates over time
for all malignancies (excluding NMSC)
10
2.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0-6
Rate/100
patient
years of
observation
(95% CI)
All malignancies (excluding NMSC)
6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 >42
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
Time period (months)
802
CI, confidence interval; NMSC, non-melanomaskin cancer
Incidence rates for lung cancer
11
4
0
Tofacitinib
All†
Rate/100
patient
years
of
observation
(95% CI)
10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg
3
2
1
5 mg LTE All
5671
24
1609
1
681
0
204
1
1452
5
3375
14
1587
3
4827
19
N
n
Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib)
0.19 0.210.20 0.07 0.13
0.27
0.56
0.00
†Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses
ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo
802
Incidence rates for breast cancer‡
12
0.8
0.0
Tofacitinib
All†
Rate/100
patient
years
of
observation
(95% CI)
10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg
0.6
0.4
0.2
5 mg LTE All
4712
19
1355
3
553
0
162
0
1452
7
3375
8
1310
1
4827
15
N
n
Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib)
0.000.00
0.18 0.16
0.08
0.24
0.18
0.15
‡all female patients; †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses
ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo
802
3
Incidence rate for lymphoma
13
0.0
Tofacitinib
All†
Rate/100
patient
years
of
observation
(95% CI)
10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All
5677
10
1609
3
681
0
204
0
1452
3
3375
2
1587
0
4827
5
N
n
Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib)
0.05
0.00
0.20
0.08
0.04
0.000.00
†Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses; for completeness2 additionalcases were included from an ongoing blinded Phase 3 study
ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo
802
0.08
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Incidence rates for non-melanoma
skin cancer (NMSC)
14
Tofacitinib
All†
Rate/100
patient
years
of
observation
(95% CI)
10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All
5671
66
1609
8
681
2
204
2
1587
6
N
n
Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib)
1.130.99
0.53
0.35
0.41 0.53
0.84
0.62
8
0
6
4
2
†Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses
ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo
802
1452
14
3375
43
4827
57
Incidence* rates
for tofacitinib-treated patients
15
*IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic
Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database
(US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients
CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non-
melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result
database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor
802
IR
Events/100 pyo
(95% CI)
Tofacitinib
N=4791
All malignancies
(excluding NMSC)
0.85
(0.70, 1.02)
Lung 0.190
(0.127, 0.283)
Breast‡ 0.18
(0.12, 0.28)
Lymphoma 0.08
(0.04, 0.14)
NMSC 0.53
(0.41, 0.67)
Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates
for tofacitinib-treated patients
16
*IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic
Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database
(US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients
CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non-
melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result
database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor
802
IR
Events/100 pyo
(95% CI)
Tofacitinib
N=4791
SIR
(95% CI)
Tofacitinib
N=4791
All malignancies
(excluding NMSC)
0.85
(0.70, 1.02)
SEER: -1.08
(0.89, 1.31)
Lung 0.190
(0.127, 0.283)
SEER: 1.91
(1.22, 2.84)
Breast‡ 0.18
(0.12, 0.28)
SEER: 0.77
(0.46, 1.20)
Lymphoma 0.08
(0.04, 0.14)
SEER: 2.58
(1.24, 4.74)
NMSC 0.53
(0.41, 0.67)
N/A
Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates
for tofacitinib- and bDMARD-treated patients
17
*IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic
Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database
(US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients
CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non-
melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result
database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor
802
IR
Events/100 pyo
(95% CI)
Tofacitinib
N=4791
SIR
(95% CI)
Tofacitinib
N=4791
IR
Events/100 pyo
(95% CI)
TNF inhibitors/
bDMARDs
N=4791
SIR
(95% CI)
TNF inhibitors/
bDMARDs
N=4791
All malignancies
(excluding NMSC)
0.85
(0.70, 1.02)
SEER: -1.08
(0.89, 1.31)
0.3-1.771-4 0.9-1.1@5
Lung 0.190
(0.127, 0.283)
SEER: 1.91
(1.22, 2.84)
0.23-0.26# 1.08-3.56
Breast‡ 0.18
(0.12, 0.28)
SEER: 0.77
(0.46, 1.20)
0.11-0.34# 0.4-1.686
Lymphoma 0.08
(0.04, 0.14)
SEER: 2.58
(1.24, 4.74)
0.06-0.14$1,2 1.1-9.72,7-14
NMSC 0.53
(0.41, 0.67)
N/A 0.23-1.3415,16 N/A
18
Conclusions
 Overall, the malignancies that occurred in the tofacitinib
development program in RA are consistent with the type and
distribution of malignancies expected for this population of patients
with moderate to severe active RA
 The IRs for all malignancies (excluding NMSC), lung cancer, breast
cancer, lymphoma and NMSC are consistent with published
estimates in RA patients treated with biologic and nonbiologic
DMARDS and do not show an increase over time
 Longer-term follow-up is necessary to further evaluate the potential
risk of malignancies in the tofacitinib RA program
802
4
Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates
for tofacitinib treated patients
References
1. Simon TA, Smitten AL, Franklin J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1819-26.
2. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2886-95.
3. Pallavicini FB, Caporali R, Sarzi-Puttini P, et al. Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:175-80.
4. Carmona L, Abasolo L, Descalzo MA, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011;41:71-80.
5. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Available
at: http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed April 27, 2012.
6. Smitten AL, Simon TA, Hochberg MC, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R45.
7. Thomas E, Brewster DH, Black RJ, et al. Int J Cancer 2000;88:497-502.
8. Mellemkjaer L, Linet MS, Gridley G, et al. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1753-7.
9. Ekstrom K, Hjalgrim H, Brandt L, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:963-70.
10. Gridley G, McLaughlin JK, Ekbom A, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:307-11.
11. Kauppi M, Pukkala E, Isomaki H. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:201-4.
12. Kinlen LJ. J Autoimmun 1992;5 Suppl A:363-71.
13. Mariette X, Cazals-Hatem D, Warszawki J, et al. Blood 2002;99:3909-15.
14. Parikh-Patel A, White RH, Allen M, et al. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1001-10.
15. Mariette X, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pavelka K, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(11):1895-904.
16. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56(9):2886-95.
802
Acknowledgments
 The authors would like to thank the patients, investigators and study
team who were involved in the studies (NCT00413660,
NCT00603512, NCT01059864, NCT00147498, NCT00550446,
NCT00687193, NCT00814307, NCT00847613, NCT00960440,
NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT00413699, NCT00661661)
 This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc
 Editorial support was provided by Martin Goulding, PhD, of
Complete Medical Communications and was funded by Pfizer Inc
20
802
Questions

More Related Content

What's hot

Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib
Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or GefitinibTreatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib
Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinibseayat1103
 
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Sophia Hsieh
 
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
MS Trust
 
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rcc
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced RccIndividualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rcc
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rccfondas vakalis
 
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part IRole of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
Mohammed Fathy
 
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rccSuccess story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
Mohamed Abdulla
 
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLCFirst-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
Yasar Hammor. MRCP(UK),FRCP
 
oral drugs in multiple sclerosis
oral drugs in multiple sclerosisoral drugs in multiple sclerosis
oral drugs in multiple sclerosis
Neurology resident slides
 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
spa718
 
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancer
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancerTreatment of non–small cell lung cancer
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancerseayat1103
 
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
 
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
John TC Lee, M.D.
 
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstracts
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected AbstractsAsco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstracts
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstractsfondas vakalis
 
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancer
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung CancerIntegration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancer
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancerfondas vakalis
 
Immunotherapy in lung cancer
Immunotherapy in lung cancerImmunotherapy in lung cancer
Immunotherapy in lung cancer
Alok Gupta
 
MET Crusader TKI presentation
MET Crusader TKI presentationMET Crusader TKI presentation
MET Crusader TKI presentation
JohnHallick
 
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
 
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment ParadigmProstate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
Alok Gupta
 
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTSTREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTSspa718
 

What's hot (20)

Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib
Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or GefitinibTreatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib
Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib or Gefitinib
 
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
NSCLC Tumor Board: Navigating the Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Multimoda...
 
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia
Chronic myeloid leukemia
 
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
Can brain atrophy measurement help us in monitoring MS progression in routine...
 
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rcc
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced RccIndividualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rcc
Individualizing Therapy For Patients With Advanced Rcc
 
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part IRole of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
Role of Chemotherapy, Targeted therapy and Immunotherapy in NSCLC Part I
 
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rccSuccess story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
Success story of m tor inhibitors in m rcc
 
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLCFirst-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
First-line Treatment In In EGFR Mutant NSCLC
 
oral drugs in multiple sclerosis
oral drugs in multiple sclerosisoral drugs in multiple sclerosis
oral drugs in multiple sclerosis
 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
Imatinib vs. 2nd gen TKI in newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia 
 
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancer
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancerTreatment of non–small cell lung cancer
Treatment of non–small cell lung cancer
 
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
Turning Tides in Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Latest ...
 
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
2022 02-20-tassid seminar-5 ASA-mesalazine old drug new tricks-dr tsung-chun ...
 
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstracts
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected AbstractsAsco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstracts
Asco 2006 Update Genitourinary Cancer Selected Abstracts
 
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancer
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung CancerIntegration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancer
Integration Of Targeted Therapies With Radiation Lung Cancer
 
Immunotherapy in lung cancer
Immunotherapy in lung cancerImmunotherapy in lung cancer
Immunotherapy in lung cancer
 
MET Crusader TKI presentation
MET Crusader TKI presentationMET Crusader TKI presentation
MET Crusader TKI presentation
 
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
The Expanding Role of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced and Earlier Stages of...
 
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment ParadigmProstate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
Prostate cancer : Changing Treatment Paradigm
 
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTSTREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
TREATMENT OF NON-HIDGKIN'S LYMPHOMA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS
 

Similar to Tofacitinib, an oral janus kinase inhibitor, analysis of malignancies across the ra clinical program

METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Care
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of CareRenal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Care
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Carefondas vakalis
 
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinicKiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rccEsmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
Danilo Baltazar Chacon
 
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_PavithranV_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
EAFO1
 
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018 M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slidesIndolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
Сергей Сердюк
 
Management of colorectal cancer
Management of colorectal cancer Management of colorectal cancer
Management of colorectal cancer
Mohamed Abdulla
 
ET in MBC.pptx
ET in MBC.pptxET in MBC.pptx
ET in MBC.pptx
HebatAllah Bakri
 
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MDAdvances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
Melanoma Research Foundation
 
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
drferozemomin
 
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
bkling
 
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancerAntiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancerContinuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRCImpact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
Mohamed Abdulla
 
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
 
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCC
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCCECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCC
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCCEuropean School of Oncology
 
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
Starttech Ventures
 
Immunotherapy update
Immunotherapy updateImmunotherapy update
Immunotherapy update
AdilDaud
 
Management of metastatic colorectal cancer
Management of metastatic colorectal cancerManagement of metastatic colorectal cancer
Management of metastatic colorectal cancer
Mohamed Abdulla
 

Similar to Tofacitinib, an oral janus kinase inhibitor, analysis of malignancies across the ra clinical program (20)

METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
METASTATC COLORECTAL CANCER IN 2017
 
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Care
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of CareRenal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Care
Renal Cell Carcinoma A New Standard Of Care
 
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinicKiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinic
 
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rccEsmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
Esmo io symposium 111915 v11_bgb_onsite_rcc
 
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_PavithranV_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
V_Hematology_Forum_Dr_Pavithran
 
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018 M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
M crc amgen luxor 20 feb 2018
 
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slidesIndolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Sharman slides
 
Management of colorectal cancer
Management of colorectal cancer Management of colorectal cancer
Management of colorectal cancer
 
ET in MBC.pptx
ET in MBC.pptxET in MBC.pptx
ET in MBC.pptx
 
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MDAdvances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
Advances in Melanoma Oncology - Mike Atkins, MD
 
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
 
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
Report Back from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS 2022)
 
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancerAntiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
Antiangiogenic Therapy in colorectal cancer
 
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancerContinuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
Continuum of care of metastatic colorectal cancer
 
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRCImpact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
Impact of 1ry tumor location on treatment guidelines of mCRC
 
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Ca...
 
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCC
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCCECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCC
ECCLU 2011 - B.I. Rini - Kidney cancer - First and further lines in mRCC
 
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
Νικόλαος Τσούλος, MedTech Conference 2021
 
Immunotherapy update
Immunotherapy updateImmunotherapy update
Immunotherapy update
 
Management of metastatic colorectal cancer
Management of metastatic colorectal cancerManagement of metastatic colorectal cancer
Management of metastatic colorectal cancer
 

Recently uploaded

Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Ana Luísa Pinho
 
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
University of Maribor
 
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
SAMIR PANDA
 
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening Disease and its ManagementCitrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
subedisuryaofficial
 
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocksStructures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
kumarmathi863
 
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptxEY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
AlguinaldoKong
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Erdal Coalmaker
 
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptxHemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
muralinath2
 
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdfLeaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
RenuJangid3
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
YOGESH DOGRA
 
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
Scintica Instrumentation
 
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerinLab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
ossaicprecious19
 
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptxin vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
yusufzako14
 
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensiveLateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
silvermistyshot
 
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Sérgio Sacani
 
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebratesComparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
sachin783648
 
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classificationinsect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
anitaento25
 
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdfextra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
DiyaBiswas10
 
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptxESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
muralinath2
 
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayCancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
AADYARAJPANDEY1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...
 
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...
 
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDA
 
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening Disease and its ManagementCitrus Greening Disease and its Management
Citrus Greening Disease and its Management
 
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocksStructures and textures of metamorphic rocks
Structures and textures of metamorphic rocks
 
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptxEY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
EY - Supply Chain Services 2018_template.pptx
 
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdfUnveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
 
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptxHemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
Hemoglobin metabolism_pathophysiology.pptx
 
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdfLeaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
Leaf Initiation, Growth and Differentiation.pdf
 
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also FunctionsMammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
Mammalian Pineal Body Structure and Also Functions
 
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...
 
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerinLab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
Lab report on liquid viscosity of glycerin
 
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptxin vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
in vitro propagation of plants lecture note.pptx
 
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensiveLateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
Lateral Ventricles.pdf very easy good diagrams comprehensive
 
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...
 
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebratesComparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
Comparative structure of adrenal gland in vertebrates
 
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classificationinsect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
insect taxonomy importance systematics and classification
 
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdfextra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
extra-chromosomal-inheritance[1].pptx.pdfpdf
 
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptxESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
ESR_factors_affect-clinic significance-Pathysiology.pptx
 
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayCancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate Pathway
 

Tofacitinib, an oral janus kinase inhibitor, analysis of malignancies across the ra clinical program

  • 1. 1 Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Analysis of Malignancies Across the Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Program JR Curtis Presentation Number: 802 JR Curtis,1 X Mariette,2 EB Lee,3 B Benda,4 I Kaplan,5 K Soma,5 D Gruben,5 J Geier,6 L Wang,5 R Riese5 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; 2Paris-Sud University, Paris, France; 3Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 4Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA; 5Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA; 6Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA 802 Disclosure  X Mariette and JR Curtis have received grant/research support from Pfizer Inc, and have acted as consultants for Pfizer Inc  EB Lee has acted as a consultant for Pfizer Inc  B Benda, I Kaplan, K Soma, D Gruben, J Geier, L Wang and R Riese are all employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc 2 802 3 Introduction  Tofacitinib is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)  Tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with RA in randomized Phase 21–6 and Phase 37–12 studies  Certain types of malignancies may occur in higher frequency in patients with RA  Additionally, malignancies are a concern with therapeutic agents that treat RA by modulation of the immune system  Presented here is an analysis of malignancy data from the clinical development program of tofacitinib in patients with moderate to severe active RA. Data cut-off date: April 2013 1. Fleischmann R et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 617–629. 2. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 1895–1905. 3. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 970–981. 4. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 1150–1158. 5. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2011; 63: S854. 6. McInnes IB et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 2013 Mar 12. [Epub ahead of print] 7. van Vollenhoven RF et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 508–519. 8. van der Heijde D et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 559–570. 9. Kremer J et al. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 253–261. 10. Fleischmann R et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495–507. 11. Burmester G et al. Lancet 2013; 381: 451–460. 12. Lee EB et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(10 Suppl): S1049, Abst 2486. 802 Methods  Data were pooled from 6 randomized Phase 21–6, 6 randomized Phase 37–12 and 213-14 open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies  Tofacitinib was dosed as either monotherapy or with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs ● Phase 2 studies were of 6 weeks’ to 6 months’ duration and Phase 3 studies were of ≥6 months’ duration ● Two ongoing open-label LTE studies enrolled patients who participated in the prior Phase 2 and 3 studies. 4 1. Fleischmann R et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 617–629. 2. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 60: 1895–1905. 3. Kremer JM et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 970–981. 4. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 1150–1158. 5. Tanaka Y et al. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2011; 63: S854. 6. McInnes IB et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 2013 Mar 12. [Epub ahead of print] 7. van Vollenhoven RF et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 508–519. 8. van der Heijde D et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 559–570. 9. Kremer J et al. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 253–261. 10. Fleischmann R et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495–507. 11. BurmesterG et al. Lancet 2013; 381: 451–460. 12. Lee EB et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64(10 Suppl): S1049, Abst 2486. 13. W ollenhaupt J et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: S548. 14. Yamanaka et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: S473. 802 Analysis  Malignancies were identified by review of investigator-reported adverse events (AEs), serious AE reports, and output from the central laboratory histology review  A malignancy over-read process involved a centralized, external, blinded review of each biopsy case performed by at least two independent, board- certified pathologists ● Discordance in opinion was resolved by using the most conservative interpretation from either the local or central pathology review ● Patients with no pathology report were classified according to the type of malignancy reported by the study investigator  Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) compared with the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database (United States) were also calculated for select malignancies 5 802 Patient demography in Phase 3 studiesa 6 aTofacitinib monotherapyor tofacitinib+ methotrexate (MTX) or other nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumaticdrugs (DMARDs); bPatients randomized to placebo were advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3 or Month 6; cActive control arm of adalimumab(ADA) or ADA + MTX. ADA was dosed 40 mg subcutaneouslyevery 2 weeks Tofacitinib 5 mg BID Tofacitinib 10 mg BID Placebo to tofacitinib 5 mg BIDb Placebo to tofacitinib 10 mg BIDb ADAc n=1216 n=1214 n=343 n=338 n=204 Mean age (range), years 53.2 (18-86) 52.5 (18-85) 52.8 (18-82) 52.2 (18-80) 52.5 (23-77) Gender, % Female 84.5 84.9 81.0 81.4 79.4 Race, % White 60.6 61.0 66.8 62.1 72.5 Black 3.7 2.9 2.3 4.7 1.5 Asian 26.9 25.9 23.6 25.1 14.2 Other 8.8 10.2 7.3 8.0 11.8 Disease duration, years 8.7 9.1 8.9 9.7 8.1  Phase 2 and LTE baseline characteristics were similar 802
  • 2. 2 Exposure to tofacitinib  Number of patients receiving tofacitinib in Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies (all doses combined): 7  Duration of exposure (LTE studies only): ● Tofacitinib 5 mg BID up to 72 months; mean 554.0 days, maximum 2187 days ● Tofacitinib 10 mg BID up to 66 months; mean 997.2 days, maximum 1996 days No. of patients Tofacitinib treatment 802 4748 3873 3080 1910 556 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 > 6 months > 1 year > 2 years > 3 years > 4 years Common types of malignancies  107 out of 5671 patients treated with tofacitinib were observed with malignancies (excluding NMSC) ● 66 patients were observed with NMSC 8  Placebo treated patients (≤6 month duration): ● No malignancies (excluding NMSC) ● 2 out of 681 patients receiving placebo were observed with NMSC  Adalimumab treated patients: ● 1 renal cell carcinoma and 1 non-small-cell lung cancer 66 24 19 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 NMSC Lung Breast Lymphoma No. of patients † 802 †all female patients; NMSC, non-melanomaskin cancer Incidence rates for all malignancies (excluding NMSC) 9 Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE; long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; PBO, placebo; pyo, patient years of observation 0 4 3 2 1 5671 107 12664 1609 13 1501 681 0 203 204 1 179 1452 41 4005 3375 42 5191 1587 8 1464 4827 83 9196 N n pyo Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib) Tofacitinib All† 10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All 0.85 0.90 0.55 0.87 1.02 0.81 0.00 0.56 802 Incidence rates over time for all malignancies (excluding NMSC) 10 2.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0-6 Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) All malignancies (excluding NMSC) 6-12 12-18 18-24 24-30 30-36 36-42 >42 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 Time period (months) 802 CI, confidence interval; NMSC, non-melanomaskin cancer Incidence rates for lung cancer 11 4 0 Tofacitinib All† Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) 10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg 3 2 1 5 mg LTE All 5671 24 1609 1 681 0 204 1 1452 5 3375 14 1587 3 4827 19 N n Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib) 0.19 0.210.20 0.07 0.13 0.27 0.56 0.00 †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo 802 Incidence rates for breast cancer‡ 12 0.8 0.0 Tofacitinib All† Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) 10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg 0.6 0.4 0.2 5 mg LTE All 4712 19 1355 3 553 0 162 0 1452 7 3375 8 1310 1 4827 15 N n Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib) 0.000.00 0.18 0.16 0.08 0.24 0.18 0.15 ‡all female patients; †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo 802
  • 3. 3 Incidence rate for lymphoma 13 0.0 Tofacitinib All† Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) 10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All 5677 10 1609 3 681 0 204 0 1452 3 3375 2 1587 0 4827 5 N n Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib) 0.05 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.000.00 †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses; for completeness2 additionalcases were included from an ongoing blinded Phase 3 study ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo 802 0.08 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Incidence rates for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 14 Tofacitinib All† Rate/100 patient years of observation (95% CI) 10 mg PBO ADA 5 mg 10 mg5 mg LTE All 5671 66 1609 8 681 2 204 2 1587 6 N n Phase 3 LTE (all tofacitinib) 1.130.99 0.53 0.35 0.41 0.53 0.84 0.62 8 0 6 4 2 †Phase 2, Phase 3 and LTE studies, all doses ADA, adalimumab;CI, confidence interval; LTE, long-term extension; N, total numberof patients; n, number of patients with an event; PBO, placebo 802 1452 14 3375 43 4827 57 Incidence* rates for tofacitinib-treated patients 15 *IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database (US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non- melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor 802 IR Events/100 pyo (95% CI) Tofacitinib N=4791 All malignancies (excluding NMSC) 0.85 (0.70, 1.02) Lung 0.190 (0.127, 0.283) Breast‡ 0.18 (0.12, 0.28) Lymphoma 0.08 (0.04, 0.14) NMSC 0.53 (0.41, 0.67) Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates for tofacitinib-treated patients 16 *IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database (US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non- melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor 802 IR Events/100 pyo (95% CI) Tofacitinib N=4791 SIR (95% CI) Tofacitinib N=4791 All malignancies (excluding NMSC) 0.85 (0.70, 1.02) SEER: -1.08 (0.89, 1.31) Lung 0.190 (0.127, 0.283) SEER: 1.91 (1.22, 2.84) Breast‡ 0.18 (0.12, 0.28) SEER: 0.77 (0.46, 1.20) Lymphoma 0.08 (0.04, 0.14) SEER: 2.58 (1.24, 4.74) NMSC 0.53 (0.41, 0.67) N/A Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates for tofacitinib- and bDMARD-treated patients 17 *IRs from randomized clinical trial data; †SIRs from published observation date; $United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases; #United States National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases and cohorts of RA patients treated with DMARDs; @SEER database (US General Population), which excludes NMSC; ‡female patients CI, confidence interval; bDMARDs, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; IR, incidence rate; N/A, not available; NMSC, non- melanoma skin cancer; pyo, patient years of observation; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SEER, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database; SIR, standardized incidence ratio (as compared with the SEER); TNF, tumor necrosis factor 802 IR Events/100 pyo (95% CI) Tofacitinib N=4791 SIR (95% CI) Tofacitinib N=4791 IR Events/100 pyo (95% CI) TNF inhibitors/ bDMARDs N=4791 SIR (95% CI) TNF inhibitors/ bDMARDs N=4791 All malignancies (excluding NMSC) 0.85 (0.70, 1.02) SEER: -1.08 (0.89, 1.31) 0.3-1.771-4 0.9-1.1@5 Lung 0.190 (0.127, 0.283) SEER: 1.91 (1.22, 2.84) 0.23-0.26# 1.08-3.56 Breast‡ 0.18 (0.12, 0.28) SEER: 0.77 (0.46, 1.20) 0.11-0.34# 0.4-1.686 Lymphoma 0.08 (0.04, 0.14) SEER: 2.58 (1.24, 4.74) 0.06-0.14$1,2 1.1-9.72,7-14 NMSC 0.53 (0.41, 0.67) N/A 0.23-1.3415,16 N/A 18 Conclusions  Overall, the malignancies that occurred in the tofacitinib development program in RA are consistent with the type and distribution of malignancies expected for this population of patients with moderate to severe active RA  The IRs for all malignancies (excluding NMSC), lung cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma and NMSC are consistent with published estimates in RA patients treated with biologic and nonbiologic DMARDS and do not show an increase over time  Longer-term follow-up is necessary to further evaluate the potential risk of malignancies in the tofacitinib RA program 802
  • 4. 4 Incidence* and standardized† incidence rates for tofacitinib treated patients References 1. Simon TA, Smitten AL, Franklin J, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1819-26. 2. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2886-95. 3. Pallavicini FB, Caporali R, Sarzi-Puttini P, et al. Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:175-80. 4. Carmona L, Abasolo L, Descalzo MA, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2011;41:71-80. 5. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed April 27, 2012. 6. Smitten AL, Simon TA, Hochberg MC, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R45. 7. Thomas E, Brewster DH, Black RJ, et al. Int J Cancer 2000;88:497-502. 8. Mellemkjaer L, Linet MS, Gridley G, et al. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1753-7. 9. Ekstrom K, Hjalgrim H, Brandt L, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:963-70. 10. Gridley G, McLaughlin JK, Ekbom A, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:307-11. 11. Kauppi M, Pukkala E, Isomaki H. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:201-4. 12. Kinlen LJ. J Autoimmun 1992;5 Suppl A:363-71. 13. Mariette X, Cazals-Hatem D, Warszawki J, et al. Blood 2002;99:3909-15. 14. Parikh-Patel A, White RH, Allen M, et al. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1001-10. 15. Mariette X, Matucci-Cerinic M, Pavelka K, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(11):1895-904. 16. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56(9):2886-95. 802 Acknowledgments  The authors would like to thank the patients, investigators and study team who were involved in the studies (NCT00413660, NCT00603512, NCT01059864, NCT00147498, NCT00550446, NCT00687193, NCT00814307, NCT00847613, NCT00960440, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT00413699, NCT00661661)  This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc  Editorial support was provided by Martin Goulding, PhD, of Complete Medical Communications and was funded by Pfizer Inc 20 802 Questions