2. Dear AIESEC in Poland,
With a huge pleasure, we would like to inform you about results of
autumn’s 2015 recruitment in AIESEC in Poland. As members of
AIESEC we spent a lot of time to prepare to this process. We were
promoting FL for long hours, preparing a lot of assessement sheets,
providing knowledge about this process to LCs and now we should
be proud that we gave an opportunity to many young people who
want to be part of our amazing organization.
We want to thank all LCVPs TM and every of you that was engaged
for your work and effort during these intense months of
preparation and work.
We are really proud of you !
Yours,
Ala MCVP TM 15.16 and Gosia NST TxP 15.16
3. overall results
We achieved
94,31 %plans nationally in new
members recruitment
*all data in this report exclude lc szczecin which didn’t
provide needed information.
4. Overall results
We had 1526 applications
We allocated 778 new members
Including 16 returnees
95 TMP-TMP
In general we allocated
889 members
5. How many people were engaged in
recruitment process?
33,3 %
40 %
6,7 %
20 %
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
up to 10 from 10 up to 20 from 20 up to 30 more than 30
In recruitment process were engaged mostly from 10 up to 20 people. In 5 Local
Committees were engaged up to 10 members. More than 30 people took part in
processes in 3 LCs.
6. How did you prepare lc members
to recruitment process?
15
6
1 1
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Training for
assessors
Simulation of
recruitment
Webinar for
assessors
Only sent
materials via
e-mail
Others
15 LCs conducted training for assessors and 6 LCs prepared a simulation of
recruitment. There was a webinar for assessors in one Local Committee and in
another one materials were sent via e-mail.
8. Approximately 175 people resigned
after filling the application,
240 people resigned after rb
and 55 resigned after
Group Exercize.
9. When did you allocate people?
2
12
1
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Pre-allocation on
each step of the
process
After interview On LCC After LCC
In 12 Local Committees people were allocated after interview. There was pre-
allocation on each step of the process in another 2 LCs. Only in one LC
allocation was done on LCC.
10. How did you allocate people?
1
8
0
3
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
With
engagement of
OCPs
Final decision
of LCVP TM
Final decision
of LCVP TM
and LCP
Final decision
of EB
Others
In 8 Local Committees final decision about allocation was done by LCVP TM in
another 3 LCs by Executive Board. Only one Local Committe engaged OCPs in
allocation process.
11. What percentage of allocated
people are women and what man?
69 %
31 %
Woman
Man
In autumn recruitment 69% of allocated people are woman, 31% man.
12. One of the LCs allocated more pepople that
was planned. Then after skips there was exact
amount of people in projects. If some projects
there were still too many people that didn’t go
to LCC, TM reallocated them to other areas that
were their second choice.
How was the gap filled in situation
when you didn’t recruit enough people?
13. In 7 Local Committees
recruitment process for
returnees was simplified.
14. Fast tracks were recruited in
8 local committees in general
number of 21 people.
15. Thank you for attention and
engagement in recruitment!
