1. Future leaders Recruitment report October 2014
* In this report you can find information about results of October recruitment of AIESEC in Poland
2. Dear AIESEC in Poland,
With huge pleasure, we would like to inform you about results of one of the biggest recruitment in AIESEC in Poland in this year – our second Future Leaders Recruitment in October 2014. As members of AIESEC we spent a lot of time in preparation to this process, we were promoting FL for long hours, preparing a lot of assessement sheets, providing knowledge about this process to LCs, but now we should be proud that we gave an opportunity to so many young people who want to be part of our amazing organization. We want to thank all LCVP TMs and LCVP Communications for your work, engagement and effort during these intense months of preparation and work. We are really proud of you ! Yours, Karolina & Ola MCVP TxP AIESEC in Poland & National Recruitment Coordinator
3. This Report containS Information About* :
Recruitment process
Result of FL campaign
Internal recruitment
*One LC didn’t fill in this report – LC Nowy Sącz
4. OVERALL RESULTS
We achieved 110 % plans nationally of recruitment new members Further information on next pages
5. OVERALL RESULTS
We had 1826 applications
We allocated 783 new members, including 31 returnees
We allocated 125 TMP-TMPs
General we allocated 908 people
9. Realization plans of number of applications
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
BS
Mkt
SE
10. Number of applications per Future Leaders sub-program
542
337
947
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Business Sales
Marketing
Social Entre.
11. Results per Future Leaders sub-program (applications stage)
136%
68%
104%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Social Entre..
Marketing
Business Sales
We didn’t achieve 100% of plans only in Marketing program (337 people in whole Poland applied for Marketing).
12. Campaign duration
19
14
14
28
17
14
17
15
15
21
28
26
14
18
25
10
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
How many days did the campaign last?
Average duration was 20 days.
13. Campaign duration
• The longest campaign has 2 LCs : LC Szczecin – 28 days 1,75 applications per day LC Kielce – 28 days 0,96 applications per day
• The shortes campaign has one LC: LC Wrocław UT – 10 days 6,7 applications per day
14. Campaign budget
1282
1448
1000
100
1000
200
0
60
1050
300
200
1612
500
0
600
300
100
Białystok
Gdańsk
Katowice UE
Kielce
Kraków
Lublin
Łódź
Olsztyn
Poznań
Rzeszów
Szczecin
Toruń UMK
Warsaw SGH
Warsaw UW
Wrocław UE
Wrocław UT
IG Bielsko-Biała
Only 2 LCs didn’t have budget for Future Leaders Campaign - they used materials from last campaign
LCs used the following materials: posters, leaflets, FL graphics, gadgets, stickers.
Average budget per LC was 634 PLN
15. Efficiency of our campaign
The most effective channel was FRIENDS – more than 450 apps
The second effective channel was FACEBOOK
8 LCs organized outdoor promotion
16. What channels did we use during our campaign?
0
5
10
15
20
25
Stands
Events
Classshouts
Media release
LC Warsaw UW didn’t use direct promotion and didn’t have media releases
17. Efficiency of our campaign
LC Lublin organized the most number of classshouts
The most number of stands were organized in LC Kielce
LC Białystok and LC Gdańsk had the most number of media releases
Only in Białystok, Katowice, Szczecin, Toruń UMK , Warsaw UW didn’t organize outdoors events
18. Campaign sum up
233 people was engaged in Future Leaders promotion
Avarage 29 people was engaged in each LC
One people provided 8 applications
9 LCs had event on facebook to promote FL
The biggest potential we had still in students of Management and Economy faculties
11 of 18 LCs had at least 1 parallel campaign
20. We achieved 110% of recruitment plans and 11 LCs achieved more than 100% (Gdańsk, Kielce, Kraków, Nowy Sącz, Poznań, Rzeszów, Szczecin, Toruń UMK, Warsaw SGH, Warsaw UW, Wrocław UE). Situation in LC Szczecin was result of wrong planned Talent Plan and plan of promotion.
IG Bielsko-Biała achieved only 30%
77%
116%
95%
129%
119%
93%
88%
150%
84%
104%
119%
480%
167%
103%
103%
122%
79%
30%
% of recruitment plans achieved
22. Allocation Results per Future Leaders sub-program
121%
85%
80%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Social Enter…
Marketing
Business Sales
Still we had the worst results in Business Sales sub-program, but they were better than during last recruitment
23. We allocated in AIESEC 908 members. 65% female 35% male. Warsaw UW allocated less than 20% of women 3 LCs allocated almost equally of women and men: : Warsaw SGH, Wrocław UE, Wrocław UT
65%
67%
63%
70%
80%
77%
83%
80%
77%
79%
71%
70%
59%
19%
57%
57%
25%
35%
33%
37%
30%
20%
23%
17%
20%
23%
21%
29%
30%
41%
81%
43%
43%
75%
Women
Men
24. Recruitment and allocation
To recruit 783 people (new members + returnees) we needed 346 members.
Most of the members was allocated to Social Enterprenuer program (page 22)
25. Only 6 LCs haven’t had skip yet ( 33%) Rest LCs noted 1-5 skips
26. How Many people We Reallocate
5
22
14
0
20
0
5
2
13
8
0
9
4
0
13
5
1
5
18
10
0
15
0
4
3
12
6
8
7
2
0
12
5
1
Applicants
Allocated members
Only 4 LCs provided more than 10 TMP-TMP Experiences. In LCs members didn’t leave for other team experience.
27. Relation of new members to reallocation in recruitment
17
64
43
22
87
58
32
16
71
25
48
47
79
57
61
42
3
4
18
12
5
15
0
4
1
9
6
10
7
2
0
13
10
1
New Members
Reallocation
We can notice that we based most on new members during recruitment
28. How Many returnees we recruited
0
4
6
0
8
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
11
7
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
8
3
1
1
2
0
1
1
9
4
1
1
0
Applicants
Allocated returnees
Only 2 LCs provided more Integrated Experience than 5 per recruitment.
29. 12%
88%
When did you allocate people?
Pre- allocation on each step of the process
After interview
Nobody in AIESEC in Poland allocated people on LCC ! It means that OCPs went to LCC prepared to their structure
33%
39%
22%
6%
How did you allocate people?
Final decision of VP TM and LCP
Final decision of VP TM
Final decision of EB
With engagement of OCPs
Only Warsaw SGH engaged OCP to allocation. It means that in most LCs TM had final decidion about allocation
30. 35%
65%
How long was Group Exercise?
30 min
30 min-60 min
23%
71%
6%
How long was average interview?
Less than 45 min
45 min- 1h
1h -1,5h
In every LC Group Exercise lastsed less than one hour
Most of LCs conducted interviews less than one hour ! (In 94% of LCs RBs lasted less than 45min and 45 min-1 hour)
It means that whole recruitment process was well-planned and materials created by MC helped LCs running recruitment.
31. Preparation to Recruitment
17
10
1
Training for assessors
Simulation of recruitment
Other
How did you prepare people to recruitment process?
Number of LC which use each materials
14
11
15
10
13
5
What materials did you use during recruitment process?
No of LCs which use each materials
Every LCs organized training for assessors and 10 LCs tried to prepare them in practice way. During recruitment in most of cases used materials prepared by MC
32. How many people RESignED AFTER EACH ELEMENTS OF RECRiUTMENT PROCESS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Białystok
Gdańsk
Katowice UE
Kielce
Kraków
Lublin
Łódź
Olsztyn
Poznań
Rzeszów
Szczecin
Toruń UMK
Warsaw SGH
Warsaw UW
Wrocław UE
Wrocław UT
IG Bielsko-Biała
After application
After Group Exercise
After RB
After LCC
33. 15%
1%
25%
22%
11%
20%
3%
0%
13%
22%
0%
28%
5%
12%
18%
7%
0%
% of people who resigned
% of people who resigned
What was the relations between people who resigned and numer of applications
34. OUR CHALLENGES during creating report
Not all of data sent by LCs was used in the report. In some cases it is impossible to create statistics.
Mistakes in providing data for campaigns results, sub-programs results - different answers in different questions
Not filling in full report
Some misunderstandings happened related to names
A few of LCs missed DDLs, that’s why we have to postpone date of published report
