THEORY & PRACTICE IN PUBLIC
     ADMINISTRATION


     TOPIC: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
             MODELS OF ORGANIZATION



     PRESENTED BY: LOUIE A. MEDINACELI
A theory . . .



 consists of a set of concepts and the
relationships that tie them together into a
coherent explanation or understanding of
       the phenomenon of interest
Cultural Studies
                                                                                                     Literary Theory
                                                                                             Poststructural Philosophy
                                                                                       Postmodern Architecture
                                                                                Linguistics
                                                                         Semiotics and Hermeneutics
                                                               Folklore Studies
                                                      Cultural Anthropology
                                            Social Psychology
                                  Biology-Ecology
                       Political Science
               Sociology
      Engineering
Economics



                                                                    SYMBOLIC-
    PREHISTORY                       MODERN                                                       POSTMODERN
                                                                  INTERPRETIVE
     1900-1950’s                   1960’s & 70’s                                                     1990’s
                                                                      1980’s

     Smith (1776)              Von Bertalanffy (1950)
                                                                      Schutz (1932)               Saussure (1959)
     Marx (1867)              Trist & Bamforth (1951)                 Whyte (1943)                Foucault (1972)
    Durkheim(1893)                Boulding (1956)                    Selznick (1949)                 Bell (1973)
     Taylor (1911)             March &Simon (1958)                   Goffman (1959)                Jencks (1977)
     Follett (1918)                 Emery (1960)
                                                                     Gadamer (1960)                Derrida (1978)
     Fayol (1919)             Burns & Stalker (1961)           Berger & Luckmann (1966)            Lyotard (1979)
     Weber (1924)                Woodward (1965)                       Weick (1969)                 Rorty (1980)
     Gulick (1937)           Lawrence & Lorsch (1967)
                                                                      Geertz (1973)              Lash & Urry (1987)
    Barnard (1938)               Thompson (1967)                Clifford & Marcus (1986)         Baudrillard (1988)

Fig 1.1     Sources of inspiration for organization theory
Theoretical Perspectives


 Theories linked by similar underlying
 assumptions, logics, and vocabularies.

Research adopting similar approaches,
   methods, and ways of theorizing.
Theory
(built from a selected set of concepts to explain, understand, criticize or create the
                               phenomenon of interest)


                 analysis and
                 association

                                 Concepts
 (categories for sorting, organizing, storing information, formed from common
                          features of specific instances)



                 abstraction

                     Phenomena of Interest
    (what is to be explained, understood, criticized or created by the theory)
Abstraction


The process of removing the unique details of
particular examples so that only their common
              aspects remain.

Enables us to process and communicate more
                information.
Abstract


                             All Living Things


                   Plant           Animal


                  Reptile          Mammal              Bird


                  Dog                                  Cat


           Fido             Spot            Phydough          Spought


Concrete
Paradigms


A set of assumptions and practices that define
           a scientific discipline (Kuhn).

A way of seeing and thinking about the world.
Why Multiple Perspectives?

1. Help better understand and manage the complexity of
   organizations.

2. Become more aware of the assumptions underlying
   theory and practice and the reasons for doing or not
   doing things.

3. Form a basis for determining pressures to act and their
   relationship to ethical, efficient, and socially responsible
   action.
Ontology


Ontology concerns our assumptions about reality
and agency

-   is there an objective reality out there or is it subjective,
    existing only in our minds?

-   are our actions predetermined or do we have
    freewill?
Epistemology


Epistemology is concerned with knowledge:

  -   how we generate knowledge

  -   what constitutes ‘good’ knowledge

  -   how we represent or describe reality
Comparing Ontologies

Objectivism –    the belief in an objective, external
                 reality that exists independently of
                 our knowledge of it.

Subjectivism –   the belief that knowledge of the
                 world is subjective and that social
                 reality only exists when we
                 experience it and give it meaning.
Comparing Epistemologies

Positivism –       we can discover Truth through the
                   scientific measurement and
                   validation of behavior & systems.

Interpretivism –   all knowledge is relative to the
                   knower & can only be understood
                   from the point of view of
                   individuals who are directly
                   involved; truth is socially
                   constructed.
Modernist Perspective

•   Objectivist ontology

•   Positivist epistemology

•   Organizations are real,
    rational entities and
    systems

•   Organization theorists focus
       on finding universal laws
    governing system
    behavior, rational
    structures, & standardized
     procedures
Symbolic-Interpretive
   Perspective

         •   Subjectivist ontology

         •   Interpretivist epistemology

         •   Organizations are communities,
             socially constructed in everyday
             interactions

         •   Organization theorists study
             how people create and give
             meaning to their experience        of
             organizational life
Postmodern Perspective

• Ontology - the social world is created
   through language & discourse

• Epistemology - there is no Truth;
  knowledge & power are interwoven

• Organizations are texts - sites of
  power relations, marginalization, and play

• Organization theorists deconstruct &
  destabilize ideologies & rational forms of
  organizing; encourage a reflexive
  questioning of taken for granted
  assumptions & practices
Poststructuralist Ideas
Culture



                   Social                    Physical
                    Structure             Structure



                           Technology




Fig. 1.2   A Conceptual Model Of Organization.
Models of
Organization
• I. The "Rational" or Formal Model (Metaphor: Machine, Army)
• A. The rationality here is instrumental rationality.
• 1. Reason seeks to adopt means solely in terms of the
  efficiency in promoting the end.
  2. Ends are set outside the organization (profits, the market
  demand for a certain line of products)
• B. The organization is likened to a machine. The individual is
  treated as a cog in the machine.
• C. Other
• 1. The organization has the formal pyramidal structure--
  Commands move down, information moves up.
  2. Individuals are glued to the organization through contracts.
• D. Problems and paradoxes
• 1. Voluntariness of the contract is contradicted by the lack of
  autonomy of a cog
  2. Alienation of labor, job dissatisfaction, etc.
• II. The "Political" or "Factional" Model
• A. The "rationality" is the "tit for tat" model of Polemarchus in Plato's
  Republic
• 1. We should help our friends and harm our enemies.
  2. We may manipulate ("use") those who are not our friends for the
  sake of our faction.
  3. The end is the increased power and satisfaction of one's faction.
• B. The organization is conceived as a field of coalitions competing
  for scarce resources, power, etc.
• C. Ethics is concerned with stating limits on permissible
  manipulation of others:
• 1. The principle of promoting the total good.
  2. The principle of respecting the rights of others.
  3. The principle of treating others in accord with distributive justice.
• III. The Caring Model (Metaphor: Family)
• A. The guiding principle is appropriate care:
• 1. Care focuses on particular persons.
  2. Care is undertaken as an end in itself.
  3. Care involves individuals engrossed in caring for other
  particular individuals.
  4. Care is growth-enhancing.
• B. The organization is conceived as a network of
  connected selves.
• C. Potential problems
• 1. Excessive caring: invasion of privacy, favoritism
  (injustice)
  2. Insufficient caring
•   IV. The Civic Model. Metaphor: New England Town Meeting
•   A. At the heart of the civic model is deliberative rationality
•   1. Goal is the common good
    2. Fundamental equality and mutual respect among participants.
    3. We can deliberate about what makes up the common good and about what
    promotes it, but not about whether we should promote the common good.
    4. Good action is valuable in itself as well as in its results. (Undercuts alienation.)
•   B. Employees are to corporation as good citizen is to the community.
•   C. Ethical considerations
•   1. Works best with long-term employees.
    2. Great salary differentials between co-deliberators must be avoided.
    3. Requires high level of integrity (good character) among the co-deliberators
    4. Not all employees will be co-deliberators; one must still treat them with appropriate
    respect, caring, etc.
    5. The pursuit of the organizational common good must be compatible with the
    common good of the larger community, with justice, and with respect for rights of
    those outside the organization.
When a man works he works. But when a man
prays, GOD works.

Commit to the LORD whatever you do, and your
plans will succeed - Proverbs 16:3

DECISION-MAKING: Trust in the LORD with all our
heart and do not depend on your own
understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him
and he will crown your efforts with success-
Proverbs 3:5-6

Thank you and God bless.

Theoretical perspectives 2

  • 1.
    THEORY & PRACTICEIN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION TOPIC: THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE MODELS OF ORGANIZATION PRESENTED BY: LOUIE A. MEDINACELI
  • 2.
    A theory .. . consists of a set of concepts and the relationships that tie them together into a coherent explanation or understanding of the phenomenon of interest
  • 3.
    Cultural Studies Literary Theory Poststructural Philosophy Postmodern Architecture Linguistics Semiotics and Hermeneutics Folklore Studies Cultural Anthropology Social Psychology Biology-Ecology Political Science Sociology Engineering Economics SYMBOLIC- PREHISTORY MODERN POSTMODERN INTERPRETIVE 1900-1950’s 1960’s & 70’s 1990’s 1980’s Smith (1776) Von Bertalanffy (1950) Schutz (1932) Saussure (1959) Marx (1867) Trist & Bamforth (1951) Whyte (1943) Foucault (1972) Durkheim(1893) Boulding (1956) Selznick (1949) Bell (1973) Taylor (1911) March &Simon (1958) Goffman (1959) Jencks (1977) Follett (1918) Emery (1960) Gadamer (1960) Derrida (1978) Fayol (1919) Burns & Stalker (1961) Berger & Luckmann (1966) Lyotard (1979) Weber (1924) Woodward (1965) Weick (1969) Rorty (1980) Gulick (1937) Lawrence & Lorsch (1967) Geertz (1973) Lash & Urry (1987) Barnard (1938) Thompson (1967) Clifford & Marcus (1986) Baudrillard (1988) Fig 1.1 Sources of inspiration for organization theory
  • 4.
    Theoretical Perspectives Theorieslinked by similar underlying assumptions, logics, and vocabularies. Research adopting similar approaches, methods, and ways of theorizing.
  • 5.
    Theory (built from aselected set of concepts to explain, understand, criticize or create the phenomenon of interest) analysis and association Concepts (categories for sorting, organizing, storing information, formed from common features of specific instances) abstraction Phenomena of Interest (what is to be explained, understood, criticized or created by the theory)
  • 6.
    Abstraction The process ofremoving the unique details of particular examples so that only their common aspects remain. Enables us to process and communicate more information.
  • 7.
    Abstract All Living Things Plant Animal Reptile Mammal Bird Dog Cat Fido Spot Phydough Spought Concrete
  • 8.
    Paradigms A set ofassumptions and practices that define a scientific discipline (Kuhn). A way of seeing and thinking about the world.
  • 9.
    Why Multiple Perspectives? 1.Help better understand and manage the complexity of organizations. 2. Become more aware of the assumptions underlying theory and practice and the reasons for doing or not doing things. 3. Form a basis for determining pressures to act and their relationship to ethical, efficient, and socially responsible action.
  • 10.
    Ontology Ontology concerns ourassumptions about reality and agency - is there an objective reality out there or is it subjective, existing only in our minds? - are our actions predetermined or do we have freewill?
  • 11.
    Epistemology Epistemology is concernedwith knowledge: - how we generate knowledge - what constitutes ‘good’ knowledge - how we represent or describe reality
  • 12.
    Comparing Ontologies Objectivism – the belief in an objective, external reality that exists independently of our knowledge of it. Subjectivism – the belief that knowledge of the world is subjective and that social reality only exists when we experience it and give it meaning.
  • 13.
    Comparing Epistemologies Positivism – we can discover Truth through the scientific measurement and validation of behavior & systems. Interpretivism – all knowledge is relative to the knower & can only be understood from the point of view of individuals who are directly involved; truth is socially constructed.
  • 14.
    Modernist Perspective • Objectivist ontology • Positivist epistemology • Organizations are real, rational entities and systems • Organization theorists focus on finding universal laws governing system behavior, rational structures, & standardized procedures
  • 15.
    Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective • Subjectivist ontology • Interpretivist epistemology • Organizations are communities, socially constructed in everyday interactions • Organization theorists study how people create and give meaning to their experience of organizational life
  • 16.
    Postmodern Perspective • Ontology- the social world is created through language & discourse • Epistemology - there is no Truth; knowledge & power are interwoven • Organizations are texts - sites of power relations, marginalization, and play • Organization theorists deconstruct & destabilize ideologies & rational forms of organizing; encourage a reflexive questioning of taken for granted assumptions & practices
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Culture Social Physical Structure Structure Technology Fig. 1.2 A Conceptual Model Of Organization.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    • I. The"Rational" or Formal Model (Metaphor: Machine, Army) • A. The rationality here is instrumental rationality. • 1. Reason seeks to adopt means solely in terms of the efficiency in promoting the end. 2. Ends are set outside the organization (profits, the market demand for a certain line of products) • B. The organization is likened to a machine. The individual is treated as a cog in the machine. • C. Other • 1. The organization has the formal pyramidal structure-- Commands move down, information moves up. 2. Individuals are glued to the organization through contracts. • D. Problems and paradoxes • 1. Voluntariness of the contract is contradicted by the lack of autonomy of a cog 2. Alienation of labor, job dissatisfaction, etc.
  • 21.
    • II. The"Political" or "Factional" Model • A. The "rationality" is the "tit for tat" model of Polemarchus in Plato's Republic • 1. We should help our friends and harm our enemies. 2. We may manipulate ("use") those who are not our friends for the sake of our faction. 3. The end is the increased power and satisfaction of one's faction. • B. The organization is conceived as a field of coalitions competing for scarce resources, power, etc. • C. Ethics is concerned with stating limits on permissible manipulation of others: • 1. The principle of promoting the total good. 2. The principle of respecting the rights of others. 3. The principle of treating others in accord with distributive justice.
  • 22.
    • III. TheCaring Model (Metaphor: Family) • A. The guiding principle is appropriate care: • 1. Care focuses on particular persons. 2. Care is undertaken as an end in itself. 3. Care involves individuals engrossed in caring for other particular individuals. 4. Care is growth-enhancing. • B. The organization is conceived as a network of connected selves. • C. Potential problems • 1. Excessive caring: invasion of privacy, favoritism (injustice) 2. Insufficient caring
  • 23.
    IV. The Civic Model. Metaphor: New England Town Meeting • A. At the heart of the civic model is deliberative rationality • 1. Goal is the common good 2. Fundamental equality and mutual respect among participants. 3. We can deliberate about what makes up the common good and about what promotes it, but not about whether we should promote the common good. 4. Good action is valuable in itself as well as in its results. (Undercuts alienation.) • B. Employees are to corporation as good citizen is to the community. • C. Ethical considerations • 1. Works best with long-term employees. 2. Great salary differentials between co-deliberators must be avoided. 3. Requires high level of integrity (good character) among the co-deliberators 4. Not all employees will be co-deliberators; one must still treat them with appropriate respect, caring, etc. 5. The pursuit of the organizational common good must be compatible with the common good of the larger community, with justice, and with respect for rights of those outside the organization.
  • 24.
    When a manworks he works. But when a man prays, GOD works. Commit to the LORD whatever you do, and your plans will succeed - Proverbs 16:3 DECISION-MAKING: Trust in the LORD with all our heart and do not depend on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him and he will crown your efforts with success- Proverbs 3:5-6 Thank you and God bless.