The Toulmin Model:
A better way of evaluating arguments


          By Harut Sargsian
       Speech 104 Spring 2012
Stephen S. Toulmin

     • Dr.Toulmin a well respected
       Philosophy Professor at USC
     • Developed a model that
       demonstrates to us on how to
       evaluate arguments.
     • The Toulmin model breaks
       the argument down to six
       parts.
Why use the Toulmin Model?
            • We use the Toulmin model
              to better understand an
              argument.
            • The better we understand
              the better we can know
              what the strengths and
              weaknesses are.
            • The better we know the
              strenghts and weaknesses
              the easier we can resolve
              the issue at hand.
The Steps of the Toulmin Model
                  •   Claim
                  •   Grounds
                  •   Warrant
                  •   Backing
                  •   Reservation
                  •   Qualifier
The Claim
       • The Statement
         that is being
         argued
       • Example: You
         should purchase
         a BMW
Grounds
    • The roots of your
      claim, what you are
      trying to prove.
    • Example: BMW has
      been the best selling
      premium car brand
      in the world for over
      10 years.
Warrant
   • The data that links the
     claim and the ground
     together, to form a
     stronger basis.
   • Example: BMW has
     been voted as best
     consumer satisfaction
     out of any other car
     brand.
Backing
   • The support of the
     argument, covers all
     points of argument to
     make it clear to the
     audience.
   • Example: You can find
     a BMW dealership and
     service center in
     almost all major cities
     in the U.S.
Qualifier
   • A statement that
     shows the strength
     between the data and
     the warrant, and how
     well the claim applies
     to both of these.
   • Example: Many people
     are satisfied with
     BMW.
Rebuttal
  • Counter –arguments that
    go against the original
    argument, finding the
    perfect statement to give
    an initial rebuttal to the
    argument.
  • Example: Many BMW
    enthusiasts are prepared
    to offer you great service
    at any BMW center.
Sources
• The Toulmin Model of Argument:
  http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/Toul
  min.pdf
• BMW News Group USA:
  https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/
  p/pcgl/startpage.htm
THE END

The toulmin model

  • 1.
    The Toulmin Model: Abetter way of evaluating arguments By Harut Sargsian Speech 104 Spring 2012
  • 2.
    Stephen S. Toulmin • Dr.Toulmin a well respected Philosophy Professor at USC • Developed a model that demonstrates to us on how to evaluate arguments. • The Toulmin model breaks the argument down to six parts.
  • 3.
    Why use theToulmin Model? • We use the Toulmin model to better understand an argument. • The better we understand the better we can know what the strengths and weaknesses are. • The better we know the strenghts and weaknesses the easier we can resolve the issue at hand.
  • 4.
    The Steps ofthe Toulmin Model • Claim • Grounds • Warrant • Backing • Reservation • Qualifier
  • 5.
    The Claim • The Statement that is being argued • Example: You should purchase a BMW
  • 6.
    Grounds • The roots of your claim, what you are trying to prove. • Example: BMW has been the best selling premium car brand in the world for over 10 years.
  • 7.
    Warrant • The data that links the claim and the ground together, to form a stronger basis. • Example: BMW has been voted as best consumer satisfaction out of any other car brand.
  • 8.
    Backing • The support of the argument, covers all points of argument to make it clear to the audience. • Example: You can find a BMW dealership and service center in almost all major cities in the U.S.
  • 9.
    Qualifier • A statement that shows the strength between the data and the warrant, and how well the claim applies to both of these. • Example: Many people are satisfied with BMW.
  • 10.
    Rebuttal •Counter –arguments that go against the original argument, finding the perfect statement to give an initial rebuttal to the argument. • Example: Many BMW enthusiasts are prepared to offer you great service at any BMW center.
  • 11.
    Sources • The ToulminModel of Argument: http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/Toul min.pdf • BMW News Group USA: https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/ p/pcgl/startpage.htm
  • 12.