The document introduces the Toulmin Model of argumentation, which breaks down arguments into the following components: grounds, warrant, claim, backing, reservation, and qualifier. The goal in introducing this model is to help readers understand that arguments are based on reasoning and evidence, analyze arguments by examining the foundation rather than just disagreeing with the conclusion, determine an argument's strengths and weaknesses, and assess the validity of a claim.

1. The Toulmin Model ByGavin Markowitz

2. The Toulmin Model

3. Groundswhat you have observed either first hand or second hand.

4. WarrantA general rule which links the claim to the grounds.

5. Claim The conclusion of the argument. What the arguer is attempting to convince the audience to do or think.

6. Backing Specific support for the grounds or warrant. Where did it come from.

7. ReservationReasons why the warrant not apply. Exceptions to the rule.

8. QualifierA word or phrase which suggests the degree of validity of the claim.

9. The Toulmin ModelGoal of Studying the Toulmin ModelMy goal in introducing the Toulmin model to you is not to have you become experts on argumentative analysis, that would be nice, but I will be happy if you realize four things: 1. The conclusion of an argument, the claim, is based on specific support and reasoning. 2. We argue by attacking the foundation of the argument, the parts like the backing, warrant and reservations, not just directly disagreeing with the claim. This is more like bickering.3. The more we understand the specific parts of an argument, the better we can determine the strengths and weaknesses of a particular argument and know how to challenge it. 4. The qualifier gives us the idea of the degree of validity of the claim. A claim that is "very highly" correct is more valid than a claim that is "most likely" correct.

10. creditsAll thanks to you professor Marteney!!