Please join Unanet's Kim Koster, and BDO's Senior Associate, Tetiana Gervis, CPA , for an informative session to help in understanding your upcoming Incurred Cost Submission (ICS). The webinar will provide Government Contractors with an introduction to Incurred Cost Submissions, overview of preparation techniques and best practices, and common mistakes which could lead to scrutiny from the DCAA. Additionally, we will provide an update on the most recent DCAA audit trends.
You will learn about:
• Current ICS audit landscape
• General overview of the requirements of an ICS
• ICS schedules explanations
• ICS timeline and submission
• Common mistakes when preparing the submission and how these mistakes could lead to inadequacies and/or inquiries from the DCAA
If you would like to join Unanet for an upcoming webinar, please visit us at; https://www.unanet.com/webinars
THERE ARE QUITE A FEW REGULATORY SPACES
WHICH NEEDS TO BE KEPT IN CONSIDERATION
WHILE MAKING THE REPORT. IN THIS ARTICLE WE
SHALL DISCUSS REGARDING DRAFTING AND THE
CONTENT OF VALUATION REPORT ONE BY ONE IN
DETAIL.
CAPITAL GAINS some basic provisions are provided. Except for exemption u/s 54/ Useful for B.Com or M.com Students. Provisions related are for AY 2014-15
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3...D Murali ☆
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3 years old and constructed on an old land owned for more than 3 years is sold - T. N. Pandey - Article published in Business Advisor, dated February 10, 2015 http://www.magzter.com/IN/Shrinikethan/Business-Advisor/Business/
THERE ARE QUITE A FEW REGULATORY SPACES
WHICH NEEDS TO BE KEPT IN CONSIDERATION
WHILE MAKING THE REPORT. IN THIS ARTICLE WE
SHALL DISCUSS REGARDING DRAFTING AND THE
CONTENT OF VALUATION REPORT ONE BY ONE IN
DETAIL.
CAPITAL GAINS some basic provisions are provided. Except for exemption u/s 54/ Useful for B.Com or M.com Students. Provisions related are for AY 2014-15
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3...D Murali ☆
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3 years old and constructed on an old land owned for more than 3 years is sold - T. N. Pandey - Article published in Business Advisor, dated February 10, 2015 http://www.magzter.com/IN/Shrinikethan/Business-Advisor/Business/
Ensuring Accuracy Best Practices for DCAA's Incurred Cost Submissions.pdfdcaaconsultant
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) plays a crucial role in overseeing the financial aspects of government contracts, ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding taxpayer dollars. Among its key responsibilities is the evaluation of contractors' Incurred Cost Submissions (ICS), which provide a detailed breakdown of costs incurred on government contracts during a fiscal year.
Improve Your Outcomes on Cost Type ContractsUnanet
Join Unanet and Aronson LLC for an educational webinar as we look at the complex world of cost type government contracts.
Many government service contractors successfully enter the government market with relatively straightforward T&M (Labor Hour) contracts. Eventually, an opportunity to bid and perform larger and more complex cost reimbursement contracts will present itself. The skills required to manage T&M contracts differ markedly from the skills required to manage a cost type contract. While the statements of work may be very similar, the administrative requirements associated with managing a cost type contract greatly exceed those required for T&M work.
Managing cost type contracts is a sophisticated undertaking. The contractor must understand what a “cost” is, have an adequate accounting system, establish both direct and indirect budgets (and actively manage them), and with actual (not billing) rates.
Failure to comply with these requirements can have serious ramifications, including incurring a loss, a poor cash flow, inaccurate cost reporting and an inadequate accounting system, An understanding of your obligations is essential to mitigating your risks, maximizing your cost recovery and maintaining your bottom line — essentially the difference between recovering your costs making a profit or losing your shirt.
Learning Objectives:
• What an "adequate" accounting system must include
• Which costs can — and can't — be reimbursed
• How direct costs are reimbursed
• How indirect costs are reimbursed
• How to handle invoicing on cost-type contracts
• The "Paid-to Cost" rule
• The limitation of Cost-and-Funds clauses
• How to facilitate a cost type contract in an accounting system
In this webinar you will learn to improve your outcomes on cost type contracts.
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Revenue Recognition In IFRS By Yash BatraYash Batra
Detailed Presentation on revenue recognition as per IFRS. Accounting on revenue recognition is critical especially when World has defined path to follow IFRS accounting and reporting of its financial. I have tried to capture all critical aspects of revenue recognition in this presentation.
Mastering the Income Statement Implementing Robust Cost Accounting Systems fo...Robert E Jones
Mastering the Income Statement: Implementing Robust Cost Accounting Systems for Federal Contractors
This webinar will provide an overview of the importance of having robust cost accounting systems for companies working on federal contracts. We will discuss how federal regulations require contractors to have adequate systems for accumulating and reporting costs under government contracts. Proper cost accounting helps ensure contractors bill the government appropriately and comply with regulations.
Learning Objectives:
Understand federal regulations related to cost accounting for government contracts
Learn the essential components of an acceptable cost accounting system
Recognize the importance of accurate cost accounting and tracking for pricing contracts and billing purposes
Identify best practices for cost accounting systems to ensure compliance and optimize financial performance
Discuss the consequences for contractors without adequate cost accounting procedures and controls
Provide recommendations for contractors to improve their cost accounting practices related to federal work
The webinar will provide federal contractors the information they need to evaluate and enhance their cost accounting systems to satisfy regulations and optimize their business.
About the Speaker: Robert E. Jones
Designation: CPA, CPCM, NCMA Fellow
Email Address: robert@leftbrainpro.com
Phone: 614-556-4415 Opt #1
Company/Organization: Left Brain Professionals Inc.
Title: Principal, GovCon Accounting Advisor
LinkedIn URL: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rjones330/
Bestselling Book: Government Contract Accounting Made Easy
Biography:
Award-winning speaker and bestselling author, Robert E. Jones shows audiences how to navigate the constantly changing legal and regulatory landscape of government contracts. In his engaging and highly rated presentations, he shares insider secrets drawn from 20+ years of DoD contract and accounting experience. His proactive, decisive approach to finding opportunities and solving problems is based on experience in directly managing more than $400 million in federal contracts and assisting clients with more than $750 million.
Mr. Jones has experience with a wide variety of speaking engagements including emcee/moderator, seminars, training, chapter meetings, and conference presentations. He engages audiences with innovative approaches to contract profitability, accounting, compliance, and related topics. The West Virginia native earned a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the McColl School of Business at Queens University of Charlotte in North Carolina. He holds a master’s degree in accountancy from The Graduate School of the College of Charleston in South Carolina. He is a licensed CPA in the State of Ohio.
Training Slides of Public Meeting - Contract Close-Out - Ground Rules.
For further information regarding the course, please contact:
info@asia-masters.com
www.asia-masters.com
Unanet is a leading provider of Cloud and On-Premise software for project-based professional services organizations. Unanet delivers a purpose built Project ERP solution with skills management, resource planning, budgeting & forecasting, time & expense reporting, billing & revenue recognition, project management analytics and dashboards, and integrated financials with AR, AP, GL and cost pool calculations.
Over 2,000 organizations trust Unanet to maximize staff utilization, reduce overhead and administrative costs, improve speed and accuracy of invoicing, and support forward decision-making for improved operations.
Learn more about Unanet at www.unanet.com/videos .
What is Going on in the GovCon Market? Benchmarks and Trends for Government C...Unanet
What is Going on in the GovCon Market? Benchmarks and Trends for Government Contractors Presented by Kim Koster, Unanet.
Uncover the insights and tips to grow your government contracting business.
* Plan & strategize for next fiscal year.
* Focus on internal control best practices and standards.
* Insights to create internal roadmaps and manage controls.
* Drive value in your overall organization.
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) continues to take shape, with the formation of the Accreditation Body (AB) and continued release of framework and contract guidance. The CMMC will be used as a unified standard for defense contractors to demonstrate cybersecurity program maturity and protection of CUI, and will ultimately require a third party assessment to achieve required certification. The DoD acknowledges that contractors of varying sizes struggle to maintain an appropriate cybersecurity posture and believes this new framework will help contractors implement effective cybersecurity controls tailored to the size and nature of their business and meet the DoD’s requirements.
In this webinar, Tom Tollerton, Managing Director of Cybersecurity & Privacy at DHG will discuss the latest developments around the framework, expectations in contracts in the coming months, and offer actionable recommendations for steps to prepare for potential requirements.
Download the presentation today or visit us at www.unanet.com.
Project Forecasting from the Perspective of an EVMA and EIA-748Unanet
EIA-748 guidelines, as interpreted for major U.S. Government projects, require that project managers develop and maintain bottoms-up estimates of the cost and schedule outcomes of their projects. There is a requirement for a comprehensive bottoms-up forecast to be done at least annually. That is supported by a requirement for a monthly update to the forecast, including best-case, worst-case, and most-likely outcomes for the project estimated final total cost.
This webinar covers these requirements and common associated processes and methods for developing the forecasts.
Included in the discussion are the topics of risk and opportunities management and their relationship to the EVMS; especially focused on the development of the risk/opportunities informed forecasts.
Rather than the development of three potential outcomes for the project timeline, the schedule portion of the discussion focuses on building and maintaining an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that meets the Generally Accepted Scheduling Principles (GASP) and the use of that IMS in establishing the probability of meeting the end date based on Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA) techniques.
The discussion ends with the topic of independent evaluations of the forecast using the Independent Estimate-at-Complete (IEAC) analysis process.
Download the presentation to learn more or visit us at www.unanet.com.
DCAA Compliant Time & Expense Reporting AutomationUnanet
This webinar for project based government contractors will show the benefits of a web-based Time and Expense Reporting solution that reduces administration effort by 90% and enables compliance with Federal Government DCAA (Defense Contract Audit Agency) reporting requirements.
More than 2,000 organizations use Unanet with QuickBooks, Deltek, Microsoft Dynamics and other accounting systems to achieve visibility in real-time into project hours, costs and comments. In addition to reducing administrative and approval effort and satisfying reporting rules for DCAA auditors, Unanet ensures correct Per Diem expense reporting based on geography.
Unanet also offers integrated Financials capabilities with GL, AR, AP and Cost Pool Calculations, removing the need to exchange data with third party systems, and thereby providing a 'single source of truth'.
Unanet supports calculation of project direct and indirect costs in real-time, as well as indirect rate calculation, Earned Value (EVMS), resource planning and forecasting, and provides performance management for your projects and people.
Unanet software is accessed via your web browser and hosted in either our secure data center or on your own servers, and can be deployed within just a few weeks.
Download this webinar today to see how your project-based business can remain compliant with DCAA requirements.
Control the Future - Budget, Plan & ForecastUnanet
This webinar will help project managers and resource managers understand the opportunities for increased efficiency and effectiveness in managing people across projects.
The webinar will show how the web-based Unanet project portfolio management system enables effective forecasting, planning, assignment and tracking of your people, providing visibility of current commitments, utilization, future availability, and skills.
The webinar includes insights from Unanet customers on their approach to managing their project portfolio, including improving processes for resource management, performance analysis, and forecasting. One organization improved engineering staff utilization by 7% in the first year of adoption.
Download the slides today and learn how to take control of your budgeting, planning & forecasting.
To learn more, visit us at www.unanet.com
The Project Life Cycle Through the Lens of a Project Based ERPUnanet
Your ERP system must support every part of the project life cycle.
Learn how Unanet can help you plan, monitor, and account for projects in this infographic.
Learn more at; https://www.unanet.com/learn/infographics
Control the Future - Budget, Plan & ForecastUnanet
This webinar will help project managers and resource managers understand the opportunities for increased efficiency and effectiveness in managing people across projects.
The webinar will show how the web-based Unanet project portfolio management system enables effective forecasting, planning, assignment and tracking of your people, providing visibility of current commitments, utilization, future availability, and skills.
The webinar includes insights from Unanet customers on their approach to managing their project portfolio, including improving processes for resource management, performance analysis, and forecasting. One organization improved engineering staff utilization by 7% in the first year of adoption.
Download the slides today and learn how to take control of your budgeting, planning & forecasting.
To learn more, visit us at www.unanet.com
Win Your Next Defense Opportunity - Seaport Next Generation (NxG)Unanet
The Defense Department’s largest contract, SeaPort-e, has generated about $62 billion since fiscal 2001 and is soon concluding its performance period. It will be eclipsed by the follow-on contract, known as Seaport Next Generation (NxG), which was awarded to approximately 1,870 contractors in December 2018.
This webinar presented by Bloomberg Government, in cooperation with Unanet, discusses the opportunities that are ahead on SeaPort-NxG and how to capture upcoming opportunities.
Topics for the webinar will include:
• Top contractors winning work on SeaPort
• Insights on the SeaPort-NxG on-ramp schedule to take place in fiscal 2021
• The volume of activity at bureaus such as NAVSEA, NAVAIR, NAVWAR, and others that has flown through SeaPort and how that may change in the future
• Analysis of the U.S. Navy Department’s $80 billion annual spending on professional services and how multiple-award contracts including SeaPort, OASIS, and AMCOM EXPRESS dominate that spending
• Expiring work on SeaPort-e that will likely be competed on SeaPort-NxG
Resource Management Maturity - Does Your Resource Management Practice Work Fo...Unanet
How mature is YOUR resource management practice?
Only 25% of respondents in our most recent GAUGE survey said they have reached a “Very Mature” level of resource management practice.
This means that the vast majority of firms just like yours have a lot of improvements that can be made.
Download the slides to take a look at how Nalas transformed their resource management practice.This is a great presentation, no matter if you think you are managing your resources really well, or if you could make some improvements.
You will learn:
*Where you fall on the resource management maturity scale (level 1-5)
*What a practical deployment of an enterprise resource management practice looks like from Nalas
*How you can move up the maturity scale
To learn more, visit www.unanet.com
Control the Future - Budget, Plan & ForecastUnanet
Learn how the web-based Unanet project portfolio management system enables effective forecasting, planning, assignment and tracking of your people, providing visibility of current commitments, utilization, future availability, and skills.
This webinar helps project managers and resource managers understand the opportunities for increased efficiency and effectiveness in managing people across projects.
This presentation also includes insights from Unanet customers on their approach to managing their project portfolio, including improving processes for resource management, performance analysis, and forecasting. One organization improved engineering staff utilization by 7% in the first year of adoption.
Download the slides now and learn how to take control of your budgeting, planning & forecasting.
To learn more, visit www.unanet.com
Why Do Projects Fail? Getting Ready for EIA 748 – Earned Value Management (EVM)Unanet
Every project based organization MUST be concerned about project execution. Over the years Humphrey’s and Associates has seen many projects and has assimilated a list of reasons for project failure.
During the webcast Paul Bolinger, an EVM expert from Humphrey’s and Associates, will refer back to the causes of project failure pointing out how a properly implemented and managed EVMS in compliance with EIA 748 can help mitigate or eliminate failure.
You will Learn:
• The major reasons that projects fail
• How a project management system can help avoid failure
• Overview of EIA 748
• What is an EVMS – Earned Value Management System
• How to implement an EVMS in your organization
• How difficult is it, how long might it take, is there an impact to project costs
If you would like to join Unanet at another upcoming webinar, please check out our upcoming webinars at;
https://www.unanet.com/webinars
If projects are the primary driver of your revenue this webcast is for you. Come learn how to optimize the project lifecycle in your organization.
Learning Objectives:
How to make the project lifecycle come alive
Growth, It All Starts with a Plan
CRM
Pipeline
Winning new Contracts
Execution
Budgeting
Forecasting
Earned Value Management
Project Management Office
Reporting/Analysis
Indirect Rates - What Strategy is Right for your OrganizationUnanet
Managing Projects with Ever Changing Rates:
Government Contractors struggle to forecast the impact costs will have when you bid a multi-year project. We will discuss how to carefully manage the ebbs and flows of the costs in the organization and stay vigilant and be ready for unexpected expenses during the execution of your project.
What should be included in the Fringe pool?
FAR 31.205-6(m) outlines what should be in a fringe pool. The question is should you have a separate fringe and overhead pool or just put fringe in overhead? In the session we will discuss the pros and cons of each methodology. What are the effects of rates on winning new business and executing projects?
Have you selected the right General and Administrative (G&A) base for your company?
You may be struggling with how to pick the right G&A base for your organization or considering making a change. The discussion will be around the finer points of Total Cost Base, Value Added Base and Single Element Base. You will learn about the components of G&A and the base, the rules and where to locate them, and the pros and cons of base selection. In addition, topics related to the FAR, CAS, and DCAA will be discussed.
Other Topics:
Other discussion topics will be Actual vs Provisional vs Target/Planning rates, calculating rates from GL budgets, and even for an organization with no cost plus work, why they should look at using indirect rates to understand profitability on T&M and FP projects.
Want to start using EVM principles for your project based business? This is a great primer to get you started. Brought to you by the team at Unanet.com.
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Learn how Unanet allows billing and revenue recognition to be integrated with the project life-cycle, and not as a separate function. Unanet offers robust support for Fixed Price, Time & Materials and Cost Plus contracts and allows managers to forecast revenue and margin in realtime. Unanet services automation software offers project-based organizations unique capabilities for engagement management, project accounting, and invoicing.
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Top Reasons to Make Managing Your Pipeline a PriorityUnanet
Managing your pipeline takes time and resources, but by making it a priority, you can drive ROI and growth, and even reduce your BD costs. Join Unanet and TargetGov to learn:
How to build a pipeline of targeted opportunities
Decision factors to consider in building an effective pipeline
How far ahead should you consider opportunities?
How do you properly track all your bid process efforts?
How do you learn from your wins and more importantly from your losses?
How do you manage forecasting for your business?
What kind of real-time visibility do you have into your pipeline and business?
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Top Signs You May Have Outgrown Your Legacy ERP SystemUnanet
Do you sometimes feel like your company is being held hostage by your legacy ERP?
Have you outgrown QuickBooks, GCS, or another system?
Did you build a home-grown system and you have simply outgrown it?
Change is scary, but making the switch to a purpose-built, cloud based, ERP solution does not have to be.
Supporting an ERP tool you have outgrown is expensive and inefficient. Poor visibility, constant reconciliation, manual integration, compliance challenges, and disparate spreadsheets are symptoms of an ERP that has outlived its usefulness.
In this webinar you will learn about Unanet, the one tool for People, Projects and Financials and how it can revolutionize your business operations.
• One source of truth – One UI, One dB, One Application
• Accessible 24/7 - 100% Web Based
• Full cycle ‘Bid-to-Bill-to-Book’ for GovCon & Commercial Firms
• Real-time Visibility into Project Status, Billings & Revenue
• Resource Forecasting & Reporting
• Flexible Invoicing, Integrated Financials with “Revolutionary” Cost Pool Calculations
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Government Contract Foundations – Understanding Indirect RatesUnanet
Join us for this webinar as we look at indirect rates and provide some tips and tricks for better managing them.
Whether you are new to Government Contracting, or are a long-term GovCon, there will be a little something for contractors of all shapes and sizes and all levels of experience.
We will take a look at the basics of indirect rates, how to develop your rates, what the submission process looks like, and how to remain compliant and avoid potential audits.
Understanding and better managing your indirect rates will allow you to in turn better manage your bottom line.
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
Cybersecurity for GovCons - DFARS 252.204-7012 Latest Updates and Last CallUnanet
In this webinar Unanet and H2L Solutions, a provider of cyber security and information assurance services, will be discussing the latest updates for the DFARS 7012 regulations and answering questions that anyone might have regarding the assessment and the NIST 800-171 controls. We will cover the key requirements, adequate security, reporting compliance, flow down, implementation experiences and and the impact the regulation is having.
Learn more at: https://www.unanet.com/news/demand-webinars
How Does XfilesPro Ensure Security While Sharing Documents in Salesforce?XfilesPro
Worried about document security while sharing them in Salesforce? Fret no more! Here are the top-notch security standards XfilesPro upholds to ensure strong security for your Salesforce documents while sharing with internal or external people.
To learn more, read the blog: https://www.xfilespro.com/how-does-xfilespro-make-document-sharing-secure-and-seamless-in-salesforce/
Why React Native as a Strategic Advantage for Startup Innovation.pdfayushiqss
Do you know that React Native is being increasingly adopted by startups as well as big companies in the mobile app development industry? Big names like Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest have already integrated this robust open-source framework.
In fact, according to a report by Statista, the number of React Native developers has been steadily increasing over the years, reaching an estimated 1.9 million by the end of 2024. This means that the demand for this framework in the job market has been growing making it a valuable skill.
But what makes React Native so popular for mobile application development? It offers excellent cross-platform capabilities among other benefits. This way, with React Native, developers can write code once and run it on both iOS and Android devices thus saving time and resources leading to shorter development cycles hence faster time-to-market for your app.
Let’s take the example of a startup, which wanted to release their app on both iOS and Android at once. Through the use of React Native they managed to create an app and bring it into the market within a very short period. This helped them gain an advantage over their competitors because they had access to a large user base who were able to generate revenue quickly for them.
Gamify Your Mind; The Secret Sauce to Delivering Success, Continuously Improv...Shahin Sheidaei
Games are powerful teaching tools, fostering hands-on engagement and fun. But they require careful consideration to succeed. Join me to explore factors in running and selecting games, ensuring they serve as effective teaching tools. Learn to maintain focus on learning objectives while playing, and how to measure the ROI of gaming in education. Discover strategies for pitching gaming to leadership. This session offers insights, tips, and examples for coaches, team leads, and enterprise leaders seeking to teach from simple to complex concepts.
In 2015, I used to write extensions for Joomla, WordPress, phpBB3, etc and I ...Juraj Vysvader
In 2015, I used to write extensions for Joomla, WordPress, phpBB3, etc and I didn't get rich from it but it did have 63K downloads (powered possible tens of thousands of websites).
First Steps with Globus Compute Multi-User EndpointsGlobus
In this presentation we will share our experiences around getting started with the Globus Compute multi-user endpoint. Working with the Pharmacology group at the University of Auckland, we have previously written an application using Globus Compute that can offload computationally expensive steps in the researcher's workflows, which they wish to manage from their familiar Windows environments, onto the NeSI (New Zealand eScience Infrastructure) cluster. Some of the challenges we have encountered were that each researcher had to set up and manage their own single-user globus compute endpoint and that the workloads had varying resource requirements (CPUs, memory and wall time) between different runs. We hope that the multi-user endpoint will help to address these challenges and share an update on our progress here.
Enhancing Research Orchestration Capabilities at ORNL.pdfGlobus
Cross-facility research orchestration comes with ever-changing constraints regarding the availability and suitability of various compute and data resources. In short, a flexible data and processing fabric is needed to enable the dynamic redirection of data and compute tasks throughout the lifecycle of an experiment. In this talk, we illustrate how we easily leveraged Globus services to instrument the ACE research testbed at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility with flexible data and task orchestration capabilities.
How to Position Your Globus Data Portal for Success Ten Good PracticesGlobus
Science gateways allow science and engineering communities to access shared data, software, computing services, and instruments. Science gateways have gained a lot of traction in the last twenty years, as evidenced by projects such as the Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) and the Center of Excellence on Science Gateways (SGX3) in the US, The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and its platforms in Australia, and the projects around Virtual Research Environments in Europe. A few mature frameworks have evolved with their different strengths and foci and have been taken up by a larger community such as the Globus Data Portal, Hubzero, Tapis, and Galaxy. However, even when gateways are built on successful frameworks, they continue to face the challenges of ongoing maintenance costs and how to meet the ever-expanding needs of the community they serve with enhanced features. It is not uncommon that gateways with compelling use cases are nonetheless unable to get past the prototype phase and become a full production service, or if they do, they don't survive more than a couple of years. While there is no guaranteed pathway to success, it seems likely that for any gateway there is a need for a strong community and/or solid funding streams to create and sustain its success. With over twenty years of examples to draw from, this presentation goes into detail for ten factors common to successful and enduring gateways that effectively serve as best practices for any new or developing gateway.
Exploring Innovations in Data Repository Solutions - Insights from the U.S. G...Globus
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has made substantial investments in meeting evolving scientific, technical, and policy driven demands on storing, managing, and delivering data. As these demands continue to grow in complexity and scale, the USGS must continue to explore innovative solutions to improve its management, curation, sharing, delivering, and preservation approaches for large-scale research data. Supporting these needs, the USGS has partnered with the University of Chicago-Globus to research and develop advanced repository components and workflows leveraging its current investment in Globus. The primary outcome of this partnership includes the development of a prototype enterprise repository, driven by USGS Data Release requirements, through exploration and implementation of the entire suite of the Globus platform offerings, including Globus Flow, Globus Auth, Globus Transfer, and Globus Search. This presentation will provide insights into this research partnership, introduce the unique requirements and challenges being addressed and provide relevant project progress.
TROUBLESHOOTING 9 TYPES OF OUTOFMEMORYERRORTier1 app
Even though at surface level ‘java.lang.OutOfMemoryError’ appears as one single error; underlyingly there are 9 types of OutOfMemoryError. Each type of OutOfMemoryError has different causes, diagnosis approaches and solutions. This session equips you with the knowledge, tools, and techniques needed to troubleshoot and conquer OutOfMemoryError in all its forms, ensuring smoother, more efficient Java applications.
Code reviews are vital for ensuring good code quality. They serve as one of our last lines of defense against bugs and subpar code reaching production.
Yet, they often turn into annoying tasks riddled with frustration, hostility, unclear feedback and lack of standards. How can we improve this crucial process?
In this session we will cover:
- The Art of Effective Code Reviews
- Streamlining the Review Process
- Elevating Reviews with Automated Tools
By the end of this presentation, you'll have the knowledge on how to organize and improve your code review proces
Your Digital Assistant.
Making complex approach simple. Straightforward process saves time. No more waiting to connect with people that matter to you. Safety first is not a cliché - Securely protect information in cloud storage to prevent any third party from accessing data.
Would you rather make your visitors feel burdened by making them wait? Or choose VizMan for a stress-free experience? VizMan is an automated visitor management system that works for any industries not limited to factories, societies, government institutes, and warehouses. A new age contactless way of logging information of visitors, employees, packages, and vehicles. VizMan is a digital logbook so it deters unnecessary use of paper or space since there is no requirement of bundles of registers that is left to collect dust in a corner of a room. Visitor’s essential details, helps in scheduling meetings for visitors and employees, and assists in supervising the attendance of the employees. With VizMan, visitors don’t need to wait for hours in long queues. VizMan handles visitors with the value they deserve because we know time is important to you.
Feasible Features
One Subscription, Four Modules – Admin, Employee, Receptionist, and Gatekeeper ensures confidentiality and prevents data from being manipulated
User Friendly – can be easily used on Android, iOS, and Web Interface
Multiple Accessibility – Log in through any device from any place at any time
One app for all industries – a Visitor Management System that works for any organisation.
Stress-free Sign-up
Visitor is registered and checked-in by the Receptionist
Host gets a notification, where they opt to Approve the meeting
Host notifies the Receptionist of the end of the meeting
Visitor is checked-out by the Receptionist
Host enters notes and remarks of the meeting
Customizable Components
Scheduling Meetings – Host can invite visitors for meetings and also approve, reject and reschedule meetings
Single/Bulk invites – Invitations can be sent individually to a visitor or collectively to many visitors
VIP Visitors – Additional security of data for VIP visitors to avoid misuse of information
Courier Management – Keeps a check on deliveries like commodities being delivered in and out of establishments
Alerts & Notifications – Get notified on SMS, email, and application
Parking Management – Manage availability of parking space
Individual log-in – Every user has their own log-in id
Visitor/Meeting Analytics – Evaluate notes and remarks of the meeting stored in the system
Visitor Management System is a secure and user friendly database manager that records, filters, tracks the visitors to your organization.
"Secure Your Premises with VizMan (VMS) – Get It Now"
Strategies for Successful Data Migration Tools.pptxvarshanayak241
Data migration is a complex but essential task for organizations aiming to modernize their IT infrastructure and leverage new technologies. By understanding common challenges and implementing these strategies, businesses can achieve a successful migration with minimal disruption. Data Migration Tool like Ask On Data play a pivotal role in this journey, offering features that streamline the process, ensure data integrity, and maintain security. With the right approach and tools, organizations can turn the challenge of data migration into an opportunity for growth and innovation.
Multiple Your Crypto Portfolio with the Innovative Features of Advanced Crypt...Hivelance Technology
Cryptocurrency trading bots are computer programs designed to automate buying, selling, and managing cryptocurrency transactions. These bots utilize advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze market data, identify trading opportunities, and execute trades on behalf of their users. By automating the decision-making process, crypto trading bots can react to market changes faster than human traders
Hivelance, a leading provider of cryptocurrency trading bot development services, stands out as the premier choice for crypto traders and developers. Hivelance boasts a team of seasoned cryptocurrency experts and software engineers who deeply understand the crypto market and the latest trends in automated trading, Hivelance leverages the latest technologies and tools in the industry, including advanced AI and machine learning algorithms, to create highly efficient and adaptable crypto trading bots
Check out the webinar slides to learn more about how XfilesPro transforms Salesforce document management by leveraging its world-class applications. For more details, please connect with sales@xfilespro.com
If you want to watch the on-demand webinar, please click here: https://www.xfilespro.com/webinars/salesforce-document-management-2-0-smarter-faster-better/
Into the Box Keynote Day 2: Unveiling amazing updates and announcements for modern CFML developers! Get ready for exciting releases and updates on Ortus tools and products. Stay tuned for cutting-edge innovations designed to boost your productivity.
Globus Connect Server Deep Dive - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
We explore the Globus Connect Server (GCS) architecture and experiment with advanced configuration options and use cases. This content is targeted at system administrators who are familiar with GCS and currently operate—or are planning to operate—broader deployments at their institution.
Experience our free, in-depth three-part Tendenci Platform Corporate Membership Management workshop series! In Session 1 on May 14th, 2024, we began with an Introduction and Setup, mastering the configuration of your Corporate Membership Module settings to establish membership types, applications, and more. Then, on May 16th, 2024, in Session 2, we focused on binding individual members to a Corporate Membership and Corporate Reps, teaching you how to add individual members and assign Corporate Representatives to manage dues, renewals, and associated members. Finally, on May 28th, 2024, in Session 3, we covered questions and concerns, addressing any queries or issues you may have.
For more Tendenci AMS events, check out www.tendenci.com/events
Corporate Management | Session 3 of 3 | Tendenci AMS
The Scoop on the Incurred Cost Submission
1. INCURRED COST SUBMISSIONS (ICS)
WEBINAR
Presented By: Tetiana Gervis, CPA
Senior Associate, Industry Specialty Services, BDO
Hosted By: Kim Koster
VP of Corporate Strategy, Unanet
2. AGENDA
2
Overview of Presentation
I. Background
II. Timeline and Submission
III. Preparation Techniques and Best Practices
IV. ICS Audit Trends
V. Questions
3. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is
the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK
company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the
international BDO network of independent member firms.
BACKGROUND
4. WHAT IS AN INCURRED COST SUBMISSION (ICS)?
4
Formally known as an Indirect Cost Rate Proposal (ICP, ICRP or ICS); used interchangeably.
Purpose is to establish final annual indirect cost rates and determine over/under billing for the
period covered by the ICS (presented on Schedule I)
The submission includes the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the contractor during its
fiscal year.
ICS schedules show the detailed calculations of indirect pool(s) and base(s), a summary of costs
incurred by contract, other supporting schedules, and the Certificate of Final Indirect Costs.
Rates developed from this submission are used for a variety of purposes, typically as the source
or starting point for calculations such as Provisional Billing rates, Forward Pricing rates, etc.
5. REQUIREMENTS
5
FAR 52.216-7 - Allowable Cost and Payment requires Government contractors to “submit an
adequate final indirect cost rate proposal to the Contracting Officer (or cognizant Federal
agency official) and auditor within the 6-month period following the expiration of each of its
fiscal years.”
Reasonable extensions may be requested in writing by the Contractor and granted in writing by
the Contracting Officer.
The proposed rates shall be based on the Contractor’s actual cost experience for that period.
The Allowable Cost and Payment clause applies to cost-reimbursement type and T&M contracts
(FAR 16.307).
All federal contracts should be included and reported individually. It is permissible to lump or
group all commercial and fixed price work together. In total, all contract costs should reconcile
to the Trial Balance and other books of record.
• For Subcontractors: Refer back to your subcontract agreement to ascertain whether the
Allowable Cost and Payment clause has been flowed-down; thus requiring subcontractors to
prepare and provide an incurred cost submission.
6. WHY IS AN ICS SIGNIFICANT?
6
Finalized indirect cost rates provide for a timely settlement of costs under cost-reimbursement
and T&M contracts.
• The establishment of final rates shall be used for contract closeout (unless quick-closeout
procedures are used).
The ICS is the contractor’s final opportunity to voluntarily disallow costs (pre-audit) that could
be perceived or determined to be unallowable.
Adjusts provisional or interim billing rates as necessary to establish the final indirect cost rates
after year end.
Final indirect cost rates are used in negotiating the final price of Federal contracts and in other
situations requiring that indirect costs be settled before contract prices are established.
An ICS can provide a historical basis for the determination of final rates and which can be used
to forecast provisional rates.
Contractors must update billings on all contracts to reflect the final indirect cost rates and
update the schedule of cumulative direct and indirect costs claimed and billed within 60 days
after settling final rates (per FAR 52.216-7(d)(2)(v)).
7. WHY IS AN ICS SIGNIFICANT? (CONT.)
7
Concluding the audit of an ICS, the contractor and contracting officer will execute a written
understanding specifying the terms and finalization of indirect rates, which would include:
• The agreed-upon final indirect cost rates,
• The bases to which the rates apply,
• The periods for which the rates apply,
• Any specific indirect cost items treated as direct costs in the settlement, and
• The affected contract and/or subcontract, identifying any with advance agreements or special
terms and the applicable rates.
The written agreement does not change any monetary ceiling, contract obligation, or specific
cost allowance or disallowance provided for in the contract.
8. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is
the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK
company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the
international BDO network of independent member firms.
TIMELINE AND SUBMISSION
9. TIMELINE FOR AN INCURRED COST SUBMISSION
9
Per FAR 52.216-7, an incurred cost submission is due within six (6) months after the contractor’s
fiscal year end (FYE).
If the contractor does not submit the proposal within six (6) months of its FYE the DCAA may
send reminder letters to the contractor.
Once the submission becomes six (6) months overdue (one year after the end of the fiscal year)
and no extension has been granted by the Contracting Officer, the DCAA auditor may provide the
CO with unilateral rate recommendations. As a result, the Contracting Officer can make a
unilateral determination as authorized by FAR 42.703-2(c)(1) and FAR 42.705(c)(1).
Delinquent ICS’ result in rate recommendations that will be based on either (1) a decrement
factor applied to indirect rates using relevant contractor historical data or (2) a company-wide
decrement factor based on questioned costs at high risk contractors applied to total contract
costs, if no relevant historical data exists.
The rate recommendation will apply to active contracts, as well as physically complete
contracts for the overdue fiscal year end.
10. INCURRED COST SUBMISSION AUDIT
10
After submission, and the determination has been made that a contractor’s incurred cost
submission is adequate, then typically the cognizant DCAA Field Audit Office (FAO) will initiate
the incurred cost audit within six months after receipt of an adequate proposal.
The audit is guided by DCAA’s Post Year End Incurred Cost Audit Program
During the course of the audit, the DCAA auditor should discuss audit findings with the
government contractor as they arise.
The contractor is expected to provide timely feedback on these issues to ensue prompt
resolution of audit findings and facilitate an efficient and effective audit process.
An exit conference will be held to summarize issues and resolutions identified during the audit
process when significant audit findings are found.
11. INCURRED COST SUBMISSION AUDIT (CONT.)
11
The contractor will be given a final opportunity to respond to the audit findings and comments
submitted by the contractor will be included in the audit report (as comments should have been
relayed during the audit process as questioned costs were identified).
The DCAA office provides the final report to the contracting officer (CO) (or cognizant Federal
agency official) for establishing the final indirect cost and billing rates.
The Contracting Officer may provide the government contractor an opportunity to personally
address the results of the audit report during “Negotiations.”
During negotiations the contractor’s position and supporting documentation is presented and
considered prior to the CO issuing its final decision regarding questioned costs and final indirect
cost rates. DCAA auditors can be extended the invitation to attend negotiations.
Within 120 days, or longer if approved in writing by the CO, after settlement of the final annual
indirect cost rates for all years of a physically complete contract, the contractor must submit a
completed invoice or voucher reflecting the settlement amount and rates (e.g., “ICS True-up”).
12. WHAT DCAA LOOKS FOR…
12
An adequate incurred cost submission: use of the ICE Model (or similar format) containing all of
the required schedules.
Schedule N is signed by an authorized party (usually CFO or above).
A contractor’s submission of all claimed costs incurred for cost type and/or T&M reimbursable
government contracts, including adjustments and explanatory notes.
Identification of unallowable costs (voluntary deletions) and expressly unallowable costs with
notes accompanying adjustments.
Identification, by contract, of awards containing FAR 52.242-3 - Penalties for Unallowable Costs
(penalty clause).
If costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable in accordance with GAAP, CAS, FAR, and
contract provisions.
13. WHAT DCAA LOOKS FOR…(CONT.)
13
Certain “trigger” accounts that may contain unallowable costs. The process for identifying
accounts with a higher probability of being selected for testing consists of, but is not limited to:
• If there have been any changes to the indirect cost rate structure between the last audited fiscal year and
the year in review. Both direct and indirect costs will be evaluated
• The results of performing a comparative analysis between the CFY and prior fiscal year pool expenses and
direct costs
• New accounts
• Prior years incurred cost audit or other audit findings
• Audit Leads
• Fraud Risk Indicators
• Audit history/experience with the government contractor
• Auditor judgment
14. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is
the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK
company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the
international BDO network of independent member firms.
PREPARATION TECHNIQUES AND BEST
PRACTICES
15. PREPARATION TECHNIQUES
15
Use of DCAA ICE Model
The purpose of the DCAA ICE Model is to assist contractors in meeting its requirement for
submitting an adequate final indirect cost rate proposal as required by FAR 52.216-7(d).
The ICE Model schedules present the minimum information needed to begin an audit and can be
obtained at: http://www.dcaa.mil/ice_model.html.
The required content of the proposal and the supporting data will vary depending on the size of
the firm, complexity of the accounting system, and type of business. Verify that the latest
model is being used or downloaded.
Use of the Model is preferred, although not mandatory, as long as the submission includes the
required schedules and support.
The company name and fiscal period should be included on all schedules submitted.
A separate schedule needs to be prepared for each final and intermediate indirect expense pool.
If pool costs are accumulated by department, departmental expenses should be identified within
each pool.
DCAA prefers that contractors include an index, similar to that used in the model, and note if
certain schedules are not applicable.
Contractors are encouraged to submit their proposal in electronic format.
16. REQUIRED VS. SUPPLEMENTAL
16
Required Schedules
• To be completed and provided to DCAA at the time of submission, if applicable.
• Some schedules, while identified as required, do not have to be completed if the schedule
does not apply to the company (i.e., Capital Cost of Money, Intermediate Schedules).
Supplemental Schedules
• Additional schedules which are not required to be provided at the time of submission for the
determination of an adequate submission; however, may be required during the audit process.
• Can be requested to be provided at the entrance conference to help determine audit risk,
preliminary and field audit steps.
• Federal contractors should consider completing and including the supplemental schedules at
the time of submission to decrease delays in facilitating the audit.
17. REQUIRED SCHEDULES
17
Per FAR 52.216-7(d)(2)(iii) An adequate indirect cost rate proposal shall include the following
data unless otherwise specified by the cognizant Federal agency official:
Indirect Cost Pools
• Schedule A – Summary of all Claimed Indirect Expense Rates
• Schedule B – General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses (final)
• Schedule C – Overhead Expenses (final)
• Schedule D – Intermediate/Occupancy Expenses (e.g., Facilities, Homogeneous Service
Centers, Home Office)
• Schedule E - Claimed Allocation Bases by element of cost used to distribute indirect costs
• Fringe* - Schedule of Fringe Benefit Expenses
• Schedule F – Facilities Capital Cost of Money Factors Computation
*Although not individually listed as a required schedule for adequacy, a separate schedule for these expenses are normally created. An
alternative is to include the fringe expenses on Schedule D-x.
18. REQUIRED SCHEDULES (CONT.)
18
Contract Costs
• Schedule G – Reconciliation of Books of Account and Claimed Direct Costs by Major Cost
Element
• Schedule H – Schedule of Direct Costs by Contract/Subcontract and Indirect Expense Applied
at Claimed Rates (as well as a subsidiary schedule of Government Participation percentages in
each of the allocation base amounts)
• Schedule I – Cumulative Direct and Indirect Costs Claimed and Billed by Contract and
Subcontract
• Schedule J – Subcontract Information
• Schedule K – Summary of Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hours contract, including labor
categories, labor rates, hours, direct materials, other direct costs, and indirect expenses
applied at claimed rates
Other Schedules
• Schedule L – Reconciliation of Total Payroll per IRS Form 941 to Total Labor Distribution Costs
• Schedule M – Listing of Decisions/Agreements/Approvals and Description of
Accounting/Organizational Changes
• Schedule N – Certificate of Final Indirect Costs
• Schedule O – Contract Closing Information for Contracts Completed in this Fiscal Year
19. KEY SCHEDULES
19
Schedule B is linked to the following SCHEDULE B
schedules: ICE (version 2.0.1g)
Sched D (x), Intermediate Allocations
Sched E, Bases
Sched H, Contract Costs General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses (Final Indirect Cost Pool)
Summary Sch H
Sched P, IR&D/B&P
ICE MANUAL
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE
TOTAL PER
ACCOUNT G/L, F/S
NUMBER DESCRIPTION Amount & TRIAL BAL. ADJUSTMENT CLAIMED NOTES Reference
- -
- -
- -
SUBTOTAL - - - -
Intermediate Allocations:
SUBTOTAL - - - -
IR & D Mat'l,Trvl,ODC(Sum SCH H) - - SUM SCHED H
IR & D Labor (Sum SCH H) - - SUM SCHED H
IR & D Overhead(Sum SCH H & SCH E) - - - 1 SUM SCHED H SCHED E
B & P Mat'l,Trvl, ODC(Sum SCH H) - - SUM SCHED H
B & P Labor (Sum SCH H) - - SUM SCHED H
B & P Overhead(Sum SCH H & SCH E) - - - 1 SUM SCHED H SCHED E
-
TOTAL G & A EXPENSE POOL - - -
Acct Balances
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Insert rows as needed here, then copy data (Account Number, Desc,
Amount by Dept) from accounting records. Delete this textbox.
Schedule B
G&A costs broken down by account name and number (before intermediate allocations)
Any intermediate allocation amounts from Service Center, Home Office, Fringe, etc.
B&P costs broken out separately into Labor, Fringe, Overhead, and ODC’s
Total expense pool amount
All unallowable costs should be deducted out in the adjustments column in the schedule
20. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
20
Schedule C
Schedule of Overhead claimed expenses by element of cost as identified in accounting records for
each final indirect cost pool
Calculates overhead expenses, those costs that are closely associated with contract performance
• Support functions for direct labor, subcontractors, etc.
Schedule includes details of costs by account name and number (before intermediate allocations)
• One schedule per O/H Pool (e.g., Manufacturing, Engineering, Onsite, Offsite, FCCOM)
• Any intermediate allocation amounts from Service Center, Fringe, etc.
Schedule C is linked to the following SCHEDULE C (1)
schedules: ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Schedule D(x)
ICE MANUAL
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE
ACCOUNT TOTAL PER G/L
NUMBER DESCRIPTION Amount & TRIAL BAL/FS ADJUSTMENTS CLAIMED Notes Ref.
- -
- -
- -
Subtotal - - - -
Intermed Pool-1 - - - - Sched D (1)
ADD: Fringe Allocation - - - Fringe
Total Overhead Pool - - -
Enter Company Name Here
Acct Balances
Enter Company Location Here
Overhead
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Overhead Expenses (final indirect cost pool)
Insert rows as needed here, then copy data (Account Number, Desc,
Amount by Dept) from accounting records. Delete this textbox.
21. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
21
Schedule D
Intermediate pools, containing costs not specifically associated with any one pool
Types of intermediate pools include:
• Home Office expenses*
• Service Centers
• Fringe Benefits
*Home Office allocations generally require a separate ICS to be formally prepared and submitted.
This Schedule does not contain any links to SCHEDULE D (1)
other schedules. ICE (version 2.0.1e)
ICE MANUAL
IMPORT DATA FROM ACCOUNTING RECORDS
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE
ACCOUNT PER G/L
NUMBER DESCRIPTION & TRIAL BAL/FS ADJUSTMENT CLAIMED NOTES REFERENCE
-
- 1
-
Total - - -
ADD: Fringe Allocation - - - Fringe
Total W / Alloc. - - - TO Sched A
Allocation of Expenses Based on
Square Feet Utilized ( Preparation Note 4 & Sample Note 2)
Claimed Allocation
Base % of Expense of Amts per
(i.e. Sq. Ft.) Total Adjustments Allocation G/L See Preparation Note 4
G & A TO Sched B
Amount 0.00% - - 2
O/H - OH TO Sched C (1)
Amount 0.00% - -
O/H - F_Pool-6 TO Sched C (6)
Amount 0.00% - -
- 0.00% - - TO Sched A
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Intermed Pool-1 (Intermed. Pool)
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Intermediate Indirect Cost Pool
Insert rows as needed here, then copy data (Account Number, Desc, Amount)
from accounting records. Delete this textbox.
22. FRINGE
FRINGE BENEFITS POOL
Account Account Name
Year to Date
Per G/L Adjustments Claimed Amount Notes Ref.
4510 Health and Life Insurance 550,000 - 550,000
4520 401(k) Contributions 158,000 - 158,000
4530 Payroll Taxes 37,500 - 37,500
4540 Holiday Leave 34,654 - 34,654
4550 Disability Leave 32,675 - 32,675
Total Pool 812,829 - 812,829
Total Base 3,678,302 - 3,678,302 Sch. E
Fringe Rate 22.10%
Fringe Allocated Labor Dollars % of Total
Direct Labor 2,998,724 81.52% 662,656$ To Sch. H
Overhead Labor 257,036 6.99% 56,800$ To Sch. C
G&A Labor 275,675 7.49% 60,918$ To Sch. B
Technology Service Center Labor 146,867 3.99% 32,455$ To Sch. D
Total Labor 3,678,302 100% 812,829
Fringe Allocated
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/2014
FRINGE
22
Schedule D
Missing allocation tables on both Fringe and Intermediate allocation schedules. The allocation
table must include:
• Allocation base by recipient (i.e., direct labor, overhead, G&A, subcontract costs);
• The percentage of the total base for each recipient; and
• The total dollars allocated to each recipient.
A B
B
A
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
23. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
23
Schedule E is linked to the following SCHEDULE E
schedules: ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Summary Sched H
Sched H, Contract Costs
Schedule C(x), Overhead
Schedule B, G&A
ICE MANUAL
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE
PER G/L, F/S PER G/L
Fringe Pool & TRIAL BAL/FS ADJUSTMENTS CLAIMED Notes Ref.
Fringe Pool -$ -$ -$ Fringe
Fringe Base:
G&A Labor -$ -$ Fringe
Direct Labor - - "
Indirect Labor (Overhead Pools) - - "
Indirect Labor (Intermediate Pools) - - "
Total Fringe Base -$ -$ -$
Fringe Rate 0.00% 0.00%
Fringe Base* - Straight time direct and indirect labor dollars.
PER G/L, F/S PER G/L
& TRIAL BAL/FS ADJUSTMENTS CLAIMED Notes Ref.
G&A Pool -$ -$ -$ Sched B
G & A Base:
Contract Labor -$ Summary Sched H
Contract Travel - "
Contract Material - "
Other Direct Costs - "
Subcontracts - "
Subtotal = DIRECT COSTS -$
General Ledger Overhead (before adjustments) - Sched C (x)
Less: IR&D/B&P O/H transferred to G & A pool.
IR &D O/H (at G/L rate) - SCHED B
B&P O/H (at G/L rate) - "
Less: Material related costs to arrive at Value Added base.
Direct Material -
Subcontracts -
Other Misc Adjustments to G&A Base (provide detailed support) -
G&A Base - Value Added (exludes IR&D/B&P and COM) -$
G&A Rate 0.00%
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Claimed Allocation Bases by element of cost used to distribute indirect costs
Schedule E
Calculates the allocation bases for all final indirect pools
24. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
24
Schedule E
Costs in each base should be broken down and by line item and entered as a link to other inputs
in the ICS, such as schedules H or otherwise
Schedule A should reference base amounts included on Schedule E
Adjustments should be thoroughly explained via footnotes
No information should be hardcoded
Allocation bases for intermediate pools are sometimes incorporated as well*
Example allocations bases include:
• G&A: Total Cost Input (TCI) or Value Added (TCI less direct subcontracts and direct materials)
• Subcontracts and Material Handling (SM&H): direct subcontracts and direct materials
• Overhead: direct labor, and fringe, plus B&P/IR&D labor and B&P/IR&D fringe
• Fringe: total labor, FTE, headcount
• Facilities: square footage or headcount
*The intermediate allocation bases will also need to be included on Schedule D
25. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
25
Schedule E
Explanation of all allocation bases must be included and match its description.
SCHEDULE E
DESCRIPTION Allowable Costs
Unallowable
Costs Total NOTES
Fringe Pool:
765,398$ - 765,398$ Sch. Fringe
Fringe Base:
Total Labor Dollars 6,754,398$ -$ 6,754,398$ Sch. E-1
Fringe Cost Base is total labor dollars for all full and part-time employees.
G&A Pool:
987,543$ -$ 987,543$ Sch. B
G&A Base:
Contract Direct Costs
Labor 777,568$ 777,568$ Sch. H
Fringe 136,353 136,353 Sch. H
ODCs 4,743,088 4,743,088 Sch. H
Materials & Subcontracts 126,582 126,582 Sch. H
Indirect Expenses 159,868 159,868 Sch. H
Total Direct Costs 5,943,459$ - 5,943,459$
Overhead Before Adjustments 140,785$ 140,785$ Sch. C
Value Add Base 6,084,244$ - 6,084,244$ Sch. B
G&A Base is total direct and indirect costs, except G&A, material and subcontract costs (value-added cost input).
CLAIMED ALLOCATION BASES BY COST ELEMENT OF COST USED TO DISTRIBUTE INDIRECT COSTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/14
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
26. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
26
Schedule F
Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM)
• Costs associated with facilities capital used to perform a contract
• Cost of money rate is the arithmetic mean of the interest rates (most recent) specified by the
Secretary of the Treasury (CAS 414)
• Applies the cost of money to the capital used, as long as it is allocated correctly and is
allowable
Schedule F is linked to the following schedules: SCHEDULE F
Schedule F-1, Net Book value of Assets ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Summary Schedule H, Contract Costs
Schedule E, Bases FACILITIES CAPITAL
ICE MANUAL COST OF MONEY FACTORS COMPUTATION
Computing COM Rate:
Treasury
Rate Mos. COM Rate
Jan - Jun 6.00 0.000%
Jul - Dec 6.00 0.000%
0.000%
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE
NBV BASES
Sched F-1 Sched E
1. Applicable 2. Accumulation 3. Allocation of 4. Total Net 5. COM for Cost 6. Allocation 7. Facilities
Company 1 Cost of Money & Distribution of Undistributed Book Value Accounting Base For Capital COM
Cost Accounting Period 20xx Rate NBV Period Period Factors
Recorded 0.00% - (Basis Of Allocation) (Column 2+3) (Column 1*4) In units (Column 5/6)
Business Leased Property - of measure
Unit Corporate/Group
Facilities Total -
Capital Undistributed -
Distributed -
Overhead Unused - - - - - 0.00000
Pools Unused - - - - - 0.00000
LESS: COM on IR&D/B&P Labor:
Unused - - 0.00000 Sum Sched H
Unused - - 0.00000
Subtotal -
G&A G & A - - - -
Expense Pools ADD: COM on IR&D/B&P Labor -
Subtotal: - - 0.00000
TOTAL - - - -
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Months percentage added for demonstration purposes -
adjust as needed
27. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
27
Schedule H is linked to the following schedules: SCHEDULE H
Schedule A - Applied Overhead, G&A, & COM Rates ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Summary Schedule H
Schedule H-1 Govt Participation
ICE MANUAL
INPUT DATA FROM ACCOUNTING RECORDS
RECHECK FORMULAS AND LINKS AFTER COMPLETING SCHEDULE Sched A
Total Claimed Direct G&A Claimed
JOB SUBCONTRACT Labor Total Sub- Direct O/H Costs Plus Base G &A Total Total Grand
ORDER CONTRACT NUMBER NUMBER OH Labor Travel Material ODC Contracts Costs OH O/H (Value Added) Applied Costs COM Total
XX. CONTRACT TYPE
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
XX. TOTAL CONTRACT TYPE: - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IR & D - - - -
B& P - - - -
TOTAL IR & D/B & P - - - - - - - - -
GRAND TOTAL - - - - - - - -
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Schedule of Direct Costs by Contract/Subcontract
and Indirect Expense Applied at Claimed Rates
Sched A
Schedule H
This schedule is one of the most important and the basis for a large portion of the submission
Calculates actual incurred costs by contract, broken out by contract type and element of cost
28. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
28
Schedule H
Project status reports or detailed project ledgers are traditionally used to compile direct costs
for each contract
Indirect rates (as calculated in Schedule A) are applied to the direct contract costs to determine
the total indirect expenses for each contract
Only Flexibly Priced Federal awards are required to be separately identified on Schedule H (at
billing level), commercial or other non-Federal contracts can be aggregated as one line item
Best Practices:
• Include federal agency/customer name, by award
• Differentiate between claimed and unclaimed (non-billable) direct costs by cost element and
applied indirect costs
• Include a column which totals both claimed and unclaimed amounts, by cost element
• Reconcile total costs incurred on Schedule H to Trial balance or detailed General Ledger
• Include attributes of clients accounting structure (i.e., project codes) into schedule to allow
for simple edits
• Calculate indirect rate caps on this schedule for greatest efficiency and easy linkage to
Schedule I
• Use commercial ‘plug’ to save time, if appropriate
29. 29
Schedule H
Prime/Sub Contract numbers must be included on the Schedule H and be consistent across
Schedules H, I,J, and K.
Prepared at the billing level
Best Practice: Include customer name/federal agency, by award.
SCHEDULE H
Sch. A Sch. A Sch. A Sch. A
20.56% 15.45% 8.35% 4.56%
Award Type Customer
Name
Project
No.
Project
Name
Contract
No.
Subcontract No. Direct
Labor
Travel ODCs Total Direct
Costs -
Value Add
Materials Subcontracts Allowable
Fringe
Allowable
Overhead
Value Add
Direct Costs
Plus Fringe &
OH
G&A Total
M&S
M&S
Handling
Grand
Total
COSTTYPE
CPAF (Agency) 100 ABC ABC-123-000 3,255 5,554 6,644 15,453 - - 669 606 16,729 1,397 - - 18,125
CPFF (Agency) 101 DEF ABC-234-000 STU 4,523 4,344 55,533 64,400 4,663,000 344,422 930 842 66,172 24,592 5,007,422 228,338 5,326,525
COSTTYPE TOTAL 7,778 9,898 62,177 79,853 4,663,000 344,422 1,599 1,449 82,901 25,988 5,007,422 228,338 5,344,650
T&M (Agency) 200 GHI CDE-456-000 VWX 345,435 43,533 6,332 395,300 - 553,322 71,021 64,343 530,664 46,417 553,322 25,231 1,155,635
345,435 43,533 6,332 395,300 - 553,322 71,021 64,343 530,664 46,417 553,322 25,231 1,155,635
Fixed Price (Agency) 300 JKL EFG-678-000 15,345 2,567 664 18,576 55,633 - 3,155 2,858 24,589 2,265 55,633 2,537 85,024
FIXEDPRICE TOTAL 15,345 2,567 664 18,576 55,633 - 3,155 2,858 24,589 2,265 55,633 2,537 85,024
COMMERCIAL 500 MNO HIJ-932-029 125,555 13,000 1,409 139,964 - - 25,814 23,387 189,165 15,795 - - 204,960
IR&D/B&P 900 PQR 34,229 986 283 35,498 - - 7,037 6,376 48,911 - - - 48,911
GRANDTOTAL 528,342 69,984 70,865 669,191 4,718,633 897,744 108,627 98,412 876,230 90,466 5,616,377 256,107 6,839,180
Sch. C Sch. B Sch. C-1
5,616,377
Sch. E- Mat. & Sub Handling
T&M TOTAL
SCHEDULE OF DIRECTCOSTS BY CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT
FISCALYEARENDED12/31/14
Anywhere, VA
ABC, LLC.
ANDINDIRECTEXPENSE APPLIEDATCLAIMEDRATES
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
30. 30
Schedules B through E to H
Pool and Base amounts on Schedules B through E must tie to Schedule H.
A
A
B
B
Schedule C
OVERHEADPOOL
Account AccountName YeartoDate PerG/L Adjustments ClaimedAmount
7000 OverheadLabor 53,892 - 53,892
7010 LaborNonAllowable 2,494 - 2,494
7020 Travel 14,632 - 14,632
7030 Professional Fees 17,932 - 17,932
Subtotal OverheadPool 88,950 - 88,950
Intermediate Allocation
TechSvcCenterAllocation 9,462 - 9,462
Total OverheadPool 98,412 - 98,412
BASETOTAL 636,900 - 636,900
OverheadRate 15.45%
ABC,LLC
Anywhere,VA
FISCALYEARENDED12/31/2014
CONTRACTORSITEOVERHEAD
SCHEDULE H
Sch. A Sch. A Sch. A
15.45% 8.35% 4.56%
Award Type Customer
Name
Allowable
Overhead
Direct Costs
Plus Fringe &
OH
G&A Total
M&S
M&S
Handling
Grand
Total
COST TYPE
CPAF (Agency) 606 16,729 1,397 - - 18,125
CPFF (Agency) 842 66,172 24,592 5,007,422 228,338 5,326,525
COST TYPE TOTAL 1,449 82,901 25,988 5,007,422 228,338 5,344,650
T&M (Agency) 64,343 530,664 46,417 553,322 25,231 1,155,635
64,343 530,664 46,417 553,322 25,231 1,155,635
Fixed Price (Agency) 2,858 24,589 2,265 55,633 2,537 85,024
FIXED PRICE TOTAL 2,858 24,589 2,265 55,633 2,537 85,024
COMMERCIAL 23,387 189,165 15,795 - - 204,960
IR&D/B&P 6,376 48,911 - - - 48,911
GRAND TOTAL 98,412 876,230 90,466 5,616,377 256,107 6,839,180
Sch. C Sch. B Sch. C-1
ABC, LLC.
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/14
SCHEDULE OF DIRECT COSTS BY CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT
AND INDIRECT EXPENSE APPLIED AT CLAIMED RATES
T&M TOTAL
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
31. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
31
Schedule K
Breaks out all T&M contracts to calculate labor hour and costs
Ensure that T&M rates are current and be aware of potential mid-year rate changes (due to
escalation or an exercised option year)
Material and travel costs then added, and loaded with the claimed G&A rate, if applicable
For each contract the total costs and task ceilings should be calculated
This Schedule is linked to schedule A for the G&A rate. SCHEDULE K
Any changes in data will affect Schedule I. ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Other than G&A rate, only manual or externally imported entries
Schedule A - Applied Overhead, G&A, & COM Rates
ICE MANUAL
RECHECK FORMULAS
NOTE: Hidden rows have been inserted that will allow for automatic adjustment of the column totals when additional rows are inserted
Contract Labor Contract No. Contract No. Contract No. Contract No.
Category (1) Task: Task: Task: Task:
LABOR Rate (2) Hrs Amount Rate (2) Hrs Amount Rate (2) Hrs Amount Rate (2) Hrs Amount
Program Manager - - # - -
Senior Engineer - - - -
Engineer - - - -
Analyst - - - -
Technical Typist - - - -
TOTAL - - - - - - - -
OTHER COSTS
Material Costs (3) - - - -
Sched A
Material Overhead 0.00% - - - -
Travel Costs (3) - - - -
Sched A
G&A @: 0.00% (4) - - - -
Subtotal - - - -
TOTAL - - - -
Task Ceilings
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Summary of Hours and Amounts on Time and Material/Labor Hour Contracts
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
32. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
32
Schedule K
Details are in the same level used for billing.
All contracts identified as T&M on Schedule H are reported on Schedule K.
ODCs and Travel costs tie to Schedule H.
Same level detail as
used for billing
Must Match Sch H
SCHEDULE K
Contract No. 120-434
Task: A123
Contractor Labor Category Rate Hrs Amount
LABOR
Labor- Category I 54.09 45.00 2,434$
Labor- Category II 79.54 132.00 10,499$
Labor Support I 66.56 35.00 2,330$
Labor Support IV 71.87 67.50 4,851$
20,114
OTHER COSTS
Material Costs -
Material Overhead -
Other Direct Costs 740
Travel Costs 20,654
21,394
G&A Rate 16.54% Sch A 6,865
Sub-total 28,259
Total 48,374$
Task Ceiling 50,000$
SUMMARY OF HOURS/AMOUNTS ON T&M/LABOR HOURS CONTRACTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/2014
Anywhere, VA
ABC, LLC
33. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
33
Schedule I is linked to the following schedules: SCHEDULE I
Schedule H, Contract Costs ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Schedule K, T&M RECHECK FORMULAS
ICE MANUAL Schedule of Cumulative Direct and Indirect Costs Claimed and Billed
by Contract and Subcontract
Unsettled/Claimed Direct
Prior And Indirect Costs Using
Subject Years Total Less Net
To Settled Prior Year Current Year Cumulative Contract Cumulative Date Cost Over Physically
Penalty Total Costs Costs Settled or Limitations Settled or Billed (Under) Complete
Order Clause Costs FYE FYE Claimed Rebates/Credits Claimed PV No. Through Amount Billing (Note 7)
Contract No. Subcontract No. No. Note (2) Note (3) Note (4) Note (4) Note (5) Note (6)
SCHED H SCHED H
Cost Type & Flexibly Priced: (note 1)
- - - -
Subtotal-Cost & Flexibly Priced Contracts - - - -
SCHED K SCHED K
Time & Material
- - - -
Subtotal-Time & Material Contracts - - - -
Total- Cost/Flexibly Priced and Time & Material Contracts - - - -
Cumulative Cost Billed (Manual Entry)Claimed
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Schedule I
Determines the costs claimed versus those billed for all Federal cost reimbursement and T&M
awards (subcontracts are traditionally included)
All cost reimbursement and T&M contracts are identified separately on schedule and should be
sorted by Federal Agency
Information on Schedule I should be presented at the billing level for each award
34. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
34
Schedule I
Current year claimed costs are linked from Schedule H (cost reimbursement) and Schedule K
(time and materials) and added to prior year settled/claimed costs
Billed costs are determined from the final invoice of the Contractor's fiscal year and should be
the cumulative billing figure for the award
Intent of Schedule I is to calculate the total over or (under) billing on all Federal awards
Other considerations:
• ‘Contract Limitations, Rebates, Credits’ column should be used for adjustments to claimed
costs such as:
Excess costs above contract ceiling rates/amounts,
Unallowable costs per contract terms,
Cost incurrence outside of the period of performance,
• ‘Net Cumulative Settled or Claimed’ column should not exceed the total contract ceiling
• Indicate whether awards are ‘physically complete’ and reported on Schedule O
• Cumulative Billings should identify Fee amounts, where appropriate, and not include these
amounts ‘Over/Under Billing’ column
35. SCHEDULE I
Less:
Total Contract Cumulative
Subject Prior Years Cumulative Limitations, Net Cumulative Costs Billed OVER Physically
CONTRACT Subcontract Order to Penalty Settled Total Settled or Rebates & Settled or AMOUNT (UNDER) Complete
TYPE CONTRACT NO. No. No. Clause Costs FYE 12/31/10 FYE 12/31/12 FYE 12/31/13 FYE 12/31/14 Claimed Credits Claimed (LESS FEE) BILLED
SCH H
Cost Type Contracts
CPFF ABC-123 007643 345 N - 56,744 55,673 556,778 123,400 792,595 0 792,595 792,600 5 YES
CPFF DEF-456 347 Y - - 635,422 876,662 454,688 1,966,772 0 1,966,772 1,966,772 - NO
CPFF GHI-789 007645 586 Y - - 8,765,422 5,533,322 6,677,888 20,976,632 0 20,976,632 20,977,600 968 YES
CPFF JKL-654 647 N - 600,703 2,333,400 4,455,673 557,774 7,947,550 0 7,947,550 7,947,500 (50) YES
CPFF MNO-321 007647 737 Y - 4,556,555 6,664,334 5,666,633 637,655 17,525,177 0 17,525,177 17,525,177 - NO
Subtotal CPFF Contracts -$ 5,214,002$ 18,454,251$ 17,089,068$ 8,451,405$ 49,208,726$ -$ 49,208,726$ 49,209,649$ 923$
SCH K
Time & Material Contracts
T&M PQRS 227 N - 45,622 5,552 224 4,442 55,840 0 55,840$ 55,840 - YES
T&M TUVW 619 N - - 5,443 555 33,345 39,343 0 39,343$ 39,343 - NO
Subtotal T&M Contracts -$ 45,622$ 10,995$ 779$ 37,787$ 95,183$ -$ 95,183$ 95,183$ -$
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/2014
SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS
CLAIMED AND BILLED ON COST / FLEXIBLY PRICED AND TIME AND MATERIAL CONTRACTS
35
Schedule I
Fiscal Year current dollars should reconcile to Sch. K for T&M contracts and Sch. H for cost type
contacts.
Contracts identified as physically complete are reported on Schedule O.
Contracts subject to penalty provision are identified.
Prior FYEs’ costs should carried forward from and reconcile to prior FYE ICS’.
Cumulative billed costs should exclude fee amounts for cost-type contracts.
Inclusion of contract limitations to prevent overstating claimed costs.
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
36. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
36
Schedule J
Subcontracts under any T&M or cost reimbursement prime contract
Intent is to provide identification of subcontracts you have awarded to companies for which you
are the prime or upper-tier contractor, including inter-divisional effort
Information that must be included:
• Subcontract number
• Prime contract number
• Subcontractor name and address
• Subcontractor point of contact and phone number
• Total value of subcontract
• Costs incurred in that fiscal year
• Award type
Costs incurred on Schedule H must agree with the amounts reported on Schedule J
Schedule not linked to SCHEDULE J
other schedules. ICE (version 2.0.1e)
ICE MANUAL
<Insert Subcontract Type> subcontracts issued under flexibly priced prime contracts – Yes ___ No ___
PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTOR'S POINT OF CONTACT SUBCONTRACT INCURRED AWARD
SUBCONTRACT NO. PRIME CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT VALUE NAME & ADDRESS DUNS NUMBER AND PHONE NO. VALUE From To IN FY 2009 TYPE
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
Subcontract Information
Performance Period
37. 37
Schedule J
Period of Performance and Subcontract Numbers must be included.
Inclusion of all subcontracts awarded to flexibly-priced contracts (detailed out).
Best Practice: Lump fixed-price and commercial awards and tie to schedule H.
Total subcontracts presented on Schedule J must tie to Schedule H.
SCHEDULE J
2014
TOTAL COSTS
SUBCONTRACT NO.
PRIME CONTRACT
NO.
Project
Code
NAME AND
ADDRESS POINT OF CONTACT VALUE START DATE END DATE INCURRED
AWARD
TYPE
Cost-type subcontracts issued under flexibly priced prime contracts – Yes _X__ No ___
654-777-765-000 ABC-1213 123 Name and Address
POC Name
Address
Phone Number 16,750$ Jan/23/2010 Jan/22/2016 6,753$ CPFF
763-654-879-001 STU-5055 124 Name and Address
POC Name
Address
Phone Number 78,150$ Jul/23/2012 Oct/22/2017 76,321$ CPFF
764-888-653-007 EDG-4987 125 Name and Address
POC Name
Address
Phone Number 236,000$ Mar/15/2011 Mar/14/2019 98,765$ CPFF
T&M/LH subcontracts issued under flexibly priced prime contracts – Yes _X__ No ___
283-458-298-294 MRY-8392 293 Name and Address
POC Name
Address
Phone Number 15,000$ Apr/06/2012 Dec/31/2018 45,500$ T&M
Incentive subcontracts under flexibly priced prime contracts: Yes _____ No __X__
Subcontract orders based on cost issued under IDIQ prime contracts: Yes_____ No_X___
Subcontract orders based on cost issued under IDIQ prime contracts: Yes_____ No_X___
Inter-divisional/intercompany and FFP effort issued under flexibly priced prime contracts: Yes_____ No_X_
Total Subcontract Costs Reported on Schedule J 227,339$
Total FFP Subcontract Costs Presented on Schedule H 181,839
Total Commercial Subcontract Costs Presented on Schedule H 715,905
Total 1,125,083$ Sch H
1,125,083 Sch H
Recon -$
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/14
SUBCONTRACT INFORMATION
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
38. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
38
Schedule L
Reconciliation of Total Payroll to Total Labor Distribution
• Ties total labor expense to IRS Form 941's
• Payroll information should be entered directly from Form 941
• Labor distribution information is entered using links from schedule H (for direct labor) and
schedules B, C, and D (indirect labor expenses)
• Total 941 amount needs to reconcile to the labor totals from the rest of the ICS
Schedule O
Contract Closing Information
• Use only for contracts ‘physically’ completed the fiscal year of ICS
• Includes the following information on each closed contract, broken out by contract type:
o Contract Number
o Performance Period
o Whether or not it is ready to close
o Contract ceiling amount
o Contract fee
o Level of Effort cumulative hours, actual and required
39. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
39
Schedule L
Schedule L is linked to the following schedules: SCHEDULE L
Schedule C, Overhead ICE (version 2.0.1e)
Schedule B, G&A RECHECK FORMULAS
Schedule D, Occupancy
Schedule H, Claimed Allocation Bases
ICE MANUAL
NOTE: Hidden rows have been inserted that will allow for automatic adjustment of the column totals when additional rows are inserted
NOTE: Links not established for indirect costs because they have to be linked to account numbers inserted by contractor.
General
Acct No. Description Ledger Reference
Direct Labor - Summary SCHED H
General & Administrative: SCHED B
Salaries - link from Schedule B
Holiday Wages -
Vacation Wages -
Sick Leave -
Personal Absence -
Overhead Pools (incl Fringe): SCHED C (x)
Wages - link from Schedule C
Holiday Wages -
Vacation -
Sick Leave -
Severance Pay (in full) -
Intermediate Pools:
Occupancy Wages - SCHED D (x)
Overtime Premium (in ODCs) - link from schedule D
Overtime Premium -
-
TOTAL LABOR DISTRIBUTION -
PER IRS
FORM 941
1ST QTR.
2ND QTR
3rd QTR.
4th QTR.
Plus: Current Year Accrual
Minus: Prior Year Accrual
Other Adjustments
TOTAL PAYROLL -
Other Adjustment to arrive at Total Payroll Distributed (Provide detailed support)
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
to Total Labor Costs Distribution
Reconciliation of Total Payroll per IRS form 941
40. Schedule L
General
Acct No. Description Ledger Reference
Direct Labor 528,342 Sch H
General & Administrative:
8000 Labor 265,766 Sch B
Fringe:
4100 Health and Life Insurance 550,000 Sch Fringe
4200 401(k) Contributions 158,000 Sch Fringe
4300 Payroll Taxes 37,500 Sch Fringe
4400 Holiday Leave 34,654 Sch Fringe
4500 Disability Leave 32,675 Sch Fringe
Total 1,606,937
PER IRS
FORM 941
1ST QTR. 450,890
2ND QTR 325,966
3rd QTR. 276,989
4th QTR. 350,987
Plus: Current Year Accrual 156,777
Minus: Prior Year Accrual 38,997
Other Adjustments: Medical FSA 5,654
TOTAL PAYROLL 1,606,260
Variance 677 0.04% (variance % of total payroll costs)
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/14
Reconciliation of Total Payroll per IRS
to Total Labor Costs Distribution
40
Schedule L
Salary and Wages reported on Schedule L must reconcile to corresponding pools.
Acceptable variance regarded as “immaterial” varies depending on auditor judgment.
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
41. KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
41
Schedule O
This Schedule does not contain any links to SCHEDULE O
other schedules. ICE (version 2.0.1e)
MANUAL ENTRIES
ICE MANUAL
Ready
Performance Period To Contract Ceiling
Contract No. Order No. From To Close(1) Amount (2) Fee(3) Required Actual Notes
Cost Type:
Time & Material
Level of Effort
Cumulative Hours
Schedule of Contract Closing Information
Enter Company Name Here
Enter Company Location Here
Fiscal Year End - mm/dd/yyyy
(if applicable)
for those Contracts which Work Effort was Completed During
42. SCHEDULE O
Contract
Type Order No Contract No. From To Required Actual
CPFF 7643 ABC-123-456 Feb/12/2010 Oct/16/2014 YES 800,600 875,000 N/A N/A [1]
T&M 8645 DEF-789-101 Mar/20/2012 Oct/01/2014 YES 20,980,000 - 167,235 167,235
T&M 8646 GHI-112-131 Jun/15/2010 May/31/2014 YES 7,955,500 - 64,832 64,899
Notes:
[1] Level of Effort does not apply to these contracts.
ABC, LLC
Anywhere, VA
FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/2014
SCHEDULE OF CONTRACT CLOSING INFORMATION
Notes
FOR THOSE CONTRACTS WHICH WORK EFFORT WAS COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR
Level of Effort - Cummulative HoursPerformance Period
Ready to
Close
Contract
Ceiling(Value) Fees
42
Schedule O
Contracts identified as physically complete on Schedule I are reported on Schedule O (and vice
versa, should reconcile).
Schedule O should contain LOE information, period of performance and ceiling information,
where applicable.
KEY SCHEDULES (CONT.)
43. SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES
43
Below is a list of supplemental schedules:
Supplemental Schedules
• Supplemental A – Comparative Analysis of Indirect Expense Pools Detailed by Account with
Prior Year and Budgetary Data
• Supplemental B – General Organization and Executive Compensation Information
• Supplemental C – Identification of Prime Contracts Under Which the Contractor Performs as a
Subcontractor
• Supplemental D – Description of Accounting System
• Supplemental E – Procedures for Identifying and Excluding Unallowable Costs from the Costs
Claimed and Billed
• Supplemental F – Certified Financial Statements and Other Financial Data
• Supplemental G – Management Letter from Outside Certified Public Accountants (CPAs)
Concerning any Internal Control Weaknesses
• Supplemental H – Actions that have been and/or will be implemented to correct the
weaknesses described in the Management Letter
44. SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES (CONT.)
44
Below is a list of supplemental schedules:
Supplemental Schedules
• Supplemental I – List of all internal audit reports issued since the last disclosure of internal
audit reports to the Government
• Supplemental J – Annual internal audit plan of scheduled audits to be performed in the fiscal
year when the final indirect cost rate submission is made
• Supplemental K – Federal and State Income Tax Returns
• Supplemental L – Securities and Exchange Commission 10-K Annual Report
• Supplemental M – Minutes from Board of Directors (or Trustees) meetings
• Supplemental N – Listing of delay claims and termination claims submitted which contain costs
relating to the subject fiscal year
• Supplemental O – Contract Briefings; which generally includes a synopsis of all pertinent
contract provisions
45. TOTAL COST RECONCILIATION
45
Amount Reference Notes
Total Costs per ICS:
Total Claimed Costs 11,743,498 Sch H
Unbillable Direct Costs 314,811 Sch H
G&A Adjustments (6,080,424) Sch B
Total Costs per ICS 5,977,885
Costs per TB:
Costs per TB 5,977,885 TB to ICS
Variance -
NOTES:
Reconciliation of Total Costs per ICS to TB
ICS FY 2016
Reconciliation of Total Costs per ICS to TB
Purpose is to ensure total costs per the trial balance reconcile to total cost claimed
46. RECONCILIATION OF ICS RATES
46
Reconciliation of ICS Rates between Schedules
FY2016
Diff from Diff from Sch H-1 Diff from
Cost Element Schedule A Schedule E Sch A Description Schedule H Sch A Description Amount Sch A
Fringe Pool
Fringe on Direct Labor 483,508 Fringe Base
Fringe on OH Labor 10,698 Direct Labor 1,044,349
Fringe (Full) Fringe on G&A Labor 44,245 G&A Labor 95,566
POOL 538,450 538,450 - 538,450 - Indirect Labor 23,107
BASE 1,163,022 1,163,022 - 1,163,022 -
FRINGE RATE 46.30%
Fringe (Limited)
POOL 142,208 142,208 - Fringe Pool 142,208 -
BASE 625,223 625,223 - Fringe Base 625,223 -
FRINGE RATE 22.75%
Fringe (Other)
POOL - - - Fringe Pool - -
BASE 1,523 1,523 - Fringe Base 1,523 -
FRINGE RATE 0.00%
Fringe (SCA)
POOL 700,714 700,714 - Fringe Pool 700,714 -
BASE 1,913,100 1,913,100 - Fringe Base 1,913,100 -
FRINGE RATE 36.63%
Overhead Expenses
POOL 109,252 109,252 - Overhead Pool 109,252 -
BASE 4,910,624 4,910,624 - Overhead Base 4,910,624 -
O/H RATE 2.22%
General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses
POOL 1,803,762 1,803,762 - G&A Pool 1,803,762 -
BASE 10,254,547 10,254,547 - G&A Base 10,254,547 -
G& A RATE 17.59%
Purpose is to ensure the rates identified on Schedule A reconcile to:
• Schedule E
• Schedule H
• Schedule H-1
48. DCAA INCURRED COST SUBMISSION ADEQUACY
CHECKLIST
48
Best Practice: Use the DCAA Incurred Cost Submission Adequacy Checklist as an basis for internally reviewing
the submission prior to forwarding it to the Contracting Officer and auditor. It can be found at:
http://www.dcaa.mil/Guide_for_Determining_Adequacy_of_Contractor_Incurred_Cost_Proposal.pdf
49. UNALLOWABLE COSTS
49
Review submission for proper exclusion of unallowable expenses in accordance with the cost
principles found at FAR Part 31 (46 cost principles)
Types of Unallowable costs:
• Expressly unallowable costs (7 of 46; i.e., Alcohol)
• Costs with limitations
• Mutually agreed to be unallowable costs (i.e. per contract terms)
• Directly associated costs
If a cost is not specifically identified in FAR Part 31, could still be unallowable if it doesn’t meet
the allowability criteria:
• Reasonable?
• Allocable?
• Complies with contract terms?
• GAAP/CAS compliant?
• Adequately Supported?
Following penalties (FAR 42.709-1) may apply for including unallowable costs in billings, claims,
or proposals:
• Disallowance of cost plus the amount equal to disallowance
• Interest on the paid portion, if any, of the disallowance
• If the indirect cost was determined to be unallowable for that contractor prior to the
submission of Incurred Cost Proposal, the penalty is 2x the disallowed amount.
The unallowable costs do not have to have been paid in order to assess a penalty
50. KEY TAKEAWAYS
50
Purpose is to establish final annual indirect cost rates and determine over/under
• Required to submit within 6-months of each of its fiscal year end (FAR 52.216-7)
Schedules B, E, and H are where the most common errors occur
Scrub unallowable activity from high risk accounts (“trigger accounts”)
• Ensure proper documentation is maintained for costs incurred!
• Leverage Salary Surveys to the maximum extent practicable
Ensure unallowable overhead expenses are included in the G&A base
Perform reconciliations and check your work!
2018 Report to Congress Coming Soon!
51. BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is
the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK
company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the
international BDO network of independent member firms.
AUDIT TRENDS
52. AUDIT TRENDS
52
Consultants
• Standardize documentation required from consultants (e.g., consulting agreements, sufficient
detail for invoices)
• Market analysis of billing rates should help support agreements
• Substance of the documentation is key to supporting cost incurred
Executive Compensation
• Ensure your HR Department has a standard processes for developing “compensation bands”
(Written Compensation Plan/Policy)
• Utilize salary surveys to the maximum extent practicable (e.g., Towers Watson, ERI, Mercer,
Radford)
• Approximately $540,000, for FY19, based on applied escalation factors from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS)1,2
Bonuses
• Documented bonus plan establishing parameters (e.g., who is eligible, timing of payouts, and
how bonuses are calculated)
• Employment agreements outlining potential compensation
Notes:
1. Section 702 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA; Pub. L. 113-67, December 26, 2013) established a $487,000 cap on the reimbursement of compensation costs
for contractor employees, adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Employment Cost Index for all workers as calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
2. Current FY Cap Amount = Prior FY Cap Amount x Change in Employment Cost Index for all workers [i.e., BLS Table 4. Compensation (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
Employment Cost Index for total compensation, for civilian workers, by occupational group and industry. (Twelve Months Ended September 30)]
53. AUDIT TRENDS, CONT.
53
Medium and small contractors will receive more attention from DCAA
Quicker contract close outs
• Contracting officers can avoid negotiations and go straight to closing out contracts using rates
established by DCAA
Continued use of multi-year audits (less favorable for Contractors)
Commercially Accepted Standards for Risk and Materiality
• Provide for both qualitative and quantitative considerations
• Auditors encouraged to discuss quantitative and qualitative materiality considerations with
contracting officers or other government customers
Statute of Limitations (6 years per FAR 33.206(b))
• DCMA may establish rates with the option of a unilateral cost decrement (FAR 42.703‐2(c)(1) &
42.705(c)(1))
• The current rate, updated in 2016, is 16.4 percent
54. 2017 REPORT TO CONGRESS
54
Incurred cost audits continued to be a top priority, reducing the backlog to an average age of
14.3 months
• DCAA expects to be fully compliant with Congress’s NDAA mandate that audit backlog
inventory must not exceed one year
Examined nearly $281B in defense contractor costs across 3,581 audit reports
Currently taking DCAA 143 days from the time an ICS audit starts to the time the audit report is
issued
55. 2017 REPORT TO CONGRESS
55
Major contractors made up a significant proportion of examined. 6,786 incurred cost years were
closed.
Only 2,860 incurred cost audits in backlog at the close of 2017
Goal is to eliminate ICS backlog by FY2020 but on track for GFY 2018
56. Integrates with 3rd Party Payroll
Providers
Plan Execute Monitor Recognize Account
• CRM & Pipeline Mgmt.
• Purchase Requisition
• Budgeting & Revenue
Forecasting
• Resource Scheduling
• Skills Mgmt.
• Scenario Planning
• Pricing
• Timesheets
• Expense Reports &
Per Diems
• Purchase Orders
• Approvals
• Collaboration and
Notes
• Contract Mgmt.
• Real-Time
Dashboards & KPIs
• Project Status,
Utilization, & Burn
Rate
• Open Commitments
• Gross & Net Margin
• % Complete & EVM
• Backlog
• GAAP Compliance
• T&M, FP, and CP
• Revenue
Recognition – As
Worked, %
Complete &
Schedules
• General Ledger
• Accounts Payable
• Accounts
Receivable
• Cost Pools
• Indirect Rates
• PO Match: 2-Way or
3-Way Match
One Software for Projects, People & Financials
In FY16, took on average ~140 days to complete ICP audit (from entrance conference to report issuance), ~885 days elapsed on average between ICP receipt and audit commencement
Types of intermediate base include:
Labor dollars or hours
Square footage
# of Computers
Although a required Schedule, contemporary contractors rarely utilize a FCCM rate
Best Practice: Include running list of all previously held contracts on bottom of schedule to allow for easy YoY reconciliations/tracking
Best Practice: Include running list of all previously held contracts on bottom of schedule to allow for easy YoY reconciliations/tracking
DCAA Annual Report to Congress
- Report highlights DCAA's audit performance, recommendations to improve the audit process, industry outreach activities, and key accomplishments for a given year
- Provides valuable statistics regarding incurred cost years closed, backlog, dollars examined and questioned costs
- DCAA does not consider an audit to be backlogged until the submission has been pending for two or more years
- Focus will shift to forward pricing rates and business systems
Commercially Accepted Standards for Risk and Materiality
Auditors may be informed by contracting officers of the importance of a certain aspect of the information, such as a cost element or account, which auditors may take into consideration in their determination of materiality
For Incurred Cost Proposal Audit Subject Matter from $1 to $1,000,000,000 use: Materiality Threshold = $5,000 x ((Total Subject Matter / $100,000) ^ .75)
For Incurred Cost Proposal Audit Subject Matter greater than $1,000,000,000 use: Materiality Threshold percentage of 0.50 percent
Sustention rates “are calculated based on contracting officer negotiation decisions” and do not account for successful contract appeals or settlements after a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision;
DCAA only considers an audit to be backlogged if it is “older than two fiscal years”; and
The backlog reduction has occurred, at least in part, because of what DCAA calls “innovative techniques for more efficient incurred cost audits,” i.e., “multi-year vs. single-year audits and sampling low risk audits based on materiality thresholds.”
DCAA estimates that it will have eliminated the incurred cost backlog by GFY 2018, even though it is taking (on average) 808 days to complete an incurred cost audit and issue a report. But that metric is old math; in the old math scenario the clock starts ticking when the contractor’s proposal is received. Using the new math metric, it only takes DCAA 143 days from the time the audit starts to the time the audit report is issued. So: 143 days it is. That’s much faster.