2. Background
• The city of Bandung famous as Creative City
(Soemardi, 2008). There are Creative Industry
Communities (Soedarsono, 2007; Fitriana, 2012), and
creative agency (Pratiwi & Damajani,2008; Achwan,
2013).
• Creative city support with creative community what
produce Creative Product. Both of them (creative
community + creative product) will be strong if
collaborate with academician, business entities,
government, and society (Pascasuseno, 2011; Irawati,
2011).
3. The Method
Paradigm : Structuralist
Method: Qualitative – Positivistic
Field Study: Bandung
Subject: Creative Community,
Creative Agency, Business,
and Supplier Product
(makloon, art design, worker)
Struktur
Aktor (Creator,
Pengusaha, Pekerja
Produksi)
ActionSistem
RASIONALITAS
Profesional Grup Kreatif
ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL FACT
(Moral fact)
Institusi Nilai Moral
Sosial Individual
Model Konseptual Masyarakat Ekonomi Kreatif
Innovasi Kreatif
Aktor (PT, Konsumen,
Mass Communication)
Profesional Grup
Diseminatif
Sub Sistem
sosial
Relasi 2 subsistem
membentuk sistem baru
ProdukKontekstual
Relasi dengan institusi lain
Area Data Penelitian
Unsur dari Ekonomi Kreatif
Penjelasan:
14. The General Pattern of Creative Community
Komunitas
kreatif 1
Komunitas
kreatif 2
Komunitas
kreatif 3
Komunitas
kreatif n
Forum
komunitas
(BCCF, KICK,
dll)
Individu Kreatif
Produk Kreatif
Sistem Kreatif
Sistem Sosial
Komunitas Kreatif
Market
15. Conclusions
• The Product has influence to system and social
structure, with building neo-system and structure, or
to empower the existing.
• Desainer (designer) was actor of creative community.
The creative actions initiative, has produce social
system or social structure.
• The system and structure have autopoiesis base on
functions. The functions have changing because
internal or external factors.
• The pattern of relational in creative economy
community because consiousnes.