Management theories have evolved over time from classical approaches focusing on structure and authority to more modern approaches considering people and external environments. Early theories included scientific management, bureaucratic management, and human relations approaches. Contemporary theories view organizations as open systems influenced by internal and external factors, with no single optimal approach but instead contingency-based solutions dependent on each organization's unique situation. The evolution of management theory continues as the business environment changes.
Max Weber developed the bureaucratic approach to management, which is characterized by division of labor, a clear hierarchy, formal impersonal relations, selection and promotion based on technical qualifications, and emphasis on legal authority. Some drawbacks are that it can be inflexible, ignore informal groups, lead to red tape and delays in decision making. The presentation aimed to explain Weber's bureaucratic management theory and discuss its pros and cons.
Scientific management emerged between 1910-1935 and was pioneered by Frederick Taylor, Henry Gannt, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, Luther Gulick, Max Weber, and Henri Fayol. They approached management in a scientific manner using tools like research, analysis, and standardization of tasks. Taylor is known for his time and motion studies and piece-rate payment systems. Gannt developed charting methods and incentive plans. The Gilbreths analyzed motions to reduce wasted time. Gulick established principles of administration and coordination. Weber described bureaucratic organization and authority. Fayol identified functions and principles of management. Scientific management emphasized efficiency and standardized work processes.
The document discusses several theories of management including:
1) Scientific Management Theory proposed by Frederick Taylor which emphasized time-motion studies, piece-rate wages, division of labor, and functional foremanship.
2) Bureaucratic Theory proposed by Max Weber which advocated for hierarchies, rules, impersonality, and career advancement based on qualifications.
3) Administrative Management principles proposed by Henri Fayol including planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.
4) Human Relations Approach advocated by Mary Parker Follett and Elton Mayo which emphasized cooperation between employers and employees, job satisfaction, and team spirit.
System theory of management bipsu-convertedJEFFREY PROJO
This document discusses the systems theory of management. It defines a system as a collection of interrelated parts working together to achieve goals. A management system includes inputs, transformation processes, outputs, feedback, and the environment. It views an organization as made up of subsystems that work together holistically and synergistically. The systems approach helps study complex organizations and identify interrelations between functions. However, it is abstract and does not provide specific tools for managers. Primary contributors to systems theory include Bernard, Simon, von Bertalanffy.
Part of Management Process. How the management process evolved from the early years.
Many experts contributed for this evolution. I compiled the list and little bit history along with the theory developed by each contributor for this process.
1. Frederick Taylor is considered the father of scientific management. He developed theories and techniques to optimize productivity, including time and motion studies to determine the most efficient ways to perform tasks.
2. Taylor advocated for standardizing tools and procedures based on time studies to determine the most effective methods. He also pushed for assigning workers daily quotas based on these studies to incentivize higher productivity.
3. Taylor's scientific management principles included developing a true science of work, scientifically selecting and training employees, equally dividing work and responsibility between management and workers, and fostering intimate cooperation between the two groups. The goal was to increase overall efficiency and prosperity for both workers and employers.
Human relations theory argues that workers respond primarily to the social context of the workplace, not just economic incentives. It recognizes two views of workers: Theory X, which sees workers as inherently lazy and only motivated by threats or rewards, and Theory Y, which sees workers as generally willing and able if properly motivated. Maslow's hierarchy of needs also informs human relations theory by suggesting workers have a hierarchy of physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization needs that must be met for maximum motivation and performance.
The document provides an introduction to the classical approach to management. It discusses that the classical approach views employees as having only economic and physical needs. It was the oldest formal school of management originating in the early 1900s. The classical approach includes scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic management. Major contributors included Taylor, Fayol, and Weber. Taylor's scientific management focused on finding the most efficient way to perform jobs. Fayol analyzed management as a universal process and introduced 14 principles of management. Weber introduced concepts of bureaucratic organizations based on rational authority. The document also discusses management as both an art and a science.
Max Weber developed the bureaucratic approach to management, which is characterized by division of labor, a clear hierarchy, formal impersonal relations, selection and promotion based on technical qualifications, and emphasis on legal authority. Some drawbacks are that it can be inflexible, ignore informal groups, lead to red tape and delays in decision making. The presentation aimed to explain Weber's bureaucratic management theory and discuss its pros and cons.
Scientific management emerged between 1910-1935 and was pioneered by Frederick Taylor, Henry Gannt, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth, Luther Gulick, Max Weber, and Henri Fayol. They approached management in a scientific manner using tools like research, analysis, and standardization of tasks. Taylor is known for his time and motion studies and piece-rate payment systems. Gannt developed charting methods and incentive plans. The Gilbreths analyzed motions to reduce wasted time. Gulick established principles of administration and coordination. Weber described bureaucratic organization and authority. Fayol identified functions and principles of management. Scientific management emphasized efficiency and standardized work processes.
The document discusses several theories of management including:
1) Scientific Management Theory proposed by Frederick Taylor which emphasized time-motion studies, piece-rate wages, division of labor, and functional foremanship.
2) Bureaucratic Theory proposed by Max Weber which advocated for hierarchies, rules, impersonality, and career advancement based on qualifications.
3) Administrative Management principles proposed by Henri Fayol including planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.
4) Human Relations Approach advocated by Mary Parker Follett and Elton Mayo which emphasized cooperation between employers and employees, job satisfaction, and team spirit.
System theory of management bipsu-convertedJEFFREY PROJO
This document discusses the systems theory of management. It defines a system as a collection of interrelated parts working together to achieve goals. A management system includes inputs, transformation processes, outputs, feedback, and the environment. It views an organization as made up of subsystems that work together holistically and synergistically. The systems approach helps study complex organizations and identify interrelations between functions. However, it is abstract and does not provide specific tools for managers. Primary contributors to systems theory include Bernard, Simon, von Bertalanffy.
Part of Management Process. How the management process evolved from the early years.
Many experts contributed for this evolution. I compiled the list and little bit history along with the theory developed by each contributor for this process.
1. Frederick Taylor is considered the father of scientific management. He developed theories and techniques to optimize productivity, including time and motion studies to determine the most efficient ways to perform tasks.
2. Taylor advocated for standardizing tools and procedures based on time studies to determine the most effective methods. He also pushed for assigning workers daily quotas based on these studies to incentivize higher productivity.
3. Taylor's scientific management principles included developing a true science of work, scientifically selecting and training employees, equally dividing work and responsibility between management and workers, and fostering intimate cooperation between the two groups. The goal was to increase overall efficiency and prosperity for both workers and employers.
Human relations theory argues that workers respond primarily to the social context of the workplace, not just economic incentives. It recognizes two views of workers: Theory X, which sees workers as inherently lazy and only motivated by threats or rewards, and Theory Y, which sees workers as generally willing and able if properly motivated. Maslow's hierarchy of needs also informs human relations theory by suggesting workers have a hierarchy of physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization needs that must be met for maximum motivation and performance.
The document provides an introduction to the classical approach to management. It discusses that the classical approach views employees as having only economic and physical needs. It was the oldest formal school of management originating in the early 1900s. The classical approach includes scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic management. Major contributors included Taylor, Fayol, and Weber. Taylor's scientific management focused on finding the most efficient way to perform jobs. Fayol analyzed management as a universal process and introduced 14 principles of management. Weber introduced concepts of bureaucratic organizations based on rational authority. The document also discusses management as both an art and a science.
The document discusses the classical approaches to management that emerged during the Industrial Revolution. It describes three major approaches: scientific management, which aimed to improve worker efficiency through time and motion studies; bureaucratic management, which emphasized rational organization structures and processes; and administrative management, which focused on management functions and principles like those outlined by Henri Fayol. The classical approaches sought to increase productivity and profitability in factories through principles of specialization, centralized decision-making, and rationalization of work.
Chapter 2 The Evolution Of Management Theorymanagement 2
The document summarizes the evolution of management theory from the late 19th century to present. It traces the development of scientific management theory by Taylor and Gilbreth focused on efficiency. This was followed by administrative management theory emphasizing formal structure and Fayol's 14 principles of management. Behavioral management theory then arose, focusing on human factors, motivated by studies like Hawthorne and thinkers like Mary Parker Follett emphasizing participation. The evolution has involved an increasing focus on both efficiency and human/social aspects of organizing work.
Classical management theory focused on finding the "one best way" to manage and included scientific, administrative, and bureaucratic schools. Henri Fayol was influential in administrative management and identified universal management functions including planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. Bureaucratic management focuses on the overall organizational system and is based on firm rules, policies/procedures, a fixed hierarchy, and clear division of labor as envisioned by Max Weber.
There are three types of management theories: historical, classical, and modern. The classical theories include scientific management theory, developed by Frederick Taylor to decrease waste and increase production efficiency. It introduced differential piece rate wages. Administrative management theory focuses on standardizing processes and dividing organizations into hierarchies under Max Weber's bureaucratic theory of management. Henri Fayol's administrative theory formalized administrative structure and clear divisions of labor according to responsibilities.
The document provides an overview of human resource management (HRM) compared to personnel management. It defines HRM and outlines its key processes and goals. HRM views all personnel functions as interrelated and emphasizes a dynamic, participatory approach to achieve both individual and organizational goals. In contrast, personnel management has a narrower functional focus only concerned with administrative tasks, and does not view these tasks as interconnected. The document also summarizes the historical development of management theories from structural, information, and human perspectives over time.
The document outlines the evolution of management theory from the systematic approach of the late 19th century to the classical theories of scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic management that emerged in the early 20th century. It then discusses the human relations school and social system school that challenged aspects of the classical theories. The document provides definitions and background on key theorists and concepts within each approach to management theory.
This document provides an overview of the evolution of management theory from 1890-2000. It discusses several important historical events and developments that influenced management theory, including Adam Smith's publication of The Wealth of Nations and the Industrial Revolution. The document then summarizes several major management theories that developed over this period, including Scientific Management Theory, Administrative Management Theory, Behavioral Management Theory, Management Science Theory, and Organizational Environmental Theory. It provides details on the key theorists and concepts associated with each theory.
The classical theory of management evolved in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution to establish management's role in organizations. It focused on efficiency and viewed employees as motivated solely by economic factors. The theory comprised three constituent theories: scientific management, which aimed to optimize work; bureaucratic management, which advocated a hierarchical structure; and administrative management, which saw management as a process of coordinating people. Classical theory emphasized specialization, structure, and economic incentives but ignored social and informal aspects of organizations. While it brought rationality and predictability, it also risked rigidity and goal displacement.
1. Management theory has evolved over centuries from early civilizations to the modern discipline it is today.
2. Early contributors included Sun Tzu, Chanakya, and Machiavelli who laid foundations for coordinated group efforts and leadership principles.
3. Scientific management emerged in the early 20th century focusing on economic rationality and efficiency through division of labor and incentives. Contributors included Taylor, Gilbreth, and Gantt.
4. The human relations movement arose in reaction, recognizing social and emotional needs. Hawthorne studies showed group influences on output. Contributors included Mayo, Maslow, and McGregor.
5. Recent decades integrate theories as management addresses increasingly complex problems across
Max Weber developed the theory of bureaucracy, which he believed was the most efficient form of organization. According to Weber, a bureaucracy has a clear line of authority and strict rules and regulations. It is characterized by job specialization, a formal authority hierarchy, selection based on technical qualifications, uniform rules and regulations, impersonal treatment of employees, and career-oriented promotions. However, bureaucracies are also criticized for being rigid, over-emphasizing rules, and causing delays due to formal processes.
This document provides an overview of organizational theory, outlining four main schools: formal theories, human relations, organizational humanism, and modern organizational theory. It discusses key thinkers and concepts within each school, including Max Weber's bureaucracy model, Frederick Taylor's scientific management, the Hawthorne Studies, and modern systems approaches. Organizational theory examines how organizations are structured and function internally and in relation to their external environment.
The document summarizes several theories of management thought and organizational theory that have evolved over time. It describes scientific management theory, administrative management theory including Weber's principles of bureaucracy, behavioral management/human relations theory, management science theory, and organizational environment/open systems theory. Each new theory built upon previous approaches to address their limitations and further the understanding of managing organizations effectively.
The document discusses contingency theory, which states that there is no single best way to lead and that leadership style depends on various internal and external factors. It describes Fred Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, which proposes that a leader's effectiveness depends on matching their leadership style (either task-focused or relationship-focused) to the favorability of the situation based on factors like the leader-member relationship, task structure, and the leader's power. The document also outlines other theorists who contributed to situational leadership theory and describes the different leadership styles and maturity levels in Hersey and Blanchard's model.
The document provides an overview of the history and development of management theories from the classical school to modern schools of thought. It summarizes the key contributors and principles of scientific management, bureaucratic management, and administrative management under the classical school. The behavioral school emphasized the human element, while the modern school integrated tools and theories from other disciplines and recognized contingent factors. Overall, the document traces the evolution of management theories from an efficiency focus on work processes to considerations of human and situational factors.
This document provides an overview of classical theories of organizations that emerged in the early 20th century, including scientific management, bureaucracy, and administrative principles. Scientific management as proposed by Taylor focused on maximizing worker efficiency through standardized tasks and measurements. Weber's theory of bureaucracy proposed a hierarchical structure with clear division of labor, rules, and impersonality. Fayol's administrative theory described the functions of management as planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. The classical theories emphasized strict control, chain of command, and predictability of worker behavior.
This document discusses the history and principles of scientific management as developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the late 19th/early 20th century. It traces the origins of scientific management from the Industrial Revolution and describes Taylor's four main principles: replacing rule-of-thumb work with scientific analysis, developing each worker's maximum efficiency, cooperation instead of individualism, and separating planning from doing. The document also outlines criticisms of Taylor's approach, such as its exploitation of workers and mechanical treatment of humans.
- The document discusses the evolution of management thought from the 18th to 20th century and highlights the contributions of three influential thinkers: Henry Fayol, Frederick Winslow Taylor, and Max Weber.
- Henry Fayol is considered the father of modern management. He was the first to develop a formal statement of management elements and principles including division of work, authority, and discipline.
- Frederick Taylor is known as the father of scientific management. He developed principles to increase workplace efficiency including replacing rule-of-thumb methods with scientific investigation and ensuring cooperation between labor and management.
- The document provides details on Fayol and Taylor's management theories and principles.
Neo classical theories and comparison of Classical vs neo classical theoryErTARUNKASHNI
DEFINITION NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
HISTORY OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
INTRODUCTION TO NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
HAWTHORNE STUDIES
FEATURES OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
ELEMENTS OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL VS NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
The document discusses several theories of leadership, including trait theories, behavioral theories, and contingency theories. Trait theories focus on identifying personality traits and characteristics associated with effective leadership. Behavioral theories examine what leaders do and how they act. Contingency theories emphasize that leadership effectiveness depends on interactions between leaders, followers, tasks, and situations. Specific theories covered include the Ohio State leadership studies, path-goal theory, Fiedler's contingency model, Hersey-Blanchard situational theory, and leader-member exchange theory.
1. Management Thought and OB for class_e9e5e7207065ef2d126b5f4bec407fea.pptxStarAngel16
The Hawthorne studies conducted in the 1920s and 1930s investigated the impact of physical working conditions like illumination on worker productivity. The studies found that productivity increased with changes but later increased even more when conditions were returned to normal. This revealed that social and psychological factors like feelings of importance, belongingness and cooperation among workers positively impacted productivity more than physical conditions alone. The studies highlighted the importance of the human element in organizations.
This document summarizes several theories and models of management, including classical, neoclassical, and modern approaches. The classical approach includes scientific management theories by Taylor and Gilbreth, as well as bureaucracy/organizational theories from Weber. Neoclassical theories incorporate human relations perspectives from Mayo and Barnard. Content theories of motivation are discussed, including those from Maslow, Herzberg, and McGregor.
The document discusses the classical approaches to management that emerged during the Industrial Revolution. It describes three major approaches: scientific management, which aimed to improve worker efficiency through time and motion studies; bureaucratic management, which emphasized rational organization structures and processes; and administrative management, which focused on management functions and principles like those outlined by Henri Fayol. The classical approaches sought to increase productivity and profitability in factories through principles of specialization, centralized decision-making, and rationalization of work.
Chapter 2 The Evolution Of Management Theorymanagement 2
The document summarizes the evolution of management theory from the late 19th century to present. It traces the development of scientific management theory by Taylor and Gilbreth focused on efficiency. This was followed by administrative management theory emphasizing formal structure and Fayol's 14 principles of management. Behavioral management theory then arose, focusing on human factors, motivated by studies like Hawthorne and thinkers like Mary Parker Follett emphasizing participation. The evolution has involved an increasing focus on both efficiency and human/social aspects of organizing work.
Classical management theory focused on finding the "one best way" to manage and included scientific, administrative, and bureaucratic schools. Henri Fayol was influential in administrative management and identified universal management functions including planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. Bureaucratic management focuses on the overall organizational system and is based on firm rules, policies/procedures, a fixed hierarchy, and clear division of labor as envisioned by Max Weber.
There are three types of management theories: historical, classical, and modern. The classical theories include scientific management theory, developed by Frederick Taylor to decrease waste and increase production efficiency. It introduced differential piece rate wages. Administrative management theory focuses on standardizing processes and dividing organizations into hierarchies under Max Weber's bureaucratic theory of management. Henri Fayol's administrative theory formalized administrative structure and clear divisions of labor according to responsibilities.
The document provides an overview of human resource management (HRM) compared to personnel management. It defines HRM and outlines its key processes and goals. HRM views all personnel functions as interrelated and emphasizes a dynamic, participatory approach to achieve both individual and organizational goals. In contrast, personnel management has a narrower functional focus only concerned with administrative tasks, and does not view these tasks as interconnected. The document also summarizes the historical development of management theories from structural, information, and human perspectives over time.
The document outlines the evolution of management theory from the systematic approach of the late 19th century to the classical theories of scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic management that emerged in the early 20th century. It then discusses the human relations school and social system school that challenged aspects of the classical theories. The document provides definitions and background on key theorists and concepts within each approach to management theory.
This document provides an overview of the evolution of management theory from 1890-2000. It discusses several important historical events and developments that influenced management theory, including Adam Smith's publication of The Wealth of Nations and the Industrial Revolution. The document then summarizes several major management theories that developed over this period, including Scientific Management Theory, Administrative Management Theory, Behavioral Management Theory, Management Science Theory, and Organizational Environmental Theory. It provides details on the key theorists and concepts associated with each theory.
The classical theory of management evolved in the 19th century during the Industrial Revolution to establish management's role in organizations. It focused on efficiency and viewed employees as motivated solely by economic factors. The theory comprised three constituent theories: scientific management, which aimed to optimize work; bureaucratic management, which advocated a hierarchical structure; and administrative management, which saw management as a process of coordinating people. Classical theory emphasized specialization, structure, and economic incentives but ignored social and informal aspects of organizations. While it brought rationality and predictability, it also risked rigidity and goal displacement.
1. Management theory has evolved over centuries from early civilizations to the modern discipline it is today.
2. Early contributors included Sun Tzu, Chanakya, and Machiavelli who laid foundations for coordinated group efforts and leadership principles.
3. Scientific management emerged in the early 20th century focusing on economic rationality and efficiency through division of labor and incentives. Contributors included Taylor, Gilbreth, and Gantt.
4. The human relations movement arose in reaction, recognizing social and emotional needs. Hawthorne studies showed group influences on output. Contributors included Mayo, Maslow, and McGregor.
5. Recent decades integrate theories as management addresses increasingly complex problems across
Max Weber developed the theory of bureaucracy, which he believed was the most efficient form of organization. According to Weber, a bureaucracy has a clear line of authority and strict rules and regulations. It is characterized by job specialization, a formal authority hierarchy, selection based on technical qualifications, uniform rules and regulations, impersonal treatment of employees, and career-oriented promotions. However, bureaucracies are also criticized for being rigid, over-emphasizing rules, and causing delays due to formal processes.
This document provides an overview of organizational theory, outlining four main schools: formal theories, human relations, organizational humanism, and modern organizational theory. It discusses key thinkers and concepts within each school, including Max Weber's bureaucracy model, Frederick Taylor's scientific management, the Hawthorne Studies, and modern systems approaches. Organizational theory examines how organizations are structured and function internally and in relation to their external environment.
The document summarizes several theories of management thought and organizational theory that have evolved over time. It describes scientific management theory, administrative management theory including Weber's principles of bureaucracy, behavioral management/human relations theory, management science theory, and organizational environment/open systems theory. Each new theory built upon previous approaches to address their limitations and further the understanding of managing organizations effectively.
The document discusses contingency theory, which states that there is no single best way to lead and that leadership style depends on various internal and external factors. It describes Fred Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, which proposes that a leader's effectiveness depends on matching their leadership style (either task-focused or relationship-focused) to the favorability of the situation based on factors like the leader-member relationship, task structure, and the leader's power. The document also outlines other theorists who contributed to situational leadership theory and describes the different leadership styles and maturity levels in Hersey and Blanchard's model.
The document provides an overview of the history and development of management theories from the classical school to modern schools of thought. It summarizes the key contributors and principles of scientific management, bureaucratic management, and administrative management under the classical school. The behavioral school emphasized the human element, while the modern school integrated tools and theories from other disciplines and recognized contingent factors. Overall, the document traces the evolution of management theories from an efficiency focus on work processes to considerations of human and situational factors.
This document provides an overview of classical theories of organizations that emerged in the early 20th century, including scientific management, bureaucracy, and administrative principles. Scientific management as proposed by Taylor focused on maximizing worker efficiency through standardized tasks and measurements. Weber's theory of bureaucracy proposed a hierarchical structure with clear division of labor, rules, and impersonality. Fayol's administrative theory described the functions of management as planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. The classical theories emphasized strict control, chain of command, and predictability of worker behavior.
This document discusses the history and principles of scientific management as developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the late 19th/early 20th century. It traces the origins of scientific management from the Industrial Revolution and describes Taylor's four main principles: replacing rule-of-thumb work with scientific analysis, developing each worker's maximum efficiency, cooperation instead of individualism, and separating planning from doing. The document also outlines criticisms of Taylor's approach, such as its exploitation of workers and mechanical treatment of humans.
- The document discusses the evolution of management thought from the 18th to 20th century and highlights the contributions of three influential thinkers: Henry Fayol, Frederick Winslow Taylor, and Max Weber.
- Henry Fayol is considered the father of modern management. He was the first to develop a formal statement of management elements and principles including division of work, authority, and discipline.
- Frederick Taylor is known as the father of scientific management. He developed principles to increase workplace efficiency including replacing rule-of-thumb methods with scientific investigation and ensuring cooperation between labor and management.
- The document provides details on Fayol and Taylor's management theories and principles.
Neo classical theories and comparison of Classical vs neo classical theoryErTARUNKASHNI
DEFINITION NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
HISTORY OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
INTRODUCTION TO NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
HAWTHORNE STUDIES
FEATURES OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
ELEMENTS OF NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL VS NEO CLASSICAL THEORY
The document discusses several theories of leadership, including trait theories, behavioral theories, and contingency theories. Trait theories focus on identifying personality traits and characteristics associated with effective leadership. Behavioral theories examine what leaders do and how they act. Contingency theories emphasize that leadership effectiveness depends on interactions between leaders, followers, tasks, and situations. Specific theories covered include the Ohio State leadership studies, path-goal theory, Fiedler's contingency model, Hersey-Blanchard situational theory, and leader-member exchange theory.
1. Management Thought and OB for class_e9e5e7207065ef2d126b5f4bec407fea.pptxStarAngel16
The Hawthorne studies conducted in the 1920s and 1930s investigated the impact of physical working conditions like illumination on worker productivity. The studies found that productivity increased with changes but later increased even more when conditions were returned to normal. This revealed that social and psychological factors like feelings of importance, belongingness and cooperation among workers positively impacted productivity more than physical conditions alone. The studies highlighted the importance of the human element in organizations.
This document summarizes several theories and models of management, including classical, neoclassical, and modern approaches. The classical approach includes scientific management theories by Taylor and Gilbreth, as well as bureaucracy/organizational theories from Weber. Neoclassical theories incorporate human relations perspectives from Mayo and Barnard. Content theories of motivation are discussed, including those from Maslow, Herzberg, and McGregor.
THEORIES AND MODELS IN NURSING MANAGEMENTLIJICMARIA
The document summarizes various management theories and models. It discusses the classical, neoclassical, and modern approaches to management. Under the classical approach, it describes scientific management theories by Taylor and Gilbreth, as well as bureaucracy theories by Weber. The neoclassical approach discusses human relations theories by Mayo and Barnard and various content and process motivation theories. Finally, the modern approach outlines leadership and decision-making theories and models, including system theory.
This document provides an overview of various models and theories of management thought from 1890 to present. It discusses early classical approaches from Taylor's scientific management to Fayol's administrative management. Contemporary approaches discussed include human relations theory, contingency theory and organizational behavior. Various management thinkers are summarized, including Follett, Mayo, Maslow, McGregor, Barnard, Mintzberg and Ouchi. The document also discusses models of nursing administration, including contextual factors, fields of inquiry, and the Canadian Association model and standards.
Classical management theory emerged in the early 20th century as organizations looked for ways to increase productivity and profits. It includes scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic management. Scientific management focused on finding the most efficient ways to perform tasks. Administrative management defined management functions and the division of labor. Bureaucratic management emphasized standardized rules, impersonality, and hierarchy. Later theories emphasized behavioral factors, quantitative analysis, systems thinking, and contingency based on situational factors. Overall, the document provides an overview of several important management theories that developed over the 20th century from a classical and mechanistic view to considerations of human and situational factors.
- The document discusses several theories of management including classical, human relations, modern approaches, and systems theories.
- The classical school emphasizes production efficiency while the human relations school emphasizes employee needs and motivation.
- Modern approaches clarify the importance of managerial effectiveness and leadership over efficiency.
- Both classical and human relations consider effectiveness as an expected outcome rather than the primary goal.
- Systems theory views the organization as interconnected parts that work as a system, and emphasizes feedback between the internal and external environments.
Management involves planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling organizational activities. The evolution of management includes classical, neo-classical, and behavioral approaches. The Hawthorne studies influenced behavioral theory by showing how social and emotional factors impact productivity. Management functions are carried out by different levels including top managers who control the organization, middle managers who execute plans, and first-line managers who oversee operations. Managers fulfill interpersonal, informational, and decisional roles in coordinating work.
This document provides an overview of organizational behavior. It discusses:
- Organizational behavior studies how individuals, groups, and structure impact behavior in organizations and how to apply this knowledge to improve effectiveness.
- Determinants of organizational behavior include people, organizational structure, technology, and the internal and external environment.
- Theories that contributed to the development of organizational behavior include scientific management, bureaucratic management, human relations management, and contingency theory.
- Early influences included Adam Smith's work on human capital and Charles Babbage's advocacy for division of labor. Frederick Taylor furthered scientific management while Hawthorne studies highlighted the importance of human relations and informal groups.
administration and management theories and practicesGangaAcharya2
This document provides an overview of classical and neo-classical management theories. It discusses key theories such as Scientific Management, Bureaucratic Theory, Administrative Management Theory, Hawthorne Experiments, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, McGregor's Theory X and Y, and Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. For each theory, it describes the main ideas, proponents, strengths and critiques. The document is intended as part of a course on management and administration theories, principles and practices.
This document provides an overview of organizational behavior including its objectives, outcomes, major contributing disciplines, and evolution. The objectives are to understand individual and group behavior, apply OB knowledge to business, and develop better workplace relationships. Regarding evolution, the document discusses the classical approach focusing on efficiency, the neo-classical approach emphasizing human relations, and the modern approach combining classical and social science concepts. Major disciplines influencing OB include psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
Introduction to Organisational BehaviourISAAC Jayant
Organisational behavior is a field of study that investigates the impact that Individuals, Groups and Structure have on behavior within organization for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards improving an organisations effectiveness. (Stephen. P. Robbins).
This document discusses several theories of management that may be useful for nursing leaders to consider, including: classical management theory, scientific management theory, human relations theory, and behavioral management theories. It provides an overview of several influential thinkers in management theory such as Taylor, Fayol, Maslow, and Likert. The document emphasizes that no single theory can guide nursing leadership in every situation, and leaders should consider multiple theories to develop an effective individual management style.
This document discusses the evolution of management theories from early pre-scientific theories to modern theories. It outlines several influential classical theories including Taylor's scientific management theory, Fayol's administrative theory, and Weber's bureaucracy theory. Taylor's theory focused on optimizing workflows using time and motion studies. Fayol's theory emphasized formal organizational structures and management functions. Weber's bureaucracy theory proposed a rational-legal authority system with standardized rules and impersonal relations. While these early theories improved productivity and efficiency, they were also criticized for being too mechanistic and ignoring social aspects of organizations.
Theories & models of Management in ppt use in ANP and Managementsonal patel
This document discusses various theories and models of nursing management. It covers scientific management theory proposed by Taylor, classic organizational theory, human relations theory, and behavioral science theory. For each theory, it provides details on key contributors such as Taylor, Fayol, Follett, McGregor, and Maslow. It discusses concepts from each theory and provides implications for how nursing management can apply concepts from theories such as setting objectives, defining managerial tasks, emphasizing staff development, and fostering positive attitudes and participation. In conclusion, it states that cooperation, coordination, interpersonal relationships, and teamwork are keys to success for nursing management.
The document discusses different approaches to management thought that have evolved over time. It begins with the classical approach, which focuses on work and emphasizes formal education. It then covers scientific management, which aims to improve efficiency. Other approaches discussed include administrative management, bureaucratic management, the human relations school stemming from the Hawthorne Experiments, and behavioral schools incorporating the work of theorists like Maslow and McGregor. Modern theories discussed include systems approaches, contingency approaches, and quantitative approaches utilizing mathematical techniques.
This document summarizes the history and evolution of management thought. It outlines the major classifications of management approaches including classical, behavioral, quantitative, and modern. The classical approach included scientific management by Taylor, administrative theory by Fayol, and bureaucratic management by Weber. The behavioral approach emerged in response and was influenced by Hawthorne studies and theorists like Maslow and McGregor. Quantitative approaches applied statistics, optimization, and information systems. Modern approaches included systems theory looking at organizations holistically and contingency theory adapting to different situations. Emerging approaches incorporated new theories like Theory Z blending styles.
The document discusses the historical evolution of management approaches from classical to contemporary perspectives. It begins with classical approaches including scientific, administrative, and bureaucratic management. Next, it covers behavioral management theories like human relations and human resources. Finally, it discusses contemporary viewpoints including systems theory, contingency theory, quantitative approaches, and total quality management. The systems approach views organizations as systems of interrelated parts, while contingency theory stresses there is no single best way to manage and the approach must fit the situation.
The document summarizes several foundational theories in organizational communication from the Scientific Management and Human Behavior schools. The Scientific Management perspective, developed by Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol, emphasized rational organizational design, worker training, and top-down communication. In contrast, the Human Behavior school, represented by theorists like Mary Parker Follett, Elton Mayo, and Rensis Likert, shifted the focus to interactions, motivation, and participation. While Scientific Management principles still influence organizations today, the Human Behavior theories highlighted the social aspects of work and importance of communication at all levels.
The document summarizes the major schools of management thought that have developed over time to study management from different perspectives. It discusses six schools: [1] Classical school (scientific management, administrative management, bureaucratic management) focused on efficiently managing workers and organizations; [2] Behavioral school (human relations, behavioral science) focused on understanding human behavior in organizations; [3] Quantitative school (management science, operations management, management information systems) focused on improving decision-making through quantitative models; [4] Systems school focused on organizations as open systems transforming inputs to outputs; and [5] Contingency school focused on applying management principles based on each unique situation. Each school made important contributions to furthering the systematic study of
This document summarizes the evolution of management thought from classical to modern perspectives. It discusses early theorists like Taylor who developed scientific management, Fayol who proposed administrative management principles, and Weber who described bureaucratic management. It also covers the human relations movement sparked by the Hawthorne Experiments and behavioral science approaches. Later, systems thinking, quantitative analysis, and contingency approaches emphasized adapting to different situations. Overall, the document presents an overview of the historical development and integration of various management theories.
Similar to The Evolution Of Management Theory.pptx (20)
Colby Hobson: Residential Construction Leader Building a Solid Reputation Thr...dsnow9802
Colby Hobson stands out as a dynamic leader in the residential construction industry. With a solid reputation built on his exceptional communication and presentation skills, Colby has proven himself to be an excellent team player, fostering a collaborative and efficient work environment.
Sethurathnam Ravi: A Legacy in Finance and LeadershipAnjana Josie
Sethurathnam Ravi, also known as S Ravi, is a distinguished Chartered Accountant and former Chairman of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). As the Founder and Managing Partner of Ravi Rajan & Co. LLP, he has made significant contributions to the fields of finance, banking, and corporate governance. His extensive career includes directorships in over 45 major organizations, including LIC, BHEL, and ONGC. With a passion for financial consulting and social issues, S Ravi continues to influence the industry and inspire future leaders.
Enriching engagement with ethical review processesstrikingabalance
New ethics review processes at the University of Bath. Presented at the 8th World Conference on Research Integrity by Filipa Vance, Head of Research Governance and Compliance at the University of Bath. June 2024, Athens
Make it or Break it - Insights for achieving Product-market fit .pdfResonate Digital
This presentation was used in talks in various startup and SMB events, focusing on achieving product-market fit by prioritizing customer needs over your solution. It stresses the importance of engaging with your target audience directly. It also provides techniques for interviewing customers, leveraging Jobs To Be Done for insights, and refining product positioning and features to drive customer adoption.
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words an...Ram V Chary
Integrity in leadership builds trust by ensuring consistency between words and actions, making leaders reliable and credible. It also ensures ethical decision-making, which fosters a positive organizational culture and promotes long-term success. #RamVChary
Specific ServPoints should be tailored for restaurants in all food service segments. Your ServPoints should be the centerpiece of brand delivery training (guest service) and align with your brand position and marketing initiatives, especially in high-labor-cost conditions.
408-784-7371
Foodservice Consulting + Design
Ganpati Kumar Choudhary Indian Ethos PPT.pptx, The Dilemma of Green Energy Corporation
Green Energy Corporation, a leading renewable energy company, faces a dilemma: balancing profitability and sustainability. Pressure to scale rapidly has led to ethical concerns, as the company's commitment to sustainable practices is tested by the need to satisfy shareholders and maintain a competitive edge.
A presentation on mastering key management concepts across projects, products, programs, and portfolios. Whether you're an aspiring manager or looking to enhance your skills, this session will provide you with the knowledge and tools to succeed in various management roles. Learn about the distinct lifecycles, methodologies, and essential skillsets needed to thrive in today's dynamic business environment.
Org Design is a core skill to be mastered by management for any successful org change.
Org Topologies™ in its essence is a two-dimensional space with 16 distinctive boxes - atomic organizational archetypes. That space helps you to plot your current operating model by positioning individuals, departments, and teams on the map. This will give a profound understanding of the performance of your value-creating organizational ecosystem.
12 steps to transform your organization into the agile org you deservePierre E. NEIS
During an organizational transformation, the shift is from the previous state to an improved one. In the realm of agility, I emphasize the significance of identifying polarities. This approach helps establish a clear understanding of your objectives. I have outlined 12 incremental actions to delineate your organizational strategy.
Comparing Stability and Sustainability in Agile SystemsRob Healy
Copy of the presentation given at XP2024 based on a research paper.
In this paper we explain wat overwork is and the physical and mental health risks associated with it.
We then explore how overwork relates to system stability and inventory.
Finally there is a call to action for Team Leads / Scrum Masters / Managers to measure and monitor excess work for individual teams.
Public Speaking Tips to Help You Be A Strong Leader.pdfPinta Partners
In the realm of effective leadership, a multitude of skills come into play, but one stands out as both crucial and challenging: public speaking.
Public speaking transcends mere eloquence; it serves as the medium through which leaders articulate their vision, inspire action, and foster engagement. For leaders, refining public speaking skills is essential, elevating their ability to influence, persuade, and lead with resolute conviction. Here are some key tips to consider: https://joellandau.com/the-public-speaking-tips-to-help-you-be-a-stronger-leader/
2. Introduction
• The theory that guides management of people in an organization is called
management thought, hence a management theory is a group of assumptions
put forth to explain the management of organizations
• Management theories were developed from practical experiences of managers in
the industry organization, and other ideas were borrowed from fields like
science, sociology, mathematics and anthropology
3. Introduction
Management theories can be classified into three groups
1. Classical theory of management
Scientific Management
Bureaucratic Management
Administrative Management
2. Neo-classical theory
Human Relations
Behavioral Science Approach
3. The Modern management theories
Quantitative Approach
System Approach
Contingency Approach
Operational Approach
4. The Concept of Evolution of Management
• The driving force behind the evolution of management theory is the search for
better ways to utilize organizational resources.
• Evolution of modern management began in the nineteenth century, after the
industrial revolution, when mechanization changed systems like crafts into large
scale manufacturing
5. The Concept of Evolution of Management
• Management theories can be divided into four general theories or stages that are
the classical theories of managing organizations.
1. Pre-scientific management period
2. Classical theory
3. Neo-classical theory(or behavior approach)
4. Bureaucratic Model of Max weber
6. Pre-Scientific Management Period
Due to the industrial revolution in the 18th century the view of management had to be changed.
This was because this introduced new dimensions taken by management, some personalities
introduced their theories:
Professor Charles Babbage of United Kingdom (1729 to 1871), suggested the use of science and
mathematics in industrial organizations to be more productive and accurate as manufactures
relied on guessing and suggestion
Robert Owens of the UK (1771 to 1858), focused on the employee welfare and introduced
cooperation and trade unions. He believed employee welfare might determine performance.
7. The Classical Theory
The Classical theory that is the scientific management theory, developed by Fedrick W. Taylor
(1856-1915), helps to improve the organizations level of task completion through scientific and
mathematical means. It focuses on worker and machine relationships
It focuses on the numbers, and cuts through aesthetics of production and value for example in
college statistics such as graduation rates and acceptance rates. Fedrick's theory was harsh as
employees are considered more widgets than humans.
Henri Fayol improved on this and introduced the six roles/functions and 14 principles of
management, allowing humans to be humans and focusing on managing situations and using
people to help in the process. The six roles are Forecasting, Planning, Organizing, Commanding,
Coordinating, Controlling.
8. The Classical Theory cont.
Henry Gantt also improved on Taylor whose theory lacked motivational impact
hence he introduced bonuses on workers and supervisors. Performance was
recorded on bar charts, the Gantt Chart.
The short comings of the scientific management theory were:
Lack of standard tools and techniques
There is no match between job and skill
No motivation from management
Monotonous and repetitive
Employee dissatisfaction
9. The Classical Theory
Develop standard
method for
performing each job
Train workers in
standard method
Provide wage
incentives to workers
for increased output
Selected workers
with appropriate
abilities for each job
Supported workers
by planning their
work and eliminating
interruptions
Basic idea of Scientific
management
10. The Classical Theory cont.
Criticism of the scientific theory
• It did not appreciate the social context of work and higher needs of workers
• Did not acknowledge variance among individuals
• Tend to regard workers as uninformed and ignored their ideas
• Increased in performance meant fewer jobs and threat to layoffs
• Workers overworking, managers wanted them to do more work for the same pay
11. The Classical Theory cont.
The Gilbreths, Frank B. and Lillian M. Gilbreths suggested management should
include both analysis and synthesis
• Analysis-Breaking down a task into its essential elements
• Synthesis-include necessary element for efficient work and eliminate other elements
They did a motion study to identify unnecessary, ill directed and inefficient
motions hence eliminate wastefulness and reduce fatigue hence promoting the
individual workers welfare and help them reach their full potential as human
beings
12. Neo-Classical Theory
Developed or came into action in the mid-twentieth-century known as the Behavioral
management theory also called the social science movement. The neo-classical theory focuses on
employee relations in the work ecosystem.
It is based on the concept that all approaches to the work place should be in the interest of not
only the company but the worker as well, Chester Barnhard in the 1940s developed a theory that
viewed workers as psychological and social beings. No separation between human and worker
The Hawthorne experiments were conducted which used pay rewards, company provided
lunches in ways to increase employee psychological well-being, and eventually employee
productivity. As a result the studies encouraged managers of different departments to
communicate with each other directly and recommend cross functionality.
Hawthorne effect is the finding that a manager’s behavior or leadership approach can affect
worker’s level of performance hence the supervisors and manages should receive behavioral
training to manage subordinates in ways that elicit their cooperation and increase their
productivity.
13. Neo-Classical Theory
• Douglas Mc Gregor proposed Theory X and Y as assumptions about how work
attitudes and behaviors not only dominate how mangers think but also how they
behave in an organization
14. Theory X and Y Cont.
THEORY X ASSUMPTIONS
• Average worker is lazy
• Dislikes work
• Will try to do as little as possible
• Have little ambition and avoids
responsibilities
To keep performance high, workers must be
supervised closely and behaviors be controlled
by means of ‘carrot and stick’
THEORY Y ASSUMPTIONS
• Workers are not inherently lazy
• Do not dislike work
• If given opportunity, workers will do the best
for an organization
Managers do not need to closely monitor the
workers behavior and exercise self-control
15. Neo-Classical Theory cont.
Human Relations Theory, suggested jobs be designed to meet higher-level needs by
allowing workers to use their full potential.
Mary P. Follet also advocated for human relations emphasis, interrelations of
management and employees and the involvement of workers in job analysis and work
development process.
The conversation and democratic process of solving conflict put forward by Mary P.
Follet involved six points:
• Listening to each other’s views
• Accepting other view points
• Integrating view points in pursuit of a common goal
• Coordinating must be achieved in the early stage
• Coordinating must have reciprocal understanding
• Coordinating is a continual process
16. Neo-Classical Theory cont.
Activities such as seminars discussing productivity, improving morale, and good
ethical actions, to open meetings where brainstorming happens, the impact has
given the employees a chance to offer a holistic influence on organizations.
The human relations theory allows employees to develop a sense of self-awareness
to understand their places within a company and their influence
17. Bureaucratic Theory
This theory relates a formal hierarchy in which many tasks are delegated to
individuals and departments (labor division), rules and employees’ placement
based on their technical capabilities. They are also held together by a central
administration.
It was developed by Max weber (1864-1920), who was a German historian and
sociologist, nicknamed the ‘’father of bureaucracy’’. Universities and other schools
rely on bureaucracies to function, which is relevant in the delegation of tasks.
18. Bureaucratic Theory
The bureaucratic model,
theocratically, has a
hierarchical structure along
with the specialized
departments, making a
clear outline for division of
labor, which is the defining
and breaking down of work
into well defined tasks, and
delegated to be
manageable, which is a key
factor in the bureaucratic
theory.
19. Bureaucratic Theory
• Rules are formal written instructions that specify actions to be taken under
different circumstances to achieve specific goals for example: at the end of the
day employees are to leave their machines in good order
• Norms are unwritten, informal codes of conduct that prescribe how people
should act in particular situations for example in a restaurant the norm might be
that waiters should help each other if time permits
• Standard Operating Procedures, SOPs are specific set instructions about how to
perform a certain aspect of task example specifies exactly how they should do so,
which machine parts should be oiled or changed
20. Bureaucratic Theory
5 Principles of Bureaucracy
• A managers formal authority derives from the position he or
she holds in an organization
• People should occupy positions because of their
performance not because of their social standing or persona;
contacts
• The extent of each position’s formal authority and task
responsibilities and its relationship to other positions in an
organization, should be clearly specified.
• Authority can be exercised effectively in an organization
when positions are arranged in a hierarchy, so employs
know who they report too and who report to them
• Managers should create a well defined system of rules,
standards operating procedures, and norms so that they
effectively control behavior within the organization
Bureaucratic Characteristics
1) Division of work
2) Rules and regulations
3) Impersonal conduct
4) Staffing
5) Technical competence
6) Official records
21. Why Study Management Theories
• Management is doing the right things, by Peter Ferdinand Drucker
• The way someone manages their team or the entire workforce has a direct impact on
the organization’s growth and profitability hence studying and the knowledge of
management theories helps to determine which management principles and
practices work best for your organization
• Management is principally a task of planning, coordinating, motivating , and
controlling the efforts of others towards a specific objective.
• It involves combining the traditional factors of production land, labor, and capital in
an optimum manner, paying due attention to the organizations particular goals.
22. Why Study Management Theories
• Proper management due to acquired knowledge from studying the theories
1. Helps in achieving group goals – arranges the factors of production, assembles and
organizes the resources, and integrates the resources in an effective manner to achieve
goals
2. Optimum utilization of resources – management utilizes all physical & human
resources productively, the available scarce resources are used in the best way out of
various uses
3. Reduce costs – it gets maximum results from minimum input by proper planning and
getting maximum output, using the best combination of human and financial resources
4. Establishes Sound Organization – no overlapping of efforts (smooth and coordinated
functions), it establishes effective authority & responsibility relationship
5. Establishes Equilibrium – enables organization survival in a changing environment, by
adapting to the changing demands of he market/needs of society
6. Essential for Prosperity of Society – efficient management leads to better economic
production increasing the welfare of people and their standard of living
23. Modern Theory of Management
• These are theories that with modern evolution of management, which include the
systems approach, contingency approach and quantitative approach
• Systems management theory of organization was borrowed from biology and
system science, it allows for an understanding of the connections between various
parts of the organization and how they interact with one another. The organization
is viewed as a system that transforms inputs into outputs while in contain
interaction with its environment.
25. Modern Theory of Management
• The contingency management theory suggests that there is no fixed or perfect way
to organize a business or Corporation, and that the optimal solution lies in the
situation that the organization operates, the contingent depends upon internal and
external environments. In other words it applies management principles and
processes as dictated by the unique chrematistics of each situation.
26. Quantitative Approach
The quantitative approach improved decision making via the application of
quantitative techniques developed from the scientific management theory, and
consist of management science(Operations Research) and Production and
Operations management. Developed during and after world war II (1940s)
Management science called operation and research, uses mathematical and
statistical approaches to solve management problems
Production and Operations management, focuses on the operation and control of
the production process that transforms resource into finished goods and services.
27. Summary
• Management theory evolution was and is still the because of changes in the
environment, and can only be studied meaningfully against the culture of their time
• Due to evolution of management, management has shifted focus from the structure
and authority to the people behind the scene
• The classical approaches to management developed in the 1950s, emphasis was on
the internal functioning of an organization
• Weber bureaucratic approach – specialized positions, structured relationships, and
rules and regulations
• The human relations approach – focused on workers, groups, organization process to
solve productivity
• Many of these principles still hold relevance in modern workplaces even if society
continue to evolve
28. Summary
• Contemporary Approach
Developed after WWII
Business environment became more turbulent
Focus on interaction between internal and external environment
Internal/organization realized as an open system
• There is no single way to manage a business and each theory can be adopted
depending on the type of organization and the situation it finds itself in hence
management is dynamic