Fr John Jimenez has been a priest of the Archdiocese of San Francisco for 25 years, involved in parishes and schools from St Pius, to Church of the Visitacion, to St Peter's and St Charles, to Riordan High School. Previous to that he was a public school teacher in Oakland. In a recent essay, "The Ascent of Money and The Pound of Flesh", Fr Jimenez summarizes Nial Ferguson's book "The Ascent of Money", with allusions to the venture capitalist Marc Andreeson's recent essay detailing all of the positive aspects of tech inventions through history, while Ferguson brilliantly makes the analogy of historical financial innovations with the anthropologist Bronkowski's "The Ascent of Man", from early civilization when humans settled and grew crops, and kept an accounting for trade on stone tablets and the first use of language, to Fibonacci's number theory and use of Sanskrit and Arabic to simplify and improve the number system, and a more accurate accounting system that allowed the rise of the Medici's and the first banking systems, particularly a more extensive system of loaning money, fiat money even, that allowed for a multiplier affect in economic growth and technological innovation that feeds each others growth, and in general, allows a rising tide to lift all boats Yet, Ferguson does describe the essence of Shakespeare's point in "The Merchant of Venice", that ultimately, a system of debt risks collapsing unless there is a "Pound of Flesh", the story where the merchant lends the money for Antonio's friend to win over the beloved and Antonio helps by borrowing money, with the ships he owns as collateral, and 'his own flesh", his life, if the loan cannot be paid back. The story illustrates at a local level that a debt system can only function when the risk ensued, if there is no payback on the loan, is enforced by the debtor losing all that they have, even their life, "contracts being enforced", or even, seemingly, the role of a mafia hitman. Ferguson does point out that the Medici's origin were, in essence, as loan sharks Add to this David Stockman's insight from his essay "The War Machine's Echo Chamber", and we see how historically, war has been the loan sharking, hitman of the rise of empires. At first, many benefit from the loans that allow economies to grow and tech to innovate, but war becomes the method of imposing the currency of the dominant power on those colonized, and controlling the means of production, the pricing and the wages paid to the worker. Ferguson describes at the financial and war supply level, the rise of Napoleon and his defeat by Ellington at Waterloo. The ideology of the French Revolution of "Liberte" evolved into a cabal holding onto power through the constant threat of arrest and violence (the guillotine), and found that by expanding this violence into empire building, fiat money financed military expeditions and opening new markets and colonies, they found their leader in Napoleon to keep them in power.