The students are expected to create a poster about a team sport other than baseball that will be evaluated based on a rubric. The rubric assesses the poster's content, organization, creativity and materials, language use, and oral presentation based on criteria such as providing an excellent description of the sport, using simple present tense and appropriate vocabulary, and presenting the poster accurately.
Evaluate to Motivate
- Sharing tips to provide an effective evaluation for a Toastmaster speeches , using skills that can help you become and effective listener and excellent leader that inspire others .
Evaluate to Motivate
- Sharing tips to provide an effective evaluation for a Toastmaster speeches , using skills that can help you become and effective listener and excellent leader that inspire others .
BA Psychology Presentation RubricBA Psychology Presentation Rubr.docxjasoninnes20
BA Psychology Presentation Rubric
BA Psychology Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Development
50.0 pts
Fair = 30 – 21 Points/Percent The presentation is two (2) slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed, but it is not fully developed. At least 2 reasons in support of the topic with 1 example for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics are inconsistent in the presentation. Parts of the conclusion do not follow the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization needs improvement, and more than one key point for the topic are missing.
50.0 pts
Good = 40 – 31 Points/Percent The presentation is one (1) slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions Subject knowledge and organization is good, but one key point for the topic is missing.
50.0 pts
Superior = 50 – 41 Points/Percent The number of required slides is used in the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization is excellent.
20.0 pts
Poor = 20 Points/Percent or Below The presentation is three (3) or more slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An inappropriate topic, purpose, and form are used for the presentation. The student does not present reasons in support of the topic. Graphics are not used in the presentation. If they are, they are not convincing or content related. The presentation has a weak or missing conclusion. Subject knowledge and organization is not evident, and several key points for the topic are missing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence/Scholarship
20.0 pts
Superior 20 - 13 Points/Percent Presentation provides dramatic and compelling evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.
12.0 pts
Good 12 - 5 Points/Percent Presentation provides a few (three (3) or more) key concepts and evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.
7.0 pts
Fair ...
BA Psychology Presentation RubricBA Psychology Presentation Rubr.docxjasoninnes20
BA Psychology Presentation Rubric
BA Psychology Presentation Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Development
50.0 pts
Fair = 30 – 21 Points/Percent The presentation is two (2) slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed, but it is not fully developed. At least 2 reasons in support of the topic with 1 example for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics are inconsistent in the presentation. Parts of the conclusion do not follow the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization needs improvement, and more than one key point for the topic are missing.
50.0 pts
Good = 40 – 31 Points/Percent The presentation is one (1) slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions Subject knowledge and organization is good, but one key point for the topic is missing.
50.0 pts
Superior = 50 – 41 Points/Percent The number of required slides is used in the presentation. An appropriate topic, purpose, and form are employed. At least 3 reasons in support of the topic with 2 examples for each are used in the presentation. Convincing, content related graphics and a strong conclusion are used according to the assignment’s directions. Subject knowledge and organization is excellent.
20.0 pts
Poor = 20 Points/Percent or Below The presentation is three (3) or more slides slide short of the required slides required for the presentation. An inappropriate topic, purpose, and form are used for the presentation. The student does not present reasons in support of the topic. Graphics are not used in the presentation. If they are, they are not convincing or content related. The presentation has a weak or missing conclusion. Subject knowledge and organization is not evident, and several key points for the topic are missing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence/Scholarship
20.0 pts
Superior 20 - 13 Points/Percent Presentation provides dramatic and compelling evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.
12.0 pts
Good 12 - 5 Points/Percent Presentation provides a few (three (3) or more) key concepts and evidence in support of the topic. Interesting, detailed presentation notes that further educate the audience on the topic. Sites all outside sources. Credits all information/ images from outside sources using superscript on the slides and APA format in the notes section.
7.0 pts
Fair ...
One of the best ways to learn public speaking, other than actual.docxsmithhedwards48727
One of the best ways to learn public speaking, other than actually doing it, is to analyze what factors contributed to the strengths and weaknesses of your speech. For this assignment you will develop a self assessment of your informative speech and assess your speech by writing a five-paragraph essay, typed and double-spaced in which you identify your strengths and weaknesses and make recommendations for improvement. Refer to the grading rubric and the grading your instructor returned to you for your speech. Your essay should be 300 to 500 word. Incorporate the following elements into your essay:
1. A header (MLA style) is required.
2. Introduction (1st paragraph): Identify the purpose of your speech and summarize your topic.
3. Body (2nd paragraph): How did you open with impact? What did you say to connect your topic with your audience? Was your thesis stated clearly? Did you present the main points in a clear, concise manner? Were transitions used between main points? Did you provide ample support for main points? Did you restate your main points in the conclusion? How did you close with impact?
4. Body (3rd paragraph): Using the rubric, identify your strengths.
5. Body (4th paragraph): Using the rubric, identify your weaknesses.
6. Conclusion (5th paragraph): State how effective you believe your speech was and how you will address weaknesses. Your essay should not be longer than 1 to 2 pages.
Introduction
5
4
3
2
1
0
Weight
Total
Attention Getter
Highly effective and obvious attention getting device used. Audience attention was clearly established. (Question, startling statement, statistic, story)
Somewhat effective attention getting device used. Established attention of audience.
Attention getter was adequate to gain interest of audience.
Attention getter was not adequate or effective to gain audience attention.
Attention getter was not used.
Was not acceptable
5
4
3
2
1
0
Weight
Total
Connects with audience
Topic relevance explained, adapted to occasion and audience. Audience motivated to listen. Connect and interest of audience obviously established.
Topic relevance explained and adapted to audience. Connect and interest of audience established.
Topic relevance established with audience. Connection with audience established.
Topic relevance minimally established or alluded to with audience. No obvious connection with audience established.
Connection with the audience was not established.
Was not acceptable
5
4
3
2
1
0
Weight
Total
Presented thesis/main points
The thesis and main points were clearly stated, identified and established for audience.
The thesis and main points were partially stated, identified and established.
Thesis and main points were stated.
The thesis and main points were alluded to or minimally i.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
TED MERSIN COLLEGE 5TH GRADES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. The students are expected to prepare a poster about a team sport other than baseball. It will be evaluated according to this rubric. Excellent Good Fair Weak Content Gives an excellent description of the sport, the place where the sport is played, the rules of the game, well supported by visual materials. Gives place to most of the expected parts about the sport. Shows only basic understanding of the sport. Has a limited knowledge about the sport subject. Content has very limited connection to the topic and not well supported.
7. Organization Prepares a well organized poster including the visual materials . Provides most of the parts poster should .have Provides partial parts of poster should have. The organization of the poster is virtually incomplete. Creativity and Materials Very original and grabs the reader’s attention. Materials clearly support the content. Some originality. Materials most support the content and are used to make poster interesting. Materials presented with little originality. Materials do not relate to the poster content or no materials are used.
8. Language Uses simple present and vocabulary related to the team sport appropriately to tell the rules. Some errors are made unconsciously using simple present tense and a few inappropriate words. Weak in using simple present tense and using limited vocabulary. No attempt to use vocabulary related to the sport and poor use of language. Delivery Presents the poster accurately, using newly acquired vocabulary effectively. Student presents the poster satisfactorily. Speech is mostly clear and easy to understand. Student is often hesitant and can’t present the poster orally.Speech is often unclear and hard to understand. Student presents the poster unsatisfactorily. Speech is unclear and not organized.
