Te xas star chart 2
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•83 views
The document is a STAR chart that evaluates a Texas school campus's use of technology across four key areas in 2009-2010: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. In each area, the campus scored between 13-14 points, indicating it was at the "developing technology" level for that year. The summary provides a high-level overview of the document's purpose and main conclusions in 3 sentences.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Key Area:1 Teaching and Learning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Te xas star chart
This document outlines a chart for assessing a school's use of technology across six key areas: 1) Teaching and learning patterns, content connections, and student mastery; 2) Educator preparation, development models, and online learning support; 3) Leadership vision, planning, support, communication, budget, and online support; 4) Infrastructure including student-computer ratios, internet access, technology, and network/distance learning support. Schools are classified from 1-4 based on their stage of technology integration across these key areas.
Hall Middle School
The document summarizes a presentation about a STaR Chart for Hall Middle School. The STaR Chart is a tool used for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluation that measures proficiency across four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. The summary identifies Hall Middle School's strengths as leadership/vision, planning, internet access, and connectivity, and weaknesses as online learning, access to professional development, instructional support, budget, classroom technology, and distance learning capacity.
S Ta R Chart Presentation
This document is a Texas STaR Chart that evaluates Hoffman Lane Elementary School's use of technology over three years from 2006-2009 according to four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that the school has progressed from Developing Tech to Advanced Tech in Teaching and Learning and Infrastructure for Technology between 2006-2009. However, Educator Preparation and Development has remained at the Developing Tech level in that time period. Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support is rated as a strength while Educator Preparation and Development and Teaching and Learning are rated as weaknesses.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the 2009-2010 results from the Texas STaR Chart assessment for Birnham Woods Elementary. It showed the school's strengths were in infrastructure for technology and leadership/administration, which were at an advanced stage. Weaknesses were in teaching and learning and educator preparation/development, which were at a developing stage. It recommends teachers improve their ratings each year, work towards becoming proficient in technology, and seek professional development in teaching and learning areas.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart is a tool used to assess a teacher's progress in four key areas related to technology readiness and implementation based on goals in the district's Long-Range Technology Plan. This particular STaR Chart shows that Matzke Elementary is striving toward becoming an "Advanced Tech" school, with technology integrated across the curriculum, strong support from leadership and infrastructure, and students demonstrating mastery of technology-related skills.
Campus star chart analysis
This document analyzes the campus star chart for Cross Timbers Middle School in Colleyville ISD. It gives ratings for key areas related to teaching and learning with technology, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. Across all areas, the school received advanced technology ratings of 3, with a few developing ratings of 2 for online learning and instructional support. The overall analysis found the school to have strong infrastructure, educator training, and integration of technology into teaching and learning.
T Exas S Tar C Hart P Ower Point
This document outlines Leo J. Leo Elementary School's 2009-2010 Texas Star Chart. The chart compares data from four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that Educator Preparation and Development, specifically levels of understanding of technology use and implementation of technology in instruction, are the weakest areas, while Leadership support and budgeting are the strongest. The conclusion states that the Star Chart is meant to track progress on technology goals and improve student learning.
Texas campus s ta r chart christy price
The STaR Chart is a tool created by the Texas Education Agency to help schools and districts evaluate their technology proficiency in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Within each area, the chart measures progress on various focus areas to determine the district's current level of technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4, from Early Tech to Target Tech. The chart can then be used to set goals and benchmarks, apply for grants, and track progress in meeting federal and state technology requirements.
Recommended
Te xas star chart
This document outlines a chart for assessing a school's use of technology across six key areas: 1) Teaching and learning patterns, content connections, and student mastery; 2) Educator preparation, development models, and online learning support; 3) Leadership vision, planning, support, communication, budget, and online support; 4) Infrastructure including student-computer ratios, internet access, technology, and network/distance learning support. Schools are classified from 1-4 based on their stage of technology integration across these key areas.
Hall Middle School
The document summarizes a presentation about a STaR Chart for Hall Middle School. The STaR Chart is a tool used for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluation that measures proficiency across four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. The summary identifies Hall Middle School's strengths as leadership/vision, planning, internet access, and connectivity, and weaknesses as online learning, access to professional development, instructional support, budget, classroom technology, and distance learning capacity.
S Ta R Chart Presentation
This document is a Texas STaR Chart that evaluates Hoffman Lane Elementary School's use of technology over three years from 2006-2009 according to four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that the school has progressed from Developing Tech to Advanced Tech in Teaching and Learning and Infrastructure for Technology between 2006-2009. However, Educator Preparation and Development has remained at the Developing Tech level in that time period. Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support is rated as a strength while Educator Preparation and Development and Teaching and Learning are rated as weaknesses.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the 2009-2010 results from the Texas STaR Chart assessment for Birnham Woods Elementary. It showed the school's strengths were in infrastructure for technology and leadership/administration, which were at an advanced stage. Weaknesses were in teaching and learning and educator preparation/development, which were at a developing stage. It recommends teachers improve their ratings each year, work towards becoming proficient in technology, and seek professional development in teaching and learning areas.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart is a tool used to assess a teacher's progress in four key areas related to technology readiness and implementation based on goals in the district's Long-Range Technology Plan. This particular STaR Chart shows that Matzke Elementary is striving toward becoming an "Advanced Tech" school, with technology integrated across the curriculum, strong support from leadership and infrastructure, and students demonstrating mastery of technology-related skills.
Campus star chart analysis
This document analyzes the campus star chart for Cross Timbers Middle School in Colleyville ISD. It gives ratings for key areas related to teaching and learning with technology, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. Across all areas, the school received advanced technology ratings of 3, with a few developing ratings of 2 for online learning and instructional support. The overall analysis found the school to have strong infrastructure, educator training, and integration of technology into teaching and learning.
T Exas S Tar C Hart P Ower Point
This document outlines Leo J. Leo Elementary School's 2009-2010 Texas Star Chart. The chart compares data from four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It finds that Educator Preparation and Development, specifically levels of understanding of technology use and implementation of technology in instruction, are the weakest areas, while Leadership support and budgeting are the strongest. The conclusion states that the Star Chart is meant to track progress on technology goals and improve student learning.
Texas campus s ta r chart christy price
The STaR Chart is a tool created by the Texas Education Agency to help schools and districts evaluate their technology proficiency in four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Within each area, the chart measures progress on various focus areas to determine the district's current level of technology integration on a scale of 1 to 4, from Early Tech to Target Tech. The chart can then be used to set goals and benchmarks, apply for grants, and track progress in meeting federal and state technology requirements.
S ta r chart data analysis-kendra okeefe l20267825
This document summarizes the results of Taylor High School's Texas STaR Chart data analysis. The STaR Chart assesses schools in four key areas related to technology integration. While Teaching & Learning improved to Advanced Tech, other areas dropped, with Educator Preparation falling to Developing Tech, and Leadership/Infrastructure dropping to Advanced Tech from Target Tech. Strengths included internet access and leadership vision, while weaknesses were technical support and online learning/professional development. Areas for improvement include increasing technical support staff and developing online learning models and professional development with leadership support.
Texas STaR Chart
Mesquite High School conducted a technology assessment using the Texas STaR Chart. The school's strengths included leadership support for technology and infrastructure. Weaknesses included limited use of technology for teaching and distance learning, and a need for more educator training. The summary calls for continued work to expand students' experiences through a global classroom and prepare them for 21st century learning.
Columbus Junior High
This document summarizes the results of a staff survey at Columbus Junior High on technology use. It found that teaching and learning of technology skills is developing, while educator preparation and infrastructure for technology scored higher. Areas for improvement include increased professional development, ensuring technology plans are supported, and providing adequate technical support staff and devices. The administration is generally supportive of technology but could provide more support for staff technology use and needs.
Campus STaR Chart
This document summarizes a campus STaR Chart from 2010. It identifies strengths and weaknesses across 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. STaR Chart totals from 2010 show the campus received advanced tech ratings of 15, 15, 18, and 15 respectively for each key area. Each key area is then broken down into further subcategories for more detailed analysis. The document concludes that 3 areas need improvement: staff development opportunities, meaningful technology experiences for students, and using new technologies like cell phones for classroom projects.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart assessment of East Chambers High School's technology readiness. It provides data on the school's scores in the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. Infrastructure received the highest score of 17, while Educator Preparation received the lowest score of 13. The summary concludes that the school needs to improve educator professional development and implementing technology into teaching and learning to become a "target tech" campus.
5352
The document discusses the STaR Chart assessment of East Chambers High School's technology readiness. It provides data on the school's scores in the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. East Chambers scored highest in Infrastructure but needs improvement in Educator Preparation and Development to better prepare teachers to use technology. The summary concludes that the school should work towards becoming a "target tech" campus.
S ta r chart data
Canyon Ridge Elementary School assessed their technology use across four key areas in 2009-2010 using the Texas STaR Chart. They scored highest in Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support. They have opportunities to improve in Online Learning, Models of Professional Development for teachers, and Technical Support. Canyon Ridge Elementary is working to enhance how they use technology for student learning and school events.
Lincoln MS STaR Chart Analysis
The document analyzes Abraham Lincoln School of Technology and Engineering's STaR Chart results from 2009-2010, which classified the campus as Developing Tech in most areas, and provides recommendations to increase technology integration, such as improving professional development for teachers and incorporating more technology-rich goals into the Campus Improvement Plan.
STaR Chart Presentation
The document summarizes the results of the Texas STaR Chart for Dobie High School which evaluates the school's technology readiness. It found that the school has made some progress but still has work to do in key areas like the number of students per computer, technical support, and distance learning capacity. It identifies the lowest scoring subareas and proposes four solutions: offering online classes for all students, a one-to-one computer program, hiring technology mentors for teachers, and securing funding for the one-to-one program and mentors. The document emphasizes that a budget is needed to successfully implement the vision.
S Ta R Ppt 29nov09
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a self-assessment tool for schools to evaluate their educational technology and readiness. It provides an overview of the STaR Chart and what it is designed to measure. The presentation then analyzes Holmes High School's current technology profile based on the STaR Chart, identifying their strengths in infrastructure for technology but weaknesses in educator preparation and development. Goals are set to improve teacher training to better integrate technology into lessons and online learning.
Campus STAR Chart Presentation
The document summarizes the findings of Copeland Elementary School's STAR Chart assessment in key areas related to technology readiness and use from 2007 to 2010. It shows that from 2007-2008, the school's teaching and learning, administration and support, and infrastructure were at the developing technology level. By 2008-2009, teaching and learning had advanced but the other areas remained developing. By 2008-2010, administration and support had also advanced while infrastructure remained developing.
Martin elementary ‘s star chart slide show
Martin Elementary in Texas received a Texas Campus Star Chart summary for the 2007-2008 school year. The summary evaluated the school across 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Martin Elementary received target or advanced ratings across most areas, with a total score of 21 in Teaching and Learning, 23 in Educator Preparation, 24 in Leadership/Administration, and 16 in Infrastructure.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
Edld 5352 S Ta R Chart
The document outlines the Texas Campus STaR Chart, a tool that assesses four domains - teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/support, and infrastructure - to measure progress towards technology goals. It provides details on completing the STaR Chart profile, which involves coordinating with technology leaders and having the principal enter campus data. An example profile for Kohfeldt Elementary shows their progress as "developing" across domains. Suggested next steps include additional professional development and community technology events.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the 2009-2010 results from the Texas STaR Chart assessment for Birnham Woods Elementary. It showed the school's strengths were in infrastructure for technology and leadership/administration, which were at an advanced stage. Weaknesses were in teaching and learning and educator preparation/development, which were at a developing stage. It recommends teachers improve their ratings each year, work towards becoming proficient in technology, and seek professional development in teaching and learning areas.
Texas STaR Chart PowerPoint
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, an online resource tool used by schools to assess their efforts to integrate technology across the curriculum. It evaluates progress in 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. The STaR Chart provides a campus profile showing the status of each area to help with technology planning and budgeting.
Texas STar Chart PowerPoint
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, an online resource tool used by schools to assess their efforts to integrate technology across the curriculum. It evaluates progress in 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. The STaR Chart provides a campus profile showing the status of each area to help with technology planning and budgeting.
Klyng Texas Campus S Ta R Chart Summary Presentation
This document summarizes the results of Mark Twain Primary School's Campus STaR (School Technology and Readiness) Chart for the years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. The STaR Chart is used to assess a campus's progress towards the goals of the Texas Long Range Plan of Technology. Based on the STaR Chart results, the document identifies Educator Preparation and Development and Infrastructure for Technology as areas needing improvement at Mark Twain Primary School. Possible solutions proposed include increasing staff development opportunities in teaching and learning, designating a campus technology leader and coach, and revisiting the campus technology budget.
S ta r chart presentation1
The document summarizes a school's results on the Texas STaR Chart, which evaluates four key areas of technology integration. For Area 1 (Teaching and Learning), the school is at the "Developing Technologies" stage, where technology is used but not integrated with curriculum. Area 2 (Educator Preparation) is also "Developing", with a focus on more online professional development. Area 3 (Leadership) and 4 (Infrastructure) are at the "Advanced" stage, with strong online support and connectivity but needing more technical assistance for teachers. In conclusion, more information can be found at the provided URL.
Texas star chart
The document outlines the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to assess progress towards technology integration goals set in the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. It describes the STaR Chart's purpose and key areas of evaluation, including teaching and learning, educator development, leadership and infrastructure. The document reviews sample campus data from the STaR Chart and proposes goals and objectives, such as creating a technology PLC and purchasing new classroom equipment, to help the campus advance in reaching technology integration targets.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart is a tool used to assess a teacher's progress in four key areas related to technology readiness and implementation based on long-range technology plans. This particular STaR Chart shows that Matzke Elementary is striving toward advanced levels of technology integration across teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure.
More Related Content
What's hot
S ta r chart data analysis-kendra okeefe l20267825
This document summarizes the results of Taylor High School's Texas STaR Chart data analysis. The STaR Chart assesses schools in four key areas related to technology integration. While Teaching & Learning improved to Advanced Tech, other areas dropped, with Educator Preparation falling to Developing Tech, and Leadership/Infrastructure dropping to Advanced Tech from Target Tech. Strengths included internet access and leadership vision, while weaknesses were technical support and online learning/professional development. Areas for improvement include increasing technical support staff and developing online learning models and professional development with leadership support.
Texas STaR Chart
Mesquite High School conducted a technology assessment using the Texas STaR Chart. The school's strengths included leadership support for technology and infrastructure. Weaknesses included limited use of technology for teaching and distance learning, and a need for more educator training. The summary calls for continued work to expand students' experiences through a global classroom and prepare them for 21st century learning.
Columbus Junior High
This document summarizes the results of a staff survey at Columbus Junior High on technology use. It found that teaching and learning of technology skills is developing, while educator preparation and infrastructure for technology scored higher. Areas for improvement include increased professional development, ensuring technology plans are supported, and providing adequate technical support staff and devices. The administration is generally supportive of technology but could provide more support for staff technology use and needs.
Campus STaR Chart
This document summarizes a campus STaR Chart from 2010. It identifies strengths and weaknesses across 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership/administration/instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. STaR Chart totals from 2010 show the campus received advanced tech ratings of 15, 15, 18, and 15 respectively for each key area. Each key area is then broken down into further subcategories for more detailed analysis. The document concludes that 3 areas need improvement: staff development opportunities, meaningful technology experiences for students, and using new technologies like cell phones for classroom projects.
STaR Chart
The document discusses the STaR Chart assessment of East Chambers High School's technology readiness. It provides data on the school's scores in the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. Infrastructure received the highest score of 17, while Educator Preparation received the lowest score of 13. The summary concludes that the school needs to improve educator professional development and implementing technology into teaching and learning to become a "target tech" campus.
5352
The document discusses the STaR Chart assessment of East Chambers High School's technology readiness. It provides data on the school's scores in the four key areas of the Texas Long Range Technology Plan: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. East Chambers scored highest in Infrastructure but needs improvement in Educator Preparation and Development to better prepare teachers to use technology. The summary concludes that the school should work towards becoming a "target tech" campus.
S ta r chart data
Canyon Ridge Elementary School assessed their technology use across four key areas in 2009-2010 using the Texas STaR Chart. They scored highest in Leadership, Administration, and Instructional Support. They have opportunities to improve in Online Learning, Models of Professional Development for teachers, and Technical Support. Canyon Ridge Elementary is working to enhance how they use technology for student learning and school events.
Lincoln MS STaR Chart Analysis
The document analyzes Abraham Lincoln School of Technology and Engineering's STaR Chart results from 2009-2010, which classified the campus as Developing Tech in most areas, and provides recommendations to increase technology integration, such as improving professional development for teachers and incorporating more technology-rich goals into the Campus Improvement Plan.
STaR Chart Presentation
The document summarizes the results of the Texas STaR Chart for Dobie High School which evaluates the school's technology readiness. It found that the school has made some progress but still has work to do in key areas like the number of students per computer, technical support, and distance learning capacity. It identifies the lowest scoring subareas and proposes four solutions: offering online classes for all students, a one-to-one computer program, hiring technology mentors for teachers, and securing funding for the one-to-one program and mentors. The document emphasizes that a budget is needed to successfully implement the vision.
S Ta R Ppt 29nov09
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a self-assessment tool for schools to evaluate their educational technology and readiness. It provides an overview of the STaR Chart and what it is designed to measure. The presentation then analyzes Holmes High School's current technology profile based on the STaR Chart, identifying their strengths in infrastructure for technology but weaknesses in educator preparation and development. Goals are set to improve teacher training to better integrate technology into lessons and online learning.
Campus STAR Chart Presentation
The document summarizes the findings of Copeland Elementary School's STAR Chart assessment in key areas related to technology readiness and use from 2007 to 2010. It shows that from 2007-2008, the school's teaching and learning, administration and support, and infrastructure were at the developing technology level. By 2008-2009, teaching and learning had advanced but the other areas remained developing. By 2008-2010, administration and support had also advanced while infrastructure remained developing.
Martin elementary ‘s star chart slide show
Martin Elementary in Texas received a Texas Campus Star Chart summary for the 2007-2008 school year. The summary evaluated the school across 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Martin Elementary received target or advanced ratings across most areas, with a total score of 21 in Teaching and Learning, 23 in Educator Preparation, 24 in Leadership/Administration, and 16 in Infrastructure.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
S Ta R Chart
The document summarizes Liberty Elementary School's STaR Chart ratings for the 2008-2009 school year. The STaR Chart rates schools in 4 key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Liberty received ratings of "Developing Tech" in Teaching/Learning and Educator Prep, and "Advanced Tech" in Leadership/Admin and Infrastructure. The summary discusses what these ratings mean for technology use at Liberty and sets goals for future improvement, such as fully integrating technology into the curriculum and providing on-demand student access.
Edld 5352 S Ta R Chart
The document outlines the Texas Campus STaR Chart, a tool that assesses four domains - teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/support, and infrastructure - to measure progress towards technology goals. It provides details on completing the STaR Chart profile, which involves coordinating with technology leaders and having the principal enter campus data. An example profile for Kohfeldt Elementary shows their progress as "developing" across domains. Suggested next steps include additional professional development and community technology events.
What's hot (15)
S ta r chart data analysis-kendra okeefe l20267825
S ta r chart data analysis-kendra okeefe l20267825
Similar to Te xas star chart 2
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the 2009-2010 results from the Texas STaR Chart assessment for Birnham Woods Elementary. It showed the school's strengths were in infrastructure for technology and leadership/administration, which were at an advanced stage. Weaknesses were in teaching and learning and educator preparation/development, which were at a developing stage. It recommends teachers improve their ratings each year, work towards becoming proficient in technology, and seek professional development in teaching and learning areas.
Texas STaR Chart PowerPoint
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, an online resource tool used by schools to assess their efforts to integrate technology across the curriculum. It evaluates progress in 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. The STaR Chart provides a campus profile showing the status of each area to help with technology planning and budgeting.
Texas STar Chart PowerPoint
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, an online resource tool used by schools to assess their efforts to integrate technology across the curriculum. It evaluates progress in 4 key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. The STaR Chart provides a campus profile showing the status of each area to help with technology planning and budgeting.
Klyng Texas Campus S Ta R Chart Summary Presentation
This document summarizes the results of Mark Twain Primary School's Campus STaR (School Technology and Readiness) Chart for the years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. The STaR Chart is used to assess a campus's progress towards the goals of the Texas Long Range Plan of Technology. Based on the STaR Chart results, the document identifies Educator Preparation and Development and Infrastructure for Technology as areas needing improvement at Mark Twain Primary School. Possible solutions proposed include increasing staff development opportunities in teaching and learning, designating a campus technology leader and coach, and revisiting the campus technology budget.
S ta r chart presentation1
The document summarizes a school's results on the Texas STaR Chart, which evaluates four key areas of technology integration. For Area 1 (Teaching and Learning), the school is at the "Developing Technologies" stage, where technology is used but not integrated with curriculum. Area 2 (Educator Preparation) is also "Developing", with a focus on more online professional development. Area 3 (Leadership) and 4 (Infrastructure) are at the "Advanced" stage, with strong online support and connectivity but needing more technical assistance for teachers. In conclusion, more information can be found at the provided URL.
Texas star chart
The document outlines the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to assess progress towards technology integration goals set in the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. It describes the STaR Chart's purpose and key areas of evaluation, including teaching and learning, educator development, leadership and infrastructure. The document reviews sample campus data from the STaR Chart and proposes goals and objectives, such as creating a technology PLC and purchasing new classroom equipment, to help the campus advance in reaching technology integration targets.
S ta r chart
The STaR Chart is a tool used to assess a teacher's progress in four key areas related to technology readiness and implementation based on long-range technology plans. This particular STaR Chart shows that Matzke Elementary is striving toward advanced levels of technology integration across teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure.
Texas STaR Chart EDLD 5352
The document discusses the STaR Chart, a tool used by Nebbie Elementary to evaluate their progress in meeting technology goals. The STaR Chart has 4 key areas (Teaching & Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure) each with 6 focus areas used to determine current status and guide future improvements. The document also summarizes Nebbie's STaR Chart results, district and campus technology goals, and helpful websites for additional information.
EDLD 5352 RHS STaR PowerPoint
The document summarizes the RHS Tigers Campus STaR Chart for 2010. It analyzes their performance in 4 key areas related to technology: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparations and Development, Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. For each area, it provides their STaR Chart total, which evaluates them as Developing or Advanced in their use of educational technology. It concludes by noting current technology resources and opportunities for future improvement through staff development and meaningful educational experiences using technology.
Texas Star Chart Pp
The Texas Star Chart is a tool for planning, assessing, and evaluating a school or district's educational technology profile based on the goals of the Long Range Plan for Technology. It examines components across four key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Each area is rated on a scale of 1-4 to indicate the level of technology integration. The Star Chart can be used for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluation, and to facilitate discussions around improving technology use and online learning to ensure the best education for students.
Reaching For The S Ta Rs
The document discusses the STaR Chart data from McAuliffe Middle School. The STaR Chart measures four areas of school technology: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. The data shows development in some areas but also opportunities for improvement. The campus goals are for students to effectively use technology as a learning tool and for teachers to integrate technology proficiency standards into instruction. The strategies to reach these goals include additional technology resources, training, and digital curriculum development.
S Ta R Chart Presentation
The document provides an overview of the Texas STaR Chart, which is a self-assessment tool for measuring a school's technology integration and readiness. It has four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Schools assess their progress in each area using a rubric with levels from Early Tech to Target Tech. The results help schools identify strengths, areas for improvement, and develop long-range technology plans in compliance with state requirements.
Texas s ta r chart
The document outlines the Texas STaR Chart review process and key areas of technology integration in schools. It discusses patterns of classroom technology use, content area connections, educator professional development experiences and capabilities, school leadership and support for technology, and infrastructure issues. It also provides the ratings for Orangefield High School across four key areas from 2007-2008 to 2009-2010, showing developing or advanced progress in different areas each year.
S ta r presentation
This document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used by Rancier Middle School to self-assess technology integration efforts. It is aligned with Texas' long-range technology plan. The STaR Chart measures four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. It provides classifications like Early Tech, Developing Tech, and Advanced Tech. Rancier's data shows progress over years but it needs to improve developing areas and identify strengths/weaknesses to move all areas to higher classifications like Target Tech.
Texas long range plan for technology
The document summarizes the Mueller Elementary STaR Chart for 2010-2011 which evaluates the school's technology integration in key areas such as teaching and learning, educator preparation, administration and support, and infrastructure. It also includes questions about ways to improve current ratings and what technology staff developments could be offered to teachers to assist with technology integration.
S Ta R Chart Presentation 1.2
The document provides information about the Texas Campus STaR Chart which is a tool used to evaluate the progress of technology integration at schools according to the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. It summarizes the results of Lorenzo De Zavala Elementary's STaR Chart evaluation and identifies goals for the school to reach the highest "Target Tech" classification, including increasing collaborative technology use among teachers and students and ensuring administrator support for technology integration.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information for technology integration. It shows the school's ratings over three years in four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership & Instructional Support and IV) Infrastructure & Technology. For 2009-2010, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes areas for improvement, such as increasing classroom technology and teacher professional development, to advance the school's ratings.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt[1]
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information which evaluates the school's use of technology across four key areas: I) Teaching & Learning II) Educator Preparation & Development III) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support IV) Infrastructure & Technology. According to the 2009-2010 summary, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas I, II, and IV, and "Advanced Tech" in area III. The conclusion notes the need to increase technology use in teaching, lower the student-computer ratio, and provide additional professional development for teachers.
Edld 5352 wk 2 ppt[1]
This document summarizes Tabasco Elementary School's annual STaR Chart information which evaluates the school's use of technology across four key areas: 1) Teaching & Learning 2) Educator Preparation & Development 3) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support 4) Infrastructure & Technology. According to the 2009-2010 summary, the school was rated as "Developing Tech" in areas 1, 2, and 4, and "Advanced Tech" in area 3. The conclusion notes the need to increase technology use in teaching and lower the student-computer ratio, while continuing professional development for teachers.
Marcus STaR Chart Review
This document summarizes the Texas Campus STaR Chart scores for Marcus High School over three years. It analyzes trends in technology, teaching and learning, educator professional development, leadership and infrastructure. While the school was classified as "Advanced Tech" in most categories, it was rated "Developing Tech" for teaching and learning during the 2008-2009 period. The summary identifies areas of strength and weakness to help plan improvements to the school's technology program.
Similar to Te xas star chart 2 (20)
Klyng Texas Campus S Ta R Chart Summary Presentation
Klyng Texas Campus S Ta R Chart Summary Presentation
Recently uploaded
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/qhtvq32h4ybf9t49ku85x0n3xl4jhr15BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdPollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
PCOS corelations and management through Ayurveda.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneবাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Recently uploaded (20)
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 7 CẢ NĂM FRIENDS PLUS SÁCH CHÂN TRỜI SÁNG TẠO ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
বাংলাদেশ অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা (Economic Review) ২০২৪ UJS App.pdf
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UP
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptx
Te xas star chart 2
- 1. TeXas STAR Chart