DescriptionThe Supreme Court of India is the premier judicial court under the Constitution of India. It is the highest constitutional court and has the power of judicial review.
This ppt describes the overview of the topic Union Executive. This ppt only describes the topic of the President of India, his powers, office, election, removal, etc.
This ppt describes the overview of the topic Union Executive. This ppt only describes the topic of the President of India, his powers, office, election, removal, etc.
What is Rajya Sabah. What are its powers, Functions and activities? How is it related with Lok Sabha? all the questions have been answered in the presentation.
This is a power point presentation on the topic "THE UNION PARLIAMENT". It includes :
The Lok Sabha
The Rajya Sabh
The President
And some good animated slides
Hope You Like it
Regards
:)
The Supreme Court of India is the premier judicial court under the Constitution of India. It is the highest constitutional court, and has the power of judicial review.
What is Rajya Sabah. What are its powers, Functions and activities? How is it related with Lok Sabha? all the questions have been answered in the presentation.
This is a power point presentation on the topic "THE UNION PARLIAMENT". It includes :
The Lok Sabha
The Rajya Sabh
The President
And some good animated slides
Hope You Like it
Regards
:)
The Supreme Court of India is the premier judicial court under the Constitution of India. It is the highest constitutional court, and has the power of judicial review.
The Environmental laws give huge importance to maintaining an ecological balance of the environment by safeguarding the forests and wildlife of the country. The main job of environmental law is to protect human health as well as the environment.
Judicial activism in India ( Brief Notes )sandhyakrish2
Judicial activism is the judicial philosophy that the courts can and should go beyond the words of the constitution or a statute to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint.
India offers astounding variety in virtually every aspect of social life. Indian society is multifaceted to an extent perhaps unknown in any other of the world's great civilizations.
Facts about directive principles of state policy (Brief Notes)sandhyakrish2
The Directive Principles of State Policy of India are the guidelines or 15 principles given to the federal institutes governing the State of India, to be kept in citation while framing laws and policies.
For Hindus, marriage is a sacrosanct union. It is also an important social institution. Marriages in India are between two families, rather two individuals. The society as well as the Indian legislation attempt to protect marriage.
Basic laws everyone should know as an Indian Citizensandhyakrish2
Indian Constitution has provided several rights to the people to protect their fundamental rights, but unfortunately, most people are not aware of their rights.
Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. Judicial Review plays an important role in Indian Judiciary.
Public interest Litigation- means, litigation filed in a court of law, for the protection of “Public Interest", such as Pollution, Terrorism, Road safety, Constructional hazards etc
Emergency Provisions are contained in Part Eighteen of the Constitution of India. The President has the power to impose emergency in all part of India if any security fails.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. • The Supreme Court is the highest judiciary court and the final court for appeal
under the Constitution of India. The highest constitutional court with the
power of judicial review. India is a federal state and has a single and unified
judicial system with 3 tier structure. That is
1. Supreme Court
2. High Court
3. Subordinate Courts.
At present Supreme Court consists 31 Judges one Chief Judge and 30 other
Judges. Supreme Court number of Judges bill 2019 has added 4 judges to the
strength it increases the judicial strength from 31 to 34 including the Chief
Justice of India. Originally the strength of the Supreme Court was fixed at 8,
1Chief Justice and 7 other judges.
3. • The parliament is authorised to regulate them. The constitution declares Delhi as the
seat of the Supreme Court. It also authorises the Chief Justice of India to appoint
other or places as seat of the Supreme Court. He can take decision with the approval
of president. This provision is only optional and not compulsory. This means that no
court can give any direction either to the President or the Chief Justice to appoint any
other places as the seat of the Supreme Court.
• QUALIFICATION OF JUDGES:
• A person to be appointed as the judge of the Supreme Court should have the
following qualifications:
1. He should be a citizen of India.
2. He should have been a judge of a High Court for 5 years.
3. He should have been an Advocate of a High Court for 10 years.
4. He should be a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President of India.
5. The constitution has not prescribed a minimum age for appointment as judge of the
Supreme Court.
4. • OATH AND AFFIRMATION:
• A person appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court before entering upon his
office has to make and subscribe to an oath or affirmation before the
President. Another person from appointed by him for this purpose. On his oath
a judge of the Supreme Court swears to bare to faith to Constitution of India to
uphold the Sovereignty and Integrity of India to faithfully and the best of his
ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of the office without fear
or favour, affection or goodwill and to uphold the constitution and the law.
• TENURE OF JUDGES:
• The constitution has not fixed the tenure of judges of the Supreme Court.
However it makes the following 3 provisions in this regard.
5. 1. He holds office until he attains the age of 65 years any question regarding his
age is to determine by such authority and in such manner as provided by
parliament.
2. He can resign his office by writing to the President of India.
3. He can be removed from his office by the President of India on the
recommendation of the Parliament.
• REMOVAL OF JUDGES:
• A judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his office by an order of
the President of India. The president can issue the removal order only after an
address by the parliament has been presented to him in the sessions for such
removal. The address must be supported by a special majority of each house of
parliament. (I.e) the majority of the total membership of that house and a
majority of not less than 2/3rd of members of that house present and voting.
6. • The grounds of removal are through misbehaviour or incapacity. These are the
2 grounds for removal
1. Proved Misbehaviour.
2. Incapacity.
• Judges Enquiry Act, 1968: Regulates the procedure relating to the removal of a
judge of the Supreme Court by the process of impeachment.
• No judges of Supreme Court had been impeached so far.
• Impeachment emotions of Justice Deepak Misra 2017-2018 were defeated in
the parliament.
7. • SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES:
• The salaries, allowances privilege leave and pension of the judges of the
Supreme Court are determined from time to time by the parliament. They
cannot b varied their disadvantage after their appointment except during a
financial emergency.
• ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE: The President of India can appoint the judge of the
Supreme Court as an acting Chief Justice of Justice when the office of the Chief
Justice of India is vacant or the Chief Justice of India is temporarily absent or
Chief Justice of India is unable to perform the duties of his office.
• He can do so only after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court
consent and with the previous consent of the President. The judges so
appointed should be qualified for appointment as a judge of the Supreme
Court.
8. • It is the duty of the judge so appointed to attend the sittings of the Supreme
Court in priority of the other duties of office. While he attends he enjoys all
the jurisdiction, powers and privilege and discharges the duty of the judges
of the Supreme Court.
• RETIRED JUDGES: At any time the Chief Justice of India can
request a retired judge of the Supreme Court or a retired judge of
a High Court who is qualified as appointment as the judge of the
Supreme Court. To act as a judge of the Supreme Court for a
temporary period. He can do so only when the previous consent of
the President of India and also of the person to be so appointed.
Such a judge is entitled to such allowances as the President of
India may determine. He will also enjoy all the Jurisdiction, powers
and privileges of a judges of the Supreme Court.
9. • PROCEDURE OF COURT: The Supreme Court can with the approval of the
President of India rules for regulative the generally practice and procedure of
the court. The constitutional cases or decided by a bench consisting of at least
5 judges. All other cases are usually decided by a bench consisting of not less
than 3 Judges. The judgments are delivered by the open court. All Judgments
are by majority vote. It differing the judges can give descending judgment of
our opinions.
• JURISDICTION AND POWERS OF SUPREME COURT:
• The Supreme Court is a federal court the highest court of appeal the guarantor
of the Fundamental Rights of the citizens and guardian of the constitution.
Therefore its independence becomes very essential for the effective discharge
of the duties assign to it. It should be free from the encroachment, pleasure
and interferences of the executive. (I.e) council of Ministers and the legislature
parliament.
10. • It should be allowed to do justice without fear or favour. The constitution has made
the following provisions to safeguard and ensure the independent and impartial
functioning of the Supreme Court.
1. Mode of Appointment.
2. Security of tenure.
3. Fixed service conditions.
4. Expenses charged on the consolidated fund.
5. Conduct of judges cannot be discussed.
6. Bare on practice after retirement.
7. Power to punish for its conduct.
8. Freedom to appoint its behalf.
9. Jurisdiction cannot be curtailed.
10.Separation from executive.
11. • JURISDICTION AND POWERS OF SUPREME COURT:
1. Original jurisdiction
2. Writ jurisdiction
3. Appellate jurisdiction
4. Advisory jurisdiction
• A court of record: As a court of record the Supreme Court has two powers.
• The judgments, proceedings and acts of the Supreme Court are recorded for
purpose memory and testimony. These records are admitted to be evidentially
value and cannot be questioned and produce before any court. There are
recognized as legal precedence and legal reference and it has power to punish
for contempt of court either with simple imprisonment for a term up to 6
months are defined in up to Rs.2000 or with both.
12. • POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.
• Judicial Review is the power of the Supreme Court to examine the
constitutionality of legislature enactments and executive orders or both the
central and state government. On examination if there are found to be violative
of the constitution. (ultra vires) they can be declared as illegal, unconstitutional
and invalid by the Supreme Court. Consequently they can be enforced by the
government.
• RECENT ISSUES IN SUPREME COURT: It is considered as the master of roaster. It
refers to the privilege of the Chief Justice to constitute benches to hear cases.
The controversy has emerged in the Supreme Court over the absolute power of
the Chief Justice is the master of the roaster and he alone is the prerogative to
constitute the benches of the court and allocate cases to the benches of
constitute.
13. • the Chief Justice OF India or Chief Justice of any High Court is he/she
who heads the administration side. This includes allocation of
matters before a judge as well. So no judge can be take up the
matter on his own unless allocated by the Chief Justice of India.