GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)Haleema Begum
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 1 Chapter 1 , Theories of the family Revision. Print out as a handout, it is a good way to revise. Application, Interpretation and Analysis tips are also included. All derived from the AS Sociology Revision Guide. Good luck!!!
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)Haleema Begum
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 1 Chapter 1 , Theories of the family Revision. Print out as a handout, it is a good way to revise. Application, Interpretation and Analysis tips are also included. All derived from the AS Sociology Revision Guide. Good luck!!!
A presentation I made for my senior seminar at Whitman College. Design ideas are drawn from "Presentation Zen".
Some of the more interactive features are, unfortunately, unable to be experienced on SlideShare.
Presented by Markus Ihalainen, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) in Nairobi, Kenya, on August 29, 2017.
A presentation I made for my senior seminar at Whitman College. Design ideas are drawn from "Presentation Zen".
Some of the more interactive features are, unfortunately, unable to be experienced on SlideShare.
Presented by Markus Ihalainen, from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) in Nairobi, Kenya, on August 29, 2017.
Contemporary Issues
Team B
PSY/480 Clinical Psychology
Title Page
1
Contemporary Issues in Clinical Psychology
Changes in Family Structure
Divorce
Remarriage: step-parent, step-children and step-sibling(s)
Death: parent or sibling
Birth: new baby or grandchild
Cultural Diversity
Discrimination
Oppression
Stereotyping
When someone seeks out a psychologist for assistance in overcoming issues related to a change in their familial structure or because of racial or ethnic discrimination, the psychologist should be experienced in the particular challenges this patient is facing. Clinical psychology has had to develop new ways to treat these patients as previous strategies were not as beneficial as they could be. Clinical psychologists also needed to evolve as psychology did so that they have the knowledge and experience to assist patients in these particular situations.
2
Changes to Family Structure
Separation
Divorce
As time continues to go on, the American family is not what is once was. Over the last 50 years there has been a dramatic rise in divorce; the highest it has ever been in the U.S. Divorce affects all types of marriages, whether it a heterosexual couples, blended couples, and even homosexual couples. “This marks a shift away from the ideal of the companion marriage popularized in the early 1920’s to self-aspiration, enhanced freedom, and egalitarian relationships” (Castelloe, 2011). Since the 1960’s the rate of divorce and separation has risen because of the fact that “society has become more inclusive and women more financially independent, resulting in increased tension in marriages between individualization and what psychoanalyst Erik Erickson described as “generativity,” a concern for the welfare of others” (Castelloe, 2011).
3
Population Most Affected
Not one race, ethnicity, culture.
High Conflict
Financially Unstable
Children of Divorce
Divorce is not exactly privy to one specific culture or ethnicity; many people of all races become separated or divorced. Since 1970, the rate of divorce, at 72%, has declined to 59% (Friedman, n.d.). Jeffrey Drew conducted a study in 2009 on couples who argued about finances. He concluded that couples who argued about finances more than once a week were more than 30% likely to get divorced than couples who argue about it only a few times a month. “According to Drew, couples who disagree about money less than once per month run a 30-40% increase in the risk of divorce” (Divorce Source, 1996). The rate of divorce ultimately increases as the arguments become more often, several times a week, daily; the risk increases 125% to 160% (Divorce Source, 1996). It is believed that children who come from a separated family or divorced family are going to be two times more likely to get divorced than a child whose parents remained together (Castelloe, 2011).
4
Family Structure changes and its effect on Psychology
Children
Men
Women
Psychology is greatly effected by chang.
ii48The Negative Effects of Divorce on the Behavior of C.docxwilcockiris
ii
48
The Negative Effects of Divorce on the Behavior of Children
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Research states that half of marriages in the United States will end in divorce, and about half of American children will experience the divorce of their parents before the age of 18 (Amato, 2000; Copen et al., 2012). According to the US Census Bureau, The rate of divorce in America is computed as the number of divorces relative to 1,000 married ladies, during the late 1980s and early 1990s; the rate of divorce reached a historic high of 22.6 divorces (United States Census Bureau, 2013). Research has focused on the reasons that's “why” and methodology that is “how” divorce affects children’s adjustment, given a large number of children that are affected by divorce. Research regularly shows a negative correlation between parental divorce and children wellbeing.
For example, children coming from divorced families tend to deal more harshly with life’s circumstances, by experiencing depression and get stuck forming close relationships with others. Children also tend to have antisocial behaviors. In addition to these measures, establishing and developing a close intimate relationship is an important indicator of how children adjust to their parents’ divorce. Research has found parental divorce to have a significant adverse effect on children’s relationship, such as intimacy and establishing trust and close relationship with others (Daly, 2003). Among children of divorce, few studies have examined boys and girls emotional perspective about divorce. There is less research on the long-term effect of parental divorce and coping strategies about how children focused on divorce.
The rates of divorce rose a dramatic 79 percent in Divorce on Children the United States between 1970 and 1977. Although these escalated rates have since declined, many marriages still end up in divorce. According to the US Census Bureau (2013), in the 1970s, children were considered better off living with one parent than living with both parents during and amidst conflict, abuse, or both. Indeed, there is a substantial affirmation from many research studies that indicate a “conflict-ridden” marriage is not in the best interest of the children. This research paper summarizes the findings of several recent studies related to this question.
1.2 Background of the Problem
Despite personal values, community standards, or religious teachings, divorce is a fact of life, as shown by these facts: 2 of 5 children will experience the divorce of their parents before they reach of 18; About 25 percent of every child will all people regardless of spending some time in a step family regardless of race, color, national origin, A couple’s marriage lasts about 7.2 sex, age, or disability. According to US Census Bureau, divorce rate leveled in the 1980’s at the rate of 11 percent lower than in 1979 and there are about 1,250,000 divorces cases per year in the United State.
In order to have citizens capable of creating peace in the world, we need stable families that instill values and capacities for peacebuilding. Marriage and the family serve a unique and essential purpose for optimum human development. Research is showing that straying from that purpose weakens the family, increasing disadvantages for the next generation and the future. Clarifying the value of the family will help us strengthen this essential building block of peace.
Causes of family breakdown and its effects on Children by David MetaloroDavid Metaloro
Abstract
The increase of family breakdown down rate in Juba City has been due to alcohol and drugs addiction, financial problems, death, plus psychological, sexual and emotional abuse, threatening diseases like HIV/AIDs and inability to resolve conflict among others.
The objective of the study was to investigate the causes of family breakdown and its effects on the children in Juba City. The effects of family breakdown on children include difficulties in school, stress, early engagement in sexual activities, insecure and afraid of the future, depression and fear of being abandoned. The forms of family breakdown identified during the study include death, separation and divorce.
The rate of the family breakage was indicating 78.3%, though the study was based in Juba city, it reflects the entire country since all of the ten states’ habitants were included in study. Some of the cultural practices were found of backing up the high rate of family breakdown and such practices include force marriage, polygamy marriage, inheritance of widowers and high bride wealth.
The study proved communication skills, creation of family laws, supporting the children of the low families, marriage preparation and parenting new initiatives and information giving and mediation are the fundamental alternative solution to family breakdown.
In conclusion, the study proved the family breakdown affects the children performance in schools in line with other effects such as; stress, depression, fear of being abandoned, insecure and afraid of the future and torn in two among others.
In the end, the study recommended that the three stakeholders; government, NGOs and the academia to play respective role suggested to them by the researcher in accordance with the findings.
Chapters 14 & 15the ending of relationshipsUncou.docxtiffanyd4
Chapters 14 & 15
the ending of relationships
Uncoupling – the series of stages by which couples (whether married or cohabiting) move toward ending the relationship
Suggested stages:DissatisfactionAttempts at changeTurning elsewhere Further distancing ResolutionInforming the other partnerAcknowledging the ending
marital endings
4 ways a marriage can end:
Desertion – one spouse simply abandons the marriage and the family has no subsequent contact
Separation – married partners decide to no longer live together
Annulment – a pronouncement that declares that a couple never had a valid marriageReligiousCivil (usually for fraud)
Divorce – legal dissolution of a valid marriage
health effects of unhappy marriagesResearch has found that the unhappily married were worse off on heart disease risk factors like high blood pressure and cholesterol than both happily married and single women. One study found that couples in high-conflict marriages take longer than the happily married to heal from various wounds – from minor scrapes to surgery
societal and demographic factors associated with divorceFamily – many of the family’s traditional functions of child care, protection, and recreation have been taken over by outside institutionsReligion – people who are religious are less likely to divorce. Spouses with the same religion more likely to have stable marriagesLaw – legal assistance easier to obtain. Unclear if the prevalence of divorce has made legal proceedings easier, or if easier legal proceedings made divorce more common.
education, income & divorceGenerally, the lower the couple’s educational level and income, the higher the risk for divorceUS Census Bureau: about 36% of women 35-39, with less than 12 years education divorced, compared to about 28% of women with 17+ years of educationnote: the higher the education, the more difficult to marry. But are the marriages more stable if/when they do marry?However, people who have started toward, but failed to complete, a particular degree (regardless of its level), are more likely to divorce than those who complete the degree.Couples below the poverty line are 2x as likely to divorce within 2 years
ethnicity & cultureAfrican American couples are 2x as likely to end their marriages as white and Hispanic couples areLargely due to the fact that they are disproportionately poorAs income levels rise, divorce rates for blacks decrease, resembling those for whitesLatinos have relatively low divorce ratesPartly due to the fact that many are Catholic, and Catholicism frowns on divorce
personal factors associated with divorce
Communication problems
Infidelity
Constant conflict
Emotional abuse
Falling out of love
Unsatisfactory sex
Insufficient income
Physical abuse
Falling in love with someone else
Boredom
effects of divorce
“Divorce hangover” – an individual is unable to let go of the fact that they got a divorce, reorient themselves as single parents, or develop new friendshipsSeparation dist.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
2. Overview
What is cohabitation?
Current trends
Types of cohabitation
Who cohabits?
Pros and cons to cohabiting
Does it lead to better marriages?
What effects does it have on children?
3. Cohabitation… what is it?
Cohabitation occurs when two
unrelated people, who are also not
married, are in a sexual relationship
and living together, (Benokraitis, 2011).
The U.S. Census Bureau calls these
individuals, POSSLQs, (person’s of the
opposite sex sharing living quarters),
but this can also pertain to individuals
in same sex relationships who live
together.
4. Growth and attitudes
Cohabitation is continually rising.
Reasons for why the numbers still
might be too low: common-law
marriages, couples don’t disclose the
information, the U.S. Census Bureau
doesn’t tabulate unmarried couples in
one home, and etc.
Increased acceptance among people
Reasons people disapprove: religious
views, morals, belief it had a negative
impact on children, and etc.
5. Types of Cohabitation
Dating cohabitation: Couple who
spends a lot of time together, decides to
move in together.
Premarital cohabitation: Couples testing
the relationship before they jump into
getting married; can be engaged.
Trial marriage: Less sure about
relationship than a couple participating in
premarital cohabitation.
Substitute marriage: Two people who
don’t plan to marry, but make the long
term commitment to move in together.
6. Who cohabits?
20% are 24 years old or younger,
(Benokraitis, 2011)
56% between 25-44 years old, (Benokraitis,
2011)
Women are more likely to cohabit if their
mothers did
Also, women are less likely to cohabit if their
mother’s have a college degree.
Highest cohabitation rates are among
American Indians/Native Alaskans and
African Americans, (Benokraitis, 2011).
Religion and social class also affect who
cohabits.
7. Pros
Emotional security
Independence
Can get out of relationship easier, without
legal issues
By holding off on marriage, the older in age
one is, the less likely of a divorce. Age is a
predictor of a stable marriage, (Benokraitis,
2011).
Some children of low economic statuses
benefit more
Don’t deal with the stress of the other’s family
(in-laws)
Learn to deal with partner’s faults
8. Cons
Feel trapped or isolated from friends
Weaker commitment to the
relationship
Not as happy or satisfied in
relationship
Less likely to be faithful
Show more negative and controlling
behaviors after marriage
No U.S. laws about the responsibilities
of cohabitants
9. Does it lead to better
marriages?
Surprisingly, NO
Higher divorce rates if cohabitation
occurred before marriage,
(Benokraitis, 2011).
Three effects that could explain the
reason: selection effect, cohabitation
effect, and the inertia effect.
10. The Selection Effect
People who cohabit, (usually before
marriage), have different
characteristics than those who don’t
cohabit before marriage.
Due to individual problems of the
people in the relationship, people are
less likely to work on the relationship,
communicate efficiently, or
compromise during arguments.
11. The Cohabitation effect
Cohabitants get used to independence
Not as willing to compromise, due to
being used to getting there own way.
Leads to instability, and the likelihood
of divorce
12. Applying the concept
In a 2009 article published in the Journal of
Family Psychology, 1,050 men and women
were given a random telephone survey
asking about cohabitation practices and
certain qualities about their marriages.
Only those aged 18-34, that have been
married for 10 years or less were used.
All different races and ethnicities were used.
“We found evidence that cohabiting before
engagement, even only with one’s future
spouse, is associated with lower marital
quality and higher divorce potential,”
(Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, 2009).
13. The Inertia Effect
When a couple moves in together,
occasionally they make certain
decisions that would make it harder to
leave the relationship
I.e. Getting a pet, sharing finances,
having children, etc.
After making these decisions, they
decide that they should just go ahead
and get married.
14. What Does This Do To
Children?
Children often endure the cohabitant’s
breakup, or deal with the parent’s
“serial cohabitation”, (living with
multiple partners throughout their
childhood).
They are more likely to be poor, due to
cohabitant’s breaking up, hence
suffering from more emotional,
behavioral and academies issues,
15. Did you know?
In some states, such as North
Carolina, North Dakota, West Virginia,
Florida, Michigan, Mississippi, and
Virginia, cohabitation is prohibited!
16. Summary
Cohabitation is when two people, that are
unrelated and not married live together, and
currently are in a sexual relationship.
Cohabitation is continuing to grow and is
becoming a more accepted practice.
There are four different types of cohabitation:
dating, premarital, trial marriage and
substitute marriage.
Most of cohabitants are under the age of 44
Women are more likely to cohabit if their
mother’s did
Social class and religion also affect
cohabitation rates.
17. Summary Cont.
There are pros and cons to cohabitation
Cohabitation before marriage DOES NOT
mean that marriages will be better, and
generally these cohabitants have higher
divorce rates.
Selection Effect, Cohabitation Effect, and
Inertia Effect are possible theories for why it
doesn’t lead to a better marriage.
Sometimes, cohabitations creates an
unstable environment to raise a child in, and
the child is more at risk of emotional,
behavioral, or academic issues if he or she
witnesses serial cohabitation or the breaking
up of cohabitants.
18. References
Benokraitis, N.V. (2011). Marriages &
families: Changes, choices, and
constraints. (7th ed.) Boston,
Massachusetts: Pearson
Education, Inc.
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., &
Markman, H. J. (2009). The pre-
engagement cohabitation effect:
A replication and extension of
previous findings. Journal of
Family Psychology, 23 (1), 107-11.