The document discusses various myths about cohabitation rights and provides examples of case studies to illustrate how courts have ruled on property disputes between unmarried couples. It finds that unlike married couples, unmarried couples have few rights to each other's property by default. However, courts have considered implied trusts and promissory estoppel claims in cases where one partner contributed financially or relied on promises about shared ownership. The outcomes depend on evidence presented about intentions, financial contributions, and actions taken in reliance on representations made by the other partner.