The document provides instructions on how to duplicate DVD movies by ripping the movie file from the DVD disc onto a computer. This allows the video to be used in different programs and edited. To make an identical backup copy, the ripped movie file can be burned back to a new DVD disc. The sections and headings clearly explain the different steps in the process. Details are included under each heading to describe that part of the duplication method. Some technical terms may be confusing without sufficient background knowledge. The writing is made clear visually through formatting with pictures and colors.
From an article, this presentation analyzes some funademental parts of an academic writing such as structure of paragraphs, puntuation, linking words, etc.
From an article, this presentation analyzes some funademental parts of an academic writing such as structure of paragraphs, puntuation, linking words, etc.
1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the document?
Primary idea is How to Duplication DVD Movies.Ripping a DVD from the disc onto your
computer allows you to use the video footage from the DVD in multiple computer programs,
such as media players and video editor.If you just want to create a duplicate of the movie for
backup, you can rip the movie file to your computer and burn the file straight to disc.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the
idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
individual sections and headings is make what is written plain in document.Example,The
person who read an this document for the first time because an headline is written comes to
understand it what is written where.And I know what is the primary idea of the contenr in
the document.
3. What details are included in the document?
The details are written with an headline.Example,if the headline says DVD Decrypter, the
details about DVD Decrypter are written in the bottom.Similarly,if the headline says Easy
DVD Clone,The method is written with an headline.
I explained the contents of the headline concretely to be more detailed than the above.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
Many technical terms were written for this document and were incomprehensible.
I felt that some knowledge was necessary to completely understand this document.In
addition, a lot of difficult English words that I did not know were written.I should have
studied more English words in high school days.I was stupid.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
When I wrote the details about each headline, I did a picture and color reason and it was
devised to be easy to come to watch it visually and was easy to read it.In addition, it was
written and thought that I was good so that a reader was easy to understand it by writing a
number when I wrote the details.
2. 6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
I do not think that we have an error for this document.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make?
It is good to write it in detail, but there is the place that is hard to be confused to some
extent.For example, it was good to ride a link, but there was the part which letters increased
by the result and were hard to watch visually.
The above is my opinion.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document
and how this author authored it
・A picture and the thing that I separate it by color and am easy to look visually and
assume. Devising it so that a reader is easy to understand it.
・It is written a lot of entries. Make what is written plain.
・Riding the uniform resource locator of the site where related information is written.
