SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1. What is the primary idea of the content in the document?

The document is thing that DVD. The primary idea of the content in the document is how to use the
DVD, such as copy. Because the document is detailed written the document about method of
reproduction. The document is respectively written the item in the document.

2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that
was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.

I think that this document is easy to read and very technical. Because I think that this document is
easy to read when I looked this document. But because this document is easy to read, this document
is hard to get the main point. This document is hard to get the main contents.

3. What details are included in the document?

The details are included step of DVD Decrypter and step of DVD Shrink and step of DVD-Burning
Software, step of Easy DVD Clone.

4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?

5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?

6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?

7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make?

8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and
how this author authored it (as you see it in the link).

More Related Content

Similar to Peer review exercise # 2

PeerReview exercise#2
PeerReview exercise#2PeerReview exercise#2
PeerReview exercise#2bancho1208
 
Review exercise#2
Review exercise#2Review exercise#2
Review exercise#2bancho1208
 
Peer review exercise #2
Peer review exercise #2Peer review exercise #2
Peer review exercise #2s1170136
 
Peer review2
Peer review2Peer review2
Peer review2c001ick
 
Peer r ex2
Peer r ex2Peer r ex2
Peer r ex2s1170131
 
Peer1
Peer1Peer1
Peer1aizu
 
Peer Review Exercise#1
Peer Review Exercise#1Peer Review Exercise#1
Peer Review Exercise#1s1170230
 
Peer 1
Peer 1Peer 1
Peer 1DoRujI
 
Week4 kozin
Week4 kozinWeek4 kozin
Week4 kozins1170208
 

Similar to Peer review exercise # 2 (20)

PeerReview exercise#2
PeerReview exercise#2PeerReview exercise#2
PeerReview exercise#2
 
Review exercise#2
Review exercise#2Review exercise#2
Review exercise#2
 
Pre1
Pre1Pre1
Pre1
 
P ex2
P ex2P ex2
P ex2
 
Peer review exercise #2
Peer review exercise #2Peer review exercise #2
Peer review exercise #2
 
Peer review2
Peer review2Peer review2
Peer review2
 
Peer r ex2
Peer r ex2Peer r ex2
Peer r ex2
 
Peer2
Peer2Peer2
Peer2
 
Week1
Week1Week1
Week1
 
Sw3-Pre2
Sw3-Pre2Sw3-Pre2
Sw3-Pre2
 
Spre2
Spre2Spre2
Spre2
 
Pre2
Pre2Pre2
Pre2
 
Peer1
Peer1Peer1
Peer1
 
P ex1
P ex1P ex1
P ex1
 
Review02.prn
Review02.prnReview02.prn
Review02.prn
 
R ex2
R ex2R ex2
R ex2
 
Peer Review Exercise#1
Peer Review Exercise#1Peer Review Exercise#1
Peer Review Exercise#1
 
Peer 1
Peer 1Peer 1
Peer 1
 
Note taking for university students
Note taking for university studentsNote taking for university students
Note taking for university students
 
Week4 kozin
Week4 kozinWeek4 kozin
Week4 kozin
 

Peer review exercise # 2

  • 1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the document? The document is thing that DVD. The primary idea of the content in the document is how to use the DVD, such as copy. Because the document is detailed written the document about method of reproduction. The document is respectively written the item in the document. 2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. I think that this document is easy to read and very technical. Because I think that this document is easy to read when I looked this document. But because this document is easy to read, this document is hard to get the main point. This document is hard to get the main contents. 3. What details are included in the document? The details are included step of DVD Decrypter and step of DVD Shrink and step of DVD-Burning Software, step of Easy DVD Clone. 4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it? 5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good? 6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected? 7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make? 8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link).