1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles?



There are many people who use cell phone while driving the car. It is a very dangerous act.

This article is written about how to ban the use of cell phones in cars. Talking on a cell phone

while driving causes impairment on par with drunk driving. This article is very important for

the driver of an automobile.



2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles)

clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your

comments.

3.

When say what kind of thing is written; about a method to prohibit that use a mobile

telephone during driving,"According to a University of Utah study, talking on a cell

phone while driving causes impairment on par with drunk driving."It is written based on a

fact.In addition, I do that I confirm a law.



4.

I did not understand it about the following sentences well."Check local laws related to driving

while talking on a cell phone and driving while texting. Use these as a baseline for crafting

your own family or business policy. According to the Governors Highway Safety Association,

25 states and the District of Columbia currently ban any use of a cell phone, whether it's

hands-free or not, for novice drivers."

5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?



This article is written about reasons for banning cell phone use when driving. It is very

important. Traffic collisions, accidents and near misses are concerns

for all drivers. Since a number of drivers use cell phones while driving, all dr

ivers and passengers are potentially effected. Accidents reported by police officers suggest

that driver distraction and inattention account for 25 percent to 50 percent of traffic crashes




6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?

          No, there aren't.

     Because in the first article is written accurately attention to

     headings How To Ban the Use of Cell Phone in Cars.

     Even the second article is written accurately attention to
headings Reasons for Banning Cell Phone Use When Driving.

  Two articles meet to headings.

  Therefore,this article need not be corrected.




7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can

   you make?

   I think that example of causing accident by using cellular

   phone while driving.

   We are slow to notice after the accident is caused.

   Other, we goes to the region where few accident that happens

   by using the cellular phone while driving.

   I think that I should put method to prevent the accident the

   people in the region carry out.



8. Identify there basic differences between how your group

  would author a similar document and how this

  author or authored it(as you see it in the link).

  I think that I should write how to ban the use of cell phones

  in cars.

  Because I think that this headings is good.

  I think that I write advantage of to use of cell phones in cars.

  I think that I write disadvantage of to use of cell phones in cars.

英語12

  • 1.
    1. What isthe primary idea of the content in the articles? There are many people who use cell phone while driving the car. It is a very dangerous act. This article is written about how to ban the use of cell phones in cars. Talking on a cell phone while driving causes impairment on par with drunk driving. This article is very important for the driver of an automobile. 2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. 3. When say what kind of thing is written; about a method to prohibit that use a mobile telephone during driving,"According to a University of Utah study, talking on a cell phone while driving causes impairment on par with drunk driving."It is written based on a fact.In addition, I do that I confirm a law. 4. I did not understand it about the following sentences well."Check local laws related to driving while talking on a cell phone and driving while texting. Use these as a baseline for crafting your own family or business policy. According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, 25 states and the District of Columbia currently ban any use of a cell phone, whether it's hands-free or not, for novice drivers." 5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good? This article is written about reasons for banning cell phone use when driving. It is very important. Traffic collisions, accidents and near misses are concerns for all drivers. Since a number of drivers use cell phones while driving, all dr ivers and passengers are potentially effected. Accidents reported by police officers suggest that driver distraction and inattention account for 25 percent to 50 percent of traffic crashes 6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected? No, there aren't. Because in the first article is written accurately attention to headings How To Ban the Use of Cell Phone in Cars. Even the second article is written accurately attention to
  • 2.
    headings Reasons forBanning Cell Phone Use When Driving. Two articles meet to headings. Therefore,this article need not be corrected. 7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make? I think that example of causing accident by using cellular phone while driving. We are slow to notice after the accident is caused. Other, we goes to the region where few accident that happens by using the cellular phone while driving. I think that I should put method to prevent the accident the people in the region carry out. 8. Identify there basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author or authored it(as you see it in the link). I think that I should write how to ban the use of cell phones in cars. Because I think that this headings is good. I think that I write advantage of to use of cell phones in cars. I think that I write disadvantage of to use of cell phones in cars.