The document discusses key design qualities for effective lesson planning:
- Content & Substance: Lessons should clearly state what students will learn and be able to do, using required standards and materials.
- Organization of Knowledge: Lessons should be organized using techniques like mini-lessons, research, and experiments to engage different learning styles.
- Clear & Compelling Product Standards: Students should understand performance expectations and evaluation criteria through rubrics, examples, and feedback opportunities.
- Protection from Adverse Consequences: Lessons should allow students to try tasks without fear of failure through support structures, checkpoints, choices, and using student talents.
This document discusses S.M.A.R.T. goals, which are goals that are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely. There are two types of S.M.A.R.T. goals: process goals that focus on implementing programs or strategies, and student result goals that provide quantitative feedback on student learning. The document provides examples of each type of goal and explains the criteria for making goals S.M.A.R.T., including making sure goals are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and have a defined timeline.
An assessment is used to evaluate student progress, instruction quality, and instructional methods. There are different types of criterion-referenced tests, including entry tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. When developing assessment items, they should be goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered. Portfolios can be used to assess student work and growth over time using rubrics. When creating an assessment instrument, objectives and analyses should be considered to ensure congruence.
This document provides information on SMART goals and examples of SMART and non-SMART goals. SMART goals are specific, measurable, action-oriented, rigorous, realistic, results-focused and timed. Examples of non-SMART goals include vague plans for teacher collaboration. Examples of SMART goals include increasing special needs student math scores by 10% and increasing student physical fitness levels. The document also provides examples of revising non-SMART goals to make them SMART and measurable.
This document discusses designing summative assessments that are aligned to course goals and the InTeGrate guiding principles. It defines different types of assessments, including diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. The purpose of summative assessments is to evaluate student learning against benchmarks or standards. The document provides guidance on developing summative assessments, including deconstructing goals into critical elements, linking elements to cognitive levels, matching elements to appropriate assessments, and selecting rubrics to score student responses. Developing well-aligned summative assessments is important for measuring student progress toward meeting course goals.
Retiring Exam Questions? How to Use These Items in Formative AssessmentsExamSoft
Presented by: Dan Thompson, Manager of Instructional Design and Educational Technology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
As semesters come and go, new exams are created and used items are retired, never to be used again. While moving on to new exam items due to poor performing statistics or to ensure exam security are sound practices, these retired items can still positively impact student learning. Retired summative assessment items can serve new purposes as formative assessment items that engage students with course content while preparing them for course exams. This presentation addresses the process of using retired exam items in creative ways to develop formative assessments to increase student self-awareness of their content knowledge and improve student retention.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
The document discusses key design qualities for effective lesson planning:
- Content & Substance: Lessons should clearly state what students will learn and be able to do, using required standards and materials.
- Organization of Knowledge: Lessons should be organized using techniques like mini-lessons, research, and experiments to engage different learning styles.
- Clear & Compelling Product Standards: Students should understand performance expectations and evaluation criteria through rubrics, examples, and feedback opportunities.
- Protection from Adverse Consequences: Lessons should allow students to try tasks without fear of failure through support structures, checkpoints, choices, and using student talents.
This document discusses S.M.A.R.T. goals, which are goals that are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely. There are two types of S.M.A.R.T. goals: process goals that focus on implementing programs or strategies, and student result goals that provide quantitative feedback on student learning. The document provides examples of each type of goal and explains the criteria for making goals S.M.A.R.T., including making sure goals are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and have a defined timeline.
An assessment is used to evaluate student progress, instruction quality, and instructional methods. There are different types of criterion-referenced tests, including entry tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. When developing assessment items, they should be goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered. Portfolios can be used to assess student work and growth over time using rubrics. When creating an assessment instrument, objectives and analyses should be considered to ensure congruence.
This document provides information on SMART goals and examples of SMART and non-SMART goals. SMART goals are specific, measurable, action-oriented, rigorous, realistic, results-focused and timed. Examples of non-SMART goals include vague plans for teacher collaboration. Examples of SMART goals include increasing special needs student math scores by 10% and increasing student physical fitness levels. The document also provides examples of revising non-SMART goals to make them SMART and measurable.
This document discusses designing summative assessments that are aligned to course goals and the InTeGrate guiding principles. It defines different types of assessments, including diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. The purpose of summative assessments is to evaluate student learning against benchmarks or standards. The document provides guidance on developing summative assessments, including deconstructing goals into critical elements, linking elements to cognitive levels, matching elements to appropriate assessments, and selecting rubrics to score student responses. Developing well-aligned summative assessments is important for measuring student progress toward meeting course goals.
Retiring Exam Questions? How to Use These Items in Formative AssessmentsExamSoft
Presented by: Dan Thompson, Manager of Instructional Design and Educational Technology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
As semesters come and go, new exams are created and used items are retired, never to be used again. While moving on to new exam items due to poor performing statistics or to ensure exam security are sound practices, these retired items can still positively impact student learning. Retired summative assessment items can serve new purposes as formative assessment items that engage students with course content while preparing them for course exams. This presentation addresses the process of using retired exam items in creative ways to develop formative assessments to increase student self-awareness of their content knowledge and improve student retention.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
The document discusses principles for effective grading and reporting of student progress. It emphasizes that grading should provide clarity, reflect growth over time, and recognize performance above expectations. Grades should be based on specific skills and content rather than comparisons to peers. The reporting system uses ratings of "still emerging," "meeting," and "exceeding" expectations rather than numbers. Family conferences involve students sharing work with families to discuss strengths and challenges. The goal is a holistic understanding of the student's learning experience.
This document outlines the agenda and goals for the first session of the ADLT 670 curriculum design course. The session will include introductions, an overview of the syllabus and assignments. An overview of the course will be provided, covering Thomas et al.'s 6 steps of curriculum design and the instructor's goals for students. Major learning goals will also be discussed, including assessing learners, instructional strategies, learning objectives, and integrating all aspects of design. Table polls will gather information about students and their goals. Components of effective teaching and why curriculum design is important for the TiME program will also be discussed. Assignments will be outlined.
The document discusses learning objectives and provides examples of how to write effective learning objectives using the ABCD and SMART models. It defines learning objectives and their benefits, and explains how to write objectives that clearly define expected skills or knowledge to be learned for different levels including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation using Bloom's Taxonomy. Examples are provided to illustrate how to create learning objectives using the ABCD model that identify the audience, behavior, condition and degree of mastery.
This document provides an agenda and overview for a class session on designing and implementing curricula. It discusses integrating course design using backward design by beginning with learning goals and aligning objectives, instructional strategies, and assessment. The document also covers establishing significant learning goals in different domains, writing measurable objectives, considering situational factors, anticipating barriers to implementation, and the difference between audit-ive and educative assessment. Students are asked to consider how to best implement their curricular projects and self-assess their performance in the course.
This document discusses developing assessment instruments for learners. It describes the Dick and Carey 5 steps for creating an assessment instrument which includes identifying elements to be evaluated, paraphrasing elements, sequencing elements, selecting the type of judgement, and determining how the instrument will be scored. The document also covers types of assessment items, domains and item types including verbal information, attitudes, psychomotor skills, and intellectual skills. It provides criteria for writing effective test items such as ensuring items are goal centered, learner centered, context centered, and assessment centered.
This indicator focuses on questioning as a key aspect of instruction. Effective questioning involves varying the types of questions asked, such as knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, creation and evaluation. Questions should be purposeful, coherent and sequenced to instructional goals. The frequency of questions and wait time after questions are also important. Strategically selecting students to respond can maximize engagement and learning for all students. Planning questioning is important to enhance learning and meet objectives.
The document discusses student learning assessment and provides guidance on effective assessment practices. It outlines the key levels of assessment from the student to institutional level. It also discusses establishing clear and measurable learning goals, focusing assessment efforts, supporting faculty involvement, and using assessment results to improve student outcomes and inform decision making. The overall message is that assessment should be an ongoing and collaborative process aimed at enhancing student learning.
This document outlines six steps for ensuring success in mathematics and science education: 1) having a well-developed curriculum, 2) using instructional materials aligned with the curriculum, 3) employing consistent instructional strategies, 4) providing adequate professional development, 5) implementing an assessment system aligned with standards and curriculum, and 6) establishing policies and procedures that support teaching and learning. It instructs teachers to rate their school on each step, discuss as a team, develop a consensus, and summarize their ratings to identify needs and guide next steps in planning.
This document discusses key concepts related to assessment, evaluation, measurement, and their purposes. It defines data, information, and knowledge, explaining how they relate. It then discusses how assessment applies to learners to determine their acquired skills and knowledge, while evaluation typically applies to programs to determine their merit. Measurement determines the attributes of what is being studied. The document provides examples of assessing learning versus assessing for learning. It emphasizes the importance of setting learning goals and using assessment to promote learning.
Learning Indicators in science classroom, types of indicators, Learning indic...Bhaskar Reddy
This slides include What are learning Indicators, Types of Indicators, How to develop Learning Indicators, How to treat with the indicators which we find in classrooms
This document discusses developing assessment instruments for measuring learner skills and knowledge. It describes four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry-skills tests administered before instruction; pretests before new content; practice tests during instruction; and posttests after instruction. It also matches test item types like short answer, matching, and essays to different cognitive domains and learning behaviors.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments. It describes criterion-referenced assessments which directly measure skills based on performance objectives. There are four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry skills tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. When developing tests, considerations include matching learning domains to items and determining mastery levels. Effective test items use goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered criteria. Alternative assessment instruments also require identifying elements to evaluate, sequencing elements, selecting response formats, and determining scoring.
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching students about enhancing and decorating finished products as an alternative source of income. It discusses the objectives of considering policies around sustainable development and demonstrating resource management skills. The lesson will involve constructing a project plan and explaining the key parts of a project plan, which include the name of the project, objectives, materials, design or drawing, procedures, and evaluation. The students will be divided into groups to explain the information that should be included in each part of a project plan.
Ech 211 ech211 ech 211 education for service uopstudy.comUOPCourseHelp
This document outlines the weekly assignments for an early childhood education course. It includes assignments such as writing a reflection paper on an experience with young children, creating learning goals and objectives for different content areas and age groups, designing an assessment for kindergarten students, observing and interviewing a teacher to reflect on lesson plan implementation, developing an original early childhood lesson plan, and completing a self-assessment of teaching dispositions. The course uses a learning management system and students must submit assignments through the online portal.
Using rubrics can improve student learning in three main ways:
1. Rubrics help clarify expectations for assignments by making grading criteria explicit for both teachers and students.
2. Sharing rubrics with students before assignments explains the scope and essential elements, indicating what quality work looks like.
3. Rubrics provide a transparent process for evaluation that can save teachers time grading and increase fairness, while also allowing students to better understand how their work was assessed.
The document summarizes a class session on curriculum design in medical education. The agenda includes examining a completed curriculum, planning a needs assessment, and conducting their own needs assessment. A needs assessment identifies necessary knowledge and skills to achieve educational goals. Components of an educational gap include what is happening, what should be happening, the cause, and symptoms. Approaches include strategic, competency-based, job/task analysis, and training/educational needs assessments. Data gathering strategies are interviews, focus groups, surveys, observation, and extant data. Students choose a scenario to work on in small groups and consider questions about designing the educational experience.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments for measuring learner progress and instructional quality. It describes criterion-referenced assessments that measure performance against specific standards or levels of mastery. The objectives are to describe criterion-referenced tests and how various assessment types (entry tests, pretests, practice tests, posttests) are used. It also discusses developing quality criterion-referenced test items in four categories: goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered.
Helping Students Get the Most Out of ExamSoft Longitudinal ReportsExamSoft
Presented by Dr. Melinda E. Lull, Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wegmans School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher College
While students are able to view their own assessment data and longitudinal reports from ExamSoft, they can easily become lost in a sea of numbers and categories. In order to best benefit student performance, students must understand both the interpretation of and the benefit from ExamSoft reports. This session will discuss ways to provide assessment data to students and aid them interpreting and using their results.
More Than Assessment: Using computer-based testing software to deliver instru...ExamSoft
Presented by Dan Thompson, Sr. Manager of Education and Assessment, ExamSoft Worldwide
Computer-based assessment software is traditionally used to assess student performance, not necessarily drive new learning. Why stop there? There is an untapped potential in how these programs are utilized to affect more than just student evaluation. Educators can work smart and not hard by using assessment software as a method of content delivery, while still taking advantage of the valuable exam delivery and data aggregation features. This presentation addresses the process of using computer-based assessment software as a way to deliver content while simultaneously assessing students and providing immediate feedback on their performance.
Psychometrics 201: Putting assessment data into actionExamSoft
Presented by: Dan Thompson, Sr. Manager of Education and Assessment, ExamSoft Worldwide
At the conclusion of each exam, a wealth of student assessment data is immediately available to faculty. The short term value of this data is evident - evaluate individual question performance. However, that’s only the beginning. Assessment data provides opportunities for in-depth analysis on course, curricular, and instructional method performance. Furthermore, specific performance data can be distributed to students to drive their self-assessment and focused study plans. This presentation addresses the process of using assessment data to make tangible changes to improve instructional and student outcomes.
This document provides an overview of assessment for teachers. It defines assessment and differentiates it from evaluation. It discusses the importance of assessment in the teaching and learning cycle and its role in planning instruction. Formative and summative assessments are defined and examples are provided. The acronym TIPS for providing effective formative feedback is introduced. Teachers will learn to incorporate assessment into their unit planning using the Understanding by Design framework. The objectives are to help teachers understand assessment and use it to improve student learning.
Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g evaluation meeting april 26th 2016Mr Bounab Samir
This document discusses evaluation in the context of a second generation curriculum. It defines key terms like assessment, evaluation, and testing. It outlines the purposes of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. Formative assessment tools discussed include portfolios, debates, conferencing, tutoring, peer assessment, and self-assessment. Formal assessment includes tests and exams to make decisions about student ranking and progression. The document suggests that with a second generation curriculum, assessment will be an integral part of the learning process to determine student proficiency and progress towards goals. Both formative and formal assessments will be used, with formative assessment providing regular feedback to students and teachers.
The document discusses principles for effective grading and reporting of student progress. It emphasizes that grading should provide clarity, reflect growth over time, and recognize performance above expectations. Grades should be based on specific skills and content rather than comparisons to peers. The reporting system uses ratings of "still emerging," "meeting," and "exceeding" expectations rather than numbers. Family conferences involve students sharing work with families to discuss strengths and challenges. The goal is a holistic understanding of the student's learning experience.
This document outlines the agenda and goals for the first session of the ADLT 670 curriculum design course. The session will include introductions, an overview of the syllabus and assignments. An overview of the course will be provided, covering Thomas et al.'s 6 steps of curriculum design and the instructor's goals for students. Major learning goals will also be discussed, including assessing learners, instructional strategies, learning objectives, and integrating all aspects of design. Table polls will gather information about students and their goals. Components of effective teaching and why curriculum design is important for the TiME program will also be discussed. Assignments will be outlined.
The document discusses learning objectives and provides examples of how to write effective learning objectives using the ABCD and SMART models. It defines learning objectives and their benefits, and explains how to write objectives that clearly define expected skills or knowledge to be learned for different levels including knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation using Bloom's Taxonomy. Examples are provided to illustrate how to create learning objectives using the ABCD model that identify the audience, behavior, condition and degree of mastery.
This document provides an agenda and overview for a class session on designing and implementing curricula. It discusses integrating course design using backward design by beginning with learning goals and aligning objectives, instructional strategies, and assessment. The document also covers establishing significant learning goals in different domains, writing measurable objectives, considering situational factors, anticipating barriers to implementation, and the difference between audit-ive and educative assessment. Students are asked to consider how to best implement their curricular projects and self-assess their performance in the course.
This document discusses developing assessment instruments for learners. It describes the Dick and Carey 5 steps for creating an assessment instrument which includes identifying elements to be evaluated, paraphrasing elements, sequencing elements, selecting the type of judgement, and determining how the instrument will be scored. The document also covers types of assessment items, domains and item types including verbal information, attitudes, psychomotor skills, and intellectual skills. It provides criteria for writing effective test items such as ensuring items are goal centered, learner centered, context centered, and assessment centered.
This indicator focuses on questioning as a key aspect of instruction. Effective questioning involves varying the types of questions asked, such as knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, creation and evaluation. Questions should be purposeful, coherent and sequenced to instructional goals. The frequency of questions and wait time after questions are also important. Strategically selecting students to respond can maximize engagement and learning for all students. Planning questioning is important to enhance learning and meet objectives.
The document discusses student learning assessment and provides guidance on effective assessment practices. It outlines the key levels of assessment from the student to institutional level. It also discusses establishing clear and measurable learning goals, focusing assessment efforts, supporting faculty involvement, and using assessment results to improve student outcomes and inform decision making. The overall message is that assessment should be an ongoing and collaborative process aimed at enhancing student learning.
This document outlines six steps for ensuring success in mathematics and science education: 1) having a well-developed curriculum, 2) using instructional materials aligned with the curriculum, 3) employing consistent instructional strategies, 4) providing adequate professional development, 5) implementing an assessment system aligned with standards and curriculum, and 6) establishing policies and procedures that support teaching and learning. It instructs teachers to rate their school on each step, discuss as a team, develop a consensus, and summarize their ratings to identify needs and guide next steps in planning.
This document discusses key concepts related to assessment, evaluation, measurement, and their purposes. It defines data, information, and knowledge, explaining how they relate. It then discusses how assessment applies to learners to determine their acquired skills and knowledge, while evaluation typically applies to programs to determine their merit. Measurement determines the attributes of what is being studied. The document provides examples of assessing learning versus assessing for learning. It emphasizes the importance of setting learning goals and using assessment to promote learning.
Learning Indicators in science classroom, types of indicators, Learning indic...Bhaskar Reddy
This slides include What are learning Indicators, Types of Indicators, How to develop Learning Indicators, How to treat with the indicators which we find in classrooms
This document discusses developing assessment instruments for measuring learner skills and knowledge. It describes four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry-skills tests administered before instruction; pretests before new content; practice tests during instruction; and posttests after instruction. It also matches test item types like short answer, matching, and essays to different cognitive domains and learning behaviors.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments. It describes criterion-referenced assessments which directly measure skills based on performance objectives. There are four types of criterion-referenced tests: entry skills tests, pretests, practice tests, and posttests. When developing tests, considerations include matching learning domains to items and determining mastery levels. Effective test items use goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered criteria. Alternative assessment instruments also require identifying elements to evaluate, sequencing elements, selecting response formats, and determining scoring.
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching students about enhancing and decorating finished products as an alternative source of income. It discusses the objectives of considering policies around sustainable development and demonstrating resource management skills. The lesson will involve constructing a project plan and explaining the key parts of a project plan, which include the name of the project, objectives, materials, design or drawing, procedures, and evaluation. The students will be divided into groups to explain the information that should be included in each part of a project plan.
Ech 211 ech211 ech 211 education for service uopstudy.comUOPCourseHelp
This document outlines the weekly assignments for an early childhood education course. It includes assignments such as writing a reflection paper on an experience with young children, creating learning goals and objectives for different content areas and age groups, designing an assessment for kindergarten students, observing and interviewing a teacher to reflect on lesson plan implementation, developing an original early childhood lesson plan, and completing a self-assessment of teaching dispositions. The course uses a learning management system and students must submit assignments through the online portal.
Using rubrics can improve student learning in three main ways:
1. Rubrics help clarify expectations for assignments by making grading criteria explicit for both teachers and students.
2. Sharing rubrics with students before assignments explains the scope and essential elements, indicating what quality work looks like.
3. Rubrics provide a transparent process for evaluation that can save teachers time grading and increase fairness, while also allowing students to better understand how their work was assessed.
The document summarizes a class session on curriculum design in medical education. The agenda includes examining a completed curriculum, planning a needs assessment, and conducting their own needs assessment. A needs assessment identifies necessary knowledge and skills to achieve educational goals. Components of an educational gap include what is happening, what should be happening, the cause, and symptoms. Approaches include strategic, competency-based, job/task analysis, and training/educational needs assessments. Data gathering strategies are interviews, focus groups, surveys, observation, and extant data. Students choose a scenario to work on in small groups and consider questions about designing the educational experience.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments for measuring learner progress and instructional quality. It describes criterion-referenced assessments that measure performance against specific standards or levels of mastery. The objectives are to describe criterion-referenced tests and how various assessment types (entry tests, pretests, practice tests, posttests) are used. It also discusses developing quality criterion-referenced test items in four categories: goal-centered, learner-centered, context-centered, and assessment-centered.
Helping Students Get the Most Out of ExamSoft Longitudinal ReportsExamSoft
Presented by Dr. Melinda E. Lull, Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wegmans School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher College
While students are able to view their own assessment data and longitudinal reports from ExamSoft, they can easily become lost in a sea of numbers and categories. In order to best benefit student performance, students must understand both the interpretation of and the benefit from ExamSoft reports. This session will discuss ways to provide assessment data to students and aid them interpreting and using their results.
More Than Assessment: Using computer-based testing software to deliver instru...ExamSoft
Presented by Dan Thompson, Sr. Manager of Education and Assessment, ExamSoft Worldwide
Computer-based assessment software is traditionally used to assess student performance, not necessarily drive new learning. Why stop there? There is an untapped potential in how these programs are utilized to affect more than just student evaluation. Educators can work smart and not hard by using assessment software as a method of content delivery, while still taking advantage of the valuable exam delivery and data aggregation features. This presentation addresses the process of using computer-based assessment software as a way to deliver content while simultaneously assessing students and providing immediate feedback on their performance.
Psychometrics 201: Putting assessment data into actionExamSoft
Presented by: Dan Thompson, Sr. Manager of Education and Assessment, ExamSoft Worldwide
At the conclusion of each exam, a wealth of student assessment data is immediately available to faculty. The short term value of this data is evident - evaluate individual question performance. However, that’s only the beginning. Assessment data provides opportunities for in-depth analysis on course, curricular, and instructional method performance. Furthermore, specific performance data can be distributed to students to drive their self-assessment and focused study plans. This presentation addresses the process of using assessment data to make tangible changes to improve instructional and student outcomes.
This document provides an overview of assessment for teachers. It defines assessment and differentiates it from evaluation. It discusses the importance of assessment in the teaching and learning cycle and its role in planning instruction. Formative and summative assessments are defined and examples are provided. The acronym TIPS for providing effective formative feedback is introduced. Teachers will learn to incorporate assessment into their unit planning using the Understanding by Design framework. The objectives are to help teachers understand assessment and use it to improve student learning.
Teacher's hand out3rd 2 g evaluation meeting april 26th 2016Mr Bounab Samir
This document discusses evaluation in the context of a second generation curriculum. It defines key terms like assessment, evaluation, and testing. It outlines the purposes of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. Formative assessment tools discussed include portfolios, debates, conferencing, tutoring, peer assessment, and self-assessment. Formal assessment includes tests and exams to make decisions about student ranking and progression. The document suggests that with a second generation curriculum, assessment will be an integral part of the learning process to determine student proficiency and progress towards goals. Both formative and formal assessments will be used, with formative assessment providing regular feedback to students and teachers.
Lesson planning is the rudiment factor for success in execution of teaching a topic in class. It makes the class effective and the teacher comfortable. It is the tool for forward thinking and reflection for your next lesson. Lesson planning gives concrete shapes to ideas. Infact if you do not plan you are planning to fail,
The document provides an overview of key concepts in curriculum planning and classroom assessment. It discusses educational goals, student profiles, learning outcomes, minimum and higher learning competencies, and their role in curriculum planning. It also covers different types of assessment including formative and summative assessment, informal and formal assessment, and traditional vs contemporary assessment. Classroom assessment strategies, methods, tools, and the purpose of pre, formative, and summative assessment are also summarized.
This PowerPoint by Dr. Dee McKinney & Katie Shepard was presented as a workshop for the East Georgia State College Center for Teaching & Learning for interested faculty & staff in January 2018.
Classroom Assessment is a systematic approach to formative evaluation, used by instructors to determine how much and how well students are learning. CATs and other informal assessment tools provide key information during the semester regarding teaching and learning so that changes can be made as necessary. "The central purpose of Classroom Assessment is to empower both teachers and their students to improve the quality of learning in the classroom" through an approach that is "learner-centered, teacher-directed, mutually beneficial, formative, context-specific, and firmly rooted in good practice" (Angelo & Cross, 1993, p. 4).
This document discusses different types of evaluation used at various stages of instructional design: formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation. Formative evaluation informs instructors during development, summative evaluates learning outcomes at completion, and confirmative evaluates long-term outcomes. Different evaluation methods are suited to different purposes, such as objective tests for knowledge and performance assessments for skills. Validity and reliability of evaluation instruments are important to ensure accurate measurement of learning objectives.
This document discusses assessment strategies for enhancing student learning. It defines different types of assessments, including diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments. Formative assessments are emphasized as being most effective for driving instruction when used ongoing throughout a course. Specific examples are provided for different formative assessment techniques like observations, homework, and reflections. The document also stresses the importance of providing timely and specific feedback to students to allow them to improve.
Active learning & classroom assessment practicesKyawmoe Aung
This document discusses various assessment techniques including formative and summative assessment, criteria for good assessment, and examples of performance-based assessments. Formative assessment occurs during instruction to inform teaching, while summative assessment happens at the end to evaluate learning. Good assessments are valid, reliable, standardized, practical, and have positive washback effects on teaching and learning. Performance-based assessments examples include K-W-L charts, pass slips, portfolios, peer assessment, and self-assessment. The role of assessment is to align learning objectives, instruction, and evaluation of skills and knowledge.
This document discusses assessment in medical education. It defines assessment as tools used to evaluate students' academic readiness, learning progress, skill acquisition, and educational needs. The main types of assessment discussed are diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. Formative assessment promotes and improves learning through feedback, while summative assessment determines learning at the end of instruction. Structured assessments aim to objectively measure students' knowledge, skills, and abilities. Good assessments demonstrate validity, reliability, feasibility, and other qualities. The document provides examples of different assessment tools and discusses calculating a utility index to determine tools' usefulness in a given context.
Curriculum development and course design involve 5 major tasks: 1) assessing learner needs, 2) deciding objectives, 3) selecting learning experiences, 4) determining appropriate methodologies/resources, and 5) evaluating effectiveness. Key aspects of the process include determining measurable objectives, using a variety of instructional methods to achieve objectives, and evaluating learner behavior changes over time through methods like tests and observations. The overall goal is to design a curriculum and courses that meet learner needs through clear objectives and engaging learning experiences.
Curriculum development and course design involve 5 major tasks: 1) assessing learner needs, 2) deciding objectives, 3) selecting learning experiences, 4) determining appropriate methodologies/resources, and 5) evaluating effectiveness. Key aspects of the process include determining measurable objectives, using a variety of instructional methods to achieve objectives, and evaluating learner behavior changes over time through methods like tests and observations. The overall goal is to design a curriculum and courses that meet learner needs through clear objectives and engaging learning experiences.
The backward design model comprises three stages:
I. Identify desired results
II. Determine acceptable evidence
III. Plan learning experiences and instruction. Once desired results and evidence are determined, a lesson plan can be developed to help students reach the objectives. Wiggins and McTighe's "WHERE" approach is used in planning instruction and experiences.
The document discusses developing criterion-referenced assessments. It explains that criterion-referenced assessments directly measure skills described in behavioral objectives and focus on gauging learner performance and instructional quality. The document provides guidance on writing test items, developing different types of assessments, setting mastery criteria, and ensuring assessments are congruent with objectives and instructional analyses. It emphasizes the importance of criterion-referenced assessments for evaluating both learners and instruction.
The document discusses developing assessment instruments for measuring learner progress and instructional quality. It covers criterion-referenced assessments that measure performance against specific standards or levels. The objectives are to describe criterion-referenced tests and different types of pre- and post-instruction assessments. It also discusses developing quality criterion-referenced test items and assessments of products, performances, and attitudes.
This document provides an overview of a webinar on assessments and rubrics for transforming undergraduate STEM education. The webinar goals are to define typical terminology related to outcomes, assessments and rubrics, propose assessments for different outcomes and levels, and access and use a materials design rubric. The rubric links learning goals and processes through seven sections including guiding principles, learning goals and outcomes, assessments and measurements, resources and materials, instructional strategies, alignment, and GETSI-specific instructional strategies. The webinar discusses writing learning outcomes, formative and summative assessments, examples of current rubrics, and designing effective rubrics.
The document provides guidance on constructing intended learning outcomes at the course level (CILOs). It defines CILOs as describing the specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes students are expected to develop by the end of a course. Guidelines are given for writing effective CILO statements, such as using active verbs to describe observable performances, focusing on significant and essential learnings, and reflecting the three learning domains of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills. Bloom's Taxonomy is referenced as a tool to help classify learning objectives according to cognitive level. Examples of well-written CILO statements are also provided.
The document discusses three main types of assessments: assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. Assessment of learning refers to summative assessments like exams and final projects that are used to evaluate learning at the end of a unit. Assessment for learning refers to formative assessments like quizzes, discussions and projects that are used during instruction to adjust teaching and provide feedback. Assessment as learning refers to assessments that actively involve students in self-assessment and goal-setting to improve learning. Examples of different assessment types are provided.
This document provides guidelines for constructing written tests to assess student learning. It discusses selecting an appropriate test format based on the learning outcomes being measured and the level of thinking required. Multiple choice tests are considered suitable for some learning targets, especially in large classes where immediate results are needed. The document outlines questions to consider when choosing a format, such as matching test items to learning objectives, cognitive level, and course content. Tests should align with instructional activities and address the desired learning outcomes to provide fair and challenging assessments of student knowledge and skills.
Similar to Some curriculum and assessment concepts (20)
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
2. SMART objectives
• We need to develop objectives for our lessons/unit/courses that are
• Specific.
• Measurable.
• Achievable.
• Relevant.
• Time-oriented.
• It is recommended that each objective follow the stem:
• By the end of the lesson/unit/course, students will be able to…
• Some specific verbs are often used in this design. They are linked to
one of the six Bloom’s Taxonomy’s level of cognitive skills.
3.
4.
5. Big ideas and
essential
questions
• These are part of a unit design framework developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
that is broadly used in many countries.
• They propose to develop a unit using backward design.
• From DESIRED RESULTS to EVIDENCE and finally to LEARNING EXPERIENCES.
• This means that we need to think, first at all, in what we want students be able to
do at the end of the unit (or lesson, or course), immediately we will face the
problem of how to assess this learning; to end (in the design process) with how we
will teach in order to get the desired result.
• In each unit we challenge our students with essential questions to elicit their
understanding of core concepts (big ideas) that need to be transferable to other
situations and sphere of knowledge.
6. Essential questions are…
…thought provoking;
…open-ended;
…questions with multiple – and not wrong – answers;
…creative;
…related to enduring understandings that we want our students take from each unit.
7. Assessment
tools and
Rubrics
An assessment tool is any instrument a teacher can use
as an evidence of the students learning. It can be a test,
the prompt for an oral task, etc.
Every assessment tool needs to be aligned with the
course/unit/lesson it will assess. In each assessment tool
the teacher set assessment objectives that correspond
with the learning objectives designed before in the
lesson/unit/course plan.
An answer key or, in some cases, a rubric needs to be
developed as well in order to evaluate the student
performance.
8. Assessment tools and
Rubrics
• In developing an assessment tool we should follow – as much as
possible – some principles:
• Practicality. The assessment will consume resources (time,
money, etc.) that are limited. So this needs to be considered.
• Reliability. An assessment taken by different students under
similar conditions will give similar results.
• Validity. The assessment tool measures what it was intended
to measure.
• Authenticity. The tasks proposed to the students are related
to real world situations.
• Wash-back. The assessment tool has (positive or negative)
consequences for the learner that can motivate him/her in
the learning process.
9. There is a lot more to
say, but I trust we can
complete the puzzle
piece by piece
together. Thank you!