SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Immediate
Activity       Activity Time Predecessor
             1            30 None                                                1   1,3                   70
             2            50 None                                                2   2,5                   70
             3            40               1                                     3   4,8                   70
             4            50               1                                     4   6,9,13                70
             5            20               2                                     5   7,10,11               70
             6            10               3                                     6   14,15                 60
             7            10             4,5                                     7   12,16                 70
             8            20               2                                                              480
             9            10               6
            10            40               9                                                        Avl Time
            11            20               7                                                        Idle time
            12            30               7                                                        Efficency
            13            50               9
            14            50             10
            15            10             11
            16            40           8,12
                         480
Lead Time                  8 Min
Cycle time (420 O/P)                    420 Min                        1 Min/ Unit
                                        420 Units
No. of WS Req (420 O/P)                    8

Cycle time (315 O/P)                   420 Min                   1.33 Min/ Unit                80         360
                                       315 Units
No. of WS Req (315 O/P)                  6
No. of WS Used                           7


                           contribution    per unit        # units                   wages          workers
                                                      30             420    12600              18               9
                                                      30             315     9450              18               7

                           Line a          Per Unit Contribution Per DayDayReg wages workers
                                                      # Units Produced / Contribution
                                                   30        420     12600          18       9
                                                   30        315      9450          18       7
                                                   30        420     12600          18       7
                                                                      3150      63000




                                                                                14             30         420
Capacity
 1.166667   0.163333         1           2       50         504            1             30       840
 1.166667   0.163333         2   1,5             50         504            2             50       504
 1.166667   0.163333         3   3,8             60         420          3,5             60       420
 1.166667   0.163333         4   4,6,7           70         360          4,6             60       420
 1.166667   0.163333         5   9,13            60         420           10             40       630
        1        0.33        6   10,11           60         420      7,11,12             60       420
 1.166667   0.163333         7   14,15           60         420         9,13             60       420
        8        1.31        8   12,16           70         360        14,15             60       420
                             9                                          8,16             60       420
     9.31                                       480                                     480
     1.31
    85.93                                                         Avl Time             3780
                                                                  Used                 3360
                                                                  Efficency           88.89


                                                                              1   1,3              70
                                                                              2   2,5              70
                                  373.3333                                    3   4,8              70
                                  0.888889 53.33333                           4   6,9,13           70
                                                                              5   7,10,11          70
                                                                              6   14,15            60
                                                                              7   12,16            70
                                                                                                  480




hours       wages
        8       1296     1256                    18          7                8        1008
        8       1008     1206                                                           420
                                                                                       1428
Reg hours OT Hours Wages / Day ontribution / Day / Worker
                             C                                                          132      12000
        8         0    1296        1256                                                       90.90909
        8         0    1008        1206
        8        14    1428        1596                                                 132
3780




                                  540
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
       1        0.33   420        540
1.166667   0.163333    360   462.8571
       8        1.31
Immediate
Activity   Activity Time  Predecessor
a                      40 None                                     1 a,b,d              110   262
b                      50 None                                     2 c,e                120   240
c                      70 a                                        3 f,g,h              130   222
d                      20 a                                                             360
e                      50 a
f                      40 b,c                                      1   a,b               90   229
g                      60 e                                        2   c,d               90   229
h                      30 d,f,g                                    3   e,f               90   229
                      360                                          4   g,h               90   229
Flow Time               6 Min
Cycle time                              420 Min                    2 Min/ Unit
                                        210 Units
No. of WS Req (420 O/P)                   3

Earlier case WS                           2
Aval time                               420
total o/p                               140

                                              contribution unit
                                                         per           # units
                                                                  30             210   6300
                                                                  30             140   4200

                          Line B              Per Unit Contribution Per DayDayReg wages workers
                                                         # Units Produced / Contribution
                                                      30        210      6300          18       3
                                                      30        140      4200          18       2
                                                      30        210      6300          18       4
                                                                         2100
229                                         1 a,b,c,d   180    140
      210                                         1 e,f,g,h   180    140
      194        16         35




Reg hours OT Hours Wages / Day ontribution / Day / Worker
                             C
        8         1   529.2      1923.6                       67.2
        8         0     288        1956
        8         0     576        1431

More Related Content

What's hot

Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERPCisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
Vinay Gk
 
Apex corporation case study
Apex corporation case studyApex corporation case study
Apex corporation case study
Utkarsh Shivam
 
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New FrontiersAlphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Radha Gupta
 
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
Rohail Siddique
 
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
Karan Jaidka
 
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimitedNitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Shashank Shukla
 
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case AnalysisHarrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
mbartugs
 
Classic pen company activity based costing
Classic pen company activity based costingClassic pen company activity based costing
Classic pen company activity based costing
Harish B
 
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Sharon
 
Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)
Bheemendra Narayan
 
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
Abbas Dhuliawala
 
Managing Cultural Differences
Managing Cultural DifferencesManaging Cultural Differences
Managing Cultural Differences
Alexandru Caratas Ghenea
 
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case AnalysisThe Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
Devanand Hariperumal
 
James Burke A Career In American Business
James Burke A Career In American BusinessJames Burke A Career In American Business
James Burke A Career In American Business
Ron Liu
 
Manzana insurance
Manzana insuranceManzana insurance
Manzana insurance
Debashish Bagg
 
Donner case study om
Donner case study   omDonner case study   om
Donner case study om
Pratik Patel
 
Workload balancing
Workload balancingWorkload balancing
Workload balancing
om prakash Gupta
 
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrushColgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
Rajendra Inani
 
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon ZehnderStrategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
Mathan Anto Marshine
 
Manzana insurance case study analysis.
Manzana insurance case study analysis.Manzana insurance case study analysis.
Manzana insurance case study analysis.
Abanta Kumar Majumdar
 

What's hot (20)

Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERPCisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
Cisco System Inc. Implementing ERP
 
Apex corporation case study
Apex corporation case studyApex corporation case study
Apex corporation case study
 
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New FrontiersAlphabet Eyes New Frontiers
Alphabet Eyes New Frontiers
 
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
Mrs. fields cookies odc section c_group 9
 
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimitedNitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimited
 
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case AnalysisHarrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. Case Analysis
 
Classic pen company activity based costing
Classic pen company activity based costingClassic pen company activity based costing
Classic pen company activity based costing
 
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
 
Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)
 
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
Tanishq - Positioning to capture Indian woman’s heart - Marketing Management...
 
Managing Cultural Differences
Managing Cultural DifferencesManaging Cultural Differences
Managing Cultural Differences
 
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case AnalysisThe Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
 
James Burke A Career In American Business
James Burke A Career In American BusinessJames Burke A Career In American Business
James Burke A Career In American Business
 
Manzana insurance
Manzana insuranceManzana insurance
Manzana insurance
 
Donner case study om
Donner case study   omDonner case study   om
Donner case study om
 
Workload balancing
Workload balancingWorkload balancing
Workload balancing
 
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrushColgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
Colgate palmolive the precision toothbrush
 
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon ZehnderStrategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
Strategic Review and Analysis of Egon Zehnder
 
Manzana insurance case study analysis.
Manzana insurance case study analysis.Manzana insurance case study analysis.
Manzana insurance case study analysis.
 

More from Rajendra Inani

Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv   iimiccdvsallocfinalDcv   iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
Rajendra Inani
 
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Rajendra Inani
 
Msrdc case study
Msrdc case studyMsrdc case study
Msrdc case study
Rajendra Inani
 
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
Merrimack tractors   analysis - finalMerrimack tractors   analysis - final
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
Rajendra Inani
 
Maharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporationMaharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporation
Rajendra Inani
 
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentationGroup 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Rajendra Inani
 
Fra coca - cola case study
Fra   coca - cola case studyFra   coca - cola case study
Fra coca - cola case study
Rajendra Inani
 
Explore indore rajendra inani
Explore indore   rajendra inaniExplore indore   rajendra inani
Explore indore rajendra inani
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_pptEpgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Rajendra Inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viiiEpgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Rajendra Inani
 

More from Rajendra Inani (20)

Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv   iimiccdvsallocfinalDcv   iimiccdvsallocfinal
Dcv iimiccdvsallocfinal
 
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
Trans share inc - case study submission 12 sep 09 v1.1
 
Msrdc case study
Msrdc case studyMsrdc case study
Msrdc case study
 
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
Merrimack tractors   analysis - finalMerrimack tractors   analysis - final
Merrimack tractors analysis - final
 
Maharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporationMaharashtra state road development corporation
Maharashtra state road development corporation
 
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentationGroup 8   epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
Group 8 epgp - meeting management - communication presentation
 
Fra coca - cola case study
Fra   coca - cola case studyFra   coca - cola case study
Fra coca - cola case study
 
Explore indore rajendra inani
Explore indore   rajendra inaniExplore indore   rajendra inani
Explore indore rajendra inani
 
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_pptEpgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
Epgp bm brand_extensions_ppt
 
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
Epgp(one year) 2009-10_fsr_group4_03.12.09
 
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010Epgp term v mos  group assignment april 2010
Epgp term v mos group assignment april 2010
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-dell assignment_#1_19jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_18jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_mos_ assignment_#1_5jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cost management_group assignement_case i_25nov09
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#4_19jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#3_14jan10
 
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
Epgp (one year) 2009-10_cf_ assignment_#2_6jan10
 
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inaniEpgp 09 10 -fra  term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
Epgp 09 10 -fra term 1 - end term submission - rajendra inani
 
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viiiEpgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
Epgp 09 10 -cfl project - term 1 - group viii
 

Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope

  • 1. Immediate Activity Activity Time Predecessor 1 30 None 1 1,3 70 2 50 None 2 2,5 70 3 40 1 3 4,8 70 4 50 1 4 6,9,13 70 5 20 2 5 7,10,11 70 6 10 3 6 14,15 60 7 10 4,5 7 12,16 70 8 20 2 480 9 10 6 10 40 9 Avl Time 11 20 7 Idle time 12 30 7 Efficency 13 50 9 14 50 10 15 10 11 16 40 8,12 480 Lead Time 8 Min Cycle time (420 O/P) 420 Min 1 Min/ Unit 420 Units No. of WS Req (420 O/P) 8 Cycle time (315 O/P) 420 Min 1.33 Min/ Unit 80 360 315 Units No. of WS Req (315 O/P) 6 No. of WS Used 7 contribution per unit # units wages workers 30 420 12600 18 9 30 315 9450 18 7 Line a Per Unit Contribution Per DayDayReg wages workers # Units Produced / Contribution 30 420 12600 18 9 30 315 9450 18 7 30 420 12600 18 7 3150 63000 14 30 420
  • 2. Capacity 1.166667 0.163333 1 2 50 504 1 30 840 1.166667 0.163333 2 1,5 50 504 2 50 504 1.166667 0.163333 3 3,8 60 420 3,5 60 420 1.166667 0.163333 4 4,6,7 70 360 4,6 60 420 1.166667 0.163333 5 9,13 60 420 10 40 630 1 0.33 6 10,11 60 420 7,11,12 60 420 1.166667 0.163333 7 14,15 60 420 9,13 60 420 8 1.31 8 12,16 70 360 14,15 60 420 9 8,16 60 420 9.31 480 480 1.31 85.93 Avl Time 3780 Used 3360 Efficency 88.89 1 1,3 70 2 2,5 70 373.3333 3 4,8 70 0.888889 53.33333 4 6,9,13 70 5 7,10,11 70 6 14,15 60 7 12,16 70 480 hours wages 8 1296 1256 18 7 8 1008 8 1008 1206 420 1428 Reg hours OT Hours Wages / Day ontribution / Day / Worker C 132 12000 8 0 1296 1256 90.90909 8 0 1008 1206 8 14 1428 1596 132
  • 3. 3780 540 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 1 0.33 420 540 1.166667 0.163333 360 462.8571 8 1.31
  • 4. Immediate Activity Activity Time Predecessor a 40 None 1 a,b,d 110 262 b 50 None 2 c,e 120 240 c 70 a 3 f,g,h 130 222 d 20 a 360 e 50 a f 40 b,c 1 a,b 90 229 g 60 e 2 c,d 90 229 h 30 d,f,g 3 e,f 90 229 360 4 g,h 90 229 Flow Time 6 Min Cycle time 420 Min 2 Min/ Unit 210 Units No. of WS Req (420 O/P) 3 Earlier case WS 2 Aval time 420 total o/p 140 contribution unit per # units 30 210 6300 30 140 4200 Line B Per Unit Contribution Per DayDayReg wages workers # Units Produced / Contribution 30 210 6300 18 3 30 140 4200 18 2 30 210 6300 18 4 2100
  • 5. 229 1 a,b,c,d 180 140 210 1 e,f,g,h 180 140 194 16 35 Reg hours OT Hours Wages / Day ontribution / Day / Worker C 8 1 529.2 1923.6 67.2 8 0 288 1956 8 0 576 1431