The document reviews the current state of software visualization (SV) research, focusing on its purposes, methods, data sources, and maturity. It identifies key visualization types such as trees, graphs, and geometric projections, along with the attributes and sources of data used in SV. The analysis includes the effectiveness of visualization methods in understanding software structure, behavior, and optimization.

1. Software Visualization Today
Results of literature review
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

2. Research Design
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

3. Research questions
• What is the focus of software visualization (SV) research?
– Why software is visualized?
– What are the visualization methods used in SV?
– What are the data sources used in SV?
• What is the maturity of SV research field?
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

4. Research process
Defining
research goals
Selecting
sources of
literature
Screening of
literature
Conducting
searches
Defining
classification
scheme
Testing data
extraction form
Qalitative
analysis
Quantitative
analysis
Synthesis
Testing search
terms
Data extraction
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

5. Analysis
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

6. Example Visualizations
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

7. Code City
https://wettel.github.io/
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

8. Polymetric Views
http://xray.inf.usi.ch/xray.php
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

9. Seesoft, line based code visualization
http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2001/cmsc838b/Project/Parija_Spacco/old_viewtips.html
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

10. Disk Usage Utilities
https://softvis.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/disk-usage-utilities/
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

11. Dependency Structure Matrix
http://www.softviscollection.org/vis/dependency-structure-matrix/
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto,
Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

12. Code Ownership Distribution Map
http://www.softviscollection.org/vis/code-ownership-distribution-map/
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

13. Results
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

14. Why software is visualized?
• To understand software structure
• To understand software behavior
• To understand software evolution
• For optimizing different aspects of software
• For project management purposes
• To understand how developers work
• For requirements management
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

15. Visualization methods used in SV
Visualization types
• Trees and graphs
• Geometric projection techniques
• Text based visualizations
• Timelines
• Info graphics
Visualization attributes
• Color
• Spatial position
• Size
• Shape
• Animation
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

16. Data in SV
Data sources
• Source code
• Software execution data
• Change data (e.g. from version
control system)
• Static code analysis data
• Software usage data
• Software related documents and
models
• Data from testing of software
Data attributes
• Hierarchies and dependencies
• Time and duration
• Object oriented metrics
• Version and change related
attributes
• Execution traces
• Text
• Similarity
• Etc.
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

17. Studied aspects Structure Execution Evolution Management Development Requirements Optimization Rendering Other
Amount of studies 37 25 15 6 3 3 3 3 2
Data sources x studied aspects Structure Execution Evolution Management Development RE Optimization Rendering Other Total
Source code 33 6 11 5 0 1 0 2 0 46
Software execution data 7 22 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 28
Change / version data 5 1 10 3 2 0 1 0 1 17
Static code analysis data 8 5 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 15
Usage data 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Documents and models 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 5
Test data 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4
Other 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Not relevant / Not stated clearly 4 0 3 2 1 0 0 2 0 9
Visualization formats x studied aspects Structure Execution Evolution Management Development Requirements Optimization Rendering Other Total
Hierarchical and Graph-Based Techniques 31 17 11 3 2 2 1 3 2 61
Geometric projection techniques 12 12 5 2 0 0 2 1 0 26
Timelines 1 9 5 3 3 0 1 0 0 18
Info graphics 7 6 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 17
Icon-based techniques 6 3 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 12
Text based visualizations 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Tag- and word-clouds 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5
Pixel-oriented techniques 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Other 3 4 4 3 0 1 1 0 0 11
Not stated clearly in the article 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Multiple views used x studied aspects Structure Execution Evolution Management Development RE Optimization Rendering Other Total
Used 16 14 12 5 2 0 2 0 0 43
Not used 21 11 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 40
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

18. Maturity of SV research
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

19. Conclusion
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

20. Questions?
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä

21. THANK YOU!
Anna-Liisa Mattila, Petri Ihantola, Terhi Kilamo, Antti Luoto, Mikko Nurminen, Heli Väätäjä