Sociolinguistic and Law
Presented by
Md Syed Ahamad
Sociolinguistic and law 1
EDWARD FINEGAN
Reference
• Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 1998
• Edited by Florian Coulmas
• Wikipedia
Sociolinguistic and law 2
Outline
• Sociolinguistic Applications in Forensic Settings
• Dialectology
• Discourse
• Conclusion – Sociolinguistic and Law
• Language experts and ethics
Sociolinguistic and law 3
Dialectology
• A dialect – shared speech characteristics of a social
group.
• Ash, a sociolinguist familiar with the phidalphia
speech community demonstrated that the change
in vowel quality in their dialect is difficult in trying
to disguise their voices.
Sociolinguistic and law 4
Dialectology
• Labov’s Acoustic analysis of the vowels in the
words bomb, there, off, and on ( “There's gonna be
a bomb going off on the flight to LA”).
• The intervention of a skilled language analyst can
lead to a recognition that a defendant is not a likely
perpetrator.
Sociolinguistic and law 5
Discourse
• Definition – the study of language use.
• Structure – A particular unit of language.
• Function – A particular focus on language use.
• A unit which looks like a sentence but doesn’t
mean anything
• e.g. Colourless green ideas sleep furiously
• The units in which people speak do not always
look like sentences.
• e.g. I mean, huh! It’s not like that……
Sociolinguistic and law 6
Shuy Issues
• First issue – challenge of making accurate
transcriptions.
• Prince Analysis
• (a) lines represent FBI transcriptions, the
(b) lines transcriptions made by Prince herself.
• T-tape carrier, D-the target and eventual defender.
• Capital letter – heavy stress
• Bracket – time length of silence.
Continue….
Sociolinguistic and law 7
First Issue
• 1 (a) T: … I don't know whether he said he
followed him or they followed him when he left
there. I don't know.
• (b) T: … I don't know whether he said HE followed
THEM or THEY followed HIM when he left there.
[4 sec] D: They can't HAVE anything. T: I don't
know.
• 2 (a) D: Jesus Christ – that's a shame. I don't know
what the hell to do.
• (b) D: Jesus Christ. [5 sec] That's a shame. [3 sec] I
don't know what the hell to tell you.
Sociolinguistic and law 8
Second Issue
• Second issue – interpretations of conversational exchanges
• Linguists analyse how people talk and not just what
they speak.
• e.g. That’s not what I mean!
• Labov’s observer Paradox - “our goal is to observe
how people use language when they are not being
observed.”
Sociolinguistic and law 9
Second Issue
• Group Discussion
• Topic analysis – who raised which topics and how
often.
• Response Analysis to a given topic(changing it,
postponing it).
• Labov’s observer Paradox
• Shuy notes “The way a person selects from among
these options gives clues to that person's concerns,
interests, and intentions.”
Sociolinguistic and law 10
Conclusion
Language experts and ethics
Sociolinguistic and law 11
Problem
• Sociolinguists who serve as consultants and expert
witnesses inevitably face ethical challenges.
• Language experts face exceptional challenges when
participating in a vigorously adversarial system.
• Awkward situation and many others.
Sociolinguistic and law 12
Solution
• Fenagan’s guidelines –
• Don't allow yourself to assume that an attorney
retaining your expertise has told you all that he or she
could reveal about the case;
• Distinguish between your roles as expert and
consultant;
• Be aware that another expert may be providing
opposing counsel with critiques of your analysis.
• No emotions but the truth!!
Sociolinguistic and law 13
Thank You
Sociolinguistic and law 14

Sociolinguistic and law

  • 1.
    Sociolinguistic and Law Presentedby Md Syed Ahamad Sociolinguistic and law 1 EDWARD FINEGAN
  • 2.
    Reference • Handbook ofSociolinguistics, 1998 • Edited by Florian Coulmas • Wikipedia Sociolinguistic and law 2
  • 3.
    Outline • Sociolinguistic Applicationsin Forensic Settings • Dialectology • Discourse • Conclusion – Sociolinguistic and Law • Language experts and ethics Sociolinguistic and law 3
  • 4.
    Dialectology • A dialect– shared speech characteristics of a social group. • Ash, a sociolinguist familiar with the phidalphia speech community demonstrated that the change in vowel quality in their dialect is difficult in trying to disguise their voices. Sociolinguistic and law 4
  • 5.
    Dialectology • Labov’s Acousticanalysis of the vowels in the words bomb, there, off, and on ( “There's gonna be a bomb going off on the flight to LA”). • The intervention of a skilled language analyst can lead to a recognition that a defendant is not a likely perpetrator. Sociolinguistic and law 5
  • 6.
    Discourse • Definition –the study of language use. • Structure – A particular unit of language. • Function – A particular focus on language use. • A unit which looks like a sentence but doesn’t mean anything • e.g. Colourless green ideas sleep furiously • The units in which people speak do not always look like sentences. • e.g. I mean, huh! It’s not like that…… Sociolinguistic and law 6
  • 7.
    Shuy Issues • Firstissue – challenge of making accurate transcriptions. • Prince Analysis • (a) lines represent FBI transcriptions, the (b) lines transcriptions made by Prince herself. • T-tape carrier, D-the target and eventual defender. • Capital letter – heavy stress • Bracket – time length of silence. Continue…. Sociolinguistic and law 7
  • 8.
    First Issue • 1(a) T: … I don't know whether he said he followed him or they followed him when he left there. I don't know. • (b) T: … I don't know whether he said HE followed THEM or THEY followed HIM when he left there. [4 sec] D: They can't HAVE anything. T: I don't know. • 2 (a) D: Jesus Christ – that's a shame. I don't know what the hell to do. • (b) D: Jesus Christ. [5 sec] That's a shame. [3 sec] I don't know what the hell to tell you. Sociolinguistic and law 8
  • 9.
    Second Issue • Secondissue – interpretations of conversational exchanges • Linguists analyse how people talk and not just what they speak. • e.g. That’s not what I mean! • Labov’s observer Paradox - “our goal is to observe how people use language when they are not being observed.” Sociolinguistic and law 9
  • 10.
    Second Issue • GroupDiscussion • Topic analysis – who raised which topics and how often. • Response Analysis to a given topic(changing it, postponing it). • Labov’s observer Paradox • Shuy notes “The way a person selects from among these options gives clues to that person's concerns, interests, and intentions.” Sociolinguistic and law 10
  • 11.
    Conclusion Language experts andethics Sociolinguistic and law 11
  • 12.
    Problem • Sociolinguists whoserve as consultants and expert witnesses inevitably face ethical challenges. • Language experts face exceptional challenges when participating in a vigorously adversarial system. • Awkward situation and many others. Sociolinguistic and law 12
  • 13.
    Solution • Fenagan’s guidelines– • Don't allow yourself to assume that an attorney retaining your expertise has told you all that he or she could reveal about the case; • Distinguish between your roles as expert and consultant; • Be aware that another expert may be providing opposing counsel with critiques of your analysis. • No emotions but the truth!! Sociolinguistic and law 13
  • 14.