This document discusses the debate around single-sex education versus coeducation for young children ages 5 to 15. It claims that single-sex education is better for younger children because boys and girls learn differently, have different strengths, and need to succeed in all areas before social learning together in a coeducational environment. The thesis statement asserts that young children should be in a single-sex environment to allow them to learn differently based on gender and have a greater chance of succeeding in all areas.

1. Single Sex Education Versus Coeducation Melissa Cahill

2. All single sex education versus coeducation Public education versus private education Young children Thoughts

3. Books Articles Facts Opinions Research

4. Girls and boys brains are different People seem to think that children should be in a coeducation environment for social reasons. Public schools have started experimenting Boys and girls seem to be more mature Teachers adapt to their students Research

5. Young children aging 5 to 15 years Learn differently Exceed different areas Young Children and Education

6. Research Question: Is single sex education better than coeducation?Claim: When children are younger they need to be in a single sex environment.Reasons: 1: Males and females learn differently 2: Males and females have stronger areas of intelligence3: Children need to exceed in all areas before they socially learn together. Paper

7. Complete Thesis Statement: Young children need to be in a single sex environment because they learn differently, they have stronger areas of development and they need to succeed as early as possible. Children ages 5 to 15 learn differently based on gender therefore should be in a same sex environment. If this were to happen they would have a greater chance in succeeding in all areas. Thesis Statment

8. The End

9. References