This document discusses the challenges teachers face in implementing a workshop approach to reading instruction. It identifies external challenges from high-stakes testing, administrative pressures, and parental expectations. It also notes internal challenges such as lack of experience with children's literature, varying definitions of reading, and the wide range of student experiences and abilities. The document provides suggestions for addressing these challenges, such as separating test preparation from reading workshops and educating administrators and parents about the workshop approach.
Assessing the Assessment: An Evaluation of a Self-Assessment of Class Partici...Eddy White, Ph.D.
Recently published online in the Asian EFL Journal (September, 2009), this article is part of my doctoral research into assessment for learning (AfL) in an EFL/ESL context with adult learners.
This presentation presents the results of an action research project investigating the impact of concept mapping and multiple exposures on fifth grade students' science vocabulary achievement compared to traditional definition-based instruction.
Assessing the Assessment: An Evaluation of a Self-Assessment of Class Partici...Eddy White, Ph.D.
Recently published online in the Asian EFL Journal (September, 2009), this article is part of my doctoral research into assessment for learning (AfL) in an EFL/ESL context with adult learners.
This presentation presents the results of an action research project investigating the impact of concept mapping and multiple exposures on fifth grade students' science vocabulary achievement compared to traditional definition-based instruction.
Research Proposal on: Teacher’s knowledge & curriculum effect on student’s le...Ghulam Mujtaba
Learning is the central concern of teachers they need to be equipped with a well-informed understanding of learning that takes account in particular of its socially situated dimensions. Learning is a phenomenon detachable from context and transferable elsewhere only under specific conditions. Nor is learning a purely individual accomplishment, being achieved alongside others in definable circumstances and in relation to particular cultural communities. Our account of this situatedness of learning is presented in terms of two well-known examples, Brazilian street vendors and English girls at home and at nursery school. The authors present a view of pedagogy consistent with the theoretical account of learning and based on four elements: situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing and transformed practice. This view is not so much prescriptive as a means of providing a vocabulary for critical discussion of teaching and learning in practice.
Enhancing Primary Mathematics learning using assessment practices: an initiat...inventionjournals
ABSTRACT : This paper attempts to study two important aspects: (1) To foster the skills for quality assessment in mathematics among prospective teachers. (2) To explore the extent to which these practices helped in improving quality of learning as well as teaching. The study has been done in MCD primary schools from class II to V with the involvement of pre-service B.El.Ed teachers, during their primary school internship in 4th year. The study comprises four phases, In the first phase, authors did a survey of the assessment practices that have been followed in these schools. Second phase comprised making student-teachers aware of the assessment practices going on in the schools, reviewing it critically, orienting them to prepare assessment profiles of their students. In the third Phase, students implemented these assessment practices in their respective classes for around three months under the supervision of authors. The final phase allowed a discussion with student-teachers and analysed the feedback of pre-service teachers as how these assessment practices helped them to take up decision regarding teaching as well as students‟ progress in understanding the concepts. Findings revealed that these assessment practices helped interns to monitor and modify their pedagogy. Further, Responses of the students in the assessment tasks improved progressively. However, some of the Interns faced many challenges related to recording individual progress, to assess through students responses while teaching as it became difficult for them to interpret individual responses.
WHAT ARE THE SUITABLE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY AND MEDIA FOR STUDENT LEARNING S...IJITE
This study aims to find out what instructional strategy and media more properly based on learning styles in
middle schools. For this purpose, 307 students of 7th to 9th grade from three middle schools were the
respondents. Index Learning Styles was used to know the student learning styles based on Felder-Silverman
learning styles. The students were also asked with the questions to know what instructional strategy and
media they like much. The results show instructional strategies that could be applicated in middle schools
are; question and answer methods, student presentations, games and simulations, lectures, problem solving
based learning, role playing, and panel discussions. Instructional media that could be applicated are;
pictures, graphics, videos, simulations, online group learning, newspapers, chatting/messenger, powerpoint
slides, computer animations, book/e-book, magazines, audio recorded, and email. This is than checked off
with the combinations of student learning style to get the most suitable one.
Using Action Research to Identify Data During Clinical Experience (main)Antwuan Stinson
Critical thinking is the focal point missed in many students’ education. Learning to ask appropriate questions and deduce information in order to build a deeper connection to the information is imperative. This paper discusses alternative master’s preservice teachers’ use of action research to serve as a guide during a 16-week clinical experience. Semi-structured interviews and reflection papers were conducted to create a comparative case study that analyzed the clinical experiences.
11Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning ProcessBenitoSumpter862
11
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Lua Shanks
Dr. Thompson
Valley State University
10-6-2021
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Contextual Factors
The efficacious teaching and learning processes are important in generating the desired academic outcomes for students. Such processes entail the transformation and transfer of knowledge from the educators to students. It requires a combination of different elements within the procedure, in which an instructor determines and establishes the learning goals and objectives, and designs teaching resources. Thereafter, teachers implement the learning strategy that they will utilize to impart intellectual content into students. However, learning is a cardinal factor that an educator musty take into account while overseeing the process of knowledge acquisition and retention. Many factors play an important role in shaping the process of teaching and learning. Contextual factors, for instance, are associated with a particular context and characteristic that is distinct to a specific group, community, society, and individual. Such factors may take the form of a child’s educational, community, as well as classroom settings.
Community, District, and School Factors
Armstrong School District is a major public learning institution that occupies a geographical area of approximately 437 square miles. Located in Pennsylvania, it forms one of the 500 public school districts in the state, and hosts teachers and students from diverse racial, ethnic, and ethnic backgrounds. As a consequence, the institution partners with families, community leaders, and teachers to improve students’’ capacity to acquire knowledge ahead of their graduation. The community refers to the urban or rural environment in which both the teachers and learners operate. These may include the teacher and students’ ethnic, racial political or social affiliations that affect learning or knowledge acquisition. Additionally, parents and community members play an integral role in ensuring the quality of education in schools. They for, example, collaborate with teachers and school administrators to develop the most effective ways of improving their students’ learning outcomes. Indeed, community involvement in schooling issues is potentially a rich area for innovation that has immense benefits that far exceeds its limitations. Considering that governments are constrained in offering quality education due to contextual issues such as remoteness, bureaucracy, corruption, and inefficient management, community factors are pivotal in bridging the gap between government initiatives and community needs. This helps to adjust the child’s familial obligations to family interests, thereby shifting towards ways of mobilizing a sense of community by strengthening trust and relationships between community members, parents, governments, as well as teachers and school leaders. Other important community factors that af ...
11Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning ProcessSantosConleyha
11
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Lua Shanks
Dr. Thompson
Valley State University
10-6-2021
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Contextual Factors
The efficacious teaching and learning processes are important in generating the desired academic outcomes for students. Such processes entail the transformation and transfer of knowledge from the educators to students. It requires a combination of different elements within the procedure, in which an instructor determines and establishes the learning goals and objectives, and designs teaching resources. Thereafter, teachers implement the learning strategy that they will utilize to impart intellectual content into students. However, learning is a cardinal factor that an educator musty take into account while overseeing the process of knowledge acquisition and retention. Many factors play an important role in shaping the process of teaching and learning. Contextual factors, for instance, are associated with a particular context and characteristic that is distinct to a specific group, community, society, and individual. Such factors may take the form of a child’s educational, community, as well as classroom settings.
Community, District, and School Factors
Armstrong School District is a major public learning institution that occupies a geographical area of approximately 437 square miles. Located in Pennsylvania, it forms one of the 500 public school districts in the state, and hosts teachers and students from diverse racial, ethnic, and ethnic backgrounds. As a consequence, the institution partners with families, community leaders, and teachers to improve students’’ capacity to acquire knowledge ahead of their graduation. The community refers to the urban or rural environment in which both the teachers and learners operate. These may include the teacher and students’ ethnic, racial political or social affiliations that affect learning or knowledge acquisition. Additionally, parents and community members play an integral role in ensuring the quality of education in schools. They for, example, collaborate with teachers and school administrators to develop the most effective ways of improving their students’ learning outcomes. Indeed, community involvement in schooling issues is potentially a rich area for innovation that has immense benefits that far exceeds its limitations. Considering that governments are constrained in offering quality education due to contextual issues such as remoteness, bureaucracy, corruption, and inefficient management, community factors are pivotal in bridging the gap between government initiatives and community needs. This helps to adjust the child’s familial obligations to family interests, thereby shifting towards ways of mobilizing a sense of community by strengthening trust and relationships between community members, parents, governments, as well as teachers and school leaders. Other important community factors that af ...
Research Proposal on: Teacher’s knowledge & curriculum effect on student’s le...Ghulam Mujtaba
Learning is the central concern of teachers they need to be equipped with a well-informed understanding of learning that takes account in particular of its socially situated dimensions. Learning is a phenomenon detachable from context and transferable elsewhere only under specific conditions. Nor is learning a purely individual accomplishment, being achieved alongside others in definable circumstances and in relation to particular cultural communities. Our account of this situatedness of learning is presented in terms of two well-known examples, Brazilian street vendors and English girls at home and at nursery school. The authors present a view of pedagogy consistent with the theoretical account of learning and based on four elements: situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing and transformed practice. This view is not so much prescriptive as a means of providing a vocabulary for critical discussion of teaching and learning in practice.
Enhancing Primary Mathematics learning using assessment practices: an initiat...inventionjournals
ABSTRACT : This paper attempts to study two important aspects: (1) To foster the skills for quality assessment in mathematics among prospective teachers. (2) To explore the extent to which these practices helped in improving quality of learning as well as teaching. The study has been done in MCD primary schools from class II to V with the involvement of pre-service B.El.Ed teachers, during their primary school internship in 4th year. The study comprises four phases, In the first phase, authors did a survey of the assessment practices that have been followed in these schools. Second phase comprised making student-teachers aware of the assessment practices going on in the schools, reviewing it critically, orienting them to prepare assessment profiles of their students. In the third Phase, students implemented these assessment practices in their respective classes for around three months under the supervision of authors. The final phase allowed a discussion with student-teachers and analysed the feedback of pre-service teachers as how these assessment practices helped them to take up decision regarding teaching as well as students‟ progress in understanding the concepts. Findings revealed that these assessment practices helped interns to monitor and modify their pedagogy. Further, Responses of the students in the assessment tasks improved progressively. However, some of the Interns faced many challenges related to recording individual progress, to assess through students responses while teaching as it became difficult for them to interpret individual responses.
WHAT ARE THE SUITABLE INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY AND MEDIA FOR STUDENT LEARNING S...IJITE
This study aims to find out what instructional strategy and media more properly based on learning styles in
middle schools. For this purpose, 307 students of 7th to 9th grade from three middle schools were the
respondents. Index Learning Styles was used to know the student learning styles based on Felder-Silverman
learning styles. The students were also asked with the questions to know what instructional strategy and
media they like much. The results show instructional strategies that could be applicated in middle schools
are; question and answer methods, student presentations, games and simulations, lectures, problem solving
based learning, role playing, and panel discussions. Instructional media that could be applicated are;
pictures, graphics, videos, simulations, online group learning, newspapers, chatting/messenger, powerpoint
slides, computer animations, book/e-book, magazines, audio recorded, and email. This is than checked off
with the combinations of student learning style to get the most suitable one.
Using Action Research to Identify Data During Clinical Experience (main)Antwuan Stinson
Critical thinking is the focal point missed in many students’ education. Learning to ask appropriate questions and deduce information in order to build a deeper connection to the information is imperative. This paper discusses alternative master’s preservice teachers’ use of action research to serve as a guide during a 16-week clinical experience. Semi-structured interviews and reflection papers were conducted to create a comparative case study that analyzed the clinical experiences.
11Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning ProcessBenitoSumpter862
11
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Lua Shanks
Dr. Thompson
Valley State University
10-6-2021
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Contextual Factors
The efficacious teaching and learning processes are important in generating the desired academic outcomes for students. Such processes entail the transformation and transfer of knowledge from the educators to students. It requires a combination of different elements within the procedure, in which an instructor determines and establishes the learning goals and objectives, and designs teaching resources. Thereafter, teachers implement the learning strategy that they will utilize to impart intellectual content into students. However, learning is a cardinal factor that an educator musty take into account while overseeing the process of knowledge acquisition and retention. Many factors play an important role in shaping the process of teaching and learning. Contextual factors, for instance, are associated with a particular context and characteristic that is distinct to a specific group, community, society, and individual. Such factors may take the form of a child’s educational, community, as well as classroom settings.
Community, District, and School Factors
Armstrong School District is a major public learning institution that occupies a geographical area of approximately 437 square miles. Located in Pennsylvania, it forms one of the 500 public school districts in the state, and hosts teachers and students from diverse racial, ethnic, and ethnic backgrounds. As a consequence, the institution partners with families, community leaders, and teachers to improve students’’ capacity to acquire knowledge ahead of their graduation. The community refers to the urban or rural environment in which both the teachers and learners operate. These may include the teacher and students’ ethnic, racial political or social affiliations that affect learning or knowledge acquisition. Additionally, parents and community members play an integral role in ensuring the quality of education in schools. They for, example, collaborate with teachers and school administrators to develop the most effective ways of improving their students’ learning outcomes. Indeed, community involvement in schooling issues is potentially a rich area for innovation that has immense benefits that far exceeds its limitations. Considering that governments are constrained in offering quality education due to contextual issues such as remoteness, bureaucracy, corruption, and inefficient management, community factors are pivotal in bridging the gap between government initiatives and community needs. This helps to adjust the child’s familial obligations to family interests, thereby shifting towards ways of mobilizing a sense of community by strengthening trust and relationships between community members, parents, governments, as well as teachers and school leaders. Other important community factors that af ...
11Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning ProcessSantosConleyha
11
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Lua Shanks
Dr. Thompson
Valley State University
10-6-2021
Factors that Affect the Teaching and Learning Process
Contextual Factors
The efficacious teaching and learning processes are important in generating the desired academic outcomes for students. Such processes entail the transformation and transfer of knowledge from the educators to students. It requires a combination of different elements within the procedure, in which an instructor determines and establishes the learning goals and objectives, and designs teaching resources. Thereafter, teachers implement the learning strategy that they will utilize to impart intellectual content into students. However, learning is a cardinal factor that an educator musty take into account while overseeing the process of knowledge acquisition and retention. Many factors play an important role in shaping the process of teaching and learning. Contextual factors, for instance, are associated with a particular context and characteristic that is distinct to a specific group, community, society, and individual. Such factors may take the form of a child’s educational, community, as well as classroom settings.
Community, District, and School Factors
Armstrong School District is a major public learning institution that occupies a geographical area of approximately 437 square miles. Located in Pennsylvania, it forms one of the 500 public school districts in the state, and hosts teachers and students from diverse racial, ethnic, and ethnic backgrounds. As a consequence, the institution partners with families, community leaders, and teachers to improve students’’ capacity to acquire knowledge ahead of their graduation. The community refers to the urban or rural environment in which both the teachers and learners operate. These may include the teacher and students’ ethnic, racial political or social affiliations that affect learning or knowledge acquisition. Additionally, parents and community members play an integral role in ensuring the quality of education in schools. They for, example, collaborate with teachers and school administrators to develop the most effective ways of improving their students’ learning outcomes. Indeed, community involvement in schooling issues is potentially a rich area for innovation that has immense benefits that far exceeds its limitations. Considering that governments are constrained in offering quality education due to contextual issues such as remoteness, bureaucracy, corruption, and inefficient management, community factors are pivotal in bridging the gap between government initiatives and community needs. This helps to adjust the child’s familial obligations to family interests, thereby shifting towards ways of mobilizing a sense of community by strengthening trust and relationships between community members, parents, governments, as well as teachers and school leaders. Other important community factors that af ...
LITERACY INSTRUCTION ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1 .docxSHIVA101531
LITERACY INSTRUCTION ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1
Applying the Five Pillars to Literacy Instruction
With Students Who Have Moderate to Severe Disabilities: Issues and Concerns
Lewis B. Jackson
University of Northern Colorado
Diane L. Ryndak and
Ann-Marie Orlando
University of Florida
Kara Halley
Metro State College of Denver
Karen McCaleb
Texas A&M University Corpus Christi
LITERACY INSTRUCTION ISSUES AND CONCERNS 2
Abstract
The findings and recommendation of the National Reading Panel (National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development, 2000) have influenced how literacy skills are conceptualized
and taught in schools. Although the report’s findings and recommendation were directed at
students without disabilities, they have the potential to impact instruction and instructional
research with students who have moderate to severe disabilities. To explore this, we used the
National Reading Panel’s five pillars framework (i.e., phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency,
vocabulary, and reading comprehension) to raise issues and concerns about literacy instruction
research and practices with students who have moderate to severe disabilities. In our discussion,
we assume the point of view of teachers who wish to improve their practices by delving into the
literacy research base, opening with a discussion of how scientific evidence can serve as a guide
for improving literacy instruction. This is followed by a discussion of specific issues and
concerns related to each of the five pillars, illustrated by research studies in which the
participants have moderate to severe disabilities. We conclude by summarizing our concerns; by
exploring additional concerns that go across the five pillars; and by posing arguments that
present questions regarding the applicability of the National Reading Panel’s (2000) findings for
students with moderate to severe disabilities. Lastly, the paper considers the potential role of
literacy research and practice as contributing factors in an unreconciled dichotomy between a
body of research demonstrating the power of evidence-based instruction with these students, and
another body of research showing the continued denial of literacy opportunities to them in
schools.
Keywords: Literacy; Reading; National Reading Panel; moderate to severe disabilities;
evidence-based instruction
LITERACY INSTRUCTION ISSUES AND CONCERNS 3
Applying the Five Pillars to Literacy Instruction
With Students Who Have Moderate to Severe Disabilities: Issues and Concerns
In the broadest sense, literacy involves understanding, using, and producing print for a
variety of purposes, where print may include text, symbols, and/or images. While the ability to
engage in literacy activities is critical for participation in a print-driven society, Lonigan and
Shanahan (2010) indicated that pinpointing what actually constitutes “literacy” is not a ...
Here is the criteria and the comments that needs to be improved in.docxpooleavelina
Here is the criteria and the comments that needs to be improved in the proposal:
Topic relevance and significance. Applicability, meaningfulness, and value of the theoretical, empirical, and/or practical contribution in relation to the conference theme
· Addresses the conference theme and current issues in the field in important ways that contributes to research and/or practice. Likely to be a worthwhile session, possibly across interest groups.
Problem/Issue description. Current, with innovative research questions, practical applications.
· Current and somewhat practical, but not innovative. Attendees from specific disciplines may gain new knowledge and insights.
Literature review and references. Clear evidence-based support, with explicit citations in APA format.
· Mentions or implies practice, and/or research, but does not support with current citations.
Specific and achievable presentation outcomes. Intended outcomes and audience participation are stated in explicit terms and can be achieved in the proposed format.
· Participant outcomes are not stated, but can be inferred, and might be achieved in the proposed format
Clarity of proposal. Level of detail, organization, and focus, resulting in a professional, accessible presentation. Grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format create professional proposal
· The proposal lacks detail, organization, and/or relevant descriptions. There are five or more errors in grammar, usage, mechanics or APA format.
Comments:
· Providing an inclusive learning environment is an important topic. More detail would be beneficial as it is unclear what skills the teachers are lacking in and although policymakers have doubts about teacher education programs providing enough support to develop skills/strategies, I would encourage you to include a study that corroborates this belief. Adding a citation with “Rightly so, many teachers lack adequate skills to work while also effectively serving special needs appropriately and promote inclusion in classrooms has been an issue in many countries, especially in USA.” would be good as well.
· The literature review did not include citations. It also was unclear how teacher education programs include a variety of targeted supports of their educators (e.g., how to handle various challenges) but “the majority of teachers will at some point develop a negative attitude.” I would suggest to add information to connect what teacher preparation programs have offered and, despite that, teachers still feel negatively. I would also encourage use of person first language (students with special needs instead of special needs students)
· The outcomes shared in this proposal seem to be at odds with the lit review. The program description described teacher prep programs as being “half-baked” but the outcomes encourage participation in a teacher prep program because “teacher preparation programs provide clear guidelines to be used when teachers engage with different types ...
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...Sedigh (Sid) Mohammadi
Testing Language Skills from Theory to Practice part one (Hossein Farhady)
l
این کتاب برای دانشجویان رشته مترجمی و دبیری زبان انگلیسی در مقطع کارشناسی به عنوان منبع اصلی درس آزمون سازی زبان به ارزش 2 واحد تدوین شده است.
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...AJSSMTJournal
The intricacies of good teaching are known only to experienced teachers. Teaching is assessment
and, learning and retention are functions of regular testing. This study theorises classroom assessments and
links them with implicit theories of learning and retention of knowledge. The subjects of the study were
motivated to maintain the momentum of learning through taking regular tests and subjected to counselling and
regular feedback on the tests they took. The study analysed statistically semester results for five different year
groups of students taught Quantum Mechanics by the same lecturer who adopted weekly testing. The results
show substantial continuous improvements in students’ academic achievement. The results may be indictments
on lecturers who do not use classroom tests to motivate students’ learning.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
1. Implementing a Workshop Approach to Reading
Dr. Frank Serafini
Academic Exchange Quarterly – Summer 2005
Abstract
Implementing a workshop approach to reading instruction presents many
challenges for classroom teachers. These challenges come from external pressures such
as high stakes testing, administrative edicts and peer pressures. They are also generated
internally from lack of experience with instructional resources, variety of student
experiences, and narrow definitions of reading and reading instruction.
Introduction
In the neo-conservative backlash we currently find ourselves in as literacy
educators (Taxel, 1999), instructional approaches that include children's literature in the
elementary reading curriculum, commonly referred to as literature based instruction
(Raphael & Au, 1997) or reading workshops (Atwell, 1998), are being challenged by
current federal legislation and its support for scientifically-based commercial reading
programs (e.g. Open Court, Direct Instruction). Teachers implementing workshop
approaches, utilizing children’s literature as a primary resource for instruction, are
coming under fire to provide scientifically-based reading research to support their
instructional choices. (Patel Stevens, 2003; Yatvin, Weaver, & Garan, 2003).
Proponents of code-based approaches to reading instruction have suggested that
literature-based approaches push the teaching of phonics and reading skills to the
periphery of the reading program (Foorman, Francis, & Fletcher, 1998). In addition, the
inclusion of systematic, explicit phonics instruction in a reading workshop or balanced
approach has been touted as the answer to the current “literacy crisis” in America’s
schools (Meyer, 2002).
Considering the political nature of the current debates in reading instruction and
what constitutes scientifically-based research (Allington, 2002; Garan, 2002), literacy
educators need to be concerned with more than the quality and breadth of the research
used to support instructional decisions and programs. Literacy educators and classroom
teachers also need to be concerned with the characteristics and abilities of the readers
developed and supported in schools, the quality of the conversations among children and
teachers, and the effects of standards and standardized assessments on the reading
curriculum (Eisner, 2001; Noddings, 1997).
With a shift in the political climate aligning to more conservative values and the
rapid expansion of high stakes testing (McGill-Franzen, 2000), the role of children's
literature may be reduced to an instructional device designed to teach children how to
decode more effectively and identify the main idea of a reading selection in order to
secure higher scores on standardized tests. Responding to political pressures, elementary
teachers are being forced to adopt reading instructional practices and commercial reading
programs that focus on decoding and comprehension strategies designed to raise
standardized test scores, rather than utilizing children’s literature in a workshop approach
to reading instruction (Putney, Green, Dixon, & Kelly, 1999).
2. A workshop approach to reading instruction generally includes, but is not limited
to, the reading and discussion of authentic children’s literature, the teaching of
comprehension strategies in the context of reading, opportunities for students to read and
explore texts independently, small group literature studies, shared and guided reading
instruction, and instruction for decoding text (Serafini, 2001). Several of these
components, in particular reading aloud and time for independent reading, were not
directly supported by the findings of the National Reading Panel (Report of the national
reading panel: Teaching children to read, 1999), to the extent that instruction in
decoding and comprehension strategies was supported. Because of this, many teachers
have been challenged to provide evidence in order to defend a workshop approach to
reading instruction by school administrators, and state and federal authorities.
In this article, I will discuss various challenges to implementing what I have
described as a workshop approach to reading instruction. These challenges have been
offered by in-service and pre-service teachers during literacy workshops, college courses,
and interviews conducted in association with the implementation of Nevada Reading
Excellence Act. The teachers interviewed were taking classes as part of the federally
funded Reading Excellence Act. In Nevada, the Nevada Reading Excellence Act paid for
the course work and training of two literacy specialists for each school that qualified for
funding under the requirements of the grant. These literacy specialists in training were
supported through the grant to take classes at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in
literacy education, assessment, and instruction.
In addition to describing the various challenges offered by classroom teachers, I
will describe some possible resolutions to these challenges in the hope that teachers will
find ways to implement a workshop approach to reading instruction during these
troubling times. The various challenges offered by classroom teachers can be loosely
categorized as external challenges, those that are imposed from outside the classroom,
and internal challenges, those challenges involved with teachers’ professional
development and instructional decisions.
External Challenges
Many of the challenges of implementing a workshop approach to reading
instruction come from entities outside the classroom. Challenges levied through political
mandates and testing programs, and by administrators, parents and peers, were all
indicated by teachers during interviews and professional development workshops.
Approximately, eighty teachers, most of them with at least five years experience as a
classroom teacher, were interviewed and surveyed through their course work in becoming
a literacy specialist. In response to these challenges, some teachers gave up their
workshop approaches and followed the lessons included in mandated commercial
programs, while others closed their doors and tried to hide what they were doing from
their administrators. Other teachers indicated they were trying to educate their
administration about the importance of workshop approaches, or lobbying their local
district officials for more choice in their instructional approaches by providing evidence
of the effectiveness of components of a reading workshop. In spite of these efforts,
teachers seem to have little voice in the decision making process concerning the reading
instructional approaches they will be allowed to implement.
3. High Stakes Testing
Undoubtedly, the most common challenge offered by teachers implementing a
workshop approach to reading instruction in their classrooms is the pressure associated
with raising students’ scores on high stakes, standardized testing. Teachers frequently
ask, “How do we prepare students for standardized tests if we don’t teach to the test
during reading instruction?” Many teachers perceived a disconnect between instruction
for test preparation and instruction for reading in the world.
While many of the skills and strategies necessary for readers to be successful on
standardized tests are also necessary for readers to be successful in a workshop approach,
other reading skills, for example, finding a main idea or sequencing elements of the story
plot, may not be emphasized in a workshop approach. Because of these distinct contexts,
it may be more effective to separate the teaching of skills for standardized tests from the
instruction in the reading workshop. In other words, rather than teaching reading as a
single cognitive operation that can be applied universally to poetry, newspapers, novels
and test passages alike, teaching standardized test passages as a separate genre, in the
same manner we would teach poetry different from expository texts may help readers be
more successful in both contexts (Santman, 2002).
It is important that teachers call students’ attention to the structures and elements
of this unique “standardized test genre”. Deconstructing the elements and structures of
standardized tests require teachers to make elements of these tests explicit so students can
attend to these elements and be successful on these standardized measures (McCabe,
2003).
Administrative Pressures
In today’s public schools, administrators are under tremendous pressures to raise
test scores and produce evidence that their school is not leaving any children “behind.”
Some administrators do not support workshop approaches to reading instruction,
preferring instead the implementation of commercial reading programs and scripted
lesson formats in order to insure uniformity and control over instructional practices
(Ohanian, 1999). In contrast, in a workshop approach all literacy lessons are not scripted
out in advance, nor are they contained in a teacher’s manual. This lack of control over the
content and sequence of literacy lessons in a workshop approach concerns many
administrators that feel having all children working on the same thing at the same time
will ensure quality instructional experiences (Eisner, 2001).
In light of the growing implementation of scripted instructional programs, it is
important to educate administrators about workshop approaches that support developing
readers. Administrators have the right to know why teachers are using particular
instructional approaches; however, the responsibility falls on teachers to defend their
instructional practices and provide a rationale and evidence of the effectiveness of their
instructional decisions. Unfortunately, if the only way to defend reading instructional
practices is through narrowly defined reading research or increases in standardized test
scores, teachers may have a difficult time defending their instructional decisions.
Many administrators have not read the same professional materials that literacy
educators have, nor have many of them taken classes or attended workshops and
4. conferences that focus on reading instruction. Because of this, reading teachers need to be
able to articulate the theoretical foundations for their instructional practices, explain how
they address any mandated curriculum standards and testing requirements, and
demonstrate why they organize their instructional approaches the way they do.
Parental Expectations
Parents want to see classroom environments and instructional approaches that
remind them of the types of experiences they remember when they were in school
(Newkirk, 1991). Unless teachers learn to demonstrate and adequately explain why a
workshop approach is superior to the instruction these parents experienced, parents will
not support how teachers are teaching. Providing parents with a series of opportunities to
help them understand contemporary instructional approaches, through parent nights and
teacher conferences, help parents see the value in what teachers are doing. Continuous
reporting of student progress and well-planned parent interactions can help parents see
the value in a workshop approach. To be successful in doing this, teachers need to talk to
parents in jargon-free language and model for them what their children will experience
throughout the school day. Connecting what parents experienced with what teachers are
doing in reading workshops, explaining the differences and helping parents understand
the instruction their children will experience, will help teachers garner parental support.
Internal Challenges
Some of the biggest challenges offered by teachers to implementing a reading
workshop approach are the lack of professional development opportunities that address
the use of children’s literature, inadequate resources and instructional materials, a limited
knowledge base in reading processes and literary theory, and the wide variety of
experiences and abilities that students bring to school. As teachers work to implement a
reading workshop, they need professional support to address the continuing challenges of
using literature and developing instructional experiences in the workshop. With so much
money in school districts going to training in particular commercial reading programs or
for purchasing basal anthologies and consumable worksheets, there is little left over for
the purchase of children’s literature or professional development opportunities. Teachers
are being trained how to follow a commercial program, but they are not being given time
and support for learning about the processes of reading, children’s literature and how to
support the readers in their classrooms.
Lack of Experience with Children’s Literature
Because course work in children’s literature is not a requirement in many states
and teacher education programs, a significant number of teachers attempting a workshop
approach to reading instruction don’t have enough knowledge of children’s literature to
know what is available or how to use the resources they are given (Hoewisch, 2000).
Teachers using literature as their primary resource for teaching reading need to keep
abreast of current publications in the children’s literature market. For many teachers, a
refresher course in children’s literature would enhance their ability to teach in a
5. workshop approach. In addition, spending some Saturday mornings in a local children’s
book store reading new books and revisiting classic texts would be beneficial.
In addition to experience with children’s literature, teachers need to read and
discuss professional articles and publications that focus on literary theory, children’s
literature and reading workshop. Opportunities for teachers to discuss literary devices,
analyze the elements in the art and design of picture books, investigate the interplay
between illustrations and text and begin to understand how readers construct meaning in
transaction with the literature they read will support their instructional decisions in a
reading workshop (McGee & Tompkins, 1995).
Definitions of Reading and Reading Comprehension
Whether teachers acknowledge it or not, their beliefs and theoretical
understandings about reading and learning to read will affect how they teach (Dias,
1992). Until teachers are able to put aside outdated theoretical models and understandings
of the reading process, the changes made in instructional practices will be largely
cosmetic. Just because teachers are utilizing children’s literature in their reading
instruction does not mean they have changed their theoretical understandings.
The basalization of literature (Shannon & Goodman, 1994) refers to the process
of treating children’s literature in the same manner as a scripted lesson from the teacher’s
manual. Requiring chapter quizzes, asking students literal recall questions and searching
for a single, main idea in every book are based on a modernist theory of reading and
meaning (Elkind, 1997). Until there is a parallel shift in theoretical understandings that
accompanies the changes in instructional resources, there will be little changes in how
reading is defined, taught and assessed (Serafini, 2003).
Varying Levels of Student Experience
Teachers often lament about the wide variety of experiences, abilities and
interests that their students bring to their classrooms, However, this concern is one of the
primary reasons for implementing a workshop approach to reading instruction. A
workshop approach is more responsive to the needs of individual children, disregarding
the “one-size-fits-all” approach of many commercial materials. In workshop approaches,
the teacher is seen as a decision maker, conducting lessons and creating learning
experiences based on the needs of the readers in their class. Having all students working
in the same book at the same time is about control and comfort, not effective teaching.
Workshop approaches allow readers to choose from a wide variety of texts. Teachers can
address individual needs based on readers’ abilities, experiences and needs.
Research has suggested that addressing students’ individual needs is an important
aspect of effective reading instruction (Fielding & Pearson, 1994). Although this may
challenge teachers’ traditional notions of reading instruction, forcing them to work in
guided reading groups and individually with readers, the research is overwhelmingly in
favor of individualizing instruction to meet the needs of all learners (Allington &
Walmsley, 1995). Teachers need to put aside instructional practices that have been shown
to be ineffective.
6. Concluding Remarks
The National Reading Panel (Report of the national reading panel: Teaching
children to read, 1999) makes specific recommendations about decoding and
comprehension instruction, but does not state that a workshop approach to reading
instruction is ineffective or should be abandoned. While particular educators and
administrators have tried to interpret the report as mandating scripted lessons and
programs, members of the panel have been adamant in their position that they did not
endorse particular programs in the report (Garan, 2002).
The document stresses the importance of decoding and explicit instruction in
word level strategies, but does not suggest that this should entail the entire reading
program. A workshop approach does not suggest the teacher sit back and let students
learn to read by simply spending time with quality literature. Instructional decisions are
made by teachers to address the needs of the students in their classrooms, rather than
coming from a commercial program. In the hands of a quality teacher, basals and
instructional materials become resources to use, rather than a series of lessons to be read
aloud.
References
Allington, R. L. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology
trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Allington, R. L., & Walmsley, S. A. (Eds.). (1995). No quick fix: Rethinking literacy
programs in America's elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and
learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Dias, P. (1992). Literary reading and classroom constraints: Aligning practice and theory.
In J. Langer (Ed.), Literature instruction: A focus on student response. Urbana,
IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Eisner, E. (2001). What does it mean to say a school is doing well? Phi Delta Kappan,
85(5), 367-372.
Elkind, D. (1997). The death of child nature: Education in the postmodern world. Phi
Delta Kappan, 79, 241-245.
Fielding, L., & Pearson, D. P. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works. Educational
Leadership, 51(5), 62-67.
Foorman, B., Francis, D., & Fletcher, J. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to
read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 90, 37-55.
Garan, E. M. (2002). Resisting reading mandates: How to triumph with the truth.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hoewisch, A. K. (2000). Children's literature in teacher-preparation programs. Reading
Online. Available: http://www.readingonline.org/critical/hoewisch/index.html.
McCabe, P. P. (2003). Enhancing self-efficacy for high-stakes reading tests. The Reading
Teacher, 57(1), 12-20.
7. McGee, L. M., & Tompkins, G. E. (1995). Literature-based reading instruction: What's
guiding the instruction? Language Arts, 72, 405-414.
McGill-Franzen, A. (2000). Policy and instruction: What is the relationship? In M.
Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading
research (Vol. III, pp. 889-908). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Meyer, R. J. (2002). Phonics exposed: Understanding and resisting systematic direct
intense phonics Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Newkirk, T. (1991). The middle class and the problem of pleasure. In N. Atwell (Ed.),
Workshop 3 by and for teachers: The politics of process (pp. 63-72). Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Noddings, N. (1997). Thinking about standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(3), 184-189.
Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Patel Stevens, L. (2003). Reading First: A critical policy analysis. The Reading Teacher,
56(7), 662-668.
Putney, L. G., Green, J. L., Dixon, C. N., & Kelly, G. J. (1999). Evolution of qualitative
research methodology: Looking beyond defense to possibilities. Reading
Research Quarterly, 34(3), 368-377.
Raphael, T., & Au, K. H. (Eds.). (1997). Literature based instruction: Reshaping the
curriculum. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. (1999). Washington,
D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Santman, D. (2002). Teaching to the test?: Test preparation in the reading workshop.
Language Arts, 79(3), 203-213.
Serafini, F. (2001). The Reading workshop: Creating space for readers. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Serafini, F. (2003). Informing our practice: Modernist, transactional, and critical
perspectives on children’s literature and reading instruction. Reading Online, 6(6),
Available:
http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=serafini/index.html.
Shannon, P., & Goodman, K. (Eds.). (1994). Basal readers: A second look. Katonah,
New York: Richard C. Owens.
Taxel, J. (1999). Multicultural literature and the politics of reaction. Teachers College
Record, 98(3), 417-448.
Yatvin, J., Weaver, C., & Garan, E. (2003). Reading First: Some cautions and
recommendations. Language Arts, 81(1).